220382
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Cochrane Editors’ Latest Statement About My Mask Study is Misleading and Spin

by Dr Tom Jefferson
14 June 2024 5:04 PM

I was one of the three people who wrote the protocol for Cochrane Review A122, ‘Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses‘ in 2006, and I have worked on all five updates. I will try to summarise what is a very confusing situation.

There are two issues here:

  1. Cochrane editorial mission control throwing us under the bus because of ‘pressure’ (let’s call it gross editorial mismanagement). This happened twice: in 2020 (fourth update) and 2023 (fifth update).
  2. Cochrane editorial mission control’s infringement of four founding principles of what was then the Cochrane Collaboration (this also took place in 2020 and 2023) is still ongoing, as none of the offending pieces of work have been retracted.

These are linked but equally serious issues.

We have told the story in a series of Trust the Evidence posts dating back two years and will continue to do so as it is far from finished, and there’s lots more to come.

The latest post is ‘Follow the narrative, not the evidence‘, about Cochrane’s race to the bottom of the evidence quality pyramid during the wokery surrounding the Covid pandemic.

And Tuesday’s ‘After Throwing Scientists Under the Bus for a Media Smearing, Cochrane Backtracks on Mask Review Statement‘, reporting how editorial mismanagement made us targets for the lobbying mob.

To add to the saga the Editors posted an update on June 6th.

This latest update adds to the confusion, as the last Cochrane Editors’ statement is misleading and spun.

The term “engagement” belies the fact that the Editor-in-Chief refused to meet with all 12 co-authors, insisted on the involvement of a mediator interacting with a single author (nominated by all the authors), and has still not explained her conduct.

The text gives the impression that the text of the review, which was approved by the editorial mission control, has been explained by interacting with the many who commented (if they are real people). This introduces two false concepts. First, that science is democratic; it can be conducted by a show of hands. The ‘Ayes’ have it. Second, that there was something to correct in the text in the first place (though curiously only in the shop windows, abstract and plain-language summary).

The Cochrane editorial bumbling opened the door to the influence of activists and overnight experts, so it’s no wonder some of you are confused.

Dr. Tom Jefferson is an epidemiologist based in Rome and lead author of the latest update to the Cochrane review of physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. This article was first published on Trust The Evidence, which you can subscribe to here.

Tags: Cancel CultureCensorshipCochrane reviewCOVID-19Face maskPropagandaThe Science

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

The Fighting-Like-Rats-in-a-Sack Theory of the Weather

Next Post

Transgender Swimmer Lia Thomas’s Former Team-Mate Demands Apology for Being “Forced to Undress With Him 18 Times a Week”

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
new follow-up comments
    Please log in to comment

    To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

    Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

    5 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    transmissionofflame
    transmissionofflame
    9 months ago

    She’s not wrong, just being dishonest about her true motives. Do you think she would be making the same arguments if left-wing speech and speakers were being cancelled from academia?

    10
    0
    RW
    RW
    9 months ago
    Reply to  transmissionofflame

    Ts ts … how nasty of you to claim her opinions were political. They’re obviously not! It’s about protecting Jewish students from spiritual genocide so that some remain for friends of Hamas to slaughter. Just what the greater good of mankind objectively dictates.

    2
    0
    transmissionofflame
    transmissionofflame
    9 months ago
    Reply to  RW

    I am apparently very nasty – just as well there are so many nice people to counterbalance my malign influence 🙂

    3
    0
    Ron Smith
    Ron Smith
    9 months ago

    One of the many things not in the King’s Speech. There is more to come. Fancy calling legislation defending free speech as ‘burdensome’!

    6
    0
    RW
    RW
    9 months ago

    In the end, then, all roads it seems will lead us, rather than to what was meant to be a newly beefed-up Office for Students, to court.

    This obviously implies no redress for students which is presumably the main motivation of Phillipson. Forced political indoctrination would become really burdensome if it was ok to be ok with being white.

    Last edited 9 months ago by RW
    4
    0
    DHJ
    DHJ
    9 months ago

    Special interests vs. Special interests.

    Wouldn’t it be good if free speech protection was consistent for everyone or better still, we recognise we may hear things we don’t like and may disagree with the opinions of others. Are campuses a bastion of truth, reason and sensibility that should get special treatment?

    4
    0
    modularist
    modularist
    9 months ago

    I suspect a significant driver in this is the amount of income that comes from overseas students, especially China, which is not a beacon of freedom and tolerance to criticism.

    Visiting academics or speakers who might be prone to talking about Uighur slaves and environmental destruction, both of which have been well documented, are problematic.

    7
    0

    NEWSLETTER

    View today’s newsletter

    To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

    DONATE

    PODCAST

    The End of American Empire? – With Doug Stokes

    by Richard Eldred
    2 May 2025
    5

    LISTED ARTICLES

    • Most Read
    • Most Commented
    • Editors Picks

    News Round-Up

    7 May 2025
    by Richard Eldred

    BREAKING: Merz Government Orders Pushback of All Illegal Migrants at German Borders, Effectively Abolishing Asylum

    7 May 2025
    by Eugyppius

    Orsted Cancels Hornsea 4 Wind Farm – and Kills Miliband’s ‘Clean Power 2030’ Agenda Dead

    7 May 2025
    by David Turver

    Council Net Zero Madness

    7 May 2025
    by Charlotte Gill

    Reform Councillors Refuse Training on Net Zero and Diversity

    6 May 2025
    by Will Jones

    News Round-Up

    39

    Orsted Cancels Hornsea 4 Wind Farm – and Kills Miliband’s ‘Clean Power 2030’ Agenda Dead

    30

    Conservatives Slump to 17% in Poll

    27

    Reform Councillors Refuse Training on Net Zero and Diversity

    35

    BREAKING: Merz Government Orders Pushback of All Illegal Migrants at German Borders, Effectively Abolishing Asylum

    16

    BREAKING: Merz Government Orders Pushback of All Illegal Migrants at German Borders, Effectively Abolishing Asylum

    7 May 2025
    by Eugyppius

    Definitive Guide to the WHO Pandemic Agreement

    7 May 2025
    by Dr David Bell and Dr Thi Thuy Van Dinh

    Orsted Cancels Hornsea 4 Wind Farm – and Kills Miliband’s ‘Clean Power 2030’ Agenda Dead

    7 May 2025
    by David Turver

    Council Net Zero Madness

    7 May 2025
    by Charlotte Gill

    China’s Climate Charade: A Green Façade for Economic Supremacy

    7 May 2025
    by Tilak Doshi

    POSTS BY DATE

    June 2024
    M T W T F S S
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    « May   Jul »

    SOCIAL LINKS

    Free Speech Union
    • Home
    • About us
    • Donate
    • Privacy Policy

    Facebook

    • X

    Instagram

    RSS

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    © Skeptics Ltd.

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password? Register

    Create New Account!

    Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

    Already have an account?
    Please click here to login Log In

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    wpDiscuz
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Articles
    • About
    • Archive
      • ARCHIVE
      • NEWS ROUND-UPS
    • Podcasts
    • Newsletter
    • Premium
    • Donate
    • Log In

    © Skeptics Ltd.

    You are going to send email to

    Move Comment
    Perfecty
    Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
    Notifications preferences