Media regulator Ofcom has been accused of double standards after fining GB News £100,000 for “breaking due impartiality rules” in a pre-election interview with Rishi Sunak, while ITV is yet to be penalised for allowing Ed Balls to interview his wife, the Home Secretary, in August, despite triggering 8,000 complaints. The Spectator has more.
The programme with which Ofcom took issue – titled People’s Forum: The Prime Minister – was, according to the media watchdog, “in breach of Rules 5.11 and 5.12 of the Broadcasting Code” after Sunak was given “a mostly uncontested platform” to big up the work of the Government. The regulator explains that “given the seriousness and repeated nature of this breach”, a six-figure fine is necessary. It’s not quite the end of the matter for GB News yet, however, as the broadcaster will challenge the breach decision via judicial review – meaning that the sanction imposed by Ofcom will not be enforced until this process has concluded. …
The decision has sparked outrage on social media, with users levelling accusations of hypocrisy at the regulator over other broadcasters not receiving similar fines. … No such penalty has been issued to ITV’s Good Morning Britain, after it allowed presenter Ed Balls to interview Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who also happens to be his, um, wife. Despite the media watchdog receiving more than 8,000 complaints about the matter, no action has been taken on this issue as yet. Will Ofcom turn its guns on ITV in the same way it has GB News? Don’t hold your breath.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
https://expose-news.com/2023/09/27/climate-crisis-activists-put-meat-on-banned-adverts/
Sorry about the dump given the sensitive nature of the article.
You do know your posts are being fact-checked by people who think men can have periods, don’t you??
What should I do Mogs?
“In general, the COVID-19 vaccines have been found to be safe and effective.”
When did they stop being 100% Safe and Effective? Someone needs to tell Mr Fauci.
Also, “in general”? What’s that supposed to mean?
Credit to this Blix woman for at least looking into it, but she seems ill qualified to work in “public health” as she seems to be under the impression we’ve recently had a “pandemic”.
My 60 year old wife was one of them.
She only had the jab so she could fly to the Maldives for a holiday of a lifetime with her girlfriends she had been saving years for.
I made her fill in a Yellow Card report which took ages to complete.
She hasn’t had another jab and won’t have anymore.
I still haven’t had any sort of jab for the past 40 years and would rather stay in the UK than play Russian roulette just so I could go on a plane.
‘Safe and effective!’ The constant use of that expression makes me begin to wonder if it’s some sort of post-hypnotic trigger that’s supposed to turn off people’s cognitive functions! Perhaps it’s because I refused to watch those daily state TV broadcasts that it does nothing to me!!
I thought these days “safe and effective” has taken on the character of a Monty Python sketch, with anyone saying the words then winking, tapping their nose and saying “say no more, say no more”
It is something we could adopt on here.
Including hat phrase is most likely the only way a research study or article about any adverse effects can be published. I had a friend who experienced this bleeding. Her pregnant daughter emotionally blackmailed her into getting the jabs. My friend won’t hear a word about the effects or her manipulative daughter. I haven’t asked my daughters about this particular effect, though I did warn two–the ones less bull-headed–about similar research quite awhile ago. As usual, they didn’t listen, as mothers don’t know anything…..
““the association is still not strong enough to say ‘well, that postmenopausal bleed was probably caused by vaccination’”. Probably? Yes. Definitely? More than likely.
For any other medicine the temporal proximity to the unusual effect would be considered to indicate a causal relationship. But never for vaccines… strange, that….
So..seriously how many is that in the anti-vaxxer’s were correct … again!
…and yet it was, and on YouTube and other platforms probably still is, misinformation/disinformation… which can now get your door kicked in and get you arrested!!
Shouldn’t the MSM point out this anomaly?…they might get people believing they give a crap if they made the effort!!
More here in this 2min clip about women in France suffering all sorts of gynae irregularities. I even remember Jessica Rose reporting ages ago on VAERS entries about little girls, like pre-schoolers, who’d also started bleeding and not just elderly women but ladies in advanced age ( 80s and 90s ) who started bleeding too. This is atrocious. What on earth is happening to people’s insides??
https://twitter.com/Demo2020cracy/status/1625158402266611717
…Imagine, if you will, a “vaccine” that doesn’t stop you catching the target disease. It doesn’t stop you spreading it. Imagine, if you will, a “vaccine” that has numerous horrible side effects, seen on a much larger scale than ever seen in any previous vaccine.
I give you the COVID “Vaccine.” I give you the new definition of “Safe and Effective.”
Imagine, if you will, it’s 2019 and somebody asks you if you’d rather catch a cold or get a novel injection with 1,291 side effects that they want to keep secret for 75 years!
”When Pfizer applied for FDA approval, they were aware of almost 158,000 adverse events. This really does not paint them in a favorable light. And now, a 38-page report features an appendix with a list that says Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has 1,291 side effects.
The list includes acute kidney injury, acute flaccid myelitis, anti-sperm antibody positive, brain stem embolism, brain stem thrombosis, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, cardiac ventricular thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, central nervous system vasculitis, death neonatal, deep vein thrombosis, encephalitis brain stem, encephalitis hemorrhagic, frontal lobe epilepsy, foaming at mouth, epileptic psychosis, facial paralysis, fetal distress syndrome, gastrointestinal amyloidosis, generalized tonic-clonic seizure, Hashimoto’s encephalopathy, hepatic vascular thrombosis, herpes zoster reactivation, immune-mediated hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, jugular vein embolism, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, liver injury, low birth weight, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, myocarditis, neonatal seizure, pancreatitis, pneumonia, stillbirth, tachycardia, temporal lobe epilepsy, testicular autoimmunity, thrombotic cerebral infarction, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, venous thrombosis neonatal, and vertebral artery thrombosis among 1,246 other medical conditions following vaccination.
“This is a bombshell,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) president and general counsel Mary Holland.”
https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/pfizer-covid-vaccine-has-1291-side-effects-reveals-official-documents/
For an illness so serious that you have to be tested to see if you have it.
Way way back not after the jabs started, I recall an interview with a receptionist at a huge GP practice in the NE, who stated that there was an extraordinary number of post-menopausal women coming in with bleeding, from mild to severe.
There were many reports of unusual/abnormal vaginal bleeding with the initial virus strain too – you know, the one they used the spike protein from for the jab. It was even discussed in THAT Dark Horse podcast from June 2021 with Brett Weinstein, Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch. TPTB knew it would cause ovarian problems because it did in the few rats they tested it on – what we don’t know are the long term consequences, although I’m sure we can all guess (cancers, sterility, other reproductive failures, etc etc etc).
I bet good old Dr Viki Male would be convinced that covid was the cause of the unexpected bleeding, if it was occuring a few weeks after a positive test. The association would definitely be strong enough then, oh yes.
Either way, an obvious side effect like this wouldn’t only be showing up after almost everyone has had the jab, if it had actually been fully tested with no short cuts, would it?
Heavy menstrual bleeding leads to iron deficiency. And according to “our marvellous NHS” that makes you more susceptible to illness and infection, including heart and lung problems.
Way to go, MHRA: make people more likely to become ill by pushing a poorly tested gene therapy on millions who didn’t gain any benefit from it whatsoever but who now run the risk of severe consequences.
Yep, I’m one of those women. After two jabs of AZ.