AstraZeneca vs South African Variant
The AstraZeneca vaccine has faltered against the South African Variant, with a new study carried out by the University of Oxford and the University of the Witwatersrand finding that it offers only limited protection. The Financial Times has the details.
The Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine does not appear to offer protection against mild and moderate disease caused by the viral variant first identified in South Africa, according to a study.
Although none of the more than 2,000 mainly healthy and young patients in the study died or was hospitalised, the findings, which have not yet been peer reviewed, could complicate the race to roll out vaccines as new strains emerge. In both the human trials and tests on the blood of those vaccinated, the jab showed significantly reduced efficacy against the 501Y.V2 viral variant, which is dominant in South Africa, according to the randomised, double-blind study seen by the Financial Times.
“A two-dose regimen of [the vaccine] did not show protection against mild-moderate COVID-19 due to [the South African variant]”, the study says, adding that efficacy against severe COVID-19, hospitalisations and deaths was not yet determined.
Worth reading in full.
The revelation prompted South Africa to suspend its rollout of the Oxford vaccine, as AFP reports
South Africa will suspend the start of its COVID-19 vaccinations with the AstraZeneca jab after a study showed the drug failed to prevent mild and moderate cases of the virus variant that has appeared in the country.
Africa’s hardest-hit nation was due to start its campaign in the coming days with a million doses of the vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford.
The suspension marks an important setback for the country, but officials said vaccine deliveries from other producers would soon be available and allow the campaign to move forward.
UK Vaccine Minister Nadhim Zahawi has written an article for the Telegraph explaining that the emergence of new variants is a challenge that the country is more than capable of meeting.
Our world-leading genomics capacity has allowed us to identify these different strains when they have appeared in the UK. Where we have seen evidence of the South African variant or other worrying mutations, we have moved to deploy surge testing to try and stop it spreading any further.
It is a timely reminder that currently, even with the vaccine rollout going well, we all need to live by the national restrictions and act as if we might have the virus to stop us spreading it.
AstraZeneca is working on a booster that will provide robust protection against the South African that is due to be ready by the Autumn.
Writing in the same publication, Professor Hugh Pennington provides some perspective.
A vaccine is not an impenetrable barrier in the body through which no virus can pass. It’s more like a superpower, which enables our immune systems to fight better, faster and stronger against an invader.
So the discovery that the Oxford-AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccine for COVID-19 is less effective against some new variants of coronavirus than others is no cause for alarm. It’s to be expected…
News that the AZ jab has ‘limited efficacy’ against mild and moderate disease caused by the South African strain of the virus was treated yesterday in some quarters as a looming disaster.
It is not – and I say this not only as an academic with a lifetime’s experience in viruses and vaccines, but as an 82 year-old man who has had his first AZ injection…
Worth reading in full
Stop Press: Muge Cevik provides a good summary of the study on twitter.
There is a lot of confusion about the efficacy of AstraZeneca/ChAdOx1 vaccine against COVID19 due to B.1.351 / 501Y.V2 – summarising the results of phase 1b/2a double-blind randomized trial conducted in South Africa (based on @GovernmentZA press conference).
— Muge Cevik (@mugecevik) February 7, 2021(1/6)
Is ‘No Jab, No Job’ Legal?
Can employers insist that staff get the vaccine? According to the Telegraph, the question is dividing the Government, with some ministers believing that employers who take a ‘no jab, no job’ approach may be protected by Health and Safety legislation.
Employers can insist that all of their staff get vaccinated against Covid under laws governing health and safety at work, ministers believe…
The idea of ‘vaccine passports’ – which would allow employers to insist upon proof of vaccination – have been dismissed by vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi as “discriminatory” and “not how we do things in the UK “.
However, the Telegraph understands that the issue is at the centre of a row in Cabinet, with some ministers arguing in favour of the scheme.
Whitehall sources believe that companies who adopt a “jab for a job” stance are protected by current health and safety laws which require workers to protect not only themselves, but also colleagues from harm.
One Government source said: “If someone is working in an environment where people haven’t been vaccinated, it becomes a public health risk.
“Health and safety laws say you have to protect other people at work, and when it becomes about protecting other people the argument gets stronger.
“If there is clear evidence that vaccines prevent transmission, the next stage is to make sure more and more people are taking up the vaccine.”
Worth reading in full.
But wouldn’t this be a breach of the right to consent, whereby the law protects people from receiving a medical treatment unless they’ve explicitly consented to it? As set out on NHS website, consent must be:
voluntary – the decision to either consent or not to consent to treatment must be made by the person, and must not be influenced by pressure from medical staff, friends or family
informed – the person must be given all of the information about what the treatment involves, including the benefits and risks, whether there are reasonable alternative treatments, and what will happen if treatment does not go ahead
capacity – the person must be capable of giving consent, which means they understand the information given to them and can use it to make an informed decision.
This strays into employment law, as well as anti-discrimination law, and it would not be a surprise to see a flurry of lawsuits if an employer insists on workers being vaccinated on pain of dismissal. Economia magazine has a viewpoint on the rules as they currently stand.
According to employment law experts, employers cannot insist that employees are vaccinated unless the circumstances are exceptional. For example, employers in the social care sector may be able to give reasonable instruction for employees to be vaccinated as they are working with high-risk, vulnerable people.
Other sectors such as professional services don’t have the same strength of argument for insisting their workers are vaccinated, as lockdown working conditions have demonstrated that work can often be done effectively from home…
“Employers should encourage, and not compel, employees to have vaccinations”, said Rachel Suff, CIPD Employee Relations Adviser…
“Mandatory vaccination may discriminate on the basis of disability, or religious or philosophical belief. If an employer disciplines or dismisses an individual who refuses to be vaccinated, this carries a risk of exposure to an unfair dismissal claim”, added Rachel Suff.
Employers should always take care that their actions do not breach an employee’s human rights and/or lead to claims for discrimination – particularly on grounds of age, religion, belief, disability, or pregnancy – or for breach of employment contracts…
Leanne Francis, Senior Associate at Pinsent Masons, said: “Mandatory vaccinations could also raise privacy implications. They could be interpreted as interfering with Article 8 of ECHR which gives individuals the right to a private life.
“An employer will need to be able to demonstrate that their interference was proportionate in all of the circumstances and this defence is often nuanced and complex. Employers will also be expected to obtain consent for any work-related medical intervention, in the same way that consent is obtained for referrals to occupational health or drugs and alcohol testing.”
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: See these six Covid vaccination questions for HR in Personnel Today for more info.
Stammering Takes a Hammering
Whether taking part in a Zoom meeting or an online lesson, or trying to talk through a mask, communicating during lockdown is not easy for those with a stammer. Inews has more.
Approximately 8% of children will stammer at some point, but many find that as they get older the condition improves.
However, under COVID-19 restrictions, a mild to moderate stammer can easily become severe due to compulsory mask-wearing, a lack of in person interaction, and the current over-reliance on technology to communicate with others in lockdown…
William Laven, 22, from Surrey is a Stambassador for Action for Stammering Children, and has experienced the challenges of communicating with a speech impediment during lockdown first-hand.
Speaking to i, he said: “I work in a busy London office and at the start of the pandemic obviously we started working from home – normally my stammer is at its best when I am socialising with people, so it was badly affected…
“Luckily I only need to wear a mask once or twice a week when I go to the shop or have to go to fill up fuel, however it can be quite an anxious experience. You don’t realise how often you lip read, especially to someone with a speech impediment.
“When I stammer I have a slight facial gesture which no one can see when I am wearing a mask. I have had people roll their eyes, take me to the wrong place in the supermarkets because they think I am not responding to them, or that I am saying something completely different.”
Likewise, others have found communicating via Zoom – now an everyday necessity – increasingly off-putting and uncomfortable, as best etiquette requires us all to see our own reflection, and for those with a stammer, confront the visual manifestation of their speech impediment.
Worth reading in full.
The iNews report references the work of Action for Stammering Children, a charity that has seen demand for its services increase markedly through the various lockdowns:
Action for Stammering Children Charity report the number of calls to their stammering helpline have increased by 57.6% over lockdown… Since the beginning of lockdown, the Helpline has seen a surge in the number of calls from concerned parents. 250 Helpline calls were taken in the final quarter of 2019/20, just before the lockdown began. However, over the first quarter of 2020/21, therapists responded to 394 calls from worried parents and therapists seeking advice about how best to offer therapy during lockdown. An increase of 57.6% occurred in the April to June period. Parents have been expressing particular concerns over managing their child’s stammering and increasing anxiety.
No Pubs, Bars or Restaurants = No Nookie
According to Reuters, lockdown has led to a sharp fall in the birth rate around Europe. The report starts with the situation in Italy where the situation is particularly pronounced.
Maybe it was the stress. Maybe it was being cooped up with the mother-in-law. But the numbers are in, and one effect of the coronavirus lockdown is now clear: people made fewer babies. A lot fewer babies.
Births in Italy in December – exactly nine months after the country went into Europe’s first lockdown – plunged by a whopping 21.6%, according to figures from a sample of 15 Italian cities released this week by statistics agency ISTAT.
And the impact is far from over. Marriages fell by more than half in the first 10 months of last year, which ISTAT chief Gian Carlo Blangiardo called “a further factor in a probable decline in births in the immediate future…”
Last year, Britain recorded a plunge in imports of baby carriages, to the lowest level since records began in 2000. (Yes, the Treasury counts imports of baby carriages. In tonnes.)
