The story on the main page today about a study which indicates the masks are harmful to children is published in JAMA, a journal with a collosal impact factor of over 56.
Impact factors this large are usually attributed to would famous Journals like the Lancet or Nature. So it is unlikely that SAGE can brush this paper off as insignificant.
They will brush it under the carpet. I think it's pretty clear by now that they are not intereted in the science or people's health. Lockdowns would have been finished a long time ago if they were.
They will brush it under the carpet. I think it's pretty clear by now that they are not intereted in the science or people's health. Lockdowns would have been finished a long time ago if they were.
well, I hope you are wrong but you may be correct. but there is a doings about it right now. I wales. I think it's going to be scrapped there at least:
Exactly freedom fighter 3..its never been about the nation's health....
to demonstrate the reletive importance of an impact factor of 56, the American Journal of Therapeutics, where Tess Lawrie's review of ivermectin got published has an impact factor of 2. Poor Tess, poor us!
