I'm happy for any therapeutic to be available for prescription if it has been on the books for a long time and causes minimal side-effects.
What fascinates me is the determination to trash ivermectin when, if used as per protocol and used as soon as symptoms manifest, appears to be beneficial. (I have heard good reports of fluvoxamine but other than keeping an open mind on it, can't comment.) The amount of words and energy expended by interested parties with links to the pharmaceutical industry, and useful lay idiots/irritants like those who promote the official narrative on here, is truly remarkable. Who has the available funding for a RCT on something that's not going to make you any money? Scientists' funding often depends on them coming to the 'right' conclusion (see the Hodgkinson article on TCW)
If you want the jab, then have the jab and the next jab, the next jab and the jab after that ad infinitum. Just stop crying when others manage to evade infection without it, and maintain an intact immune system by listening to sensible health advice, rather than our State system which appears to have gone rogue.