While its data is not yet complete, the German statistics office said 2020 was probably the first year since 2011 that the population did not grow, both because of declining births and because COVID-19 meant fewer people immigrated.
There are signs, though, that in Germany, at least, the trend is reversing.
Still, there are signs some people who put off making babies in 2020 may be getting down to business at last. Sales of pregnancy tests and pregnancy vitamins in Germany jumped in the last few months, according to a poll conducted for pharmacy news service Apotheke Adhoc.
The US has also seen a sharp drop in the birth rate, according to Alice Broster in Forbes.
In June 2020, the Brookings Institute estimated that the U.S. would see between 300,000 to 500,000 fewer births than in 2019…
A reduction in births was exactly the opposite of what many people anticipated would come out of 2020. Spending more time at home with a partner sounds like the perfect recipe for speeding up family planning. However, with increased job insecurity, health anxiety and the Government encouraging people to stay away from hospitals, it’d seem COVID-19 made people reconsider…
“The economic fallout, persistent health concerns, uncertainty about the safety and availability of medical care and the closure of schools all combine to make this a very unappealing time for couples to start or expand their family,” said Emily Smith-Greenaway, an Associate Professor of Sociology and Spatial Sciences at the University of Southern California on HuffPost. “We certainly anticipate there to be a rebound, but we’re not so sure about an overshoot – a boom that helps to offset the bust.”
The pandemic had a profound impact on fertility treatment plans. Many clinics postponed treatment cycles and closed their doors to new patients throughout 2020 in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Research published in the Human Reproduction journal used data from almost 10,000 people who had already undergone IVF. Researchers were looking at the impact of delays and the backlog of treatment due to being done once clinics opened. They found that patients across the age brackets, from under 30 to 42, had experienced delays of six to 12 months.
Worth reading in full.
Germany’s Federal Ministry of the Interior Colluded With Scientists to Frighten the Public
There was an interesting story in yesterday’s Welt am Sonntag based on 200 pages of internal correspondence seen by the paper and obtained by lawyers in the course of an ongoing legal dispute involving the Robert Koch Institute.
In March 2020, during the first wave of the pandemic, the Federal Ministry of the Interior Ministry enlisted scientists from multiple research institutes and universities for political purposes. It commissioned researchers from the Robert Koch Institute and other institutions to create a model, upon which basis the Minister of the Interior Horst Seehofer (CSU) wanted to justify tough Corona measures.
This has emerged from more than 200 pages of internal correspondence between the management of the Ministry and the researchers which is available to the Welt Am Sonntag…
In an email exchange, Markus Kerber, Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of the Interior, asks a researcher to prepare a model upon the basis of which “measures of a preventative and repressive nature” could be planned.
According to the correspondence, the scientists, in close coordination with the Ministry, compiled the contents for a secret paper in just four days. It was then released over various media in the days that followed.
The paper included a “worst case scenario” according to which more than one million people could die from coronavirus in Germany, if social life were to continue as before the pandemic.
Worth reading in full.
Miracle in Singapore
The Republic of Singapore has not suffered in the way that most other countries have from COVID-19, with fewer than 60,000 cases and 30 deaths. How did the city state do it? Was it the modest lockdown, or was it something else? It remains a bit of a mystery, but Stuart Derbyshire, an Associate Professor of Psychology at the National University of Singapore, has put forward a couple of ideas in Spiked. First, however, he dismisses a couple of other explanations.
Singapore is a major travel hub and welcomes close to 20 million overseas visitors every year. Between October 2019 and March 2020, close to 7.5 million visitors entered Singapore from overseas, with roughly 20% of them coming from mainland China. Singapore did not close its border to tourists until March 24th, one week after Rome closed its main terminal… Tight border control cannot explain Singapore’s extreme outlier status.
Singapore is also densely populated; people live and socialise in close proximity. Few people cook at home because eating out is so cheap, and the weather is conducive to being outdoors… The national lockdown, known here as a circuit breaker, did not come into effect until April 7th, almost a month after Italy, and about two weeks after New York City and the UK. A widespread tendency to distance or an early lockdown cannot explain Singapore’s extreme outlier status.
It is far more likely, he reckons, that the low death toll is due to an effective track and trace system and the swift and decisive action taken in care homes.
Around 12,000 Singaporean citizens live in care homes, compared with around 418,000 UK citizens. That equates to about 0.3% of Singapore’s population (citizens only) and about 0.6% of the UK’s. Outbreaks of Covid in care homes in the UK and elsewhere have had a devastating impact, but that has clearly been avoided in Singapore.
Indeed, shortly after the first case of Covid was detected in a care home on March 31st, Singapore’s Ministry of Health moved around 3,000 nursing home employees into hotels to isolate them from the wider community, and tested all 9,000 nursing-home staff. Positive tests were followed by contact tracing and quarantine. Those measures were in addition to a month-long ban on visitation, safe-distancing in all homes, and zoning. Singapore has reported only three Covid-related care-home deaths, compared with estimates of 25,000 Covid-related deaths in the UK.
Worth reading in full.
Round-up
- “The lockdown debate – a further reply to Toby Young” – Christopher Snowdon replies to yesterday’s post from Toby in their ongoing debate
- “PSNI miss three deadlines to justify Covid regulations power of entry claim” – The PSNI have missed three proposed dates to respond to a legal challenge over whether officers have the power to enter private homes to enforce Covid rules, reports the Belfast Telegraph. Stormont’s Department of Health has also not explained how the regulations give police this power
- “Vision problems arise in young school kids in COVID-19 quarantine” – The University of Minnesota’s Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Policy report on yet another unintended side-effect of COVID-19 restrictions
- “The poisonous, empathy-free lockdown debate shames our national discourse” – A gentlemanly piece from Dan Hannan in the Sunday Telegraph decrying the ‘gotcha’ mentality of most participants in the lockdown debate
- “Forget individual vaccine passports, our country needs a collective one” – Ross Clark argues in the Telegraph that every British citizen should automatically be given a vaccine passport once a certain percentage of the population has been vaccinated
- “Will young people ever work again?” – Recent graduates are facing an uncertain future says Maria Albano in Unherd
- “Why greens love lockdown” – Some see lockdowns as the beginning of a bright new era of global environmental consciousness and good international governance writes Ben Pile in Spiked
- “Hold Hands, Show Face, Give Grace” – A new website set up by a Lockdown Sceptics Reader who has autism. It calls for a swift return to the old normal
- “Downfall, the Covid version” – The Conservative Woman features Ivor Cummins’s Downfall parody, a response to the one taking the Mickey out of him written by Christopher Snowdon
- “As COVID-19 vaccines raise hope, cold reality dawns that illness Is likely here to stay” – A dose of realism from the Wall Street Journal; new variants and the limits of vaccination programs mean that COVID-19 will be around for years
- “Masking America’s greatest natural monuments” – The National Park Service (NPS) has mandated wearing face masks on all National Park Service lands. It will spur endless, pointless arguments says James Bovard on the AIER blog
- “Federal Government delays plan to forcibly confine travellers after public backlash” – Good news for Canada, as the federal government delays its plan to charge travellers $2,000 for forced hotel quarantine. Credit for this U-turn goes to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedom
- “The results are in: Lockdowns don’t work” – Listen to Sharyl Atkinson talking to Professor Jay Bhattacharya about the data that proves lockdowns don’t work
- “Defeating life threatening COVID-19” – A powerful video showing a patient’s recovery from COVID-19 after receiving ivermectin in the United Memorial Medical Centre in Houston
- “Lockdowns are unlawful and should never be attempted” – A twitter thread from Abir Ballan, a member of Panda, considering whether lockdown would be justified in the event of a pandemic with a far higher fatality rate.
- Police in Greater Manchester assault a coffee shop owner in the most alarming instance of over-zealous enforcement of lockdown rules so far
Theme Tunes Suggested by Readers
Four today: “Seven Year Ache” by Rosanne Cash, “I Want to Break Free” by Queen, “One in Ten” by UB40 and “Tell Ms It’s Not True” by Barbara Dickson.
Stop Press: A public-spirited reader has created a Spotify playlist of all the theme tunes nominated in this slot (at least, for those that are available on Spotify). It is presently 511 songs and clocks in at 33 hours. If you’re on Spotify, just search for “Lockdown Hits”.
Love in the Time of Covid
We have created some Lockdown Sceptics Forums, including a dating forum called “Love in a Covid Climate” that has attracted a bit of attention. We have a team of moderators in place to remove spam and deal with the trolls, but sometimes it takes a little while so please bear with us. You have to register to use the Forums as well as post comments below the line, but that should just be a one-time thing. Any problems, email Lockdown Sceptics here.
Sharing Stories
Some of you have asked how to link to particular stories on Lockdown Sceptics so you can share it. To do that, click on the headline of a particular story and a link symbol will appear on the right-hand side of the headline. Click on the link and the URL of your page will switch to the URL of that particular story. You can then copy that URL and either email it to your friends or post it on social media. Please do share the stories.
Social Media Accounts
You can follow Lockdown Sceptics on our social media accounts which are updated throughout the day. To follow us on Facebook, click here; to follow us on Twitter, click here; to follow us on Instagram, click here; to follow us on Parler, click here; and to follow us on MeWe, click here.
Woke Gobbledegook
We’ve decided to create a permanent slot down here for woke gobbledegook. Today, from MailOnline, we bring you broadcaster Andrew Neil’s battle against the woke warriors who are trying to blow up GB News on the launch pad.
Andrew Neil today slammed “woke warriors” for trying to cancel his new GB News channel before it even starts.
