Keir Starmer has suffered the biggest fall in approval rating after winning an election of any Prime Minister in the modern era – plummeting 49 points from plus-11 to minus-38 – a poll has shown. The Telegraph has the story.
Sir Keir’s approval rating was at a high of plus-11 in July after Labour won the election with a landslide 174-seat majority – the biggest in 25 years – according to the poll, by More in Common.
But by this month, ahead of Rachel Reeves’ Budget on Wednesday, his personal rating had fallen to –38 – a net drop of 49.
It takes him below Rishi Sunak’s rating, which this month has improved from –37 when he lost the election to –31, according to the poll of 1,012 adults.
In comparison, Sir Tony Blair’s approval was still at plus-46 in August 1997, three months after his landslide victory, when the figure stood at plus-60. It took until summer 2000 before his rating turned negative.
David Cameron’s approval rating did not turn negative until the start of 2011, after he had defeated Labour and formed a coalition Government with the Liberal Democrats in 2010.
It was not until the “omnishambles” Budget of April 2012 that his rating dropped to just above –30.
Boris Johnson, who started off at –20 despite winning the 2019 election, had turned his rating around to plus three by January and then plus-14 by the following March.
Luke Tryl, the Executive Director of More in Common, said the collapse in Sir Keir’s approval rating was “unprecedented” compared with other Prime Ministers in the modern era.

Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The case for climate change is so compelling that they have to bully people into going along with it. Remind you of anything? The deadly pandemic that needed its own advertising budget.
I’ve still got a cellar full of emergency provisions I bought in anticipation of the “deadly Millenium Bug”!
All round to yours then Steve when the food shortages are rolled out.
An alternative choice of words for downplaying climate risk is “tell the truth.”
“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act” – George Orwell.
The elites squirm and squeal louder than ever as the stench of their climate bullshit wafts over more and more people as they wake up to the scam. This is a great little summary to send to those who have gone nose blind..
And whoever wrote that list didn’t mention the 1963 winter, or the 1976 summer heatwave. Maybe it’s convenient to ignore historic reality, though.
What a bloody charge sheet.
Oy! Where’s my downtick?
The climate may or may not be changing and this may or may not be influenced by human activities. That’s uncertain. What’s certain is that the people who push the climate change narrative are doing so because they believe it’ll be useufl for their preconceived political agenda and it’s also certain that these people will not ever tell the truth because whatever happens can always be improved by giving it a fanciful facelift. Assuming the Maledives were under water by now, they’d be predicting that – in 2035 – the Himalaya will be submerged unless they’re all getting house insulation and solar panel subsidies now.
Gosh yet another cock up. No plan or orchestration here. Just cock up.
We have:
the global Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority,
audit watchdog the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) published reviews on Friday
the FCA’s director of ESG.
the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB),” said
None of these outfits are doing proper work. This is bullshitting paid for by us. Actually companies trying to tell me how “green” their credentials are just piss me off.
The more this garbage is pushed the more vehement my rejection.
Another climate hoax money making scam.
It’s funny, but I thought I was looking at another shot of Lozza Fox’s mate being roughed up and arrested for flying a flag…