The dangers of poorly drafted laws relating to online speech and expression were starkly revealed late this March when it emerged that a heavily pregnant businesswoman had been arrested in Nigeria, banged up in a water-flooded prison cell and threatened with a sentence of seven years behind bars and a £2.8m fine in damages – all for the heinous crime of criticising a tin of a local tomato purée product online.
Chioma Okoli, 39, reportedly said the purée in question – which I shan’t name here, for fear of being immediately beheaded by overseas operatives from the Tomato Blasphemy Dept. of Boko Haram – was “too sweet” for her tastes, leading to her being contacted by a man claiming (possibly figuratively, using local Nigerian slang) to be the “brother” of the businessman who made the stuff and told to stop complaining about it to her 18,000 followers on the internet.
To this request, Okoli replied: “Help me advise your brother to stop ki**ing [‘killing’, presumably] people with his product, yesterday was my first time of using and it’s pure sugar.” The company owner deemed this statement to be somehow defamatory in nature – I guess he took the insinuation that his tomatoes were “killing” customers literally? – saying that, as it had gone viral online, it had since cost him oodles of custom.
For carelessly expressing this heinous viewpoint in such a reckless public fashion, Okoli was subsequently charged in both criminal and civil suits with severe offences like “instigating [public opinion against] Erisco Foods Limited, knowing the said information to be false”. After all, no matter how much sugar the tins may or may not have contained, they did not literally represent a real-life Attack of the Killer Tomatoes, did they?
The Nigerian Police Force put out the following solemn statement about the whole affair on Twitter:
I cannot pretend to be an expert in the minutiae of Nigerian online hate and libel laws but – whenever and by whomever they were drafted and passed – are cases as absurd as the above really what their creators hoped they would one day be used for?
A Real Act of Harm
Amidst some stiff competition from the likes of Scotland and Ireland, perhaps the most ill-conceived piece of web-related anti-free speech legislation currently being pushed through in the Western world today is Canada’s appalling Online Harms Act, a real pet project of the nation’s present simpering woke man-child PM, Justin ‘Aladdin Sane’ Trudeau. So badly written is it, Canadian web-users may soon be seeking asylum in downtown Lagos, where they will probably be infinitely more free to speak their hateful little minds, whether specifically about tomatoes or otherwise.
Already decried on the Daily Sceptic, the provisions of this Act have aptly been deemed “Orwellian” due to their incredibly illiberal provisions which, astonishingly, allow provincial Canadian judges to order individuals to be placed under house arrest if they deem there to be “reasonable grounds” to believe a person “will commit” an offence of “online harm” hate-speech in the future. That’s the basic plot of Philip K. Dick’s Minority Report come true; Protected Minority Report, maybe.
According to Boyband Justin’s [Social] Justice Minister and Attorney General Arif Virani, who introduced the Bill pushing the Act into possibly forthcoming law, he was “terrified of the dangers that lurk on the internet for our children”. Personally, I’m much more terrified of the dangers that currently lurk inside the West’s ‘democratic’ parliament assemblies for our children, Mr. Virani being a prime example of such hazards.
According to the mollifying mantras of individuals such as Virani, however, the harshest uses of Bill C-63, as it will be known, will supposedly be used very, very sparingly indeed – an offender would specifically have to portray a protected group (i.e., all the usual ones) as being “inherently violent” or “unhuman” to be prosecuted under threat of the greatest punishments available, to such an extent that their words could be considered to be advocating genocide. If somebody is found guilty of this particular offence, they might well be sentenced to life imprisonment. In Nigeria, you only get seven years for dissing tinned purée products.
Well – fair enough, some may say. Nobody wants genocide to happen, do they? If only Adolf Hitler had been banned from Twitter, with his all smart-devices confiscated from him by the excessively lax Weimar-era State, then six million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals and assorted other items of supposed human refuse need never have died at all.
Others, however, disagree. The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CFF), for instance, thinks Trudeau’s Act may well be unconstitutional, as:
The Bill would create a new process for individuals and groups to complain to the Canadian Human Rights Commission that online speech directed at them is discriminatory. The tribunal could order fines of up to $50,000, and awards of up to $20,000 paid to complainants, who in some cases would be anonymous. Findings would be based on a mere ‘balance of probabilities’ standard rather than the [much higher] criminal standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The subjectivity of defining ‘hate speech’ will lead to punishments for protected speech. The mere threat of human rights complaints will chill large amounts of [previously constitutionally-] protected speech.