The former BBC presenter laid into activists after they launched a sabotage campaign against his soon-to-be-launched TV channel.
Twitter activists are urging firms not to advertise with the new station under the hashtag “Don’tFundGBNews”, because they fear the channel will be “like America’s Fox News” – a comparison bosses have rejected.
And those backing the campaign, including equality campaigner Femi Oluwole, have threatened to cancel their phone contracts if companies such as EE and Vodafone pay for advertising spaces on the channel.
But Mr Neil, who is the chairman of GB News, today hit out at those behind the campaign…
In a tweet he said: “The woke warriors trying to stir up an advertising boycott of GB News, a channel that hasn’t even started broadcasting, are hilarious.
“Even funnier is their threat to cancel mobile phone contracts of operators who dare to advertise on GB News.
“I mean have they ever tried to cancel a mobile contract?! But GB News will be ready to help. We will campaign for easier cancellation.”
The row erupted last night when campaign group Stop Funding Hate – previously criticised as a “hard-left censorship group” – urged people to join the hashtag Don’tFundGBNews.
The group, founded by a former Amnesty International worker, said on Twitter: “If you want to help stop ‘Fox News style’ TV in Britain: Tweet your mobile phone company using the hashtag #DontFundGBNews.
“Urge them not to advertise with GB News or any ‘Fox News style’ channel, & explain why this matters to you.”
GB News officials have repeatedly hit back at the Fox News comparison, with some media experts expecting the channel to be “right-leaning” rather than right wing.
The hashtag was backed by LBC Presenter Natasha Devon, who threatened to quit Vodafone, as well as Mr Oluwole, a political activist and co-founder of the pro-European Union advocacy group Our Future Our Choice, who threatened to quit EE if its advertises with GB News.
He said: “Hi EE, I was on Orange since I started using mobile phones and switched to you almost as soon as you took them over.
“But I will switch service provider immediately if I hear of one EE advert placed on that channel. #DontFundGBNews.”
But while the Tweet received support from some, many quickly criticised his backing of the campaign, saying it amounted to “mass censorship”.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: The Minneapolis Star Tribune is warning Minnesotan parents that they may be about to see a “woke revolution” at their child’s school, thanks to new standards set by the local Department of Education.
By 2022, as your first-grader is learning that two plus two is four, the Minnesota Department of Education intends to mandate that she also learn to recognise “stereotypes”, “biased speech”, and “injustice at the institutional or systemic level”.
Your middle schooler will be drilled in how his identity is a function of his skin colour.
Your high schooler will be required to explain how Europeans invented “whiteness” and that America’s 19th-century westward expansion was the shameful product of “whiteness, Christianity and capitalism”.
Stop Press 2: John McWhorter has written a blog post examining the N-word as slur vs. the N-word as a sequence of sounds. He focuses on the case of Donald McNeil, who recently lost his job at the New York Times when he used the N-word to describe an insult, rather than using it to insult anyone.
“Mask Exempt” Lanyards
We’ve created a one-stop shop down here for people who want to obtain a “Mask Exempt” lanyard/card – because wearing a mask causes them “severe distress”, for instance. You can print out and laminate a fairly standard one for free here and the Government has instructions on how to download an official “Mask Exempt” notice to put on your phone here. And if you feel obliged to wear a mask but want to signal your disapproval of having to do so, you can get a “sexy world” mask with the Swedish flag on it here.
A reader has started a website that contains some useful guidance about how you can claim legal exemption. Another reader has created an Android app which displays “I am exempt from wearing a face mask” on your phone. Only 99p.
If you’re a shop owner and you want to let your customers know you will not be insisting on face masks or asking them what their reasons for exemption are, you can download a friendly sign to stick in your window here.
And here’s an excellent piece about the ineffectiveness of masks by a Roger W. Koops, who has a doctorate in organic chemistry. See also the Swiss Doctor’s thorough review of the scientific evidence here and Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson’s Spectator article about the Danish mask study here.
Stop Press: There can, apparently, be such a thing as too masked up. In a happy twist of event, airlines have now been kicking passengers off the flight for wearing too much protection, according to Travelpulse.
United Airlines removed a New Jersey man and his brother from a recent flight leaving Newark Liberty International Airport when they boarded a plane wearing a Narwall Mask. Unlike an N95 mask or a cloth face covering, the Narwall Mask is a full face shield that filters air in and out using a design inspired by scuba diving gear.
Problem: United doesn’t accept that kind of personal protection, saying it was not in compliance with their mask policy, and Rob Joseph and his brother were kicked off the flight before it left…
The brothers were asked to replace their Narwall masks with cloth coverings. They declined, and United did not allow them to fly.
The Great Barrington Declaration
The Great Barrington Declaration, a petition started by Professor Martin Kulldorff, Professor Sunetra Gupta and Professor Jay Bhattacharya calling for a strategy of “Focused Protection” (protect the elderly and the vulnerable and let everyone else get on with life), was launched in October and the lockdown zealots have been doing their best to discredit it ever since. If you googled it a week after launch, the top hits were three smear pieces from the Guardian, including: “Herd immunity letter signed by fake experts including ‘Dr Johnny Bananas’.” (Freddie Sayers at UnHerd warned us about this the day before it appeared.) On the bright side, Google UK has stopped shadow banning it, so the actual Declaration now tops the search results – and Toby’s Spectator piece about the attempt to suppress it is among the top hits – although discussion of it has been censored by Reddit. The reason the zealots hate it, of course, is that it gives the lie to their claim that “the science” only supports their strategy. These three scientists are every bit as eminent – more eminent – than the pro-lockdown fanatics so expect no let up in the attacks. (Wikipedia has also done a smear job.)
You can find it here. Please sign it. Now over three quarters of a million signatures.
Update: The authors of the GBD have expanded the FAQs to deal with some of the arguments and smears that have been made against their proposal. Worth reading in full.
Update 2: Many of the signatories of the Great Barrington Declaration are involved with new UK anti-lockdown campaign Recovery. Find out more and join here.
Update 3: You can watch Sunetra Gupta set out the case for “Focused Protection” here and Jay Bhattacharya make it here.
Update 4: The three GBD authors plus Prof Carl Heneghan of CEBM have launched a new website collateralglobal.org, “a global repository for research into the collateral effects of the COVID-19 lockdown measures”. Follow Collateral Global on Twitter here. Sign up to the newsletter here.
Judicial Reviews Against the Government
There are now so many legal cases being brought against the Government and its ministers we thought we’d include them all in one place down here.
The Simon Dolan case has now reached the end of the road. The current lead case is the Robin Tilbrook case which challenges whether the Lockdown Regulations are constitutional. You can read about that and contribute here.
Then there’s John’s Campaign which is focused specifically on care homes. Find out more about that here.
There’s the GoodLawProject and Runnymede Trust’s Judicial Review of the Government’s award of lucrative PPE contracts to various private companies. You can find out more about that here and contribute to the crowdfunder here.
Scottish Church leaders from a range of Christian denominations have launched legal action, supported by the Christian Legal Centre against the Scottish Government’s attempt to close churches in Scotland for the first time since the the Stuart kings in the 17th century. The church leaders emphasised it is a disproportionate step, and one which has serious implications for freedom of religion.” Further information available here.
There’s the class action lawsuit being brought by Dr Reiner Fuellmich and his team in various countries against “the manufacturers and sellers of the defective product, PCR tests”. Dr Fuellmich explains the lawsuit in this video. Dr Fuellmich has also served cease and desist papers on Professor Christian Drosten, co-author of the Corman-Drosten paper which was the first and WHO-recommended PCR protocol for detection of SARS-CoV-2. That paper, which was pivotal to the roll out of mass PCR testing, was submitted to the journal Eurosurveillance on January 21st and accepted following peer review on January 22nd. The paper has been critically reviewed here by Pieter Borger and colleagues, who also submitted a retraction request, which was rejected in February. UPDATE: The retraction request has been rejected.
And last but not least there was the Free Speech Union‘s challenge to Ofcom over its ‘coronavirus guidance’. A High Court judge refused permission for the FSU’s judicial review on December 9th and the FSU has decided not to appeal the decision because Ofcom has conceded most of the points it was making. Check here for details.
Samaritans
If you are struggling to cope, please call Samaritans for free on 116 123 (UK and ROI), email jo@samaritans.org or visit the Samaritans website to find details of your nearest branch. Samaritans is available round the clock, every single day of the year, providing a safe place for anyone struggling to cope, whoever they are, however they feel, whatever life has done to them.
Shameless Begging Bit
Thanks as always to those of you who made a donation in the past 24 hours to pay for the upkeep of this site. Doing these daily updates is hard work (although we have help from lots of people, mainly in the form of readers sending us stories and links). If you feel like donating, please click here. And if you want to flag up any stories or links we should include in future updates, email us here. (Don’t assume we’ll pick them up in the comments.)
And Finally…
Chase Dreams, a lockdown anthem by the new band Dreamdrive, documents the experience of life in Melbourne, Australia in the year 2020. It’s not pretty.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
When the censoring of science and common sense finally cracks here, the repercussions are going to be enormous. Potentially, so bad for so many people, that you could imagine the case for not releasing the truth!
It’s going to be hard to get a hotel in Nuremberg at this rate.
You’ll always be able to get a room in Hilbert’s Hotel.
What nation is going to call for any kind of Nuremberg trials?
As Steve Kirsch has told us, there’s not one college in America that will even host a debate on COVID policies.
