• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

What Climate Emergency? Temperatures Have Risen Much Higher and Faster in the Past

by Chris Morrison
24 March 2022 3:01 PM

Abrupt changes in global temperatures are commonplace throughout the climate record. Movements as high as 5-10°C have been recorded over periods of just a few years, and these compare with the 1.1°C warming seen today that dates back to the early 19th century. Of course, these changes are well known, but they have been downplayed of late as Net Zero political activists proclaim that the climate is breaking down owing to human emissions.

Professor Mark Maslin is a regular broadcaster on the so-called climate emergency. In October 2021, he tweeted: “The climate disaster is here. Earth is already becoming unliveable.” In 2019, he responded to an Australian think tank report stating that climate change could bring about the end of civilisation as we know it, by stating: “Maybe, just may[be], it is time for our politicians to be worried and start to act to avoid the scenarios painted so vividly.” In 2018, Maslin was one of a number of influential eco-activists who signed a letter to the Guardian saying that they would no longer “lend their credibility” by debating climate change scepticism.

In 1999, his language was more measured. In a paper he co-wrote on “sudden climate transitions”,  he said: “All the evidence indicates that most long-term climate change occurs in sudden jumps rather than incremental change… the tendency of climate to change relatively suddenly has been one of the most surprising outcomes of the study of earth history, specifically the last 150,000 years.” He went on to add that some, and possibly most, large climate changes involving movements of several degrees centigrade occurred at most on a timescale of a few centuries, sometimes decades, “and perhaps even a few years”.

On the basis of what he said then, it could be argued that the recent rise over nearly 200 years of just over 1°C from a prior 500 year cooling period, is hardly evidence of a climate emergency. Let us examine the record further.

Four fairly regular glacial-interglacial cycles occurred during the past 450,000 years. The shorter interglacial cycles (10,000 to 30,000 years) were about as warm as present and alternated with much longer (70,000 to 90,000 years) glacial cycles substantially colder than present. Notice the longer time with jagged cooling events dropping into the colder glacials followed by the faster abrupt temperature swings to the warmer interglacials. This graph combines several ice-core records from Antarctica and is modified from several sources including Evidence for Warmer Interglacials in East Antarctic Ice Cores, 2009, L.C. Sime and others. (Utah Geological Survey)

The recent Watt’s Up With That? essay winner, “Is there really a climate crisis?” reproduced the above graph above from the Utah Geological Survey showing the cycle of glacial and interglacial cycles. The temperature change on the left refers to Antarctica ice cores and not global averages. Dramatic averaged changes up to 20°F (11°C) can been seen across the last 450,000 years. As the essay noted, the current inter-glacial is about 8°F (4.4°C) degrees cooler than the maximum temperature of the one preceding it.

This graph was presented by the German broadcaster ARD in 2013 and uses scientific data. It clearly shows the periods of warming and cooling that have occurred in the recent past, following the lifting of the last glacial period 11,000 years ago. A significant warming occurred 8,000 years ago, with temperatures much higher than today. Temperatures then dropped 3°C, only to rise by a similar amount in the subsequent significant warm period. The Roman warming saw grapes being grown in England as far north as Lincolnshire, while the Medieval warming was followed by the little ice age, when the River Thames froze during winter. The current – some might say, welcome – warming might have a little way to go, but it seems to lack the rate of ascent seen in the first two examples.

It is likely that our old friend Professor Maslin might disagree. Back in 1999, he was working out of the Geography Department at Imperial College. Now promoted to Professor of Earth Systems Science, he suggests we may have kicked off the sixth mass extinction on Earth, “and the global climate is warming so fast we have delayed the next ice age”. In his view, the Anthropocene – activist-speak for the renamed Holocene era – began with European colonisation and mass slavery. The origins of racism and climate emergency “share common causes”, he thinks.

