Children as young as seven are skipping school to join pro-Palestine marches, with various hard Left groups behind the protests. The Mail has more.
Hardline groups are advising parents on how to avoid fines from schools and on setting up protests, according to the Policy Exchange think-tank.
The wave of truancy comes amid a school absence crisis triggered by the pandemic.
Education Secretary Gillian Keegan said last night that it was unacceptable for pupils to put activism ahead of study.
The report claims some parents were allegedly told by teachers they would not be penalised over the protests.
The Policy Exchange also says that:
- The hard-Left Stop the War Coalition co-ordinated parents and children to strike together across the country
- Young activists were directed to material from Cage, a hardline group accused of sympathising with terrorists after calling Islamic State fanatic Jihadi John a “beautiful young man”
- Children as young as seven were seen chanting the slogan ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’
- Activist teachers in Bristol have waived through the absences saying there would be “no risk of a fine”
Mrs. Keegan said: “Children should be in school. While I would always encourage young people to engage in world events, doing so by joining protests during school time is unacceptable.
“I am deeply concerned political groups are encouraging children to join protests at the cost of invaluable time in the classroom. Children should not be used as political tools by campaign groups, who in some cases hold extreme views.
“I strongly support schools and local authorities in setting clear expectations that pupils should be in school, and in taking action where that is not the case including using fines where applicable.”
Thousands of schoolchildren have attended marches in recent weeks. More than 400 attended a single protest in Tower Hamlets, East London, on November 16th, while 500 marched in Redbridge, North-East London, on November 17th.
Another 300 children at Beal High School in Ilford, East London, boycotted an assembly with local Labour MP and Health spokesman Wes Streeting over his stance on the war in Gaza.
The report by the Policy Exchange sparked outrage from MPs and experts who called for parents who allow their children to join protests to be fined.
Worth reading in full.
The Times has also reported on the involvement of Stop the War Coalition, a front for the Socialist Workers’ Party, in the schoolchildren’s protests.
Stop Press: Leading period product company Hey Girls has prompted outrage by telling schoolgirls that men can have periods.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Whitty is an evil man but he is also a scared man. He will spend the rest of his days looking over his shoulders.
Good.
Just imaging mass non compliance like this:
The great SICKOUT spreads as airline pilots, railway workers, air traffic controllers, police, firefighters and the other people who keep society running say NO to vaccine coercion and threats
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-10-11-the-great-sickout-spreads-as-airline-pilots-railway-workers-police-firefighters-say-no-to-vaccine-coercion.html
Saturday 16th October 1pm
Hold the Line Stand by the Road (bring your Boards & Banners) event
– plus walk to the Town Centre
Stand in the Park
Make friends – keep sane – talk freedom and have a laugh
Wokingham Stand in the Park Howard Palmer Gardens RG40 2HD Sundays 10am
behind the Cockpit Path car park in the centre of the town
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Bracknell Stand in the Park South Hill Park Sundays 10am & Wednesdays 2pm
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Reading Stand in the Park River Promenade Sundays 10am
Telegram https://t.me/standindparkreading
Depends how brutal the regime is in your specific part of the global state. In the Australian sector, protests were met by horseback police with truncheons, also tear gas, rubber bullets, threats of unemployment, and police interrogations. Journalists from the Australian newspaper of record were beaten and tear-gassed, the internet was cut to stop news getting out and a no-fly zone was put over Melbourne to stop TV helicopters capturing the beatdown.
Never mind – you can have a laugh about it all in Bracknell.
The “sick out” article you link to and the news about Texas not mandating jabs gave me some hope – hope that those attitudes might spread across the Atlantic to Europe and that people here might read them and begin to cop on.
It looks like the paid troll raye has been marking down your excellent post.
He looks like he’s 70 years old. (In his mid fifties actually). Carrying all that guilt must be making him age prematurely.
He’s been a Bill Gates paid operative for decades, but as a psychopath he won’t be carrying any guilt.
Chris Whitty’s fan club here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpCxpmegbnE
Into the corners of a very small cell, I hope.
Looking at his eyes, you can tell he already has his bags packed!
I may be wrong, but he can only look over both shoulders – at the same time – if his neck could swivel aprox. 180 degrees.
That said, I would attain great pleasure in helping him in that regard.
Which is tricky when his head is shoved right up where the sun does not shine
Likewise Vallance.
How a vaccine policy should work in a true democracy, say like Norway or Sweden…
Because your hospital is my hospital, I guess.
If you ever experience any avoidable disease or injury, I’m sure you’ll do the right thing and die alone in a ditch rather than burdening Our NHS and inconveniencing the Deserving Sick.
Its ok Rogerborg – according to another post Rayc made somewhere else on the site today he is saying he is in Germany – he won’t be a burden to NHS. I, personally, don’t think Rayc has a clue where he is or who he is supposed to be from one day to the next on this site.
It’s raye the paid troll hard at work again, I guess.
The simple fact that recovering from SARS2 provides protection against catching it again, whereas the clot-shot does not shows that only recording whether you’ve been jabbed or not is not based on medical reasons.
The fact they claim the jab is not risky, but give immunity to the manufacturer shows they are lying about risks (name another product like this).
Let me guess, around the world they’ll be identical 9 point plans that were all independently come to by “experts” and no you cannot see the minutes of those meetings.
“Offering the vaccine to those with an underlying health condition makes sense“
I am sick of seeing this bit of propaganda.