Are they the same paragons of US education – cannot bring myself to type “advanced” – that have cancelled the likes of Duesberg for decades relating to any discussion or research funding to look further into HIV/AIDS/AZT etc etc ? I think they may have “form”.
Censorship?
At present they’re just totally ignoring it.
The sleight of hand from – ‘It will stop you getting covid” to “It reduces severity of covid” was highly telling.
In the future, the phrase will be, “es it might kill you or do you harm, but you have a duty to run the risk of taking one for society”.
That’s where we’re headed. The Human Rights Bill kills off individual rights, and imposes the concept of ‘greater good’.
It’s communism – a Conservative government is introducing communism.
Don’t give up too soon. Some walls are beginning to crack: https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1577745/Pfizer-vaccine-side-effects-adverse-effects
Fake Cracks.
No mention of the deaths though, I wonder why?
As Sir Desmond Swayne put it, taking one for the team, Just like the Queen, he is a let down.
Five live this morning there was an epidemiologist claiming natural immunity isn’t as effective as the vaccine. At least dick Turpin wore a mask.
They are just liars aren’t they?
What evidence is there of a Conservative Government t? I see none whatever.
Yep. Spot on.
https://m.theepochtimes.com/episode-1-war-on-the-human-spirit-the-dark-origins-of-communism_3947877.html
Pfizer; the company subjected to the largest criminal fine ever. Chance to break its own record?
Moderna: originally styled ‘ModeRNA’.
Never going to happen. Who will demand repercussions? The media? When they played a leading role in propaganda and disinformation? The politicians? When they exploited and whipped up fear to gain buy-in for their authoritarian power grab? Trade unions, NGO? nope, all bought and paid for, all on the jab train.
No, the people who did this will escape justice entirely, unless we physically do it ourselves.
I’m not so sure. Never underestimate the ability of politicians to do a 180 degree turn on a sixpence, when it suits them. Remember the politicians and indeed bureaucrats who made the decisions in 2020 won’t be in power for ever, and one day someone will come along and see a political open goal – the ability to blame all the woes of the moment on politicians of the past. I’m not saying its likely, but it is possible. Politicians of the future will be quite happy to throw their forebears under the bus if it saves their skins.
Tony Blair comes to mind with his WMDs
Repercussions? You’re having a giraffe, right? The establishment will close ranks and there will be a brief fudge before it’s forgotten. Like every other costly and illegal government cockup ever.
A bit like Partygate, remember Boris answering a police accusation
Or the invasion of Iraq, instigated by an as yet un-prosecuted war criminal.
Before he died, the famed prosecutor and author Vincent Bugliosi (sp?) was pushing as hard as he could for a prosecution of George W. Bush (and all his Neo-con advisers) to be tried for crimes against humanity.
At the time, my eyes had not been fully opened to the real nature of the world and I probably thought, “chill out, Vince.” Now, however, I see that he was exactly right.
His book on the subject is a riveting, recommended read.
Not this time. This is an international scale of duplicity and deception, and will not go away. The other stuff you mention is insignificant in comparison. All it needs is MSM to switch sides, which they will as presiding governments are overturned and it will turn into a huge roar for accountability. I shall watch what happens in Austria where they have suspended only, not recanted, on legal enforcement. A sizeable proportion has steadfastly refused vaccination, and when the rest truly learn how they have been deceived it will start an avalanche. I would not like to be in avalanche or Whitty shoes, and Van Tam saw that!
This is worth a laugh…
https://babylonbee.com/news/dr-fauci-gets-in-intense-debate-with-dr-fauci-from-a-few-months-ago/
The war in Ukraine is a made to measure distraction to ensure that the release of the truth goes unnoticed and when ‘normal services are resumed’, the general public with the attention span of a gnat will be preoccupied with some new terror or mundanity.
Also, a lot of people don’t want to admit they were duped, it embarrasses them… as it should.
All the defenders of all the false narratives and bogus science know that they “must all hang together.” If they don’t, they know that they could all “hang together.”
So nothing is going to happen to them. They know this because they know that the “watchdog” press is just as complicit as they are … so they are not going to expose their “crimes against humanity.”
There is actually “safety in numbers” when all the key parties were equally wrong.
Faster! faster! This headlong rush for new vaccines
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/faster-faster-this-headlong-rush-for-new-vaccines/
Tom Penn
Next events – come and join us
Thursday 10th March 5pm to 6pm
Yellow Boards
A329 London Rd,
Near Running Horse/Lily Hill Park
Bracknell RG12 2UJ
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
–
Mummy, what’s a safety trial?
it’s something to ignore dear, in the search for money.
We have all read the facts. The data was fudged, the tests were useless, the statistics artificially inflated, and many deaths were intentionally caused through institutionalized medical negligence. Hospitals received funding bonuses as payoffs.
None of that had anything to do with bad data, or pessimistic models. They did it all on purpose, all of it.
Every life lost, every business destroyed, every penny wasted, every child traumatised. Every moment of anxiety and fear – every single one – entirely intentional.
They ruined lives and countries and the global economy as a deliberate policy on the back of a vast web of lies, and last act of the deception will be to claim it was a “mistake”.
https://off-guardian.org/2022/03/07/dont-believe-the-medias-fake-post-mortem-the-pandemic-was-not-a-mistake/
GB News are currently conducting a ‘post mortem’ of the pandemic on the Dan Wooten slot, Robert Jenrick last night is still insisting the government took the right decisions at the right time.
We’ll revisit that statement in a few months, Robert.
“He would, wouldn’t he”. When it’s not been about profiteering and domineering, it’s a massive arse-covering exercise by people who are either very clever and dishonest, or very stupid and equally dishonest.
Damehoods, knighthoods, peerages and other bunce all round.
I think the Court Of Public Opinion goes deeper into the crux of the issue. I don’t see dan Wotton questioning the dodgy PCR tests, or asymptomatic transmission etc, or even the clot shots. It’s almost like they’re some sort of relief valve.
I’m with Reiner Fuellmich all day.
Me too; I suspect that DW might have an editorial leash attached as far as those elements are concerned – he cannot be unaware given his strident position on other CV19 bollox.
Ron,
We had great hopes for GB news but now apart from Nigel Mark and the bearded Scot, we are about to give up.
Their coverage of the Ukraine invasion is far from believable.
It really disses us off when each of the above has to bring on -usually a female – who has not learned the rudiments of drawing breath so that the hosts can get a word in sideways.
“He would say that , wouldn’t he?”
Oh here we go. Sleepyheads waking up. John Campbell has switched has he? Dozy old geezer finally reading the fineprint is he. After all this time, all those ticks with his blue pen. But careful: in no way should this article be taken as a discouragement to get the clot shot though, because, ‘vaccines are the greatest most wonderful thing science has ever invented’.
Medicine is the only area of “science” where the practitioners seem to be trained to expect reverence from others, and by implication it is expected that we should never question them. There are no exceptions to the old adage “There is no such thing as a free lunch”. Vaccines do not escape the rules of risks, benefits, manufacturing tolerances and the law of unexpected consequences due to insufficient knowledge.
Vaccines didn’t save the world, engineers did, by providing clean water, sanitation and decent living conditions. The whole vaccine industry should be dismantled, it is quite clear that the bastards have lied, still lie, and will lie again. The practice of medicine needs to return to small scales to keep the state, vested interests and other influencers out and to ensure patient privacy.
Half way through RFK Jnr tome, that is spot on so far.
Read it, read it, read it! I’m three-quarters’ way through.
Well I spend a lot of time involved in the greatest science fraud of all time Man/Woman Made Global Warming.
I can assure you this injection fraud is small beer in comparison
I would say that the tried, tested and effective vaccines that we have been using for decades are in general a good thing for mankind, although I wouldn’t be quite as gushing as to say they’re the “most wonderful thing”. Given that their origin was in astute observation and some experimentation 220 or so years ago, it’s surprising that more progress hasn’t been made.
None of this applies to the perverted science of gene therapy, masquerading as “vaccine”, cooked up and applied with minimal testing and total dishonesty; not, apparently, for the principal benefit of Mankind, but to make shedloads of money.
As The TartanEagle suggests, I am astonished at the combination of arrogance, gullibility, incuriosity and stupidity of so many medical practitioners and “scientists”. If mere laymen can obtain, read and understand, with open minds, the information available, whilst retaining the ability to question and “read between the lines”, one might suppose, or hope, that more of those responsible for the patients to whom they are administering this stuff might have a similar frame of mind and approach. I suppose the £15 per, and £20 at weekends might have weakened their intellects, such as they are.
I have only selectively watched Campbell’s videos, but I don’t take exception to them.
He has managed to very carefully give out information which is damning without being closed down, some feat over the last two years.
I think you have to be attuned to his style, he throws give away statements in a sardonic manner to keep the show on the road, but they are done in such a way that it its easy to read what message he is giving. He is a sceptic.
I gave up on him long ago. Not nearly fierce enough for my tastes. Staying in the good books of the censors doesn’t win any brownie points for me. The article says that he only switched recommending the vaccines as a result of this new information which has just come out. So if that’s true, and Dr Campbell has been recommending the so-called COVID vaccines all along until last week, then that is completely indefensible. If you don’t take exception to someone recommending the vaccines up until last week, then you aren’t a sceptic, you’re a Big Pharma cheerleader.
His Youtube revenue may be bringing in more than Moderna at this point.
Id estimate he has brought in not far off a million over the length of the pandemic!
I wonder how your estimation went. Care to share your workings?