Let us return to the science. Over the last few decades, scientists have examined ice core records in the Arctic and Antarctica and found numerous examples of sharp, short-term temperature change. No substantive evidence has been found linking temperature change to varying levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The No Tricks Zone climate site has compiled a number of significant changes. Numerous citations are listed here. For instance, Dr Ruza Ivanovic of Leeds University records a time 14,500 years ago when temperatures in the Northern hemisphere rose by 4-5°C in just a few decades.

A number of scientists have pointed to an abrupt global multiple degree cooling and warming period that occurred about 8,200 years ago over 150 years. Dr. Takuro Kobashi examined the paleoclimatic records and found a drop around 3°C within two decades, followed by a similar rise over 70 years. During this period, it is noted CO2 levels remained the same. Historian Dr. Seren Griffiths of Manchester Met University reported that the event was first identified in Greenland ice cores, but subsequently noted in multiple proxies across Europe. Another abrupt cooling period is said to have occurred about 4,000 years ago.

Looking further back into the geological record, temperatures rose dozens of times by up to 10°C within decades between 80,000 and 20,000 years ago. These are known as DO events and are named after the paleoclimatologists Willi Dansgaard and Hans Oeschger. During the last glacial, temperatures would rise by multiple degrees about every 1,500 years. Physics professor Zhi-Gang Shao of South China Normal University, states that DO events are part of the natural variability and are not externally triggered.

Dramatic temperature rises and falls are common in the climate record. Professor Emeritus of Biogeography Philip Stott at the School of Oriental and African Studies is a noted climate sceptic. He argues that the idea of climate stability is an oxymoron:

Opponents of global warming are often snidely referred to as ‘climate change deniers’; precisely the opposite is true. Those who question the myth of global warming are passionate believers in climate change – it is the global warmers who deny that climate change is the norm.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor

Tags: Climate AlarmismClimate changeNet Zero

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

U.S. Navy Refuses to Deploy Warship With Unvaccinated Commanding Officer

Next Post

New Zealand Axes Vaccine Passports and Mandates Claiming Herd Immunity

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

84 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago

The fallacy that the planet and its climate exists for our sake, and that its current state is ‘optimal’ and deserving of our efforts to maintain it as such, demonstrates the height of human arrogance.

Last edited 3 years ago by Marcus Aurelius knew
86
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

Do you mean the height of human ignorance

24
-1
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Both, I’d say.

28
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

.I find it odd that a bunch of committed environmentalists, who want to save trees, should aim at dropping CO2 to the ‘pre-industrial level’ of 280ppm.

Which will put a major strain on all plant life…

39
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

How major a strain?
Quote some facts on this.

0
-30
Mumbo Jumbo
Mumbo Jumbo
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Oh, about this much he said, holding his hands apart.

13
0
A Heretic
A Heretic
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Never wondered why people pump co2 into their greenhouses/aquariums?

anyway, here you go:

150 – 200 ppm threatens plant growth, although slow and drought-vulnerable growth is possible under optimal conditions of rain and soil and sunlight near the equator. Below 150 – 100, few can grow at all even under the best of conditions.

Now, with CO2 raised from 280 ppm to 415 ppm, EVERY PLANT on earth is growing 12% to 27% faster, taller, greener, more productively and more drought-tolerant.

Last edited 3 years ago by A Heretic
47
0
Beowulf
Beowulf
3 years ago
Reply to  A Heretic

There’s at least one tree on here suffering from a lack of CO2.

17
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  A Heretic

Don’t tell climate Genius Al Gore – it might be an ‘inconvenient truth’.

6
0
bowlsman
bowlsman
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

🤣 🤣 🤣

0
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  A Heretic

Apart from the ones that can no longer grow, due to drought etc.

0
-15
bowlsman
bowlsman
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

And evidence please? Obviously you’ve got your deserts, semi-deserts, artic regions.
We all await an evidenced response.

6
0
David Walker
David Walker
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Wrong as usual.
As CO2 levels rise trees require less water due to the stomata have to stay open for shorter periods so less water is lost.