It’s not rocket science. Even given the general curtailment of the testing program – the vulnerable were excluded from any RCT and, secondly, the curve of all cause mortality shows that rise after the introduction of the snake oil to that group.
I am sick of seeing this bit of propaganda.
Oh yes indeed! People with inadequate immune systems are being given “toxic death shots,” which will wreck their immune systems for what will be the rest of their short lives.
No you are right – there is no evidence base. The vulnerable are likely even more vulnerable to harm than the fit. It is hard to understand that argument.
You aren’t supposed to understand it – you just need to believe that it’s true because our glorious leaders say it is so!
And sadly plenty of people do, because, after all, it’s “the science”
I too have never understood why a “vulnerable” person should be exposed to an inadequately tested, novel and dangerous treatment. Especially after the death rates in care homes following the vaccine deployment.
Maybe because they are expendable?
Maybe because they are expendable?
Yes, they are expendable and their vulnerability allows some plausible deniability when they take a turn for the worse. But in the fairly near future, it will be apparent to even the dullest Covidian that we are all very expendable.
I thought vaccination was to mend the mental health issues.
Uneducated people are uninformed people, they are easily led due to ignorance, easily influenced to perform acts of depravity as they are encouraged to cling to the herd. A population mass like this makes things very easy for the Whitty elites who seek to dominate and control. So any excuse not to educate the children of those not belonging to the high castes as decided by the likes of Valance and Zahawi will and is being used.
The answer. set up community schools staffed and operated by the community using retired teachers, experts and disenfranchised teachers who will provide an infinitely superior eductation than that currently being provided by the state.
As a teacher I would gladly contribute to this. But what are the chances of these psychopaths allowing that to go on unchallenged?
Where is a UK politico with the balls and common sense of Craig KellyMP?
https://twitter.com/JamesMelville/status/1447690275191672836?s=20
We need more people of influence and in power in Britain to call out this Covidian Cult Sham for what it is right now… a sick zero carbon/zero covid agenda of coercive technofacist authoritarianism before it is too late.
Didn’t they pass a bill to outlaw home schooling in France?
France fucking terrifies me at the moment.
Sadly, it’s actually the most educated who are following the narrative most trustingly. Most of my uni friends are totally behind it. Whereas when I’m talking to other parents at the kids’ footy matches, who are doing ordinary jobs, unlike my lawyer etc friends, they are generally pretty critical. I think this is even a known phenomenon. Look at e.g. Martin Heidegger. Maybe the better educated you are the more likely you are to identify as part of the system, particularly if the system then rewards you with a good job…
Perhaps because it is the hallmark of the stupid to vocally oppose something which actually benefits you.
It would be of great benefit to humanity if your sergeant put you on other duties.
Think that’s deffo true I’ve observed anecdotally that the kids whose parents want them to be masked/jabbed tend to be the ones from middle-class more ‘educated’ families whereas the working class kids instinctively don’t want anything to do with it. Which speaks volumes about the thing we refer to as the education system!
if you suspect as i do, that people are being re-engineered to be “pets” (i.e. permanently childlike neotes) rather than behave as adults.
Yep, I worry that the “vaxxine” will wipe out the British middle class.
Reminds me of other revolutions where the middle class were targeted, as the cultural inheritors and the most resistant to the necessary change.
Well written – the more benign explanation is keeping the pipeline running for Pfizer. The less benign is the ID 2020 Alliance (which is not a figment of my imagination). https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/10/the-id2020-alliance-the-global-totalitarian-project-hiding-behind-the-vaccine-drive.html
“Tributes have poured in for Olympic diving coach David Jenkins who died over the weekend aged just 31.
The highly-respected coach, who had worked with diving star Tom Daley, was part of Team GB‘s Tokyo 2020 training squad – which helped secure a joint-record medals haul at this year’s Olympic games.
David’s death was confirmed by British Swimming on Monday, although the cause remains unknown. ”
Cause unknown? I think we do know!
‘After a short illness’
yes – seeing that a lot re a swathe of deaths in recent months – prior to all this it used to be a euphemism for “died from cancer”. Now you can be fairly certain it means “died after jab”. I’d imagine the majority of the population still think it means “cancer”.
Yes it was cancer, then AIDS and now it’s the Klopp Shot.
There are now rumours that the bereaved are being encouraged to keep quiet about the cause of death and that in return there may be substantial “help” with the arrangements. This kind of silence is complicity in the crime of genocide.
If Witty knows what he is doing then he is lying, if he doesn’t he should not be in the job.
What we need to work out is how this scheme was sold to the world’s leaders and their scientific advisers. The pursuit of profit /corruption in my mind is an inadequate explanation. That’s why I tend to favour the idea that this is an emergency defensive manoeuvre in the context of an economic/monetary collapse.
It’s possibly a mixture of all of this?
Certainly all play a part but it feels somehow like a crisis we can’t see to me – these people were already wealthy beyond belief, why pull this stunt now? I’m kind of obsessed with the ‘why’ part of it but maybe should give up trying to work it out!
It could be that they se the need to reduce the population after an economic collapse, especially the population that is dependent on public funds, like pensioners, and also they can recapitalise the banks on the fire sale assets of those who have lost their livelihoods.
