CB I dont think you have been paying attention for months then if you dont know why LDs dont work and the destruction they have caused out weighing the benefits.
Perhaps you need to go over all the posts and read them carefully. Your understanding may then increase.
With respect Charles it has been acknowledged by some leading charities that lockdowns could lead to between 50 and 100 million deaths in the coming few years, mainly due to economic recessions in developed countries. I am very sorry to say but you do approach this debate with a very one-sided view but then you want to berate others, for being steadfast lockdown sceptics.
You really cannot have your cake and eat it Charles.
Yes - Can you please give me the evidence that LDs cause more deaths than they save. That is exactly why I am here.
Thanks.
Can you give evidence that LDs save more deaths than they cause long term?
Especially when this goes directly against Imperial, the CMO and CSAs advice in March.
it has been acknowledged by some leading charities that lockdowns could lead to between 50 and 100 million deaths in the coming few years
Reference for that please?
CB I dont think you have been paying attention for months then if you dont know why LDs dont work and the destruction they have caused out weighing the benefits.
Perhaps you need to go over all the posts and read them carefully. Your understanding may then increase.
I have read the Great Barrington declaration, the letter from Gupta to 10 Downing Street, Toby Young's Telegraph article, many posts here, the Imperial College model for what would happen with covid. I follow infection rates, hospital admissions and deaths on a daily basis.
When lockdowns are introduced the infections reduce. Please give me a reference to somewhere that suggests that is not true.