5
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

I’m sure he’d be happy to, just following you posting your first fact ever on this site.

5
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

This site seems to be an inappropriate place for facts.

0
-17
ChrisDinBristol
ChrisDinBristol
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

This site? I think you mean your brain.

9
0
David Walker
David Walker
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

With regard to climate science, it seems you wouldn’t recognise a fact if it bit you on your snout.

2
0
chris-ds
chris-ds
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Plants consume CO2 when photosynthesising to generate energy to grow.

CO2 is plant food.

before life on earth the atmosphere was overwhelmingly composed of CO2, algae, plants and anything else that can photosynthesise changed the atmospheric composition over billions of years to the tiny amounts of co2 we have now.

you can google “early earth atmospheric composition” and find out for yourself.

I learnt about photosynthesis in infant school.

id consider knowledge of how plants make their energy to be elementary science, in the same league as adding water to something makes it wet.

not knowing that co2 is plant food is probably why the young are all get up about this.

13
0
Banjones
Banjones
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

”Fake invisible catastrophes and threats of doom” by Dr Patrick Moore.

There – have a read. That should inform you.

2
0
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

Twelve Teslas Queued Up For A Charge
https://rumble.com/vy6wei-twelve-teslas-queued-up-for-a-charge.html?
tonyheller

Saturday 26th March 1pm to 3pm
Yellow Boards LONDON
Junction Victoria St/Bressenden Pl
London SW1E 5NA

Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane 

Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens 
(Cockpit Path car park free on Sunday) 
Sturges Rd RG40 2HD  

Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

1
0
Early Doubter
Early Doubter
3 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

It’s pretty obvious from the charts, that 250,000 years ago and every 100 thousand odd years before that, humans existed with a vast industrial polluting civilisation that caused their manmade climate warming and caused catastrophic events that wiped any traces of their existence off the face of the planet.

Last edited 3 years ago by Early Doubter
3
0
NeilParkin
NeilParkin
3 years ago

Any parent knows that ‘because I say its so’ is the mark of a lost argument.

Also if I might be so bold, can I mention that there is no money in telling the truth on this or many other subjects.

32
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
3 years ago

Off subject

Under the terms of the Online Safety Bill you are not allowed to tell anyone about the below article

‘Incredible’ teenager died from blood clot after receiving AstraZeneca Covid jab – North Wales Live (dailypost.co.uk)

15
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

I would like to know why her life doesn’t matter; why charges have not been brought.

3
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago

I’m not even sure I believe there’s such a thing as ‘the climate’

8
-2
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

There isn’t. It was a convenient term to describe regional weather variations to schoolchildren.

What alarmists mean when they refer to climate is temperature change, they are just too stupid to realise that.

8
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

They are ‘just too stupid’ – period. And they are not alone in this sad crowded little Island.

3
0
Rose Madder
Rose Madder
3 years ago

No CO2 connection – no need for net zero. Keep chipping away, Mr Morrison.

20
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  Rose Madder

No point in chipping away… he’s only talking to a handful of deniers.

They are already on his side and there is no cogent argument put forward to deny the reality of climate change. Good enough for you lot, but not for sensible folks.

1
-50
Mumbo Jumbo
Mumbo Jumbo
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Which reality is that? the one represented by the first assessment by the IPCC, or the second, or the third …….. We are now on the sixth now and they still haven’t got it right. Good to know the science is settled.

30
0
Rose Madder
Rose Madder
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Hello tree. CO2 is your food. More CO2, deserts shrink, record crops, fewer starve. Try https://notrickszone.com/2022/03/19/higher-co2-concentrations-mean-better-plant-water-use-enhanced-photosynthesis-expanding-sahel/

plenty more where that came from.

18
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

You’ve ended up on the wrong website again. Try http://www.bbc.co.uk – you’ll find all sorts of interesting news and lifestyle articles that will satisfy your need for establishment viewpoints. Wonderful recipes too, happy browsing!

