Baroness Casey’s rapid audit into the rape-gangs scandal has been published, with the Government accepting her recommendation to hold a national inquiry into the scandal in a humiliating U-turn. Casey has called for ethnicity to be recorded for every offender, and in the audit she completely demolishes apologists’ frequent claims that this is not a problem particularly related to Pakistani communities. Indeed, there is an entire section on “denial”, as she slates how “the system has consistently failed to fully acknowledge” the central role of ethnicity in this travesty. Children, meanwhile, were seen by those who should have protected them as collaborators in their own abuse, rather than victims. “If we’d got this right years ago,” she says, “then I doubt we’d be in this place now.”
While it is shocking and damning to hear such things stated so bluntly, much of Casey’s findings are things we already knew. Yet there is one part of the report which is so disturbing that it threatens to plunge the country into chaos. After it was leaked (it has been in the hands of the Government since last week) it had already prompted nervousness inside Downing Street about civil unrest.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Civil war is coming. And it won’t be very ‘civil’
”Despite being only 4% of Rotherham’s population, Pakistanis commit 62% of child gang rapes.
That is a 1,550% overrepresentation.”
”Pie charts from operation Stovewood showing ethnicity of suspects (first photo) and convicted suspects (second photo) in Rotherham, showing a high portion of Pakistani suspects and convicts.”
https://x.com/vpopulimedia/status/1934702291140977024
So Two-Tier and his appalling Government is importing and forcing taxpayers to fund Muslim gang-rapists.
No wonder he’s hiding in Canada.
The report was delivered over 10 days ago but coincidentally it was released whilst Sir Scumbag was in Canada heroically saving it from Donald Trump.
Dominic Cummings has been highlighting the risk that the proposed national inquiry won’t be national. Rather, it will be the same local inquiries but with an overarching, coordinating body sat above the local groups.
This structure, he contends, keep the whole thing local with no investigation of central government of what they knew, when they knew it, & how they shut it down.
Still plenty of long grass about.
I contend that one of the reasons for ignoring the issue was the ethnic block vote potential, as demonstrated by the Pro-Gaza MP elections. A quick search of the 179pp report brings up not a single reference to vote/ing, postal votes/ing, harvest/ing of votes, so a key issue will not be addressed in the forthcoming examination, postal vote fraud.
This video illustrates the issue perfectly (along with lots more). FF to 7:30 for the specifics..Andrew Gold on X: “YouTube today banned my @recusant_raja interview about the grooming gangs. You guys gave me an idea: I have decided to post it here on X. Thank you @elonmusk. I’ve never encountered so much pressure to suppress a video so please like and share far and wide. And follow my page https://t.co/2qFpIoETcE” / X
And postal vote fraud is endemic amongst the islam hordes.
What will the recording of the ethnicity of future convicted perpetrators be recorded as? ‘Asian’? As if Koreans or Japanese might be involved. There’s plenty of scope to obfuscate there, and the let the grass grow long over this matter.
The primary purpose of the system of diversity that manages the multiculturalism is to protect communities and marginalised groups. The white girls are the collateral damage of the administration of this system.
The Uniparty’s desperate attempts to cover up this crime, and/or kick it into the long grass, makes me wonder if it isn’t just the illegal immigrant aspect of it that has been motivating them……
it’s not as if Westminster is a paragon of sexual prudence, and maybe not our Councils or Police either?
Surely the Uniparty wouldn’t try to use the civil unrest argument to try to stifle knowledge of a more widespread issue, would they?
What, you mean like, actual involvement?🫣🫣
Erm, yes H but you know that.
They are scared that the complicity by police and local authorities will come out
My advice to the Pakistani, and wider Muslim, population of Britain, for what it’s worth. Stop playing the Racism/Islamophobia card, acknowledge that there are immoral and illegal actors in your community, and demonise them unmercifully as malefactors, rather than showing them solidarity as Muslims or immigrants.
That means preaching in mosques, or pronouncing on Question Time, that families and neighbourhoods should shun, and shop, sexual offenders, drug dealers and corrupt councillors, that the offenders themselves should be reminded that their religion includes eternal damnation for the unjust and physical punishments under sharia law, and that illegal immigrants should be told by their own people that they must obey the laws and go home, or face ostracism by their ethnic brethren.