When is “protected speech” no longer protected? When people are being “protected” from “harm” even more by an utterly ‘benign’ Big Brother Government, that’s when!
The Truth Will Set You Unfree
Meanwhile, even David L. Thomas, the former Chairman – sorry, ‘Chairperson’, don’t accidentally want to commit an online hate-crime – of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal complains that Trudeau’s and Virani’s Act will, um, breach Canadians’ Human Rights. In an op-ed piece for leading Canuck newspaper the National Post, Thomas argued that:
The Liberal government’s proposed Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act, is terrible law that will unduly impose restrictions on Canadians’ sacred Charter right to freedom of expression. That is what the Liberals [Trudeau’s and Virani’s Party] intend. By drafting a vague law creating a draconian regime to address online ‘harms’, they will win their wars without firing a bullet… Criticism of Government policies, like immigration policy for example, might suddenly become dangerous.
So, for example, if one were to say that the introduction of such a rhetorically restrictive Bill by a man of obvious non-white immigrant stock like Arif Virani sounds suspiciously like a backdoor means for legally preventing any future public criticism about being forced to admit millions more people just like him into the country – an opinion which, whether it be true or false, would have been perfectly legal for any Canadian citizen to openly express prior to the creation of Bill C-63 – then one could, in the opinion of several informed observers like David L. Thomas, soon be prosecuted for it.
But, if one were to be prosecuted in order to shut you up for complaining that the whole law was specifically designed to shut you up from talking about such now-verboten issues in the first place, then would this not ironically prove that you were correct to make such accusations after all? Ah, but under the terms of the proposed Act, that’s no defence in court, either.
According to a comprehensive online demolition of the Bill produced by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) in February, “Those who are prosecuted by the Human Rights Commission [under the proposed Act] cannot defend themselves by establishing that their supposedly ‘hateful’ statement is true, or that they had reasonable grounds for believing that their statement is true.” Shades of the recent Sam Melia ‘racist stickers’ judgment, methinks (for my own appalled thoughts on which, by the way, see here).
If this particular assessment is indeed correct, then Trudeau’s Act really is well-described as being Orwellian in its scope, as it will quite literally contain provision for people to be prosecuted for ‘Truth-Crimes’, just like in 1984. Still, that’s ‘liberalism’ for you – or what currently goes around posing as it, at any rate.
The True Price of the Bill
The JCCF’s takedown of Bill C-63 is well worth reading in full, but amongst other clear flaws in the legislation, the organisation points out the following:
- Complainants can be anonymous, and only have to assert to a provincial court that they “fear” someone may promote genocide online, not that they have done so; if found ‘guilty’ [sic] of a crime they have therefore not even yet committed, ‘offenders’ will be subjected to “pre-emptive punishment” in terms of enforced curfews, house arrest, electronic tagging, bans upon consuming alcohol, visiting certain places or people, or else outright imprisonment.
- Under the terms of the Act, suggestions to commit genocide online need not actually be acted upon – indeed, how could they be? Very few individuals these days have a spare gas-chamber handy and waiting at the bottom of their back garden, or a helicopter gunship filled with hundreds of cannisters of waiting sarin or VX nerve-agents stored away inside the garage. In order to actually be able to commit genocide, you need the entire force of the centralised apparatus of the nation-state behind you: no matter how virulently any given individual online loudmouth may wish to eliminate the Jews/blacks/Eskimos/extended Trudeau and Virani clans from Canada wholesale, the only people with any even remote vague possibility of actually being able to do so one day are those who currently hold political power, i.e., men like Justin and Arif themselves. Therefore, say the JCCF, “Free societies recognise the distinction between speech and actions. The Online Harms Act blurs that distinction.” Or, a more forthright critic might say, recklessly erases it wholesale.