20
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Still waiting for one of you to make a cogent argument. Looks like it will be a long wait.

0
-11
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

It’s http://www.bbc.co.uk; there’s a menu bar at the top where you can access all the main stories and the recipes are under Food. There’s Have Your Say too if you’re interested, you can share ideas with like-minded members of the public who I think will really enjoy your commentary.

3
0
ChrisDinBristol
ChrisDinBristol
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Your hypothesis, it’s on you to provide evidence. That’s called science, by the way.

5
0
Beowulf
Beowulf
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

No one’s denying the reality of climate change we’re just questioning the claim that a) the anthropogenic signature has been detected b) that increased CO2 is the cause of global warming c) that a warming of the planet will end life as we know it. So Mr. Tree, what evidence have you got that you can share?

14
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

I don’t know a single person who denies the climate, or even that it’s changing.

Running round with your hair on fire screaming ‘we’re all doomed’ isn’t science.

Bring something meaningful to the conversation.

16
0
Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Is there anyone quite so blind and obtuse as this person “Tree” who will not acknowledge that there have been periods of much more intense warming and cooling long before man-made emissions? Carbon dioxide may play some small part today but current warming is nothing like we have had in the past. I have looked down from the hills above Harlech in North Wales and seen the remnants of terraces where vines grew freely during the Roman warm period. And, trudging through a rank and miserable bog above Machynlleth, I was amazed to be told by an archaeologist in our hiking party that we were standing in part of a pre-Roman kingdom, where digs had shown it was once a land flowing in milk and honey whose people created dazzling artefacts. “Tree”? He or she is barking up the wrong one. More to be pitied for blind ignorance than laughed at.for sheer folly.

12
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  Paul Morgan

Was anyone around to witness any of these very warm periods of time?
Were they trying to grow crops to feed billions of people.

Using excessive timeframe trends to argue against real trends now seems to be standard denier tactics. Doesn’t stop it being stupid.

0
-10
Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

You have confirmed to me that no one should take you seriously. You ask did anyone witness these warm periods of time. The vine terraces speak for themselves to anyone with half an ounce of common sense. It was t hot enough for people to grow grapes, for goodness sake. And of course I explained that archaeological digs have attested to the bogs above Machynlleth once having been rich agricultural land capable of supporting a vibrant culture. With people like your good self around it is no wonder we have had two years of dreadful collateral damage from the Covid lockdowns. The warming psychosis echoes the similar Covid fear, panic and blindness.

14
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

http://www.bbc.co.uk

0
0
ChrisDinBristol
ChrisDinBristol
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

I’m sure someone must have around in those days, though I’ve never met one. Should I then conclude that they didn’t exist?

Meanwhile, focussing obsessively on ridiculously short timeframe trends with no historical context seems to be standard alarmist tactics. Doesn’t stop it being stupid, though.

0
0
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Take a look at the wholly unrealistic and clearly stupid temperature projection used by Al Gore.

3
0
Dave
Dave
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Using miniscule timeframes is standard climate panicker tactics. Doesn’t stop it being stupid

0
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

You’ll find all sorts of sensible folks in the Have Your Say section on the BBC website. With your way with words, you’ll get tonnes of 👍👍👍 Good luck!

1
0
ChrisDinBristol
ChrisDinBristol
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Use of the word ‘denier’ betrays your ignorance of both science and reality.

7
0
Francis64
Francis64
3 years ago

Climate Change ….

FDBAe0YWYAA_jYt.jpg
35
-1
tree
tree
3 years ago

Another attempt to deny the undeniable.
DS keeps doing coming up with this selective garbage and the readers just buy it.

They are duty bound to oppose anything that is an accepted truth.

So just publish a dodgy article and let their ignorance and preconceptions to the rest.

Last edited 3 years ago by Stop believing start thinking
3
-48
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

If you tilt the graph it can agree with your version of reality. It’s all the rage with the modelling community these days.

16
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Your epistemological and psychoanalytical sense making is too advanced for us, tree 🌳. What are we buying?

