Apparently, many Japanese people are blissfully unaware that there is any difference between the distant yet distinct European landmasses of Ireland and Iceland; the problem stems from the rather similar phonetic pronunciation of their words ‘Aiulanndo’ (Ireland) and ‘Aisulando’ (Iceland). But, if current climate scaremongering upon the Emerald Isle is accurate, the tongue-tied Japs may have been correct all along, with Dublin set to become every bit as frozen as the ice-caps above downtown Reykjavik sometime within the next 25-50 years.
Iceland – sorry, I mean Ireland, I’m starting to turn Japanese myself here, now – is currently governed by a coalition between the Fine Gaolers, the Fianna Fáilures and the Greens, with the latter having naturally landed the plum role of Climate Minister for their own TD (what the Irish call MPs), in the shape of a man named Eamon Ryan. In an op-ed for the Irish Times on September 3rd, Ryan warned that, thanks to alterations in the Atlantic Gulf Stream caused by climate change, by the middle of this century, Ireland could become an icy, snow-bound wasteland, like Star Wars’ Planet Hoth, but with more potatoes. Ryan tweeted pure hyperbole as follows on the day his newspaper article went out:
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
https://expose-news.com/2023/09/27/climate-crisis-activists-put-meat-on-banned-adverts/
Sorry about the dump given the sensitive nature of the article.
You do know your posts are being fact-checked by people who think men can have periods, don’t you??
What should I do Mogs?
“In general, the COVID-19 vaccines have been found to be safe and effective.”
When did they stop being 100% Safe and Effective? Someone needs to tell Mr Fauci.
Also, “in general”? What’s that supposed to mean?
Credit to this Blix woman for at least looking into it, but she seems ill qualified to work in “public health” as she seems to be under the impression we’ve recently had a “pandemic”.
My 60 year old wife was one of them.
She only had the jab so she could fly to the Maldives for a holiday of a lifetime with her girlfriends she had been saving years for.
I made her fill in a Yellow Card report which took ages to complete.
She hasn’t had another jab and won’t have anymore.
I still haven’t had any sort of jab for the past 40 years and would rather stay in the UK than play Russian roulette just so I could go on a plane.
‘Safe and effective!’ The constant use of that expression makes me begin to wonder if it’s some sort of post-hypnotic trigger that’s supposed to turn off people’s cognitive functions! Perhaps it’s because I refused to watch those daily state TV broadcasts that it does nothing to me!!
I thought these days “safe and effective” has taken on the character of a Monty Python sketch, with anyone saying the words then winking, tapping their nose and saying “say no more, say no more”
It is something we could adopt on here.
Including hat phrase is most likely the only way a research study or article about any adverse effects can be published. I had a friend who experienced this bleeding. Her pregnant daughter emotionally blackmailed her into getting the jabs. My friend won’t hear a word about the effects or her manipulative daughter. I haven’t asked my daughters about this particular effect, though I did warn two–the ones less bull-headed–about similar research quite awhile ago. As usual, they didn’t listen, as mothers don’t know anything…..
““the association is still not strong enough to say ‘well, that postmenopausal bleed was probably caused by vaccination’”. Probably? Yes. Definitely? More than likely.
For any other medicine the temporal proximity to the unusual effect would be considered to indicate a causal relationship. But never for vaccines… strange, that….
So..seriously how many is that in the anti-vaxxer’s were correct … again!
…and yet it was, and on YouTube and other platforms probably still is, misinformation/disinformation… which can now get your door kicked in and get you arrested!!
Shouldn’t the MSM point out this anomaly?…they might get people believing they give a crap if they made the effort!!
More here in this 2min clip about women in France suffering all sorts of gynae irregularities. I even remember Jessica Rose reporting ages ago on VAERS entries about little girls, like pre-schoolers, who’d also started bleeding and not just elderly women but ladies in advanced age ( 80s and 90s ) who started bleeding too. This is atrocious. What on earth is happening to people’s insides??
https://twitter.com/Demo2020cracy/status/1625158402266611717
…Imagine, if you will, a “vaccine” that doesn’t stop you catching the target disease. It doesn’t stop you spreading it. Imagine, if you will, a “vaccine” that has numerous horrible side effects, seen on a much larger scale than ever seen in any previous vaccine.
I give you the COVID “Vaccine.” I give you the new definition of “Safe and Effective.”
Imagine, if you will, it’s 2019 and somebody asks you if you’d rather catch a cold or get a novel injection with 1,291 side effects that they want to keep secret for 75 years!
”When Pfizer applied for FDA approval, they were aware of almost 158,000 adverse events. This really does not paint them in a favorable light. And now, a 38-page report features an appendix with a list that says Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has 1,291 side effects.
The list includes acute kidney injury, acute flaccid myelitis, anti-sperm antibody positive, brain stem embolism, brain stem thrombosis, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, cardiac ventricular thrombosis, cardiogenic shock, central nervous system vasculitis, death neonatal, deep vein thrombosis, encephalitis brain stem, encephalitis hemorrhagic, frontal lobe epilepsy, foaming at mouth, epileptic psychosis, facial paralysis, fetal distress syndrome, gastrointestinal amyloidosis, generalized tonic-clonic seizure, Hashimoto’s encephalopathy, hepatic vascular thrombosis, herpes zoster reactivation, immune-mediated hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, jugular vein embolism, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, liver injury, low birth weight, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, myocarditis, neonatal seizure, pancreatitis, pneumonia, stillbirth, tachycardia, temporal lobe epilepsy, testicular autoimmunity, thrombotic cerebral infarction, Type 1 diabetes mellitus, venous thrombosis neonatal, and vertebral artery thrombosis among 1,246 other medical conditions following vaccination.
“This is a bombshell,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) president and general counsel Mary Holland.”
https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/pfizer-covid-vaccine-has-1291-side-effects-reveals-official-documents/
For an illness so serious that you have to be tested to see if you have it.
Way way back not after the jabs started, I recall an interview with a receptionist at a huge GP practice in the NE, who stated that there was an extraordinary number of post-menopausal women coming in with bleeding, from mild to severe.
There were many reports of unusual/abnormal vaginal bleeding with the initial virus strain too – you know, the one they used the spike protein from for the jab. It was even discussed in THAT Dark Horse podcast from June 2021 with Brett Weinstein, Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch. TPTB knew it would cause ovarian problems because it did in the few rats they tested it on – what we don’t know are the long term consequences, although I’m sure we can all guess (cancers, sterility, other reproductive failures, etc etc etc).
I bet good old Dr Viki Male would be convinced that covid was the cause of the unexpected bleeding, if it was occuring a few weeks after a positive test. The association would definitely be strong enough then, oh yes.
Either way, an obvious side effect like this wouldn’t only be showing up after almost everyone has had the jab, if it had actually been fully tested with no short cuts, would it?
Heavy menstrual bleeding leads to iron deficiency. And according to “our marvellous NHS” that makes you more susceptible to illness and infection, including heart and lung problems.
Way to go, MHRA: make people more likely to become ill by pushing a poorly tested gene therapy on millions who didn’t gain any benefit from it whatsoever but who now run the risk of severe consequences.
Yep, I’m one of those women. After two jabs of AZ.