He’s offering a free pdf download of his two medical books, so he can’t be that mercenary.
You need 300-500 million views for that money. If you think he had that in 2 years then ha made a million pounds.
I’d say I’m somewhat of a Campbell fan, but he has certainly been enthused by the vaxxes until very recently.
To give him his due, he has featured data on Ivermectin for months, now.
Better to deliver your message somehow than be cancelled by Gluggle, Facelift etc?
Same here. I haven’t seen all of them, but he’s done well to remain on You Tube in the circumstances. Sometimes the editing is quite clever, e.g. one of them was produced as an interview with an Australian specialist, in which they managed to express their attitude without actually using terms that might have them in difficulty, as it were.
I see Dr. Campbell differently. He has seen through a lot of the lies and falsehoods but has trod carefully. Staying on YouT (not being censored) can demand a delicate balance and by saying that he supported vaxxn but in the next breath that he couldn’t “understand at all” why something was so or “You’ll have to ask so-and-so why that should be” he was walking that narrow line. Listen to him talking about vitamin D, for example, and his puzzlement as to why the UK health authorities hadn’t recommended it. He knows full well why they hadn’t.
For those who have missed it, the story of how Ivermectin was cancelled (so the gene therapies could be given emergency authorisation)
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-story-of-how-ivermectin-was-cancelled/
The High wire was a good listen this week with Dr Tess Lawrie, goes over what is in The Real Anthony Fauci. She does get across how angry she is with Andrew Hill. People really do need to wake up to this.
Dr Been put up good video yesterday covering some of the Pfizer documents called Pfizer Vaccine Side Effects of Special Interest From the Court Ordered Documents
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQNOUYRykUI
In a subsequent video he talks about the attempts to silence him. Very sad that this is happening to such a thoroughly decent and brilliant individual.
Daft question Why do people still use those stinkin’ Tube you Buckface and other Silly Con valley outfits when they censor the truth?
I see even Duck Drake has now gone over to the dark side. There are ample alternatives.
The Israeli scientist giving his lecture at Davos won’t be stopped by this, they have bigger plans to totally change the DNA of humans, it was never just fiction where mad scientists try to take over the world. The Davos audiences look as if they are already mind altered the way they sit focused on the lunatics on the stage.
The awesome lock downs, face masks and vaccines: all brought to us by the same media and government gang that is now bringing us a twenty year war with Russia.
Having already brought us wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, the unintended seeding of Al Qaeda, Taliban and ISIS plus an uncounted number of civilian deaths.
Pots calling kettle black.
The news keeps getting worse.
Sorry to say it, but for those expecting bombshells from what will now become an endless train of scandals as more information emerges, you are going to be disappointed.
Nothing done in relation to Covid medication is new. Flawed, fixed and fraudulent trials, smearing and cancelling of medical figures who challenged the money-spinning narrative, dozy, compliant media far more keen to hype the vial threats than follow the money.
All these things come from the playbook that Fauci started writing in 1976 over a faked Swine flu scare in the US. He perfected it as part of the $trillion industry that surrounds the HIV/AIDS scenario, and rolled it out for a series of apparent viral threats culminating in the great Covid fraud.
Fauci is directly and indirectly responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands through reckless trials of highly toxic and typically useless vaccines and medications, especially in Africa where – with a little help from Bill Gates and corrupt governments – whole populations were put at his disposal to test what he liked.
Having got away with equally corrupt practices for 50 years, sadly I think that continued disinterest and collusion from government and the media mean that the whole circus will just go on.
Sadly, I agree with everything you write.
Dr John is a bit behind the times !!!!
Wonder if YouTube will bin him off now lol
That’s what’s so fascinating (and unique) about him. He was pro-narrative for so long that to censor him now would be very conspicuous and would effectively be to admit that the narrative is being controlled by shadowy corporate forces. Covidians all subscribe to him, having grown fond of watching him underline things and put asterisks next to things for most of the pandemic
Yes and I’m not sure what the Covidians think, precisely, when he comes out with the off-message stuff. They don’t seem to be tuning out by the figures, so perhaps a message or two is getting through. I suppose if you are super-fearful about your health, then news of alternative treatments and suspect vaccines ought, in theory, to be of interest—if they are believed when MSM says little or nothing.
My impression is that many of his subscribers are international, since they frequently complain about the lack of reliable news and data in their own countries.
I know what they think – there are threads on mumsnet about how he has gone mad
Sorry to say but can covidians actually think?
In the interests of full disclosure, he does also occasionally draw outlines around complete phrases. I wonder if it’s just so he keeps a track of where he is on the page, since he admits he’s a little dyslexic and has trouble reading numbers when he’s doing the videos.
I rather like the amateurishness of it. Were it slicker, I’d suspect Pharmas grasping hand somewhere in the background.
Judging by the sound quality of some of his early stuff, Santa brought him a better quality microphone this year or last.
The only shocking things is that apparently it’s a surprise to people – (or rather it would be if it was properly reported in the MSM).
Anyone who knows anything about big pharma knows it’s second nature to them. They’ve had a lifetime of doing it. They have special departments/expertise dedicated to this.
They set the criteria, they set the exam, they mark their own results, they lobby the MSM and TRPTB.
Just read Kennedy’s book, The Real Anthony Fauci.
Everyone should be made to read it – for the greater good – that’s the “new” in phrase I’m led to believe.
I’m ploughing toward the end of it. Something of a surprise that Fauci and his backers haven’t engineered a ‘grassy knoll’ moment yet.
Kennedy’s done the world a real favour with his opus. Now it’s a question of getting it read by enough people.
FOr me the most important element is the continuing update of the key issues. This “existentialist” for me and no going back.
Many/most of us saw the exact same table of organs where the vaccine ends up months and months ago from the leaked Japanese Pfizer documents. But it was just a “conspiracy theory”.
I remember that came up more than half year ago. Harvey Risch showed the paper on trialsitenews when I first heard about it in July 2021. One of my main points to refuse this vaccine together with the Swedish study about dna damage repair.
Astonishing. Talking to a triple vaccinated friend last night, who showed me an exchange with her doctor by email. She had had persistent pins and needles for about 8 weeks after the first two Pfizer shots. Her doctor was completely dismissive of the idea that this was connected to the vaccine – ‘No I don’t think it’s got anything to do with that’ was his response. She has subsequently learned that this is a symptom of blood clots. Her father, who suffers from an autoimmune syndrome, had become very ill after his, eventually losing his sight. The doctor was completely dismissive of the idea that this was related to the vaccine. I think on balance it’s the medical professions I’m most angry with. Big Pharma was just being its usual fraudulent criminal self. Doctors, with their blinkered stupid absolute faith in pharmaceuticals, are the ones who have really betrayed their patients’ trust. Dr John Campbell could have known this well over a year ago if he’d been brave enough to investigate.
I’ve only watched a couple of Campbell’s videos, but I get the impression he’s been walking the tightrope of getting the information and discussion out there, without the inevitable ban that has gone with it. He might find this one get’s removed..
He’s an interesting case. He was generally beloved by Covidians because he took the narrative at face value whilst providing very superficial analyses of approved sources of information. But fundamentally he’s a good actor, so he’s been honest about his growing scepticism, much to the annoyance of erstwhile fans. Now hardcore Covidians hate him and think he’s gone mad / down the rabbit hole
just because he’s now saying patently obvious things. Quite funny really. He recently appeared on Russell Brand’s YT channel so that must mean that he has truly crossed the rubicon.
John Campbell is not a physician, he has a PhD in education and is currently registered as a nurse with the NMC.
Yes, sorry, I was referring to my friend’s doctor (and a few others I know!)
If he were a physician, he’d have been too busy jabbing people to have time to maintain a YT channel.
I’ve said on these pages a couple times now that when my partner sought sleeping tablets for stress due to the NHS jab mandate, the Doctor wrote on the prescription that her stress was due to the Christmas rush.
Same doctor rejected my partner’s claim for an exemption to the jab. Same doctor has now jabbed my eight year old nephew.
Something has happened to these doctors over the last couple years. Is it money? Political? Threats against their jobs?
I remember asking the DR for some sleeping tablets that I used before, he said there is a safety concern with them and prescribed a different sort. So they can follow safety data when it suits them.
A distinction does need to be drawn there.
With regard to the tablets, he would be liable for mis-prescribing if he didn’t have regard to the safety data, as he was the one giving the medical advice regarding the tablets.
when it comes to the jabs, the doctors are probably exempt from liability for administering the jabs if someone subsequently suffers a harm
Without meaning to generalise too much, I think many doctors are on the autism spectrum; they seem to think in fairly black and white terms and if the screen in front of them suggests a particular course of action because the NICE guidelines say so, they follow this unquestioningly. They have been trained this way, and everything leads to a pharmaceutical solution. The ‘vaccine’ recommendations were top-down and it would have taken an unusual doctor with a slightly rebellious nature (not many of them) and the time to investigate to go up against this. I think that’s all it is. Of course, many doctors made a personal fortune from the ‘vaccine’ programme but I don’t think this is the main driver of their collusion.
They know that doing their own research is dangerous.
If you do your own research you might realise the official position is wrong.
If you know the official position is wrong then that puts you in a moral dilemma, if you challenge the orthodoxy you will be punished.
If you refuse to do your own research and just accept what authority tells you then your position is safe and you can earn lots of extra money jabbing people safe in the knowledge that ‘I was only following orders’ if you kill/injure people.
But maybe not your daughter?