3
-1
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Try coming up with something yourself to convince us all the planet is warming catastrophically.

6
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

You see.. making things up isn’t for me.

0
-5
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

You are pushing a large gas-bag of CO2 uphill!

Where are your objective facts and how do you differentiate them from your hysteria??

4
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Look there are 30 such idiots with their downward thumbs.

0
-7
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

The BBC has an excellent Climate Crisis section I think you’d really enjoy. Up to date reporting of the myriad impacts extreme weather is having around the world. Sobering stuff ..

Last edited 3 years ago by crisisgarden
0
0
ChrisDinBristol
ChrisDinBristol
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Do you think you are funny?
You clearly think you’re clever, but I’ve seen no empirical evidence of that either.

1
0
ChrisDinBristol
ChrisDinBristol
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

Deny the undeniable.
Accepted truth.

I think the ignorance and preconconceptions are clearly yours.

Look up up logical fallacies, first formalised by Aristotle 2500 years ago.
Though I haven’t met him either, so he probably didn’t exist.

1
0
tree
tree
3 years ago

“don’t worry the next ice age in 50000 years should cool us down”

0
-14
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

You know what they say, make hay while the sun shines.

2
-1
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Gates wants to block out the sun – the giver of life. – with dust

That fugures.

6
-1
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Gates: a truly evil being.

2
0
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
3 years ago

And this is why it’s vital that Nigel Farage and other leading figures opposing the carbon madness stop giving credence to the man-made CO2 threat.
AGW is the great deception employed by the Reset Gang to crush working and middle class oiks.

22
0
Chris Morrison
Chris Morrison
3 years ago
Reply to  NeilofWatford

Agreed. Farage and Tice hit the easy target of Net Zero, but back away from disputing the “settled” science around CO2. Politics, eh.

9
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris Morrison

Defeat NetZero and ‘climate change’ is defeated.

3
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

Get Johnson out of Number Ten and this increasingly rotten Tory Party is defeated!

2
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Surprised that you would prefer Labour.

0
-1
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  Chris Morrison

There is no such thing as ‘settled science’ or else the sun would still be going around the earth as a matter of “scientific fact”

10
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

F=MA

P=V^2/R

What’s wrong with these.

0
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago
Reply to  NeilofWatford

Got it in one!

1
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago

I’m getting a strong feeling of deja vu with these climate articles. Even when preaching to the choir you might want to mix up the parables a bit.

2
-4
Chris Morrison
Chris Morrison
3 years ago
Reply to  Rogerborg

Have you listened to the BBC or read the Guardian lately?

5
0
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago

What politicians say: it’s vital that we massively reduce emissions.

What politicians do: spend 25 years rapidly increasing the population through mass immigration of people from countries where per capita emissions are much, often very, very much, lower. With Channel -crossers, people from Hong Kong, Ukrainians and “Ukrainians”, the current government seems determined to achieve new records.

9
0
RedhotScot
RedhotScot
3 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

British passport holders from Hong Kong, of which there are many, by definition, are British and entitled to come here.

3
0
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago
Reply to  RedhotScot

BBC, 1 February 2021

“British National Overseas (BNO) citizenship is a type of British nationality created in 1985 that people in Hong Kong could apply for before the 1997 handover to China to retain a link with the UK.

The lifelong status, which cannot be passed down to family members, did not give holders any special rights.
It meant only they could visit the UK for six months without a visa.

But the new system, in place from 31 January 2021, allows these BNO citizens and their close family to apply for two periods of five years to live and work in the UK.

After the first five years, they are able to choose to apply for indefinite leave to remain, which means an individual can live and work without applying for a visa.

And after one year of this status, individuals are able to apply for British citizenship.”

Last edited 3 years ago by Nearhorburian
3
0
tree
tree
3 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

That’s just your racism talking.

0
-6
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago
Reply to  tree

That’s just your drooling imbecility talking.