- As the Act will give the Canadian Human Rights Commission new powers to prosecute “offensive but non-criminal speech”, this inevitably empowers malcontents or the mentally ill to subjectively deem any subject under the sun to be ‘hateful’ just because they personally happen to think it is, which sounds like an absolute cranks’ charter. Have a grudge against someone? Why not just make an anonymous complaint to the authorities about their Facebook posts and see if you can ruin their life, consequence-free (at least for you)? Under the terms of the Act, you may even get a CA$20,000 reward, direct from the pockets of the ‘criminal’; Trudeau’s own Government could be handed over an additional CA$50,000 in addition. Although many prosecutions under the proposed Act will not technically be criminal in nature, as so often, says the JCCF, the process is effectively the punishment in and of itself, as such court cases will prove exceedingly costly and time-consuming to defendants.
- As complaints are potentially anonymous, “centuries of Common Law tradition” go out of the window, in terms of “the ancient and well-founded right to face and question one’s accuser” – if you even have an accuser, that is. Astonishingly, “No actual victims are required for the Canadian Human Rights Commission to find guilt or to impose penalties.” Thus, Trudeau has inadvertently given birth to a new legal variant to the old Zen koan “If a tree falls in a forest and no-one is there to hear it, does it still make a sound?” in terms of “If you write ‘KILL ALL THE INJUNS!!!’ on Twitter and no-one reads it, have you still incited genocide under the terms of Bill C-63?”. Unlike Zen koans, however, Trudeau’s own legal conundrum actually has a definite answer to it: “Yes. Yes you have, and now you’re going to go to jail for it. Forever.”
As Canada’s greatest living author (Canada only has one great living author at present, the others have all just been executed for saying naughty things under the exciting new legal principle of “pre-emptive punishment”) Margaret Atwood warned about Bill C-63 on X: “The possibilities for revenge, false accusations + thoughtcrime stuff are sooo inviting!”
As the author of The Handmaid’s Tale, Atwood knows quite a bit about the construction of disturbing totalitarian dystopias from which there is no possible human escape – but she has nothing in this respect on her countryman Justin Trudeau.
And yet, as we shall see next time, so ineptly has the Act been drafted, it does raise one rather delicious possibility: namely, that Justin Trudeau himself could be prosecuted under its terms, upon the potential charge of encouraging genocide himself!
Steven Tucker is a journalist and the author of over 10 books, the latest being Hitler’s & Stalin’s Misuse of Science: When Science Fiction Was Turned Into Science Fact by the Nazis and the Soviets (Pen & Sword/Frontline), which is out now.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“The Big Short” was an excellent movie – anything with Christian Bale is worth a look – although the central role of the Federal government (Barney Fwank et al) in creating the housing crisis was passed over without the slightest reference.
Michael Burry has been wrong far more often and costly than right since then.
A bit like Odey.
He wasn’t a fan of lockdowns
Where’s the outrage?
How come the DS doesn’t cover Julian Assange?
It seems to me that his persecution is the single most important event in journalism in the last 10 years. In fact, could it be the reason that mainstream journalists have become enthusiastic cheerleaders of the establishment and have ceased to question authority properly?
Assange definitely showed what the establishment will do to you if you embarrass it really badly.
I’m with you 100%….He has now spent his fifth birthday (in July) in Bellmarsh..it’s an absolute travesty….and an egregious stain on reputation of the United Kingdom…..
Every single MSM platform should do the Convid thing and have his days imprisonment in the top corner ticking down, and they should have regular updates about him..the fact they say and do nothing speaks volumes….and every time they talk about the plight of journalists throughout the world, they sounds insincere, stupid and hypocritical….
A couple of days ago Steve Bell did a cartoon for the Guardian..you can see it before it goes to a paywall here…
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/picture/2023/aug/14/steve-bell-reports-julian-assange-offered-plea-deal-cartoon?CMP=fb_cif
Assange Plea Bargain: For What Crime Exactly?…”
Caitlin Johnson hit the nail on the head for me…
“It really is nuts that there’s talk of Assange being offered a “plea bargain” for rightly exposing US war crimes. What’s he meant to plead guilty to? Good journalism?”
FREE ASSANGE NOW!