I believe it’s simply a case that they don’t want to lose their job, or face the raucous wave of hostility from TPTB. I imagine they’ve been warned about it by their managers and wouldn’t dare step out of line.
There’s little point in thinking for yourself when the CDC, FDA, PHE and UKHSA do it for you.
And if you oppose The Narrative, you get threatening letters from the GMC, as Dr Kendrick has pointed out.
I think both you and CG have nailed it.
That is very true. I work with a few doctors who left because medicine is not what they thought it would be: they have to act unthinkingly following an alogorithm. They left to use their brains.
Guess who is left in medicine?
“First do no harm” to a Drs lifestyle, there’s always other patients,
It’s a combination of their education and desire. Much like the priesthood, medicine is really a vocation, or it used to be. Now, much like dentistry etc, this is a profession that attracts those who want money and status, in the manner thst accountancy begets money , if not status. The minority who are truly interested in medicine become specialists in their field or drift overseas where they feel they can make a genuine difference. GPS your first port of call, generally but obviously not exclusively , tends to be where the money/ status people remain.
I don’t think it’s got anything to do with faith. It’s agreed. Most people don’t know that GP’s are paid to administer vaccines, as far as I can remember something like £15 per shot.
I think most docs have been so gung-ho for this foisting of vaxes that they don’t want to think what they might have been a part of.
I watched Dr Campbell very early on in February 2020 and he was a very big advocate for using vitamin D, I based my own supplementation on the research he described. I became annoyed with him over his mask and vaccine advocacy. He is quite deferential to experts, he is essentially trusting and a little naive in in respect for the motives of these actors, often confused why the authorities wouldn’t, for example, recommend mass supplementation of vitamin D.
He has now eventually become red pilled. He’s been on a journey that has been fascinating to watch. I’m convinced he is genuinely sincere in his belief in doing good for people. I think he has only just realised that not everyone one he trusted and relied on also shared these intentions.
As Gillian Dymond has asked in TCW, and Debi Evans has asked for UK Column…Where is June Raine? Where is the forensic risk assessment for the “vaccines”? Why are the mounting death’s and myriad adverse reactions being OBVIOUSLY covered up?
As the fully awake are aware, this is mass murderer and the war in Ukraine is a very very convenient “look over here, don’t look over there” event!
yes that is where my anger is directed: the regulators. They are there to safeguard everyone’s safety. They have been criminal in their negligence, and complicit in the harm.
Years of hard labour would be insufficient punishment.
Facebook don’t like this article – they took it down within minutes of it being posted.
So they were already performing ‘doses’ of the fake vaccine in the early trial period. Normal vaccines don’t require doses and so-called boosters.
Normal vaccines would still be going through these trials right now and into the future before people gave their consent to be jabbed.
Unfortunately the clotshot is not a vaccine and it’s intended purpose is yet to be revealed.
Actually most vaccines do have a booster stage. Typhoid lasts 5 years without a repeat. Hepatitis A lasts for 10 years. All of the childhood vaccinations are multiple doses, the final tetanus being given aged 16.
You’re talking years (multiples), above talks about three of four jabs in a period of months. That is not remotely comparable.
The 6 in 1 is administered three times over a period of 8 weeks, at 8 weeks old, 12 weeks old and 16 weeks old. Meningitis B at 8 weeks old and 16 weeks old, with a third dose at 12 months old.
When they started jabbing they only mentioned 2, didn’t they?
Which means they always intended there to be more but were lying to us, or is yet more evidence that nothing remotely resembling proper testing took place.
If you have the time it would be good to have a reasoned opinion on some of the studies mentioned in this :-
http://vaccinepapers.org/
I must admit being “anti vax” since the early 90’s after being involved in Court cases re dangers of blood transfusions and having touched upon vaccine compensation damage claims.
Even back then it was impossible to obtain a nuanced view one way or the other and it would be useful to have an opposing view.
Once I have access to my home PC then I can more easily have a look at those papers.
Thank you.
Correct. none of those mentioned are respiratory viruses and they give sterilising immunity once the appropriate dosage is completed, that means the recipient gains immunity to the specific virus inoculated against, and does not transmit.
The mRNA experiments do not so they are not properly called ‘vaccines’.
Measles and rubella are technically upper respiratory tract infections.
Some did need short term multiples. If you look at my record sheet (attached), at the bottom of the list you will see that the Rabies one was essentially 3 in 4 weeks.
Historic list – occasionally used for some journeys.
It doesn’t matter, this won’t see the light of day in MSM, and that’s all the sheep feed on. I believe Covid was a trial and, if successful, the first stage of the Great Reset.
Stage 1 (Covid). Test the water:
Stage 2 (war):
Stage 3 (the [final] solution):
Obviously summarised, but this is what I believe and I think we’re in this for the long haul. It’ll be a slow collapse of moral over many years. I hope to God I’m completely wrong.
Chin up; just been sent this:
https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1577745/Pfizer-vaccine-side-effects-adverse-effects
Doesn’t go into detail but might just cause a flutter at the breakfast tables of Britain.
This sort of thing is key. Reporting the truth should erode trust in authority and MSM. I say ‘should’ because most people are just too far gone and are naturally submissive. But there’s always hope of a mass realisation I suppose.
Blimey that’s a (bit of a) breakthrough…
If you watched UK Column News yesterday, an MP Christopher Cope was talking about vaccine side effects compensation to pretty much an empty room; only , once he mentioned the vaccine two people walked out. this is a disgrace compared to the full house offered to the Ukrainian President.
Ukrainian Oligarch Puppet.
The target date is 2030.
Despite recent claims that the vaccines were only ever intended to reduce serious illness,
They’re not recent claims.
The pharma companies stated, right from the beginning of this horror show, that the ‘vaccines’ could only reduce serious symptoms.
This is why they were described as gene therapy…until the dictionary definition of ‘vaccine’ was officially changed.
There was a concerted effort by the MSM the other day to glamorise gene therapy.
Without even a hint of irony, they applaud claims that the Chinese have utilised gene therapy to supposedly extend life.
Over to Reuters…
Your are right, but few sheep access information sources other than MSM, so they would gear only what Govt and MSM said and kept repeating which was they stopped disease and stopped spread.
But even what the pharmas said was not true. The ‘trials’ carried out on the 16 to 65 age group of healthy people, only measured effectiveness to prevent infection turning to disease. Absolute Risk Reduction being 0,84%.
The trial was not designed to measure reduction of symptoms or safety. It specifically omitted the cohort, elderly with comorbidity, the very group in which this discriminating virus was active which could have provided information on its effect on severity.
The ‘less serious’ claims we now hear have as much supporting evidence as they did at the start, that is none. Those who now have realised the claims that the pseudo-vaccines would stop disease, stop spread were nit true are idiots if they believe the ‘less serious’ claims. Alas, the previous claims were falsifiable, the less serious claims are not falsifiable.
My view is they knew all along it was junk, but a good opportunity to try the experimental mRNA agent on millions/billions of subjects without the usual regulatory rigour and cost, or delay between development and market = £Loadsa.
The original claim was that the vaccine reduces the chance of you becoming infected which was shown by the original data. Their was no experiment done to demonstrate anything else.
They initially claimed that the shots were 95% effective at preventing people from catching covid, this was complete cobblers as the trials were manipulated to high heaven.
it’s now 300% effective at MAKING you catch covid over the jab dodgers.
The summary in John Campbell’s video, echos pretty much what we’ve been saying here for 2 years. The whole reaction to Covid was a continuous case of crying wolf, when in fact it was a slightly unruly dog. It will take years to rebuild any trust in public health officials.
John Campbell seems to be tripping up somewhat on certain issues. Good to see he is seeing how the regulators are completely captured and have outright lied to the people, however, given his profile and reach now, he needs to be a little more thorough.
His recent piece on Ivermectin in Florida over egged a study and one of the lead authors, a medical student, didn’t take too kindly to it.
https://youtu.be/szJGEIEudq0
Did the JCVI and the MHRA have sight of these documents before approving the gene therapy aka vaccine?
If they did, how could they possibly approve it for the general population? If they did not, why not? and how did they manage to approve the GT/Vax without sight of it?
A very good question. I have long had a sense that press releases from pfisser et al. saying how fabulous the vaxxes worked pre-empted the course that regulators followed. Politicians had f-d up big time by following China, found out that the lurgi had not left after March 2020 and (in their minds) had to impose another lockdown, how else otherwise to explain the need for the first one. The vaxx was to be the way out of that quagmire.
So the seeds were sown by the vaxx producers, were spread far and wide in the media, the politicians picked up the ball and ran with it and made it easy for the regulators to go ahead and authorise merely on the basis of what someone else said. There’s a video with that CDC idiot Walensky saying how excited they were when CNN informed them that the vaxx worked. Hey? Shouldn’t it have been the CDC informing CNN? Same here, the head of the OMT said the information about the vaxx was positive – adding the caveat that he had only seen the press releases. He also said at one point that the vaxx had been fully authorised by the FDA – in other words, he was saying the authorisation (which it wasn’t) of a foreign regulator was good enough.
The CDC did not okay the vaxx, that was the FDA, in Europe the EMA, but it was the CDC (and the Dutch OMT) that determined the strategy to be followed, including the vaxx. They should have examined the vaxx data themselves from top to bottom and if they didn’t have detailed info (which I very much suspect to be the case), should have refused to include the vaxx in their strategy as having insufficient scientific basis or should have insisted it be given to only specific vulnerable groups with a clear statement that it was experimental and much was still unknown.
