News Round-Up

A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ‘climate emergency’, public health ‘crises’ and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.

8 min read

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

42 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago

It is reported the IMF has drawn attention to the Laffer Curve. Its solutions include cutting waste in the NHS and removing the protection for OAP. If it was an objective organisation it would have mentioed the benefits paid to non-citizens as the first thing to cut.

If it was truly a servant of democratic nations it would not give advice on cuts to spending at all other than they must be done.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
3 months ago

Once Starmer’s gone someone will need to produce songs about his successor that are as good as these.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9heZvDseRPE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K9rwr6YO3c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psjWBq5D6oQ

soundofreason
soundofreason
3 months ago

HS2 failings blamed on high-speed focus and political pressure  Says Aunty Beeb

The HS2 rail line failed due in part to a focus on achieving the highest possible speeds and political pressure, a review is expected to find.

The scheme has been undergoing a “reset”, and in March Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander asked HS2 bosses to look at lowering top speeds to save money.

Remind me what the initials HS stand for?

If it is no longer HS then there’s no great advantage for it to be non-stop between London and Birmingham. It becomes just an ordinary railway line. Instead of HS2 it’s YARL – Yet Another Railway Line.

It’s too late to scrap it completely as too much irreversible damage has been done. Open it to commercial bids to build stations along the way so that some people at least can get some benefit from it – other than the grifters currently involved in ‘managing’ the building of it.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
3 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

HS = Horse Shit

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

HS2 failings are based on “everybody lied”.

Pretty much across the board… as usual, they really need to look at what money has gone where.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

The economic advantage – supposed – is it would save business people travel time thereby reducing time spent away from their workplaces – and “time is money”.

But this assessment was based on old data before mobile phones, tablet/laptop computers, Internet and wi-fi on trains.

The train carriage now becomes the work place, and for some it means they get more done away from the distractions of the office. I suppose we could call it “Work from train”.

The supposed economic benefit is no longer there, since some might welcome longer journey times.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

The problem with a high speed railway on the island of Great Britain is… it is a small island, and cities/towns are not far apart. Travel distances between stops is short, so it is only possible for a high speed trainset to reach and cruise at maximum speed for very short periods before having to brake… or end up in Denmark.

Other Countries with HS trains – France, Germany, Spain, China are much bigger territories with long distances between stopping points.

This was evident from the start.

The success of InterCity 125 trainsets was not their high speed of 125mph – average speed was 90mph to 100mph – but they could accelerate and brake much quicker between, so they could travel longer at cruising speed, thereby reducing journey times.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago

Because it is so unusual I want to report that I did not have to login on my iPhone this morning. However that gives me the opportunity to report another fault which I have noticed over recent days/couple of weeks.

When posting a comment the text box use to disappear. Now it remains and there is no indication the slow responding DS system has taken it. So, I press “Submit” again. Whereupon it tells me I cannot post the same comment twice. The text box remains.

Why has DS employed careless programmers and implemented untested changes.

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Have you tried emailing the team at; [email protected]? They’ve always got back to me in a timely manner with any inquiries or probs I was experiencing.🤞

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Unless your browser clears its web activity history when shut down, or if the browser was not shut down, you will remain logged in.

Text box remaining – sounds like a communication problem between your iPhone and the website.

Dinger64
Dinger64
3 months ago

“How batteries can help Britain beat a £300 surge in energy bills”

Jonathan Leake your a fool!

Completely covering the UK’s total electricity usage strictly with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) is technically unfeasible. Batteries are designed for short-term balancing, not multi-day, seasonal backup. Building enough capacity for even a single day’s demand would be prohibitively expensive, costing between £152 billion and £360 billion.

Thats a mere £131,400,000,000,000 (131.4 TRILLION) for the whole year!

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
3 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

I’ve tried to do a few back of the fag packet calculations for the real cost of achieving net zero including battery storage which would be by far the biggest single cost. There’s so many assumptions such as how much nuclear power we’d have, how much solar and wind capacity we’d have and how often it could meet demand, the cost of batteries especially the raw materials such as lithium etc. Based on the cost and storage capacity of what was the world’s largest battery when it was installed in S Australia I came up with figures between 3 and 5 trillion pounds for battery storage. The batteries would probably last 8-10 years, depending on how often they were charged and discharged then need replacing. Since the battery in S Australia was installed the price of lithium has sky rocketed so £5trillion would now be the lowest possible figure.