Please don’t because you are absolutely right…
I think it is both – the problem is the need to cover up economic collapse and the leaders will get rewarded in some way for doing the covering up – plus some of them will also have a bit of a depop agenda going on too and some of them are just loving the power
It is because the current model of economic growth is unsustainable. Simply not enough stuff to go around for everyone. That’s why a believable explanation is needed why some are not going to ever get as affluent as others. And also a good system for acceptance and enforcement of “the rules” whatever rules may become necessary to quell rebellion in the future. As with corona, the “save the climate” part is appeal to people’s good character. If that appeal is not followed without coercion, the beating with a stick part will be employed, just as it is now being done with the vaccines. The overall plan is get all people in the world used to being beaten with a stick, for the benefit of the beaters.
Then why on earth are you worried about Covid and all tis talk of how effective or not the vaccine is? It doesn’t matter because, as you seem confusingly to agree, it’s agenda driven and not about a virus.
It’s about managed collapse
Just looking at this guy’s face should tell you all you need to know. I often wonder how people like this sleep at night. But actually, I suspect he sleeps very well indeed. That’s the worrying part.
Sorry but if you look at his face it looks like he’s never slept. Which might be the problem.
He finds himself as an educated and experienced individual lying through his teeth on TV. That’s got to be bad for your mental health.
“But according to Chris Whitty, “roughly half” of children have already had COVID”
There are 15 million people under 18 in the UK. Whitty admits that 7.5 million have already had covid-19, obviously, without serious adverse effects. Yet, he forces children to have an injection which the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, meeting on September 17, 2021, openly admitted would give 1 in 5000 16-17 year-olds heart damage.
There are 1.5 million 16-17 year olds in the UK, so here Whitty is stating that giving 300 teenage boys heart damage for no reason at all is good science.
I’m in a school witnessing children who I know have ‘had covid’ being so-called vaccinated against covid! I’m at a loss as to what the thought processes of the parents are. Mindless virtue-signalling I suspect. I hope we one day find out what this was all about. Something very, very evil is at work here. Didn’t even believe evil existed until 18 months ago.
“Mindless virtue-signalling I suspect.”
Not at all. They are genuinely fearful and ill-informed. They believe it.
I agree with this. There has been a two-year terror campaign waged by the “authorities” against the citizens, including bullying, blackmail, threats and intimidation, all mixed in liberally with the lies and deception. Many have been crushed by learned helplessness. They genuinely fear a disease for which children have a 99.9973% infection survival rate.
And just because the shiny little computer phone in their hands told them so.
Yes I suppose you’re right but given the fact that they have watched a grand total of zero children become ill with the virus, and given the fact that they and all their middle-class friends have only had bad cases of covid after they were vaccinated, it’s fascinating that they would still believe it to be the right course of action. Mass psychosis at work.
I think for the most part they think the vaccination is harmless (which is not far from the truth) and given that they wish to avoid confrontation or formal disadvantages to their children. So far from “mass psychosis”, by now it’s commonly just an instance of “where’s the harm” thinking. The harm is not to the recipients of the vaccine, it is to social order at large, but it is subtle enough to be dismissed as “conspiracy”.
Unless and until medium- or long-term hazards become apparent I suppose…
Except there are none. But you’re still welcome to keep banking on it. How long?
I’m not ‘banking’ on it at all. It would mean the majority of people I know and love being at serious risk. I’m influenced by the words of a large number of experts who believe that long-term risks are a possibility and I don’t have the microbiology expertise to rule out their opinions, or ability to see into the future, like you believe you do.
There is not a large number of experts who claim such things. Rather, there is a couple kooky people on the Internet voicing such concerns (some with PhDs no doubt).
No not at all. There are many of them, from many different relevant fields, and they are anything but kooky. I can tell you’ve not really looked into this.
There are many of them but you cannot name any credible. Look, I’ve been frequenting this very site, and before that swprs.org pretty much since the beginning. I’m fairly aware that I know what the “anti-corona experts” are saying (as is your host here, Toby Young).
Yeh sure.
There are ‘no’ long-term risks of a drug less than one year old? You’re discrediting yourself there I’m afraid.
Pfizer themselves would not market the vaxxine without release from liability because they stated they could not know the long term effects.
There you have it from the horses mouth.
Please don’t repeat any of the manufacturer’s own statements about their own product; this makes you an antivaxxer conspiracy theorist.
Not true – they were worried about liability from the short term effects because of the huge number of injections to be performed in a hurry. It’s a risk to extrapolate from several thousand doses to billions of doses. But luckily for Pfizer and the governments, this risk has not materialized. There might have been some slight reasons for worry if you had been the clinical trial participant, but with passing time, it is less and less of a concern to any thinking person.
Not materialised? I’m not sure that’s quite true. It appears to be rather more dangerous than any of the properly developed vaccines of the [past anyhow.
What is it that leads you to have such faith in these jabs? It does look to me like faith, because as crisisgarden points out, we simply cannot know about medium and long-term reactions until the medium and long term have been reached ( without a Tardis). There have been so many short term reactions that it doesn’t bode well for the future, I would say.
Exactly the way it looks to me!
Or DeLorean.
The entirety of scientific and empirical evidence presented so far.
Despite the fact that some airplanes fall down from the sky, it would be foolish to refuse to ever enter an airplane because you fear the specific risk related to it. What proof do you have that the particular airplane is not going to crash? None – in fact it may have only flied for a couple months – so you do not even have the “long term” proof you seem to be so clamoring for.
And yet you enter aboard and entrust your life to some unknown persons who have designed and are operating this plane – maybe just to go for some stupid vacation. Viewed in relation to all the other life risks we undertake without thought, the risk from vaccination is miniscule, and that’s how it should be treated. And the only reason you are thinking so hard about it is because other scaredy people are feeding your own, well, vaccination panic.
Yawn.
You get some specific advantage from flying in an aeroplane. It currently appears that some populations will derive more risk from these “vaccines” than benefit. As the onnly point in taking them is to reduce risk, there is thus no point in taking them for these people. Of course it can and has been argued that nobody would benefit from them.
And that strikes me as unfair on vacations. They materially improve quality of life, indeed they not infrequently provide the best experiences in life. The only criteria for medication is whether it is likely to improve health.
Clearly raye is a paid troll and will believe whatever nonsense will pay his/her wages.
The Yellow Card reporting system and VAERS data show beyond doubt that there is a huge problem with the experimental jabs (and statisticians have demonstrated that these adverse effects are not occurring because of coincidence).
Up to 7 years I understand. Not while it’s still in the trial stages anyway.
https://www.mylondon.news/news/south-london-news/london-firefighter-43-left-paralysed-20946027
A London firefighter has been left unable to work after contracting a rare illness that’s left him paralysed from the neck down.
Dave Elson, 46, a firefighter based at Greenwich Fire Station, was said to be previously fit and healthy according to his close friend and former colleague, Rob Hyde who spoke to My London.
Rob said he had received the news on June 12 that Dave was diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome, a rare and serious condition that affects the nervous system.
“We’re not 100 per cent sure but two weeks beforehand he had his first coronavirus jab,” Rob said.
That doesn’t sound harmless to me.
You need to consider the total number of such cases, and no, those fabricated horror stories reported via VAERS / Yellow Cards don’t count. Just because someone vaccinated got GBS or died does not mean the vaccine did it (the proof being the same events of GBS and death occurring at the same rate before the vaccines as well).
Discrediting yourself again. What evidence do you have that VAERS entries are fabricated? Most are completed by healthcare professionals under the threat of prosecution for falsified information. What you’re saying makes no sense.
The evidence that VAERS entries may be fabricated is that they do not reliably correlate with entries from other, less open clinical monitoring systems that do not allow submission by anyone.
Additional evidence is that there are known cases of medical professionals abusing this and worse (e.g. people vaccinating with saline solution instead of real thing, destroying vaccines and what not). Obviously if the “threat of prosecution” is not enough to keep you from doing these things, it will not stop you from messing with VAERS. And no, you do not need any special access privileges to submit case reports there, that’s the whole point of an open system.
This risk, of VAERS containing garbage, is acknowledged by VAERS operators themselves – always has been. The purpose of VAERS used to be to detect alarming trends during the normal times when there were no incentives to falsify it. Not in times when vaccines have become such a major political issue that fortunes depend on it.
For that reason VAERS has lost much of its credibility and statistical usefulness for corona specifically – but of course it cannot be disabled altogether because that would, again, cause a huge outcry from certain politicians. So in the effect it is simply ignored by the health professionals, who have to rely on more solid data from other systems.
Paid troll nonsense from raye. What a tosser he is.
Your argument about correlation not being the same as causation applies equally to symptoms of disease that we say with utter certainty are caused by SARS-cov-2. Where is the proof that this virus is causing the symptoms and not another one, or something else altogether? And this is gaslighting on a massive scale – to tell all those who have become ill after being jabbed that it can’t have had anything at all to do with the jab when they are saying it has, because it’s so obviously a coincidence. To me this displays a basically religious or ideological belief in the practice of vaccination, which is set above criticism to the point that you ridicule those who question it. If people are saying they are suffering after being jabbed, why are you not able to listen to them? We have been told to turn our world upsidedown in an apparent attempt to stop suffering from a virus, but we don’t show any concern at all for those who say or whose doctors say they are suffering from a medical procedure we have recently invented and are trying to force on every human on the planet? I just don’t get it. Can you explain?.
The argument that SARS is causing the symptoms is of course that you can infect people (or rather animals, as is commonly done in labs) with SARS and observe the symptoms. No religious beliefs involved whatsoever.
And I’ve never said that every human on the planet should be getting the drug, just that if they do, it won’t cause any huge health problem. In fact I find the vaccination of children completely unnecessary, the same goes for all the segregation of vaccinated/unvaccinated people. Individual freedom of choice is clearly much more important than the risks from corona, and the fact that many people will make bad/stupid choices does not change it.
Still trying to convince yourself you didn’t take a huge gamble on getting clot-shotted?
I don’t need to convince myself, I was already convinced when I took the decision, having delayed for several months to observe the overall developments. Still alive and well, just like everyone else I know who did the same (to resort to the silly first-hand experience argumentation style, which of course is weak; and which is why we have all the statistics and clinical monitoring that trump all the Internet testimonials).
of course so are all the people here who didnt risk the clot-shot.
Nobody claimed otherwise.
Do you advocate forced/mandated vaccination?
If so why?
If not, why not?
Yaaaaaawn.
Don’t waste time on raye he is a paid troll.
More nonsense from raye the paid troll.
Basing your decisions on this sort of content makes about as much a sense as running to get jabbed because they showed you some photos from the ICU.
Yawaaaaan
‘…The harm is not to the recipients of the vaccine…’ – say that to BBC presenter Lisa Shaw’s family.
Agenda 30 is the answer to what this is all about.
Sustainable Development is code for depopulation.
As far as I can see, the professional epidemiologists are now in a quandary.
It used to be the case that disease epidemics could not be suppressed, and medical response was to either run, or address disease symptoms.
Vaccination gave us a way to avoid infection while remaining in society. And for some illnesses which only infected humans, it held out the possibility of eradicating them. For multi-species infections like flu, however, you could not eradicate. The best you could do was avoid infection while remaining in society by taking a measles or flu jab.
It seems to me that the epidemiologists started by treating Covid as similar to smallpox – a very damaging disease which was capable of being eradicated. Now we know that it is actually similar to flu, which we always dealt with by providing optional flu jabs each winter for those who wanted them – typically only the vulnerable.
And yet we persist in pretending that this is a combination of typhoid, cholera and plague. There is too much loss of face involved for us to do anything else. I wonder how we are going to get out of this…?
“ I wonder how we are going to get out of this…?” Why would the Government and the rest of evil bastards helping them want to get out of this? It’s a gift that keeps on giving – unless and until a majority wake up and realise they’ve been had.
“Now we know that it is actually similar to flu” – ?
We’ve always known that. And I don’t pretend to be an epidemiologist.
Yes indeed. Dr John Ioannidis from Stanford published this in October 2020. Same IFR as flu, known for a full year. Ultimately it kills in a different way, but the numbers are the same, and so are the target demographics (very elderly, immunocompromised, obese).
Flu is less specific when it comes to demographic – some strains can badly affect younger, healthy people. This of course actually makes Covid easier to deal with, although the government is never going to admit that.
You are quite right – my sloppy writing. Flu can target much younger people and can be very dangerous in the young, unlike covid.
We’ve always known that.
Er…no. Many of us have always SUSPECTED it. Only once we have been through a wave of infections and gathered the evidence can we be said to KNOW this. Prof Ioannidis is a very experienced operator in evidence-based medicine, but is paper is just one piece of evidence.
A good indicator is a government minister stating that flu is now a greater danger. That indicates that this is now generally accepted knowledge. This is what I was talking about – the gradual understanding that we have made a big mistake, and how we are going to extract ourselves with minimal embarrassment…
The exit route is to declare victory after “enough” people have been vaccinated (e.g. see Denmark). That’s also why the vaccination push continues – to be able to attribute progress to this campaign rather than just passing of time. It is extremely important to politicians to keep up appearances that the “war against corona” is “decisively won” by their wise decisions because they bet their political careers on it. It cannot just end randomly leaving them look like the fumbling fools they really are. Simple as that.
“The exit route is to declare victory after “enough” people have been vaccinated” So why didn’t we do that when the “vulnerable” were “vaccinated” – which is what Hancock said we would do? Because he fucking lied, because he’s an evil fucking liar, and anyone that believes any word that comes out of their filthy mouths needs their head read. Good luck having confidence that this will ever end until people push back.
Simple, they could not have ended it when the vulnerable got vaccinated because they’ve already purchased tons of unnecessary vaccine “just in case” by then. Following sunk cost fallacy, they must utilize these purchases, else they would be (rightly) accused of gross negligence throwing public funds down the drainer. Since they cannot undo their past mistakes, they are hell-bent on covering them up. This in general is how history is made, written by the victors. So their only concern is to come out as victors rather than losers out of the shit they created themselves.
I swear we’ve ordered more vaccines since the initial batch
That is true, and does not disprove the initial knee-jerk reaction. They will keep ordering these vaccines as long as they can be “sold” to the population. Because they get kickbacks and also because the population “demands” it.
I’m going to watching very closely to see whether the children I know who are getting the shot become ill ‘with covid’ over the next few months.
What sort of proportion of the kids in your school are getting spiked?
About a third
“Preventing COVID Infections Among Healthy Children Is Pointless”
Well, yes, everyone with any sense knows that, including Chris Whitty and the Government. But what makes anyone think that this is their aim? Do you think that the vaccination of children is anything to do with health, or covid, or anything other than political theatre, evil arse covering and power madness?
We used to be encouraged to get whatever was going around plus get out in the fresh air, everything has turned on its head with the Covid Agenda
Dr Franc Zalewski anylyses the contents of Pfizer vials – disturbing.
Also shows that 2 out of 3 vials contains saline solution.
Label this as mad conspiracy if you want, but the more evil this becomes the more the rationals refuse to believe it, and the more evil it can become still.
And you think the test labs that perform checks before each batch of the vaccine is released to market around the world don’t analyze the contents, just Dr Zalewski?
I’ve posted this before but it is relevant here so I’ll repost with an updated chart
If you look at children in the age group 1-14 for which there is a long ONS death history, it appears that covid doesn’t affect this age group at all (source ONS: Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional: week ending 1st October 2021). Time will tell if any increase in all cause mortality following vaccination occurs in this age group bearing in mind most of this age group is too young to have been experimentally vaccinated.
The next age group up for which there is long term data available is 15-44 so that doesn’t give us many clues pre 2020.
See this chart I’ve produced which on the left shows weekly all cause deaths in the 1-14 age group and on the right cumulative all cause deaths in this age group over the calendar year.
Notice the absence of any obvious peak at all in all cause deaths in Spring 2020 or Winter 2020/2021 and that the number of all cause deaths in this age group during 2020 or year 2021 to date is lower than in the preceding years.
And this is despite the number of children in England and Wales in the age 1-14 age group being 9.1 million in mid-2010 and 10.1 million in mid-2020. Increasing numbers in this age group would mean other things being equal more expected deaths in 2020 than in 2010 etc.
It’s often said that covid roughly affects different age groups proportionately in relation to their chances of dying from other causes. But this chart indicates this may not be true for the 1-14 age group. On the surface given all cause deaths are lower in the age 1-14 age group than previous years, then the starting assumption should be that all covid deaths in this age group are other deaths that would have occurred anyway that have been misallocated as covid.
And here’s the same chart in the age 45-64 age group to illustrate the point
You can see that covid and the misguided response to covid did have an affect in those age groups on all cause deaths (for example in Spring 2020 see the red line peak around week 16). Compare this with no obvious affect in the age 1-14 age group.
And all cause deaths in 2020 and 2021 to date are higher than the years 2010 to 2019 because of covid, the response to covid and in 2021 the experimental vaccines, and a lack of availability of healthcare for other conditions etal. Note how this differs from the 1-14 age group where all cause deaths are still at historical lows.
45-64 age group.
I’d wager the median/halfway point in terms of age is over 60.
Agree. The chance of a 64 year old dying in a year is about 5 times that of a 45 year old so deaths are heavily weighted towards the upper end of that range.
Thanks for all your work on the graphs and statistics, F-C. They are appreciated and I keep them to refer to.
Thanks. That’s very kind of you to say so.
It’s just my way of trying to independently make sense of what is going on. If the charts are of some small use to others that’s great.
I think this is true across the population as a whole. Given (a) the all-cause population adjusted mortality for 2020 is nothing exceptional and (b) the age distribution for C19 deaths is pretty well the same as the age distribution for all-cause deaths (which looks to be true independent of any of/with C19 argument), then the only conclusion is that, absentia C19, those who died of/with C19 would have died of something else.
In this case, the vaccinations do nothing in terms of overall mortality, they (at best) move the cause from C19 to something else (otherwise, if the vaccines were successful we would see a sudden drop in all-cause mortality of something like 10%, which is clearly implausible).
The policy is already to infect non-vulnerable people to build up immunity. They just cannot admit it because it would appear contrary to their previous policy and people would sensibly question whether the original policies were required at all. Vaccines for groups that don’t need them are just to cover up this new policy and make it appear like we are still “fighting the virus” (and make pharma pals some good money in the process). In reality we are no longer fighting anything but each other.
“In reality we are no longer fighting anything but each other.” Not quite. The elites and their lackeys and collaborators are waging war on us.
Only if you want to engage, and not for much longer.
Sorry, that’s gone over my head. I’m a simpleton. You’ll have to spell it out for me. I don’t do subtle.
In most countries getting vaccinated gets you the freedom pass for the next few months. And since the vaccination is by far and large harmless (if also ineffective), nobody is really waging any war on you. Call it a low-level scam of the same sort as the government demanding fees for public TV you don’t watch.
After winter there will be fewer and fewer infections and hospitalizations happening, making the case for booster vaccinations or extending pass controls in spring less and less likely to appeal to the general public. So they will have to remove the useless vaccination passports while at the same time declaring how greatly they have helped us to come out of the pandemic, and thanking the population for their efforts and compliance. No pandemic of respiratory diseases in known human history has lasted longer than 3 years. So the next winter season most likely the “measures” won’t be “necessary” to become reintroduced, at least not on basis of the established metrics.
The lasting victory for the policy makers is that thanks to all the terror now they have a tool that can be reintroduced any time when they deem necessary, e.g. when China attacks the world with their next virus or when the vaccine producers manage to manufacture one of their own to create the next campaign. But that shift of power has already happened, and in case of the quite foreseeable biological terrorism/warfare (thanks to technological progress), it might even be a good thing.
The measures were never necessary, and there wasn’t/isn’t a pandemic, so how long actual pandemics have lasted is irrelevant. This “pandemic” can clearly be prolonged for as long as the evil ones choose to, as long as the sheeple don’t wake up. I’m not holding my breath.
“Low level scam” – most costly, repressive, long-lasting, damaging (with far-reaching effects) mass hysteria in human history, globally. And not over yet.
You contradict yourself, because you actually seem quite intelligent. I completely agree with this phrase “The lasting victory for the policy makers is that thanks to all the terror now they have a tool that can be reintroduced any time when they deem necessary” and that’s clear not part of a “low level scam”.
“Low level scam” refers just to the vaccination (which seems to work very well as an act of misdirection), not the whole package. Thanks to the “deadly vaccination” fantasies the government now has a good supply of idiots who they can point their finger at and use as scapegoats. It is always great for a despot to have an opposition which can be easily discredited and ridiculed and that’s exactly what we observe happening with the anti-(covid)-vaxx “movement”.
You’re clearly seeing something different to me. I’m seeing many eminent scientists with absolutely nothing to gain and everything to lose denouncing the vaccines as reckless, harmful and unnecessary and then being attacked, discredited and slandered by a compliant media. You’re not suggesting they’re idiots, just because they don’t fit into your chosen interpretation are you?
I don’t know about “eminent scientists”, I know from from Germany (Wodarg and Bhakdi) who in the beginning seemed somewhat reasonable, but frankly descended into full-on wackiness (and made a lot of money by selling books in the process).
If you want an “eminent scientist” who is critical of the whole interventions, and who still kept his cool, Ioannidis is a great example. You will notice he is not rallying people against vaccines. Unlike the retired clowns mentioned before, the guy has personal integrity and is not willing to risk his professional reputation.
As for the media and politics engaging in censorship and witch hunts, yes, this is happening. But it is just human behavior and power mongering, it does not bear any relevance to the factual status of claims about effectiveness/danger of vaccines or what not.
In other words, what you hear from Ioannidis may be true, he may be a good guy, a great scientist, and still be persecuted by others because it serves their political interests. And the reverse is also true, you can have people hurling insults and sending death threats to Fauci, and it does not mean that he suddenly becomes some sort of martyr and obtains a monopoly on truth just because of this “persecution”.
I understand confirmation bias, and that this might lead someone suspicious of the whole episode to seek out dissenting scientists and base their opinions on this. But I do not accept that these voices are ‘kooky’ and attention-seeking/self-serving as you seem to be suggesting. And if we step back and look at the totality, this is what we see:
You already know all of this. But this is the environment in which you decided to take the chance?
I so desperately want your prediction to be accurate.
Vaccines for groups that don’t need them is all about destroying the control group. Think how much harder the prosecution’s case will be with no unvaccinated around to compare to.
If there was any worry about “prosecution”, they would not be injecting it into billions of people to begin with. For the same reason – and because significant time has passed since the first vaccinations with no consequences – we do not need to worry at all about any horrors happening to the vaccinated.
Apart from the waning efficacy and the social conflict they sow there are almost no problems with this vaccine. The couple hundred people unluckily vaccinated to death (per country) are just a tiny collateral damage, especially compared to those who have naturally died from the virus already.
Opposing the vaccines on the grounds of them being “deadly” is the surest way to appear like an idiot. If you want to oppose them, you should do it on the grounds of general medical consent for any therapy, discrimination laws, and also because the risk/benefit ratio is questionable for those who are not threatened by corona. Better yet, stop opposing the vaccines (did you cry about flu vaccines before 2019?), instead just reject all the “measures” built around them. That would be enough to restore normality and bury the panic makers.
In absolute terms you are right to a point, but only because the safety standards expected of drugs and vaccinations has gone from almost completely safe, to mostly safe.
You and your persistent argument that vaccines are essentially safe are the embodiment of this degradation of the standards expected of medical treatments.
I know more people who have been badly injured by the jabs than by covid. That is a fact. And I don’t know a single person that has been badly injured by any drug or vaccine before. Not one.
Do I know more people that have been jabbed and are ok than those that have been injured. Of course. By an overwhelming margin. But that’s a terrible standard.
I agree with your overall argument that the real objection to all this should be coercion, but I simply don’t agree with your claims that the vaccines are basically safe. They are only by a low standard we have never had before.
‘we do not need to worry at all about any horrors happening to the vaccinated.’
I admire your confidence but wouldn’t you call tens of thousands of dead otherwise healthy people a ‘horror’. And how can you be so sure about long-term risks? There’s plenty of mechanisms for potential harm that people much more qualified than us have outlined. Can you dismiss them so easily? We are less than one year into this..
The confidence about long-term risks comes from understanding the fact that the vaccine does not remain in your body for years. Also from the fact that the immune response stops working after just a couple months as we see, so whatever “long-term” “change” has occurred in your body becomes undone. And finally from the fact that decades worth of experimentation with mRNA vaccines were performed on animals – so we know what to expect.
Just because a particular drug is new does not mean that the whole relevant pharmacology is unknown. And people pushing it are not as dumb as you seem to imagine either – risking any sort of health system collapse because of a new drug is the last thing the pharma peddlers want to happen to them, quite regardless of who would have to pay for it. What they rather want is a placebo that sells very well.
“The confidence about long-term risks comes from understanding the fact that the vaccine does not remain in your body for years. Also from the fact that the immune response stops working after just a couple months as we see, so whatever “long-term” “change” has occurred in your body becomes undone.”
I almost never do this but for this post I will break the rule of a lifetime – I call BS.
“And finally from the fact that decades worth of experimentation with mRNA vaccines were performed on animals – so we know what to expect.”
All the mRNA experiments were formerly performed on animals. There was only one outcome. The animals all died. So we know what to expect.
Yes, we will all die eventually. At least we agree on that.
As I understand it the ‘vaccine’ is an instruction for cells to produce spike protein. No one with any medical knowledge I’ve asked has been able to tell me how long this continues for, nor where in the body it occurs. Usual notions about a drug ‘leaving your body’ don’t seem to apply. Sounds like we’d be putting our faith in institutions with a track (and criminal) record of malfeasance unless I’m missing something?
Again, not true. The spike proteins (not to be confused with antibodies against them) are estimated to last a few weeks in the body. Of course, this can and has been measured. You are supposedly a teacher, so I will not google it for you.
The outrage is our governments’ effectively mandating these so-called vaccines. Forcing everyone to play russian roulette with their health and eliminating the right to bodily autonomy.
I don’t call that a minor infraction.
Except there is hardly any Russian roulette involved, and the alternative is unvaccinated infection, which is like playing the same or worse “roulette” a hundred times in a row. Yes, the government coercion is abhorrent, but not because it increases your risk, only because it’s a slippery slope toward much more nefarious plans.
It is very easy for quite high rates of adverse events that also have relatively high background rates to go unnoticed for years; this is what happened with Vioxx. Even thalidomide took several years to take off the market. Giving a treatment to large numbers of the general public, with very poor followup and media censorship of adverse events on top, does not show that the treatment is safe. Just giving it to doctors to give out to the general public is what they used to do in the 1950s, and that system was replaced by lengthy clinical trials because of thalidomide.
