News Round-Up

A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the u2018climate emergencyu2019, public health u2018crisesu2019 and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.

5 min read

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
4 months ago

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15834297/Bolt-CEO-fires-entire-HR-team-created-problems.html

This article should be emailed to everyone drawing a salary in the Civil Service. Not difficult is it?

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
4 months ago

A retrial jury has been discharged at Liverpool Crown Court after failing to reach verdicts in the case of two brothers accused of assaulting a police officer at Manchester Airport, according to the Mail.’

These scumbags seriously assaulted three police officers. Their guilt is not open for discussion.

More needless waste of taxpayers money.

Dinger64
Dinger64
4 months ago

“Leave donors Lord Cruddas and Peter Hargreaves have pledged to bankroll a fresh campaign to fight any attempt by Labour to drag Britain back into the EU”

“A fresh campaign” campaign? f@uk campaign..what about legal action in the high Court for trying to undermine a legally recognised democratic vote by the people?

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
4 months ago
GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
4 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Headlines used to be more imaginative. “CEO Bolts for the exit of divisive HR culture”

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
4 months ago
AbsolutelyNot
AbsolutelyNot
4 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

We already know that Muslims have a tribal mentality, even the moderates covering and protecting their own, so I have a strong feeling that this is the case with this jury as well. And we’re going to see more and more such examples, as they infiltrate the police, justice system, politics, etc.

Ironically, without a jury a (non Muslim) judge would have given a verdict within the first day.

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
4 months ago

Watering down sanctions on Russian oil is ‘insane’

Having sanctions to try and compel Russia to cave to our demands, while at the same time harming the UK materially is the ‘insane bit’. Who is laughing and who is suffering.?

Monro
Monro
4 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

You’re okay with a country invading another country (twice) to whom we have given security assurances and we don’t even place sanctions on them?

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
4 months ago
Reply to  Monro

That’s not what I said, Monro. The point of sanctions is that you cause loss or distress to the country that you are sanctioning in order to pressure them to change their behaviour. Placing sanctions, in effect, on yourself, when said sanctions cause no pressure on Russia is stupid, as Germany did with Russian gas. Russia is still exporting all its oil through proxies, and making as much or more money from the exports than they did without sanctions. THAT is insane.

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
4 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

And it has changed their behaviour. They have found alternative buyers and are establishing different trading regimes that don’t involve dollars.

Angelcake
Angelcake
4 months ago
Reply to  Monro

We need to get real. The UKs ability to impact Russia is minimal whilst we are shooting ourselves in the foot by refusing to use cheap Russian oil. If the net zero agenda hadn’t been a thing we might have been able to virtue signal without hopping about on one leg.

Monro
Monro
4 months ago
Reply to  Monro

This is the reality:

‘We conclude that the import embargo has likely been the most consequential sanction, reducing Russian oil income through a buyer’s discount and by increasing transport costs. Furthermore, the price cap has not primarily functioned as a binding price cap, but as a partial transport embargo, reinforcing the import embargo’s effects.’

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002460

The major factor affecting oil prices has very little to do with sanctions on Russia (other sources, particularly Norway’s North Sea oilfields are more important to us, hence Putin’s interest in our undersea infrastructure) and a great deal to do with the ‘not our war’ conflict with Iran.

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
4 months ago
Reply to  Monro

We imposed sanctions in December 2022. Have you noticed any difference in Russia’s position re. Ukraine.? No.? Then its a total waste of time and we should stop doing it. Our ‘leverage’ is like a flea on a dogs arse.

Monro
Monro
4 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Or not really:

‘The more important shift is conceptual. Until this spring, war and sanctions were officially treated as temporary shocks that would eventually pass. The new forecast moves them into the baseline.
This is the economy Russia now has: chronically slower than the global average, chronically short of cash for anything other than the army and the state, increasingly dependent on China, technologically lagging, and steadily losing the people most likely to do something about it.’ 20 May 2026

https://cepa.org/article/russia-settles-for-stagnation/

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
4 months ago
Reply to  Monro

Well I am sure we get an unbiased view from The Center for European Policy Analysis.

Monro
Monro
4 months ago
Reply to  Monro

‘Overall, we rate The Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) Right-Center Biased based on editorial positions and political news reporting that slightly favors the Right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.’

Media bias/fact check, Oct 2025

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
4 months ago
Reply to  Monro

Is one obscure organisation the sole arbiter of reality?

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
4 months ago
Reply to  Monro

If only it was so simple.

Monro
Monro
4 months ago
Reply to  Monro

‘State finances thus face growing strains. War-fuelled high prices of capital, labour and goods, as well as rising taxes, have begun to depress the civilian sectors. But this is not releasing resources for military production, resulting in a dual economy of overheated military output and civilian stagnation.’

https://www.iiss.org/research-paper/2026/05/the-coming-crisis-in-russias-political-economy/

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
4 months ago

Supermarkets may be asked to freeze prices of milk, eggs and bread

When Rachael did her Economics Degree, did she actually read any books on Economics..?

AbsolutelyNot
AbsolutelyNot
4 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

I am absolutely convinced that if members of the cabinet (experienced or otherwise) would ask AI before taking any decision (what could be the consequences? Or, even better: has it worked somewhere else?), we would be in a much better place right now.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
4 months ago
Reply to  AbsolutelyNot

Our cabinet members are not bright enough to have come up with this idea.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
4 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

I don’t think socialists care about economics, other than how to try and spin it in a way that means they get to tell other people what to do.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
4 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Supermarkets might be happy to sell milk, eggs and bread at a loss to keep customers and slightly increase the price of lots of other goods, so that no one really notices it, to compensate so that some people think they’re saving money when their overall food bill stays pretty much the same.

JXB
JXB
4 months ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

That’s standard practice in many businesses. The net profit on total revenue is considered not just per sku. Companies therefore have loss-leaders to get people into the store.

Already supermarkets are doing “price match” with Lidl and Aldi on basic items, so they are already selling some items at a loss.

Rachael won’t know this of course.

JXB
JXB
4 months ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Rachael from accounts has announced she is playing her part by removing tariffs from numerous food items, and now demands supermarkets play their part.

Er, Rache…. why are there tariffs on food items in the first place? Tariffs are a tax aren’t they, an import tax? Why do you think you are doing us a favour by removing taxes from our food which shouldn’t be there in the first place?

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.