The FDA would appear to be fully owned by the pharma industry and most foreign regulators appear to have taken their lead from the FDA. I suspect that very few of them did any real research of the data themselves and this simply went straight down the line: hospitals, doctors, nurses were all told by the highest authorities it was safe and effective, they felt no need to look further. There’s an article on Children’s Health Defense about how some physicians viewed the vaxx rollout, based on discussions in a private group. An eye opener in terms of how dumb, disinterested and irresponsible some of them sound.
You are applying logic where it does not belong. These EGT’s were always going to be rolled out because they were part of the initial strategy of the Reset.
The EGT’s have been brewed to a recipe such that the adverse reactions, the ongoing illnesses like myocarditis etc could be dismissed as coincidences. The EGT’s were brewed to specifically maim and kill in both the short and long term – the long term being 2030.
Remember: we were all protected by the Nuremberg code that made it the worst crime to force people to take an experimental treatment.
We were protected by the human rights act, by the freedom of information act, by common law, by many other acts.
And they were all ignored. It’s not just the science that failed, it is the law, the police, the government, the media, they all failed us.
Free, civil society and democracy emerge from institutions. When those institutions fail, so do our societies. That is exactly what has happened.
What’s worse is that the Government have discovered what their limits where, which pieces of legislation hampered their aims, and they are now pushing through the legislation to get around it. As if Covid was a trial run for whatever is coming next, once they have removed the legal safety nets.
We’ve been over this again and again and again. The Nuremberg code does not create crimes. It does not contain laws. No court enforces it.
It’s more what you’d call guidelines. Some nations codified some parts of it a laws, or as codes of professional conduct. That’s the entire extent of it.
This repeated assertion that it’s some Holy Writ that can be plead directly in a court of law is infantile and weak. Be better than that.
That’s why they were ignoring it I suppose!
Am I right in concluding that actually, the real criminals here are the approval bodies? It looks like Pfizer were at least somewhat honest about just how terrible these “vaccines” were, yet they received approval anyway.
I remember way back when the vaccines were first approved thinking, firstly, that at the age of 30 I did not need to be vaccinated against a cold, but also that the climate of hysteria was not one conducive to rational, clear-headed science or balanced decisions. The “vaccines” were always doomed to fail because nobody was thinking straight. There was a total desperation to approve something, anything, as our (or rather governments’) way out of the “pandemic.”
Pfizer could have submitted literally anything and it would have received approval, no matter what.
Not just the regulators. MHRA certainly failed in the UK, on their own terms, but so did NICE. Health Economics was thrown right out of the window by NICE, you genuinely have to wonder what they have been doing for two years. What do they do all day?
https://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c3581/rapid-responses
NICE allows its guideline development group members to have conflicts of interest so long as the conflicts of interest are 12 months old and are stated up front. So they could have received millions in funding, so long as it was 12 months ago. And then they can participate in writing guidelines on that very drug/drug company.
‘There was a total desperation to approve something, anything,’
Not so. They did all they could to discredit established, cheap repurposed treatments.
For those in power the new and expensive vaccines (along with the vax passports) were always the only game in town.
I think what was implied was that the desperation was to approve something, anything that would make money for Pharma. The rubbishing of alternative, approved early treatment choices would not have taken place when it did, had the vaxes not required ’emergency’ authorisation.
Remarkably – or perhaps not – the disgusting BBC continues to gaslight victims of vaccine injury: Covid vaccines not linked to deaths, major US study finds – BBC News
Seriously, how do these vermin sleep at night?
Hopefully with just a little bit of anxiety about the three doses of cytotoxin they queued up for and then bragged about on Facebook.
So how do the un-jabbed know to start dying en-masse within two weeks of their age group getting jabbed?
It’s must be true, the BBC have said it’s false.
You’re assuming they need to sleep at night?
Its weird because when you read the actual study, the data do not make the points reached in the conclusion or in the headlines. They show that there is a ton of raised risk when it comes to all kinds of side effects, and “most” being “mild” is frankly irrelevant. That some are not mild is the point – because some is not vanishingly rare.
If this is what the early pfizer data looked like and it still got approved as ‘safe and effective’, just imagine what the early Astra-Zeneca data must have looked like for it to be quietly shelved. Just wondering if we can get hold of the equivalent UK document for the AZ vax. Also – I would like to see some attack ads showing various UK politicians promoting the jab, inter-cut with stats from these documents and first hand accounts of adverse side effects. These shysters cannot be allowed to get away with this scam scot-free (Javid, Zahiwi, Johnson etc). We need to ruin their political careers – pour encourager les autres.
The astrazenica vaccine uses an adenovirus (type 5) as it’s delivery system. If old Clever clogs Sarah Gilbert would have even googled “adenovirus type 5 ” she would have seen that it’s been known to be linked with blood clotting since the 60’s!!!
She is a murderer.
so why did she get a damehood and a standing ovation on Wimbledon’s centre court (which greatly impressed my father but completely disgusted me)?
I really have little sympathy for these drones that lined up ignoring the warnings. They brought it on themselves.
We need these people on our side.
We need them to wake up and realise they have been conned by the government.
Best to frame it that way rather than to be critical.
Agreed.
Every day new horrors expose the real damage done by the mass ’emergency’ vaccination campaign – and yet every day more of our children are vaccinated by this Government and its Health Minister Javid. regardless of any consequences and with the nodding consent of all out MPs.
This is irresponsibility by Government Ministers regarding the health of children on a scale never before experienced in this country
The conclusions we must draw surely get more frightening by the hour.
We now have discoveries of Bio labs in Ukraine funded by the US and sponsored by Fauci- accused of manipulating the virus itself and the vaccine roll out in the US – so where does it all lead?
On present evidence it seems to be: ‘The Heart of Darkness’?
Meanwhile I’m currently in a room with 25 15-16 year olds who have taken two doses of this poisonous bullshit because idiot grown-ups told them it was safe and the right thing to do. Even the ones who privately expressed scepticism to me ultimately ended up taking it. I feel very, very angry right now.
…
The bottom line in any and all discussions about “vaccines” and in particular Corona vaccines is that they are simply NOT required.
I took the decision before these killer brews arrived on the scene that they could not possibly be safe and I was correct. What many people are forgetting is that the IFR for C1984 is less than 0.5% and the vast majority of those who die are suffering with other illnesses.
I decided I was prepared to take the risk of catching this illness and as I said to my family, if it kills me, so be it. I wasn’t exactly taking a big risk was I? As it happened I caught some bug and it laid me low for a fortnight but I got over it. I didn’t ask for medical assistance, not that any existed.
After the last two years does anybody believe Bozo gives a FCUK about the lives of anybody on this planet? So “vaccines” are definitely NOT being developed to save lives.
Quite simply:
The world does NOT need “vaccines.”
Talking crap about effectiveness and efficiency is a smokescreen covering nefarious intent.
Let’s change the message:
The world does not need “vaccines.”
When the vax producers insist on blanket indemnit and ask for a 75-year halt on data release, you know that ‘safe’ isn’t what they felt obliged to aim at.
0.15% fatality, almost all folks on the way out.
Extraordinarily, the govt published the figures for those actually killed BY Covid
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021
<7K from Feb 2020 to Dec 2021. Avg c 10 per diem. Ten.
Fatality rate in the Pfizer docs, of ADRs reported
3% – and that’s if ADRs were not multiply reported for a single person, which they would have been.
https://www.qwant.com/?q=5.3.6+CUMULATIVE+ANALYSIS+OF+POST-AUTHORIZATION+ADVERSE+EVENT+REPORTS+OF+PF-07302048+%28BNT162B2%29&client=brz-brave&t=web
Worth looking at the nine pages at the end, where various adverse reactions are recorded. Had they done them line by line, it would have been many many pages…
Sample of ONE page…
APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST 1p36 deletion syndrome;2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria;5’nucleotidase increased;Acoustic neuritis;Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency;Acquired epidermolysis bullosa;Acquired epileptic aphasia;Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus;Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis;Acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures;Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis;Acute flaccid myelitis;Acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis;Acute haemorrhagic oedema of infancy;Acute kidney injury;Acute macular outer retinopathy;Acute motor axonal neuropathy;Acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy;Acute myocardial infarction;Acute respiratory distress syndrome;Acute respiratory failure;Addison’s disease;Administration site thrombosis;Administration site vasculitis;Adrenal thrombosis;Adverse event following immunisation;Ageusia;Agranulocytosis;Air embolism;Alanine aminotransferase abnormal;Alanine aminotransferase increased;Alcoholic seizure;Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis;Allergic oedema;Alloimmune hepatitis;Alopecia areata;Alpers disease;Alveolar proteinosis;Ammonia abnormal;Ammonia increased;Amniotic cavity infection;Amygdalohippocampectomy;Amyloid arthropathy;Amyloidosis;Amyloidosis senile;Anaphylactic reaction;Anaphylactic shock;Anaphylactic transfusion reaction;Anaphylactoid reaction;Anaphylactoid shock;Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy;Angioedema;Angiopathic neuropathy;Ankylosing spondylitis;Anosmia;Antiacetylcholine receptor antibody positive;Anti-actin antibody positive;Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody positive;Anti-basal ganglia antibody positive;Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive;Anti-epithelial antibody positive;Anti-erythrocyte antibody positive;Anti-exosome complex antibody positive;AntiGAD antibody negative;Anti-GAD antibody positive;Anti-ganglioside antibody positive;Antigliadin antibody positive;Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody positive;Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease;Anti-glycyl-tRNA synthetase antibody positive;Anti-HLA antibody test positive;Anti-IA2 antibody positive;Anti-insulin antibody increased;Anti-insulin antibody positive;Anti-insulin receptor antibody increased;Antiinsulin receptor antibody positive;Anti-interferon antibody negative;Anti-interferon antibody positive;Anti-islet cell antibody positive;Antimitochondrial antibody positive;Anti-muscle specific kinase antibody positive;Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies positive;Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein associated polyneuropathy;Antimyocardial antibody positive;Anti-neuronal antibody positive;Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody increased;Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive;Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive vasculitis;Anti-NMDA antibody positive;Antinuclear antibody increased;Antinuclear antibody positive;Antiphospholipid antibodies positive;Antiphospholipid syndrome;Anti-platelet antibody positive;Anti-prothrombin antibody positive;Antiribosomal P antibody positive;Anti-RNA polymerase III antibody positive;Anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody test positive;Anti-sperm antibody positive;Anti-SRP antibody positive;Antisynthetase syndrome;Anti-thyroid antibody positive;Anti-transglutaminase antibody increased;Anti-VGCC antibody positive;AntiVGKC antibody positive;Anti-vimentin antibody positive;Antiviral prophylaxis;Antiviral treatment;Anti-zinc transporter 8 antibody positive;Aortic embolus;Aortic thrombosis;Aortitis;Aplasia pure red cell;Aplastic anaemia;Application site thrombosis;Application site vasculitis;Arrhythmia;Arterial bypass occlusion;Arterial bypass thrombosis;Arterial thrombosis;Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis;Arteriovenous graft site stenosis;Arteriovenous graft thrombosis;Arteritis;Arteritis
indeed – that is just the conditions beginning with A
it was the rapid development that did it for me – truncating what should be a 10 year process into something less than 8 months didn’t smack of “safety” to me
Dr. Ben Tapper, a small town chiropractor who is black labeled as a member of the “Disinformation Dozen” during the COVID-19 pandemic, rallies together healthcare professionals across America to share an alternate view point of the global narrative.