If a lot of countries try to achieve net zero the cost of raw materials will be astronomical. A couple of people far more knowledgeable than myself have tried to calculate how long it would take to mine enough raw materials, at current rates of production, for the whole world to… Read more »

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

There would be no nuclear. Nuclear cannot be used intermittently to back up intermittent wind/solar, battery output.

Reactors are designed for constant high output, with long, slow cooling periods if maintenance or change of fuel rods is needed. Frequent cooling down then beating up causes damage to the core which can include fuel rods buckling and getting stuck, but in any case will shorten the reactor life considerably – an expensive outcome.

Wind, solar, batteries cannot provide frequency inertia. There can be no fossil fuel free electricity generation, because at least 60% of spinning generation would be required at all times to guarantee a frequency stable grid to avoid black-outs from which if would take days/weeks to recover and restore the grid.

Net Zero is the fantasy of those who do not understand physics or economics.

Purpleone
Purpleone
3 months ago
Reply to  JXB

Like mad Ed Milliband…

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  Dinger64

The test:

Compared to what?

At what cost?

Based on what evidence?

And – 85% of our « energy » is from fossil fuels, batteries can play no part in that.

Conflating energy and electricity is either ignorance or duplicity.

The whole problem with Net Zeroids – Socialists – is they fail to see electricity as a demand service in a market system, supplied by enterprises who require a return (profit… Boo! Hiss!) on their considerable capital investment. So they only look at marginal prices. They have no concept of “Cost plus one”. The first new-model car off the production line costs £14billion, the next one costs £10 000 and that £14 billion has to be amortised over the production run.

No intermittent business can be profitable – or would even attract investment in the first place. So the only way to get people to invest in and run these “businesses” is by promising vast subsidies and guaranteed above market prices for their output.

And that goes onto bills. The more of these inherently non-profitable subsidy harvesters there are, the more will go on to the bills.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
3 months ago

Imo all the talk about what Liebour leadership candidates want to do regarding the EU is irrelevant. Streeting says he wants Britain to rejoin the EU, so what I want a lot of things.

Surely the next PM wouldn’t dare try to rejoin the EU or even hold a referendum as it wasn’t in Liebour’s manifesto and they have no mandate to do so. If they did rejoin Farage could include it in Reforms manifesto that we’d leave within a week of him becoming PM.

In some ways in-out could be a good thing. Farage could do what the Tories should of done and leave then negotiate, why might get a better deal but it’s hard see how we could end up with a worse one than we’ve currently got.

Obviously the next PM will be very pro EU and drag us back in bit by bit, negotiation by negotiation but in this respect can they be any worse than Starmer?

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

In the last paragraph I think you meant voluntary surrender by voluntary surrender. There is no meaningful negotiation to be had with the EU and there is nothing we want from them.

Dinger64
Dinger64
3 months ago

I still hope, true to his nature, that spiteful Starmer will announce a general election to take all his turncoats with him!

Grahamb
Grahamb
3 months ago

I would want to know who approved the scale of what happened and what the justification was for it. An apology is not enough.
Met Police apologises to Graham Linehan over Heathrow arrest” – The Met Police has apologised to Father Ted creator Graham Linehan for arresting him at Heathrow over gender-critical social media posts, says the Telegraph

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
3 months ago

How can you simultaneously be neck and neck and a runaway favourite?

CircusSpot
CircusSpot
3 months ago

😂 and through the middle comes the winner, the battle hardened nag 2TK!
I hope not, but am rather sceptical about the ‘fight’ between Streeting and Burnham concerning the EU.

soundofreason
soundofreason
3 months ago

Because one is already scheduled for the dog meat factory.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago

The French nursery staff sexually abusing children and staying on

This, of course, is what happens when you put liberal progressives in charge of anything, they’re complicit in the evils perpetrated on others, particularly children.

No wonder they’re not intending to have any investigation into the rape gangs, they know damn well what’s going on, because they’re involved, and they’re worried what will be seen when the stone is kicked over.