Caitlin’s article..
https://www.caitlinjohnst.one/p/an-assange-plea-deal-for-what-crime
Hear, hear, Stewart! Assange continues to languish in a high security prison despite never being formally charged. Five years now! His extradition case lingers on in vain hope of reprieve and every day is a step closer to being bundled into plane and across the oceans to rot in a maximum security hellhole that could only ever designed and devised by the cruellest minds. The fact that so few journalists want to talk about Julian Assange shows how utterly spineless they are and how corrupt their editors are. This is about freedom of speech and they are in the free speech business, the opinion business, but of course they are not. The Overton window only allows so much lateral movement after all. It’s sort of obvious that orders come from above never to touch this story but to try and pretend it doesn’t matter. Just how an ambitious journalist can live with this set of conditions placed upon them is probably explained by the fact that they have debts, mortgages, bills, families and children and it’s so easy to have your life destroyed just as Julian Assange’s life was destroyed. He is the cautionary tale of journalism, the dark woods you should never venture into because there are monsters in there and they are real.
On the news in NL:
Plans to create a pipeline to pump CO2 under the seabed are to go ahead. The pipeline will run from the Rotterdam harbour (apparently responsible for 1.5 % of Dutch CO2 emissions) to the North Sea bed.
What could possibly go wrong?
Interview with Gambian asylum seeker…’I will go on holiday to Gambia as soon as I can’…
The CO2 carbon capture industry seems like the perfect scam, how will anybody ever know if you actually ever captured or stored anything? Whether it works or not? it will make no difference to ourselves or our lives, we will just all be poorer paying for a pointless industry to do nothing of any consequence. Nice work if you can get it.
Yes, just a few important looking pipes and some bubbling water and ‘hey presto!’ you could even get a government grant and become rich beyond your wildest dreams…just like every other self-serving government contractor!
The people behind bottled fresh air businesses will be sensing an opportunity: –
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/shortcuts/2021/mar/01/take-a-deep-breath-how-cornish-air-sells-for-60-a-bottle-even-if-its-from-devon
‘The great replacement’ appears to be going great guns and has already succeeded in some European cities, and there are data to demonstrate this is so;
”The fear of the peoples of Europe in the face of mass immigration is constantly described as “xenophobia”. This is the fear that the camarillas in charge can denounce as “racism”, raising the specter of a democratic apocalypse, while the accepted “narrative” evokes an inclusive majority and an excluded minority which, thanks to hyper-tolerance policies, will benefit from it.
But only the blind can deny the ongoing disintegration which validates the sociological thesis of the disappearance of the majority and the birth of a cottage cheese society.
“Buying vegetables from the Moroccans, meat from the Turks and olives from the Greeks is nice, but that’s not enough. If we really want to live together, even people without a migration background will have to do their best. Now they are the minority in many cities”. Such are the findings in a study by Professor Maurice Crul (VU University Amsterdam). He examined six major cities in five countries: Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Malmö, Hamburg, Vienna and Antwerp.
“The selection is not random”. This is where native Europeans are no longer the majority.
In three out of four provinces in Spain there are more arrivals of migrants than births. Most of the new Spanish population now comes from abroad. In 2037, one in four Spanish residents will be born abroad. Already today, 8 percent of all those born in Spain are Moroccans. And the total number of Muslims in Spain has increased tenfold in thirty years.
And in Italy? We’re getting there. 100,000 migrants have landed since the beginning of the year alone, an average of 450 foreigners a day and an increase of 135 percent compared to the same period in 2022.”
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/375483
If anyone wishes to nerd-out here is the 2021 paper Professor Crul et al wrote on which he subsequently wrote a book ( ‘The New Minority ) this year, but I can only find it in Dutch so here’s the study;
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2021.1906925
Not great news from NZ;
”There were 38,442 deaths among all ages for July 2022-June 2023 compared to 33,753 deaths in the 2018/19 comparable period. This is an increase of 4,689 deaths (up 14%) which occurred at a rate of 90 excess deaths per week.
Working age people were also affected. Deaths among 15 to 64 year olds were up by 6%. Figures released by the Household Labour Force Survey reports rates of disability sufficient to preclude joining the workforce among this age group has increased by 37.5% over the same period and now stands at 14.3% of the workforce. That is huge. Why?
Alarmingly, natural live birth increase (births minus deaths) fell from 26,500 in 2018/19 to 19,185 in 2022/23 a decrease of 7,400 or 28%. This is an absolutely unprecedented drop. Nothing even remotely like this has been recorded previously.
Covid deaths over this whole period reported by Our World in Data appear insufficient to explain the increase in deaths. Nor is an ageing population sufficient explanation for the figures that is a long term gradual trend, this is a sudden rise.”
https://hatchardreport.com/deaths-are-up-natural-births-are-down-and-disability-is-up/
Jinx!…..was just putting this on from Australia….very similar….
https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/all-cause-mortality-started-trending
All-cause mortality started trending upwards with vax rollout, not Covid, report finds
Prior to the pandemic, Australians were living longer, with death rates amongst older Australians trending downwards. But in 2021, that trendline upturned, and Australia started chalking up excess mortality at rates not seen since WWII.
The numbers are truly frightening….
You’re right, gums, it is frightening. It’s all in line with what Ed Dowd is reporting from the US data but also the UK data, whereby he demonstrated significant increases in disability in working age people. All of this correlating data from various countries…
Well this may not go far..even Buckhault’s classes himself as a ‘nobody’….…but if you have been following Kevin McKernan’s discovery of the fact that the vaccines are contaminated with Plasmid DNA..you’ll know that Buckhault’s has repeated Kevin’s experiments and confirmed them…
Just putting that up so you will understand the context of the tweet…and I really believe every little thing helps..especially if it’s based on a purely scientific basis?
Phillip J. Buckhaults, Ph.D.
@P_J_Buckhaults
An open appeal to health care workers around the world. The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA. I want to test tissue and blood samples from people recently vaccinated and see if there is any evidence of this DNA integrating into host genomic DNA. PM me if you would like to help. Thanks. -Dr B.
https://twitter.com/P_J_Buckhaults
“The real cause of the Maui wildfire disaster”
So a strong wind blows down a mountain side and a town below bursts into flames?!
Also stated are strong winds that snap off power poles and rip rooves of! Compare the ariel photos of the Maui fires/hurricane winds to real hurricane damage , the roads are blocked by debris within seconds, why are all the roads in the town perfectly unaffected by debris? Was there a wind or wasn’t there? swimming pools clear of debris, tarmac unaffected by searing heat, buildings raised to the ground while trees around them still have their leaves! I didn’t see and power poles down in the pictures and not a one of them laying across a road!
I think it seems to be arsonist season in various countries; Canada, Greece, Maui ( Jeff Bezos’ place is apparently untouched, as is Oprah’s, so that’s OK then ) and now Tenerife. What happened in Maui though is extreme and especially bad due to the loss of lives, including many kids, and also still so many unanswered questions. Like why did their warning system not go off, why did they have no water and where were the fire brigade? And apparently the vulture estate agents are already offering residents money for their properties.
”A wildfire that ignited within a mountainous national park on the Spanish island of Tenerife on Wednesday has rapidly expanded, officials said.
Hundreds firefighters are trying to bring the major blaze under control on the largest of Spain’s Canary Islands.”
https://www.dw.com/en/wildfire-on-spains-tenerife-burning-out-of-control/a-66555063
Arsonists season is a very real explanation.
Best way to check wether it’s a natural fire or not: if it’s naturally caused look for a reported volcanic event, a lightning storm or on the infinitesimally small chance of a meteor impact!
Non of those? = Human causes !
Agreed, Dings. But I’m a bit ignorant on the whole subject of wildfires. We’ve obviously always had countries which are prone to them due to having longer spells of hot, dry weather, creating a dry tinder environment, so what would cause a naturally-started wildfire without any human involvement whatsoever, aside from your above examples? I don’t know what the score is in Tenerife and were the fires in Greece established arson? The problem is when it’s a huge area, like the case with the Canadian fires, or somewhere out in the sticks, even if arson was suspected how on earth would you even ever catch the culprits? Apparently Maui has previous form for arsonists starting fires, according to Ed Dowd.
Another reminder, if one were needed, of the immensity of the ‘scam’..it’s enough to make your head explode..and frankly I’m not sure what I am now, as I’m beyond ‘incandescent with rage’….
https://brokentruth.com/nihgate/
Does the NIH have a process in place to ‘take down’ studies, papers, or people that go against the NIH’s financial interests? Is a member of the NIH who works on a US Army Base colluding with researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
Apparently, yes. Read on to find out what we’ve uncovered so far in our developing NIHgate series.
WHY aren’t people going to jail?
More on the horrific sexual assault in France. It appears that the monster that did this was known to the authorities and had previous form, including the sexual assault of his little sister. FFS though! And they let this dangerous psychopath roam free to strike again at will?!! Can we expect some rioting any time soon do you think??
”The 18-year-old suspect in custody for the barbaric rape of a 29-year-old woman in the French port city of Cherbourg-en-Cotentin already had a rap sheet consisting of 17 offenses involving violence, theft, and the incestuous sexual assault of his younger sister.
Oumar Ndiaye was arrested by French authorities on Aug. 10 for an attack that has rocked the nation and prompted several interventions from high-ranking politicians.
Dubbed “the monster of Cherbourg” by French conservative activist Damien Rieu, Nidaye allegedly broke into his victim’s home before subjecting the young woman to multiple counts of rape, which included the use of a 29-inch broomstick to penetrate her and inflict life-threatening injuries.
Several high-profile politicians across France have expressed their anger over the attack with conservative lawmakers warning that such crime is on the rise in the country.
“Courage to the 29-year-old victim, the umpteenth life shattered by the barbarism that is gaining in France,” tweeted Jordan Bardella, president of the National Rally.
“I dream of a France where a young woman is not in danger of ending up in a coma after being robbed, raped and horribly tortured by Oumar, a repeat offender, in her own home,” added former presidential candidate Éric Zemmour.”
https://rmx.news/crime/teen-suspect-for-barbaric-rape-of-french-woman-with-broomstick-was-already-being-investigated-for-sexually-assaulting-his-minor-sister/
“It’s time to abolish the university”
A pretty poor attempt at satire by Eagleton IMHO (who unfortunately was required reading on my last uni course). The comments section (especially the first ‘by Pil Grim’) is far better.
As a related aside, two independent organisations I’ve done short courses with recently have both been thrown off their platforms with no notice and had to scramble to relocate. It seems that any attempt to break from the stranglehold of The Narrative™ is in the firing line.
The problem of the “university” is not new:
What’s a’ your jargon o’ your schools-
Your Latin names for horns an’ stools?
If honest Nature made you fools,
What sairs your grammars?
Ye’d better ta’en up spades and shools,
Or knappin-hammers.
A set o’ dull, conceited hashes
Confuse their brains in college classes!
They gang in stirks, and come out asses,
Plain truth to speak;
An’ syne they think to climb Parnassus
By dint o’ Greek!
– Robert Burns (1785)
Yea Gods I thought he was long gone!! I remember doing a ‘Marxist reading of Frankenstein’….LOL! There’s a few hours I’ll never get back!!
Although this was way back at Sheffield University..the home of Labour/Socialism…so he was considered to have deity status!! LOL!
You too eh?! I had to wade through The Idea of Culture – what a joy. Not. He did a good take-down of Richard Dawkins though. (According to Wiki he’s still at it at U Lancaster at the age of 80. Don’t these people ever let go??!!)
Births in 2022 in England and Wales ONS publication just out
https://www.ons.gov.uk/releases/birthsinenglandandwales2022
There were 605,479 live births in England and Wales in 2022, a 3.1% decrease from 624,828 in 2021 and the lowest number since 2002
Don’t have time to look at it properly, but I’m posting up so others can see.
This is the ONS chart showing live births, note this doesn’t adjust for female population size in childbearing ages
Thanks for taking the time to post these…I just don’t know what to make of it all…
I do know that right back at the beginning of this crap shoot I was looking at the 6 monthly Pfizer Vaccine Updates as they released them….and they never once said anything other than they didn’t have enough data for pregnant and lactating women…..
I have never known how that translated so quickly into ‘all pregnant women need to be jabbed’….?
Where did the people who decided to jab get their data if it wasn’t from the vaccine manufacturer?…….and who made those decisions…and why? Seems like someone should answer it doesn’t it?
It would be ironic if court action resulted in the staff of the Leith Arches living under the arches in Leith.
https://off-guardian.org/2023/08/16/isis-are-back-and-theyre-faker-than-ever/
Kit Knightly with another excellent take-down of the return of ISIS.
Desperation.
Paul Weston´s latest talk today on YouTube spells it all out – in his inimitable fashion.
I gather he´s been debanked and fled England. Where to?