https://rumble.com/vr9myk-the-time-is-now.html
This doctor’s alarming observations are sufficient to halt the COVID vaccines in the US
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/this-doctors-alarming-observations
So long as the Billionaire Globalists the Corporates and their stooges control the narrative the media and the narrative, the vaccinations will continue until their task is done!
This world coup has been twenty years in the planning!
Presumably the British authorities had access to all this as well.
Boris and his chums are responsible for killing and maiming millions of people..
That is not even up for debate.
The amount of criminal incompetence (at best) is staggering. The people that have approved these substances absolutely belong in jail.
” In Jail ” ……until the appointed day.
I’ve started greasing the axles on the tumbrel. It’s dirty work, but we want it running smoothly.
Most Doctors all over the world honour this principle –
First do no harm.
[To your bank balance and career prospects].
Asking awkward questions of authority is usually damaging to both, so most just keep their heads down and do as they are told.
Well Clarice, we’ll keep the Chianti, but I’m going to have to change the menu.
– H
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0brtz13
Zeitgeist 
Absolutely priceless unintentional satire that looks like something I’ve made up in a dark moment. Top Covid shill Kate Garraway presents witless peasants with computer generated virtual reality representations of the insides of their own diseased bodies on BBC2.
BEcause they’re fat fecks who used too much coke like Kate’s husband?
The plebs don’t ‘get satire’ it’s not literal enough and it’s probably just racist anti-vaxxist, anti-maskist and sexist anyway.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/yes-the-vaccines-were-supposed-to
yes, the vaccines were supposed to stop covid spread. yes, the “experts” told us so.
el gato malo
Dec 30, 2021
320
the revisionist history around vaccines is getting pretty extreme. let’s be VERY clear:
(of course, they then changed the definition of “vaccine” as well to make this look like less of a failure)
despite the massive PR offensive underway to deny this, these are the facts.
Justin Hart
this is what they sold us.
and we have the receipts.
i’m going to compile them here so people have them. if you have more, please drop links in the comments. this is information that needs to be preserved instead of whitewashed out of existence.
let’s start with this compilation from always on point gatopal™ and rational ground stalwart justin hart who in his inimitable way, once more skewers the fauci follies from CNBC yesterday.
watch the video. it’s a doozie.
@justin_hart
Dr. Fauci on CNBC
Host: “I wonder whether you felt there had been a communication error…”
Fauci: “Well I think it was the question of what people interpreted…”
December 29th 2021
908 Retweets2,168 Likes
this new tale of “communication errors” is a complete fabrication.
tony could not have been more clear. in fact, this whole “vaccinated people become dead ends for the virus and cannot spread it” talking point was his invention. they are his words.
Vaccines then are the means to justify the”Dead”ends .
Fauci ‘hiding his intentions in plain sight as usual”?
Thanks for your efforts with this important project. Your clip files are going to be massive.
Hey phantom downticker, don’t downtick this comment if you don’t think it doesn’t mean that that wouldn’t make you look foolish.
Correct.
S/he just couldn’t help him/herself.
Almost silence on this subject in the MSM. It’s now all Ukraine/Russia.
The msm reminds me of John Cleese in Fawlty Towers …
“Listen. Don’t mention the
warvaccine. I mentioned it once but I think I got away with it. “It is the next page of their programme! Wait for “wartime economy and rationing imposed on the , UK population to “help the Ukraine” ( The British will buy just anything their Rotten Media sells )
I’m going to try to post excerpts from this on my own Facebook site as well as several Facebook private groups (started by “skeptics” of the authorized narrative).
I’m already on Double Secret Probation at Facebook so I don’t know how many people will see these posts or if this might be the post that gets me permanently banned.
If it does, I would simply point out in my own defense that I am posting excerpts from documents produced by Pfizer. Is Pfizer’s own “science” also “misinformation” and thus censorable?
I see Ian Collins had some retired (retard) immunologist/virologist on this afternoon who was spouting the crap the government were 2 years ago – stops you getting ill, protects others around you, safe and effective etc etc. Not once was he challenged by Collins who has been a massive disappointment over Covid. Plus, he loves the sound of his own voice.
For once you appear to have got it wrong. The purpose as stated is to prevent Covid-19 developing as a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. That is indeed what it does. You have fallen into the usual trap, which I have been going on about for years, of conflating the two and thus causing confusion.
Covid-19 is the severe cytokine storm reaction to infection, not simply infection with the virus. Covid-19 is identical to the cytokine storm syndrome seen from other triggers. Vaccination cannot stop you acquiring the virus but it may stop you getting very sick.
Lastly I fail to understand why there is an obsession with the vaccine remaining where it is injected. This is medical nonsense. Any intramuscular injection will disperse in the bloodstream.
“For once you appear to have got it wrong. The purpose as stated is to prevent Covid-19 developing as a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. “
Except it doesn’t. Triple jabbed getting far more infections that the unjabbed. And the more jabs the more infections.
Sorry.
You cannot stop a respiratory virus with medicine. You may ease symptoms, but you cannot stop them with vaccines – history shows that. However, hubris means that millions will be damaged by these experimental shots.
You read the Pfizer doc on the clinical trials?
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
Appalling levels of ADRs and fatalities. Number of vulnerable groups NOT included in testing – the auto immune (and given the clear hit the jabs have on such, no wonder Pfizer didn’t do that), kids, pregnant women. And these was not a proper control study.
I think the nonsense about it staying in the arm comes from the CDC or Pfizer or someone…they were all like “oh we don’t need biodistribution studies because vaccines stay at the injection site”
which ignores the fact that these are (1) novel agents so you cannot extrapolate their PK and distribution characteristics from completely different agents, no matter if you call them “vaccines” and (2) nobody knows where vaccines act anyway, as nobody does biodistribution studies on them either, it turns out….because, reasons? vaccines are magic? god only knows.
For whatever reason, it seems like regulatory oversight of vaccines is minimal and any preclinical work seems to be almost voluntary.
Well, I’m glad I said no, just over a year ago. For the record, I haven’t had any more communication about it from the local surgery, after a brief acknowledgement. There was a bit of printed junk mail from elsewhere, but nothing at all since last Summer.
He he. I’ve been having a running battle with our medical practice for months on the matter of masks and the death shots
I wrote saying that were I to need an appointment, I would not wear a mask.
Doc says – “I have to protect my staff, a third of them are off sick”
Me – Maybe because the masks don’t work?”
Doc – I read a paper that….
Me – I’ll mail you the paper that lists 150 studies that say they don’t.
Silence…
An immediate halt to these experimental biologicals is the only acceptable response. This may just happen. Lawsuits, there will be many.
Dr. John Campbell, welcome to the jungle. It took you a while, but you got there.
MHRA refusing to acknowledge ANY damage.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/the-deafening-silence-of-dame-june-raine/
Welcome aboard, Dr John Campbell. Now you need to start looking into the activities of The WEF, Gates, Soros and Fauci.
I’m glad I declined when I did.
But what about Astra Zeneca? Will they be subject to the same disclosure requirements? Or is that a whole nother ball game?
The Dr John Campbell video should come with a health warning – what you’re watching is somebody going through a mental breakdown, somebody realising that they’ve been lied to.
This is just as Dr Nicola Ridgway predicted back in 2020.
Well whaddaya know? Who would have thought that it was necessary to trial/test new pharmaceuticals for longer than 3 months prior to injection into the arms of the world, often under mandate. “It’s not an experimental vaccine”. As we say here in NZ “Yeah Right”.