This coming Sunday, July 14th, is Bastille Day, the annual celebration of the royal prison-fortress in question being stormed by a radical mob back in 1789, marking the real beginning of the French Revolution. In 2024, the political revolution had occurred upon the previous two Sundays, June 30th and July 7th, when the French electorate had rebelled against the 21st-century ancien régime of President Emmanuel “Let Them Eat Cake” Macron, first of all by voting for the supposedly “far Right” National Rally of Marine Le Pen, and then for a more authentically far-Left “New Popular Front” electoral alliance between Communists, Greens, Islamists and other assorted racaille, to keep the Rally out of office. Come the next French Presidential election due in 2027, King Macron himself may well be electorally guillotined and Le Pen become the nation’s new Queen.
Or, then again, maybe something else revolutionary in nature could occur – France may descend into outright civil war. At least, that was the warning of Jupiter Macron: vote for anyone other than the grown-up, rational centrists like him, and there would be immediate bloodshed. Strange, really. When Donald Trump warned of a “bloodbath” in the U.S. car industry should Biden win America’s own Presidential election earlier this year, he was spuriously accused of inciting mass violence. Why wasn’t Macron monstered by the media similarly? Because, unlike with Trump, the mainstream Western media are overwhelmingly on Macron’s side.
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Did Toby believe a single word he said about replacing Braverman or that Cameron had anything useful to offer? Really?!
If Cleverley is the best Toby can put forward for the next leader things must be worse than I tought. To follow his analogy, however, the destruction will surely be half way between Nagosaki and Hiroshima 1946. Southampton 1945 looked better than the Tories will the morning after the GE.
Haven’t listened to this yet, but if Toby says a word in defence of Sunak I’ll thcweam and thcweam and thcweam until I’m thick.
How is the return of Cameron “bizarre”? It’s entirely in keeping with the direction of travel in every possible way.
Agreed. They’re simply getting all their political ducks in a line. If we view the landscape that the elites are playing on as a battleground, which it is, then they are preparing for a huge offensive.
I have decoded the Cameron thing. Rishi will be gone soon and Cameron will be PM. Interesting idea eh? There is much more to all this, and only Nadine Dorres has written anything about it. “The Plot:” her new book, is brilliant.
Finally got round to listing to the whole podcast. Toby is still remaining adamant that anyone raising any kind of eyebrow about the ease at which Hamas found itself in Israel as “distasteful”. I’ll ask the question again: Toby, do you find questions around the complicity of the US in 9/11 “distasteful”? What about the possibility that Bush and Blair knew full well that there were no WMD in Iraq before invading? “Distasteful”? What about the possibility that the US deliberately provoked Russia into conflict? That must also be “distasteful”, right? Are you saying that anyone who questions a States complicity in an act that causes civilian deaths are “distasteful”? You must be. Or are you just cherry picking and arbitrarily choosing what people can ask questions about and what they can’t?
Please respond Toby, as my respect for you is waning by the week. I’m sure I’m not alone.
Oh, and you guys had better change the name of the podcast (and this website actually). Either that or Toby needs to reacquaint himself with the definition of ‘sceptic’.
Not too long ago Natanyahu turned all children in his nation into Pfizer guinea pigs and locked up everyone who refused. I think it’s save to say that he doesn’t care for human life. It’s why I wouldn’t dismiss the idea of him allowing the recent terror attack to happen. Yes, it’s outrageous, but so is Netanyahu’s track record.