Truly astonishing how many cleave themselves to the parties that literally condone this behaviour…

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

The ruling classes across europe seem all to be disgustingly pervert adjacent.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago

Trans Indian MSP wants Scots to pay reparations to Palestine

Don’t care… they voted him in. As ye sow, and all that…

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

This guy is such a fraud on two counts, in my opinion. I don’t for one minute think he actually gave a flying fig about the ‘Palestinians’ while he lived in India. Maybe if anyone can find some evidence of him raising awareness or any type of activism in this regard it’ll refute my theory. Same goes for his alleged trans identity. He’s grown his hair long but I notice he’s not gone the whole hog and worn make-up or women’s clothes. That’ll be because his mam and dad are watching from India and he knows they’ll disown him if he carries on like that. Again, proof is needed that he lived as a ‘trans’ identified man prior to moving to the UK.
I think this joker has just jumped aboard the relevant bandwagons in order to further his self-serving interests because he’s got his own personal agenda. And what better vehicle than the Green Party Clown Show by which to achieve his desired objectives.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I live in Scotland and didn’t vote the Greens into a position where they could form a coalition so I care if reparations are paid and it leads to even worse public services than I currently have to put up with.

soundofreason
soundofreason
3 months ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

I feel sorry for you but if a voting majority of your countrymen want a particular form of government then so be it. I’m sure if you want to live like the English you’d be welcome.

As far as scenery goes, if you live in the Highlands I don’t think England has anything to match. But we’ve certainly got some good places.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

A trans indian – so no indian but blacks his face and wears a turban?

How strange.

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

As long as it’s with their money nit English money.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago

Whitehall could sabotage Farage with strikes if he wins election

Told you… honestly, I’m surprised we’ve not yet heard of this in the locals that Reform took last week.

Can’t they simply be sacked? The first few thousand or so to be dismissed will reduce the size of our bloated government machine and, perhaps, incentivise the rest?

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

I may need to go that way but probably not easy – at least some will need replacing, and there will be legal cases that may find in favour of the employees. It may be necessary for a future Reform government to change employment laws.

Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

I believe if you are paid by the public purse then a refusal to work should lead to instant dismissal. You sign the contract or you don’t. Existing public service employees are given three months to accept that they’re employed by the people, not the state, and sign a new contract or find another job. It would be better to pay these idiots off if need be then have them suck at the teat of hard working people forever.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

That was exactly my reaction, I suspect 80% of them add no value to we the people.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Obviously the majority of judges will try and sabotage Farage, especially on immigration/deporting people who should never of been allowed to stay in the UK after arriving on a small boat or their work/study visa expiring. This will be the case even when we leave the ECHR.

Farage will have to tell the courts in no uncertain terms that Parliament makes the laws and if they don’t like them they can go swivel. If the government has to ignore High/Supreme court rulings on who can stay in the UK so be it. Other than having a hissy fit and running crying to the left wing media what can the courts do about it?

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

The law will have to be changed. We must leave ECHR, abolish the equalities act and the HRA. Also the Blair laws which give civil servants the right to decide which Ministerial instructions they will follow.

Without that it is unlikely any tax payer funded staff would carry out detention and deportation or any other of Reform’s policies.

It may be Reform has to arrive in government with legislation already drafted in case Parliamentary Draftsmen refuse to do their job.

It used to be said that nations could only vote for communists once because thereafter political rights would cease to exist. Britain seems to have voted left too often. Blairite abuse of our constitution and freedom became embedded during the Tory years and now Starmer is trying to seal off any chance of our reverting to parliamentary democracy.

soundofreason
soundofreason
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

[Abolish] Also the Blair laws which give civil servants the right to decide which Ministerial instructions they will follow.

^ This above all.

ECHR is construed differently by different countries. The way the UK follows it is even more nuts than the convention itself. We don’t really have to leave it – just interpret it to our own advantage like most other countries which claim to follow it.

If a civil ‘servant’ won’t follow a Minister’s direction as a matter of conscience then they need to find a job which their conscience will allow them to do.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

It appears foreign judges are more patriotic about ECHR interpretation than British ones. We can’t now change our courts without changing the law and Les ing ECHR.

We all remember how the British civil service gold plated EU rules whereas others, such as France, just ignored them when they felt like it.

soundofreason
soundofreason
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Good points.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Judges need to be accountable to parliament who can give them a severe blocking, first and final warning e.g. if they give an illegal immigrant 75 hours community service for a crime that could receive 2 years in prison. If they do something similar again sack them. Once we get illegal immigration under control they’ll be a lot less work for judges hearing endless appeals so we can manage without hundreds of the worst ones

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

There’s so much Reform need to do they have to hit the ground running. It’ll have to be a case of “we all know Liebour and the Tories have fucked up this country and it’ll take you a long time to sort the mess out. Don’t waste your time keep saying it’s all their fault get on and do what needs to be done”.

soundofreason
soundofreason
3 months ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

Yes, they need to have plans ready. A whole list of bits of secondary legislation and quangos already scheduled for the chop and a list of primary legislation bills ready to go. Devolution may mean that they can only do some of these things in England – but they should not hold back.

If it’s a waste of rations then cut it, whatever it is.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.