Whether the desire to build law-abiding communities outweighs the Islamic norm that even a bad Muslim is better than a saintly kaffir I don’t know, but the sad alternative (which as a Christian I can’t, of course, endorse) is that a whole minority will be tarred by the public with the same brush.
In other words, the real threat of civil unrest can only be exacerbated by the Inquiry, unless the Muslim community itself takes the bull by the horns and assumes the lead in purging their community of the causes of just anger to ordinary people of all stripes. That might take the kind of courage we’re lacking in our own politicians, but it’s what they owe to the host nation and to their own families’ safety.
Very well put. On top of that, cynically manipulative white people and their “liberal” useful idiot supporters need to stop playing the racism card.
“My advice to the Pakistani, and wider Muslim, population of Britain, for what it’s worth:
Pack your bags pronto and F off.”
That’s better.
Excellent comment we should be hearing from senior politicians especially of the Muslim persuasion.
Muslim politicians always rely on the race card, a lesson picked up from the Abbacus – never leave home without it.
As Laurie mentions above, it’s also extremely concerning that this issue of organized child sexual exploitation and abuse is ongoing. They want us to believe all of this is historical, like anyone was deported ( I believe not a single rapist was, according to Charlie Peters, though a few did scarper back to Pakistan to evade justice ) and all perps were imprisoned, where they undoubtedly learned their lesson and were rehabilitated, but this is a very naive assumption and they’re taking the public for fools if they push this narrative and expect us to swallow it.
As long as you have these sorts in communities and people in authority willing to cover it up then this is an ongoing problem and vulnerable underage girls remain at risk;
”Important data uncovered by our inquiry. Across 125 local councils, 4,141 cases of child sexual exploitation are being monitored across Britain right now. Between 2018 and 2024, 100 councils reported 37,536 monitored cases – with victims as young as 8 years old.
This is the tip of the iceberg. Why? Many councils just do not have the reporting systems in place.
Of the 379 councils surveyed, just 70 had the means in place to report on “gang/group based CSE”.
Just nine councils were able to provide information on the ethnicity of perpetrators. Nine.
This patchwork, inconsistent, politically correct approach to data has been going on for decades.
And it all serves one purpose: to avoid uncomfortable truths.
We are calling for:
– A national data standard for all councils and police forces – enforce it
– Collection of ethnicity, nationality, immigration status and more
– Clear tracking of victim age, gender, ethnicity, and status in care
– Mandatory collection of data on group offending
– Transparency on how many reports were ignored or downplayed
If we can track potholes, school attendance and recycling bins – then we can track child rape.
This is a key test for our inquiry, and we will keep searching and pushing.”
https://x.com/RupertLowe10/status/1934843178978259004
What a disgusting hideous shitshow.
I think the vast majority have never even been to court, let alone been convicted. It would be good to get numbers on this. So they’re still out there, basically. I also think that as long as you have entire communities covering these crimes up, literally due to the fact that they ( shamefully, including Muslim women ) view these under-aged girls from disadvantaged backgrounds as ”trash” and ”white slags”, then not only will you continue having these issues of abuse but just the general attitude of these Pakistanis says to me that they don’t want to assimilate and ‘multiculturalism’ is a Lefty pipe dream, nothing but a failed experiment. I’m sorry but opening a kebab/phone repair shop and paying taxes isn’t proof of integration.
It’s the whole: ”It wasn’t my husband’s fault he raped and trafficked round the country these 13yr old girls. It’s their fault for wearing short skirts and drinking the alcohol/taking the drugs that they were offered.” You can’t do anything with people who have an attitude like that towards natives.
What I would like to know and can never find out is what is the Islamic view of prostitutes and prostitution. Do they have brothels?
no need when you have slaves
And if the vast majority have never been to court who’s guilty?
Plod for failing to do their jobs.
Local councils are complicit in the CSE crimes but the operative word is “crimes.” So as we are talking about serious crimes the people who should be in the crosshairs are the police.
The first lot who should be scheduled for court appearances are senior plod officers and Council leaders. Perspective needs to remain focused.
I totally agree – but is this even possible?
I don’t claim to have any detailed knowledge of Islam. But the fundamental issue is that some of the teachings of the Quran appear to support the behavior of these people.
I am only familiar with Christian culture. So I can state with absolute certainty that there is nothing in the entire New Testament that condones sexual abuse. No preacher could justify child sexual exploitation with, say, quotes from St Paul’s letters, let alone anything that Jesus ever said or implied. On the contrary.
But is that true of Islam? I have my doubts.
Well, that’s the shibboleth, isn’t it? Muslims as a whole will loudly reject these teachings, or their silence will demonstrate that they support them, and their support will show that Islam is not compatible with… civilisation. And civilisation will act accordingly, if now necessarily peacefully. That’s why it seems to me to be crunch time for them far more than for public, politicians, policemen etc.
Which is, fundamentally, Islam is utterly incompatible with Western values. They should not be here; none of them.
This would be difficult to do for those living in the sort of clan-based arrangement that most of the convicted perpetrators are part of. The clan’s set of obligations do not make for individuals.
As it happens, I don’t think this is an ‘ethnic’ issue so much as it is a ‘cultural’ one?
Ethnicities can rub along pretty well as long as they all cleave to a central ethos, that of the host nation. Cultures are different, by definition, and they will always seek dominance over one another.
The situation we find ourselves in now is most troubling, not so much for what it is, as terrible as that is, but because of the way the ‘authorities’ have now been shown to have consistently lied and gaslit the population.
People do not like being lied to, they’re angry, and there’s a very real danger, I believe, that we are at a fork in the road where, if the matter is not properly, transparently and quickly dealt with, we might see a deal of unrest as chickens come home to roost.
Sadly, in these febrile times when the country needs real leadership, we find ourselves saddled with the most useless PM and government that we have enjoyed in our history… an ‘inquiry’ is fine, insofar as it goes, but it pushes everything down the road. People need to see action now.
I have real fears for the country, in what could quite easily turn into a summer of serious discontent should just one incident prove to be the match that ignites this dry tinder.
The rhetoric I’m hearing on the radio this morning really suggests things could unravel very quickly indeed.
Your initial point boils down to nature vs nurture. At an individual level I expect this will always remain fuzzy. At a societal level, I think if you fill a land with large numbers of people of a given ethnicity, it will end up looking very much like the land they originally came from. I really don’t see much room for debate there. The question is, what to do about this.
Detain and Deport.
Oh yes anyone not a UK citizen who commits a felony should be sent away.
I guess a key question is should an immigration policy be partly based on race/ethnicity. I think there is a case for that, though now that we have had so much I think we need to stop it completely for almost everyone.
Absolutely.
I’d imagine lots of people feel the same as this man, and I can see how, especially within certain highly diverse areas in the UK resentment will inevitably grow. I must stress, I hate Islam but I don’t hate Muslims. Only the spongers, rapists, paedos, terrorists ( and supporters ), misogynists, West-haters, Jew-haters and the ones that want to enforce Sharia law. But hopefully there’s still plenty of decent ones left once you exclude all of the above;
”The left often say “stop blaming immigrants”. In reply the right often says “I don’t blame immigrants, I blame government policy”. But when I walk around a Tesco in Bradford and see Muslims still in their pyjamas and sandals, and wearing face veils and burkas, I do blame them. I blame them for making my home a more hostile and alien place. I blame themfor expressing their open contempt for our society.
I blame them because they are not here to assimilate. They’re not here to experience our culture or to fit in and contribute. They are here to exploit the economic freedoms and benefits, and they are here to replace us. The burka and shalwar kameez are a very deliberate “fuck you” symbol of separatism.
Call me racist if you like, but I am not judging on the colour of their skin. I very much am judging them on the content of their character, and their shitty culture. I feel entirely justified in blaming them – and hating them. They should not be here and they must be removed.
This is not an extreme position. Most of us think it. Most of us feel it in our bones, instinctively, that it’s bad – and a threat to us. It’s regressive and it’s backwards, and it’s wholly unwelcome. Ban the burka, and deport the lot.”
https://x.com/FUDdaily/status/1934253004250653048
I cannot disagree with the above.
Well said.
I don’t understand this situation. Are we really expected to believe that Baroness Casey has done her job honestly and diligently and therefore has dropped Kneel and his government of traitors right in the doo doo? It seems hard to believe. The ramifications of her report could be pervasive and long-lasting and managing the collapse of our economy whilst at the same time keeping a lid on potential sectarian strife is more than a stretch too far even for the combined talents of the useless uniparty. So, what else is going on behind the scenes? Or has Baroness Casey really given Kneel some payback?
Bottom line, as usual there is more to this than we are being told.
Entirely justified cynicism, let’s wait and see, but to me it looks like a step in the right direction.
Need to keep the pressure on now.
There is political blood in the water.
…step in the right direction”
Undoubtedly, and the big plus is that more will be awakened to the whole globalist enterprise being exercised against us so even if there is something going on behind all this some benefits will accrue to we righteous.
Lawyers don’t actually take responsibility for anything they just present a case to be judged by others. Starmer is a lawyer and is behaving according to type. “Get me a case then I can argue it. Ask me to think for myself and I am lost”.
Leave the ECHR.
In the meantime throw all foreign criminals in our jails out of the country, handcuff their feet and hands, escort them to planes at night and either repatriate, or dump them on the chagos islands.
Use the Navy to force back to France the small boats
Establish a force like those catching ilegals in the States and push them back to their own country or to the Chagos.
Finally stop all access to welfare, to accomodation, health care and schooling etc for all illegals, for those here and any new arrivals.
Build camps in fields with security fencing and guards to hold the current batches.
Word will soon get around that the UK is nothing like a sanctuary country, and the smugglers will find another sap country,
Use the Navy to force back to France the small boats.
As I’ve already pointed out a couple of time in the past: This cannot be done.
Leaving the issue with reliably finding these vessels in transit aside (already impossible), there’s nothing the navy can do about people who didn’t break any British laws and who are sailing in international waters. They become illegal immigrants the moment they have crossed the border illegally, but they aren’t before they did this.
The idea of a military invasion of France in order to dump people there who illegally crossed the border of the UK is even more ludicrous — Britain going to war with France over this issue would certainly be highly entertaining. But considering that the UK cannot even ship illegal immigrants to countries willing to take them (Rwanda), the possibility of something like this seems extremely remote.
You are defaulting to “the law.” Wrong. Law nowadays can be made to fit any desired scenario, just ask our former head of CPS.
I don’t quite understand this comment. Technically, if ships of the Royal Navy would intercept random civilian vessels for no particular reason and force the people sailing on them to do something they’re weren’t planning to do, this would be piracy. Probably, piracy the RN would get away with but piracy nevertheless. Forcibly dumping them onto some French shore would be an act of military aggression against France. The former is already inconceivable, although at least remotely possible¹. The latter is certainly not going to happen.
¹ For the odd case where interception of a small vessel with no radar signature discernible from the waves around at sea it would actually work.
With respect, it’s pretty easy to identify the small boats loaded with middle eastern men. No need to board luxury yachts.
The sea is extremely vast and has no landmarks whatsoever. It will not be possible to find these boats at sea. I’ve actually worked as lookout on a German navy Frigate in the past and because of this, I claim to have a realistic idea about what can and cannot be done under such circumstances.
Historical example: Success of the convoy system in two world wars against German submarines. Compared to the size of the sea, a convoy of ships is doesn’t cover a significantly larger area that an individual ship and because of this, it’s vastly more difficult to find a convoy on the open sea than some of a bunch of individual ships on different courses. And as opposed to small boats, these were ships which were easily detectable with electronic means.
And that’s only the first problem, albeit a sufficiently complicated one that it would sink the whole proposal. There’s still absolutely nothing the Navy could do with these vessels while they’re in international waters because not baving crossed the UK boarder is not against UK law.
You’re missing the point. It doesn’t take a 100% interception of illegals coming across the Chanel and into UK jurisdiction for a successful outcome. Even if only 10% or 5% were caught and then turned around or sunk the message would get through. Publicise it as much as possible. They come because they are welcomed and supported. Stop supporting them and make their lives as difficult as possible and the same effect will occur.
I’m not missing any ‘points’, I’m pointing out facts:
That you really want this to be different doesn’t make it so.
Well, I think the Aussies did it quite successfully. If you think “this cannot be done” then you’re not going to even try.
Seconded 👍
Whatever vessel the channel marauders are using – yachts, rowing boats or blow up rubber dinghies – they are heading here, not on a day trip but with the specific intent to illegally cross our borders, park their backsides here and suck the resources dry!
If it was my shout, I’d have gunboats patrolling the waters! Extreme times, extreme measures.
I used to be reasonably tolerant but that tolerance has gone now. I for one am sick and tired of being taken as a fool by successive governments who facilitate the ongoing abuse of us, who treat us with contempt and favour the interlopers who have no right to be here.
Enough is enough!
Coastal patrol vessels combined with a dense net of lookout posts could work. But for handling, there’s really only the Australian option: Instead of allowing them to make landfall, tow them to some location where their details and intentions will be ascertained while they wait in some not overly comfortable barracks.
I have said this elsewhere. Waiting now for the apologies and compensation for the establishment backed persecution amounting to terrorism of Tommy Robinson by the police, judiciary and successive governments over the last 10 years.
Casey’s report insults a lot of Asian people as she refers to the child rapists as being ‘Asian’ more than anything else. She fails to acknowledge that the real problem comes down to not just those from one country but from mainly just one area of Pakistan – Azad Kashmir. Even within that the Mirpur district is where the majority come from. She probably does not comprehend the tribal nature of Pakistan and how they stick together in forming criminal networks of which child rape is only one aspect – drug smuggling, drug dealing, money laundering, immigration fraud, car theft, fencing stolen goods and cigarette smuggling. So there is every reason to go after this lot to reduce overall crime.
Isn’t it Mirpur that several allegedly British MPs and personnel are pushing to have a new airport built? More and more could be flown here, then. Yippee!
On the other hand, wishful thinking, more and more could be evicted and flown back…
The two stories today must be connected. How many activist members of the Civil Service Muslim Network are working throughout the councils in the affected towns suppressing reports of what is going on or advising their co-religionists at prayers in the mosque if they have been flagged for investigation by the police, social services or even just the taxi licensing department?
A question – is Starmer and his Party desperate enough to reverse the plummet in popularity by adopting a ‘bash the grooming gangs’ policy? Or will their response just make things even worse?
I suspect their response will be “digital ID”. They are looking for a reason to introduce it and this might be it.
Another question is how many of the boat people are Iranian? What are Iranian men with short hair cuts doing in the UK?
But… but… but… they are all asylum seekers we have been consistently told, fleeing evil regimes …. of Greece, Italy, France, Germany. The UK is the only safe place.
Public anger is already fuelled-up, telling everybody what they already know isn’t going to make much difference.
people be sure to read an article in todays wedneday 18th june …daily mail online…labour warned small boats crisis risks fueling further grooming gang cases…..will you now help with the following petition…shut the migrant hotels down now and deport illegal migrants housed there..it currently has 71,816, signatures it needs a minimum of 100,000 signatures to get it debated in the uk parliament and YOU can help in getting them first by signing it and then be sure to reshare it widely all over the uk with as many like minded people as you popsibly can and be sure to ask each one of them to do exactly the same as im asking you in this message
Many of us are aware that Labour are anti-British Fabians. If they are both ideologically as well as specifically so it shouldn’t be a surprise
This is doubtless going to be politically damaging for Labour, with a dismal record on both the boats and the gangs.
The first question is, Did Gordon Brown, when PM in 2010, knowing the girls were underage, give a direct instruction for the gang raping to be ignored, because the girls were consensual? If he did, he must be arrested and charged with abetting rape of minors.
The next question is, Did Keir Starmer, when DPP, accept such an instruction from Brown and apply it? If he did, he too must be charged with the same offence.