4
-1
kate
kate
3 years ago

Bad News, everyone.
I remember watching this lawyer testify to Reiner Fuellmich’s Coronavirus Committee.
She has been arrested
One of the attorneys assisting Reiner Fuelmich in proving world leaders have committed crimes against humanity in the name of Covid-19, has been arrested in France on suspicion of terrorism and treason.
Virginie de Araujo Recchia, a French attorney living in France who is participating in the work of the Citizen Jury with Reiner Fuellmich, was arrested in her home at dawn on March 22nd in front of her children. The arrest comes three weeks before ahead of the French presidential elections.
Fuellmich’s team have allegedly been informed the charges involve counterterrorism and possibly treason
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/24/fuelmich-lawyer-arrested-treason-for-exposing-covid-fraud/
 
https://www.conspiracywatch.info/virginie-de-araujo-recchia
https://archive.ph/Ed8es

3
0
Jack Daw
Jack Daw
3 years ago

An interesting article, thank you. It’s such a shame our cloth-eared, brain-dead political leaders ignore facts and science and make policy on the advice of soothsayers.

5
0
JohnnyDollar
JohnnyDollar
3 years ago

A sigh of Relief At last British joins lists are being red pilled and finding the courage ( the balls ) to write the truth about this climate fraud , the likes of pierce Corbyn, Vernon Coleman & Tony Heller has been saying this for donkeys ( forgive the spelling ) .

1
0
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago

Yet another dismissal of the climate change scam. However, one of the main benefits to the globalists and their minions, such as Boris, is to impoverish normal people whilst building their own wealth and exercising a truly Orwellian level of control over us. We are at war with them and we simply have to win, whatever it takes, for the benefit of our descendants. Of course “climate change” is only one of their weapons…

5
0
Rose Madder
Rose Madder
3 years ago

Those four glacials/interglacials. Turning points top and bottom roughly align. Some sort of natural governor at work. Overlay CO2, and it peaked at, what, 280ppm? Not much doom-loop runaway catastrophic global warming climate change. And now CO2 is over 400ppm, shouldn’t temperature be off the scale?

1
0
JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago
Reply to  Rose Madder

It’s logical that there is a natural relationship between the two, in as much as when it’s really frozen, the number of plants that extract CO2 is bound to be lower. Apart from the temperature and lack of available water, low carbon levels in the air would also inhibit the growth of plants. A bit like turning down the heat and slowing the clock, as it were.

0
0
Quentin Newark
Quentin Newark
3 years ago

Chris, excellent acerbic piece, with a great counter-riposte at the end.

There are plots of (estimated) temperature going back 500m years, also showing CO2, proving that rises and CO2 are never tethered, the latter mechanistically driving the former – as we are currently forced to believe.

I was very depressed to watch Steve Baker on a video saying that the chance to counter the narrative that “carbon” is responsible for rising temperature, and that a minute rise in one inevitably meant a rise in the other, was lost. That train has left the station he said.

2
0
Chris Morrison
Chris Morrison
3 years ago
Reply to  Quentin Newark

Thank for your generous comment. It’s the same with Farage and Tice. They want a Net Zero referendum but seem to accept that we need to reduce CO2 emissions. You can’t have both, since Net Zero is a logical solution if you think the planet faces an existential threat from CO2. It’s just politicians playing their usual games.

4
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 36 of the Sceptic: Karl Williams on Starmer’s Phoney Immigration Crackdown, Dan Hitchens on the Assisted Suicide Bill and Tom Jones on Reform’s Local Council Challenge

by Richard Eldred
16 May 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

15 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

16 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

16 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

29

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

25

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

19

News Round-Up

18

Chris Packham is the New St Francis of Assisi

39

Trump’s Lesson in Remedial Education

16 May 2025
by Dr James Allan

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

15 May 2025
by Dr Nicholas Tate

‘Why Can’t We Talk About This?’

15 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

POSTS BY DATE

March 2022
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Feb   Apr »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences