What follows is a press release written by the doctors behind the HOPE Accord, an online petition calling for the suspension of the COVID-19 vaccines.
Thousands of doctors and healthcare professionals have signed a petition calling for the immediate suspension of all COVID-19 mRNA products because they are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths.
The online petition, known as the HOPE Accord, makes five calls to the international community in relation to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines that were given emergency use authorisation, stating that “a growing body of evidence suggests that they are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths”.
The petition calls for “independent investigations to be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive re-evaluation of all COVID-19 products. There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their effect on the human body, both short and long term.”
There are additional calls for immediate recognition and support for the vaccine-injured. “The vaccine-injured must be recognised, and every effort must be made to understand their conditions. Support should include readily accessible multidisciplinary clinics offering investigation and treatment, as well as appropriate compensation for all those who have been harmed.”
It also states, “The medical profession must lead by admitting we lost our way. By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the COVID-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to ensure the relevant facts are known and vital lessons are learned. An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate.”
An open letter to the General Medical Council of the U.K., written by Consultant Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra and signed by several leaders in health, also makes reference to the petition of which he is a co-founder. The letter was CC’d to key figures, including the Chief Medical Officer Sir Chris Whitty, the Chief Scientific Adviser to the British Government Patrick Vallance, and the Secretary of State for Health Wes Streeting.
Dr. Malhotra says that, given the level of evidence of unprecedented harm, their position not to suspend the Covid mRNA products is now untenable. Re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomised controlled trials on the Covid mRNA products by independent experts, including the associate editor of the BMJ, revealed a greater risk of serious harms from the vaccine than from being hospitalised with Covid. This rate of serious harm is 1 in 800 at two months, suggesting the harms are likely much greater, as it does not take into consideration medium- to long-term harms, including heart attacks, strokes and cancer. Conversely, the level of benefit in the highest-risk group – those over 90, according to U.K. HSA data for 2024 – is 1 in 7,000 to prevent a Covid hospitalisation. In other words, there is at least an eight times greater risk of harm than benefit in this group.
A similar story of the overstatement of findings without attention to methodology applies to the highly publicised headline, “millions of lives saved” from a WHO report. While the headline is attractive, the data is derived from a modelling study that doesn’t enter into the hierarchy of evidence-based medicine studies (poor-quality evidence) and has been described by the Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, Carl Heneghan, as “implausible”. It’s like saying the best football team in the Premier League is a fourth-division club, whilst completely ignoring the Liverpools and Manchester Cities of this world. In other words, such a claim is fake.
Two of the world’s pre-eminent experts in oncology and immunology, respectively, feel there is strong mechanistic evidence, through different pathways including prolonged immunosuppression and DNA contamination, that the Covid mRNA vaccines cause cancer. The thought that billions of people have been injected with a potential carcinogen is so horrific to bear that one can understand why medical professionals who encouraged patients to take the vaccine would rather choose to bury their heads in the sand. But such wilful blindness will not eliminate an ongoing problem. It is staggering beyond comprehension that the U.K. is still recommending this product, given its poor efficacy and serious, unprecedented harms, including the irrefutable risk of death in the short term for a sizeable minority.
The letter to the GMC also explains why the medical regulators for drug approval, such as the MHRA and FDA, cannot be trusted to be independent because they take most of their funding from the pharmaceutical industry, an industry that has been diagnosed as psychopathic in its pursuit of profit. It describes the recent revelations by the Secretary of State for Health at the time, Matt Hancock, ordering the MHRA to “shut down” vaccine concerns when the AstraZeneca vaccine was being rolled out as a “scandal”.
Failure to acknowledge the clear and overwhelming evidence of serious harm from these products, which have caused a “public health calamity”, is due to either ignorance, wilful blindness or commercial corruption, Dr. Malhotra writes.
He concludes: “At this point in time, the evidence of the Covid mRNA product doing significantly more harm than good is overwhelming, even for the highest-risk groups. The longer the General Medical Council, the Secretary of State for Health and the Chief Medical Officer delay acting on this, the greater the harm to public health, the further decrease in trust in the medical profession, and the more strain on an already failing NHS. It is evident that many physicians and medical leaders remain either unaware of the latest evidence or too deeply entrenched in the corrupted ties between the healthcare profession and the pharmaceutical industry to recognise clear conflicts of interest.
Expert reaction
Emeritus Professor of Oncology at St George’s University Hospital, Angus Dalgleish, said:
My own observations in cancer were that I witnessed an outbreak of melanoma relapses in patients who had been stable on my immunotherapy treatment programmes for over 5–18 years. The only thing they had in common is that they had all had booster vaccines, which, as predicted, were causing T-cell suppression. I continue to see these relapses, as well as rapid cancer progression, after these totally unnecessary boosters. The tragedy is that all oncology doctors are seeing this but are afraid to speak out, with a few exceptions. Having reviewed how mRNA vaccines can cause cancer for special evidence to Parliament and specialist bodies worldwide, including the Australian Senate most recently, I am horrified that they are still available. Evil is done when good men do nothing, and evil has certainly been done by all our institutions, including the MHRA, who should have banned these vaccines within three months of rollout; the Chief Medical Officer and Chief Scientific Adviser, who should have intervened; the Department of Health; and the NHS, who are still pushing these vaccines, with the Government paying Moderna to make £250 million a year for the next 10 years. Doctors who support the continued vaccination are clearly clinically incompetent or have been infected with groupthink straight out of 1984; they are the ones who need to be held to account.
Emeritus Professor of Immunology, Robert Clancy, said:
The spike protein generated via message expressed within injected mRNA is systemically distributed – the packaged mRNA in its lipid nanoparticles – and can potentially infect every cell in the body. Spike protein can be found in body fluids and tissues at least 12 months after injection. It is a foreign protein, evoking an immune response, causing inflammation and tissue destruction. I support the position taken by Dr. Malhotra that mRNA vaccines have attracted a forest of red flags, including unprecedented mortality and morbidity, unknown genetic confusion and disappointing clinical value. His call for the cessation of mRNA vaccination, pending objective scientific review, is one widely shared by those who have braved the tidal wave of cognitive dissonance. It is the only evidence-based way forward to protect the health and lives of our communities. I am beyond despair that it is even necessary for me to be asked to provide this support.
Former General Secretary to the Congress of South Africa and Cabinet minister under Nelson Mandela, Jay Naidoo, said:
I owe Dr. Malhotra immense gratitude for his unwavering commitment to the truth around very critical issues concerning the Covid pandemic response, including the safety and efficacy of the Covid injection. It’s clear to me that information on the harms caused by the Covid injections is deliberately withheld to prevent a robust public debate. This is an attack on our freedom of speech and right to protest, which have been cornerstones of democracy for many decades. Having been a victim of demonisation that created a toxic environment around me and the leadership of the freedom struggle, which saw my name appear on death lists several times, this victimisation campaign against Dr. Aseem Malhotra reminds me of how the apartheid regime sought to discredit us during the freedom struggle. Dr. Aseem Malhotra is regarded as a hero for exposing the deep complicity of the pharmaceutical industry, which has committed fraud on a global scale and has killed, harmed and maimed millions around the world, and been found guilty on innumerable occasions of criminal negligence. In the current global context, when the veil of secrecy is being lifted over the harm that has been done by the pharmaceutical industry, it’s important that Dr. Aseem Malhotra’s call for the suspension of the Covid jab be accepted until the data is studied independently, and recommendations be made on the overhaul of the whole health sector so that the rights of patients are fairly balanced with the role of the medical industry and its regulation, which is driven by profit and medical capture by pharma interests.
Former Wimbledon champion and BBC tennis commentator Pat Cash said:
In my view, from everyone I’ve spoken to, including people I personally know who are severely vaccine-injured, there is more than enough evidence for the Chief Medical Officer and Chief Scientific Adviser to the Government to call for a pause in the use of Covid mRNA vaccines and to carry out an independent investigation into their true benefits and harms. The vaccine-injured deserve this for the unwitting sacrifice they have made.
To read the full open access letter, click here.
The HOPE Accord can be viewed and signed here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I was surprised Sunak did not know of the QUALY data. I was aware of public reports on that quite early on.
as Chancellor, did he not have a voice. Should he not have asked for that data.
I would bet money on Keith knowing all about QALYs. He knows it’s a subject best avoided!
No don’t count on it, these ppl are incredibly dumb. His answer actually shows he has no clue what it even is.
A top KC who gets paid ££££s will not be “incredibly dumb”. If you look at the cases he has been involved in, it’s clear he will have developed an acute political awareness. You don’t get to be a top KC by just knowing the law.
Speaking the truth can be career limiting or, at the very least, close doors to you. I should know, I’ve found myself there at least three times in my past.
I spoke the inconvenient truth and took the hit. You might say I’m my own worst enemy, but I don’t regret it.
Perhaps that tendency is why I also couldn’t shut up about lockdown and the rest. I think I’m just wired that way.
“Speaking the truth can be career limiting or, at the very least, close doors to you.”
Exactly.
Yes I’m just a millionaire a couple of times over instead of 10 times over had I kept my thoughts private. My mouth has cost fortunes and now my career is basically over, albeit I cannot claim poverty.
Join the club, GDA…
You might be right but you’d be surprised how supposedly intelligent ppl are completely innumerate. On reflection the speed with which he moved on suggests you are right, though his explanation of Qaly was wilfully misinformed.
I know lots of “intelligent” people who are gullible or capable of great intellectual laziness when it suits them. However it seems to me that to get to the top of a profession like law, or politics, requires you to have the skills of a professional liar and to know which side your bread is buttered.
So, two things can both be true at the same time
A KC has a huge advantage in a conventional courtroom – he has read his brief, he knows which questions he wants to ask, he knows which subjects he wants to explore and how to close down the areas he doesn’t. The witness is often nervous, may be scared.and may not have the same level of articulation as the KC. A KC doesn’t get to his or her position without being clever and skilled both inside or outside the courtroom.
But, if you come up against someone who is self-assured or confident, knows their subject and crucially knows how to prevent having words put in their mouth then any of the KC’s shortcomings or his prepared position may be exposed, as I believe they were here. I suspect he is probably fuming about this brief exchange, especially as it happened on the last day, for now, and was widely reported.
Yes, that’s a good point.
As I’ve said before there should really be two or maybe three adversarial teams who can call witnesses and cross examine them – one that is defending the government’s actions, one that is advocating for more restrictions and one for none. That way more people would be exposed to the holes in the whole thing.
Spot on. As I mentioned in the “roundup” commentary earlier today: “And the likely increase in deaths by alternative routes, due to lack of service & extended waiting lists for a range of other diseases. It’s entirely possible to demonstrate that the concept of “lockdown” had a negative effect, just based on QALY using the original definition of the term. No surprise that the barrister steered clear of it.”
A cynic might suggest that the so-called “Inquiry” is actually a self defence process.
Indeed. I think it’s more than self-defence, it’s an integral part of covid theatre, to consolidate the Big Lie that there was a Deadly Pandemic and a Public Health Emergency.
Smoke and mirrors. People will remember only the conclusions drawn at the end.
We’ll remain labeled as conspiracy theorists, whereas we’re simply performing the radical act of remembering specific details.
I think it’s a subject he’s been instructed to avoid.
Keith is clearly an ignoramus. This retard has been hand picked to guarantee the “right” outcome. QALY is a basic concept used in public policy.
A discussion between an ex-Chancellor and a top end barrister. Keith is clever enough to avoid the topic altogether; it’s not on his agenda. I assume you are using the term “ignoramus” in the legal use of the term, so as to deliberately pretend to not know something!
I don’t know if it’s ignorance or malevolence, does it even matter? I’ve spent so much time around lawyers to be aware they are not terribly numerate, even supposedly brilliant ones. They have a niche skill, the law, bugger all else but think yr right about his political acumen
A Cost Benefit Analysis? How does that apply?
Someone please tell me, what benefit at all was there from lockdown?
Well you’ve nailed it. Zero benefits, 400bn costs. -400bn.
Well, there could be a list of those that made a profit out of it, along with that lost revenue etc, including those that lost their reputation on account of their behaviour. However, I’m sceptical of the availability of honest reports on either side.
Indeed. Lockdown is a novel intervention with an obviously huge cost. As such, it’s up to lockdown advocates to provide a compelling case with real world evidence that there was a benefit. I’ve not seen any such compelling evidence.
https://off-guardian.org/2023/12/13/russias-friendliest-bank-will-help-brics-implement-the-climate-agenda/
Climate change in Russia will cost the economy 580 billion roubles pa between now and 2027 apparently.
Why is ‘Climate change’ always bad news? A little global boiling would certainly be much appreciated in the UK over the course of the next few months and would help to reduce fuel bills for everyone. Why such negativity?
He’s a Lawyer for God’s sake, and a KC. Years ago the title QC actually meant the holders thereof had at least a shred of Honour.
He won’t give a shit – as long as he’s paid.
If he’s never heard of a cost benefit analysis/risk assessments then I’m the King of Scotland. It’s the FIRST question any Lawyer asks re possible injury claims. But as most on here know it ain’t about that is it.
And as for the Good Lady, Christ, she’s an utter disgrace to my once honourable profession. A pure Government puppet. They chose her well.
And in the very unlikely event anyone connected with these bastards reads this, complain to the Law Society and try to get me struck off the roll.
No doubt that these two were hiding behind their very expensive sofas when covid insanity kicked off.
It’s really bad what happened and him being put in charge. You could see years before that this was essentially their idea of a counter coup. But the consequences for the people of this country will be distastrous. And whoever comes next will be even worse. Until the population understands that the real evil emanates into these people from elsewhere. It’s sick what they have done to their own population.
Recently, the Germany parliament allowed a professor to speak freely on the ‘health’ controls and he did not hold back.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iq2TZPEWjcA&t=610s
SMOKING GUN: German Professor in the German Parliament Explains All!
Vaccine scepticism has become mainstream. It always follows this trajectory – first they ignore you then they laugh at you then you fight them then you win, as Gandhi said. But the real battle lies elsewhere. Lets say 90 percent of people learned that they were stabbinated with a bioweapon – this is only meaningful if they care about it. If they were that easy to control the first time around then believe me they will be suckers for the second round. It is their karma to follow that path. Revelation talks about spiritual death and about of a third of people consigned to it. We will have to learn to acknowledge the dead walking amongst us. We could make something beautiful out of it.
Some on here claiming Hugo Keith is somehow thick. This is a hyper-intelligent, well paid puppet with a moral vacuum the size of Heather Hallett’s arse, being told to throw as much smoke as possible to divert attention from the psychopath puppet masters who are currently paving the way for the WHO pandemic treaty.
A binding agreement to initialise and light the touchpaper for a single global control cartel most probably orchestrated by a tie in deal with the WEF and its “penetrated cabinets”, Gates and the Chinese. With Covid having been the initial grooming exercise.
I can see no other explanation anymore.
I’m a pleb but that’s a great post