Flu vaccines ARE relatively extremely safe, I’ve not seen any complaints about those here. Most people here are not “anti-vax” they are anti poorly tested vaccines with shoddy followup and censorship of adverse events.
The claims that there is no monitoring going on and that the anomalies could not be detected by statistical means in commonly occurring adverse events are simply baseless. It does not matter whether an adverse event is common or uncommon, if you see a relative spike compared to the baseline, you can detect it by comparing to the baseline, and this can be done across different groups. And if you cannot detect it, by definition it means there is no huge anomaly.
The monitoring is dire. We have seen huge spikes in COVID itself immediately following vaccination campaigns and even they are ignored; the effect is particularly obvious in countries that had little or no COVID before the campaign, but initial strongly negative efficacy was noted in the Danish study and is implied by numbers reported from Pfizer’s own phase 3 trial. 12 year old Maddie de Garay was paralysed within 24 hours of jab 2 during the Pfizer trial and it was just recorded as “abdominal pain”. The high death rate reported on the Yellow Card system is dismissed, on no evidence, as not necessarily linked to the vaccines; where are the autopsies to demonstrate that one way or the other?
The grounds you set out are from what I’ve read the grounds on which most of us are opposing the vaccines
And what about the well documented concerns by Ryan Cole and others about the impact the vaccines have on switching off those vital cellular responses which prevent the replication of cancers, and the reports of the increase in cancer deaths in the jabbed post jab? Those knock on effects might not be known in their entirety for many years to come – as M Yeadon has described it, far enough away in time from the moment of jabbing to be covered by the definition of ‘plausible deniability’. What, precisely is in it for the likes of Dr Peter McCullough et al, other than losing their licences to practise medicine and research funding etc, to say that not only do they consider the virus to be a bioweapon but the leaky vaccine developed to counteract it is also a bioweapon?
We know the answer – rayc thinks they’re all idiots.
Just because you can express some concerns does not mean that the same concerns automatically become valid. To put it another way, mass-producing theories (about anything, of any kind) is a cheap stunt. It is testing these theories where the real scientific effort happens, and short of empirical testing, explaining the mechanism of action which agrees with all the known empirical data. Which is precisely what Cole has not done, which is precisely why his ass was fact-checked into oblivion, which is precisely why he becomes a quack and loses all credibility in an instant – unlike more reasonable people like Ioannidis who do not just spew any anti-vaxx bs which first comes to their mind.
I used to know a guy named horse. Ex Irish guards. Chronic alcoholic. Died in a police cell.
By the way.
I am thinking the same. Their job is almost done. Get rid of the control group.
“To infect non vulnerable people to build up immunity”
I do not understand this logic. The so-called vaccines that are used are only “effective” against the original spike protein conformation and wholly ineffective against the spike of the newly dominant delta strain.
So-called vaccination now is only likely to increase susceptibility to ADE and reduce the efficiency of immune response to challenge by coronavirus.
No, the vaccines are not “wholly ineffective” against delta. In fact, they are 80-90% effective for keeping your ass out of the hospital from a delta infection, and this is true across all age groups, for at least several months. The only thing they are ineffective against is preventing infections, although even the infection rate is also reduced by 80% or so in the period after the jab, and within several months drops down to 40%. So perhaps you should check your sources before repeating unfounded statements.
The jabbing of children is the key battleground.
If parents are prepared to put their children at risk by jabbing them, what will they be prepared to do to complete strangers who refuse to be jabbed and who the state is actively demonising? In time, anything. Literally anything.
If they succeed in jabbing most children, it’s all over.
Today is the 17th day of jabbing schoolkids in the UK. Have any teachers, headmasters or school ‘nurses’ (from a private company) been hauled into court yet?
Slightly off topic, but once again illustrating this government’s use of pseudo-science to push the narrative; A friend in the UK who is medically vulnerable and has shielded throughout most of the last 18 months has received a 3 page letter from the NHS urging vigilance. Unbelievably it urges those shielding to ‘consider the vaccination status of people they mix with’.
Support the brave pilots, cabin crews at Southwest and ATC in Florida.
Peace
That would have been unbelievable a year ago, but unfortunately it isn’t now – it’s all part of the plan to put as much pressure on people as possible to have the clotshot, and encouraging others to ostracise those who haven’t is one of the tactics.
If the NHS was serious about your friend’s vulnerability they would have sent him/her a one page A4 ditty with the following advice and a free prophylaxis starter pack, and this all done back last March in 2020. Take daily:
Vitamin D3
Vitamin C
Zinc
Quercetin
Mouthwashes & nasal spray
Secondly if your friend had caught a suspected SARS Cov2 infection then they would have had immediate access within the first few days to an available NHS clinic where he/she would have been treated as follows:
Ivermectin
Sulodexide (LMW heparin)
Fluvoxamine or cyproheptadine
Steroids: Prednisone or budesonide
Monoclonal antibody treatment
What they wouldn’t have been subjected to was non-stop 24/7 fear porn via the MSM and BBC and the sterling advice of sitting obediently home diligently for at least 14 days till they had serious breathing difficulties?
It’s never been about health folks.
It bears repeating, everyday: it’s never been about health.
From that photograph, it looks like Chris Whitty is discovering the price of power.
It’s not about health. It’s about Agenda 30.
Do you have a good link for that for getting up to speed on Agenda 30?
For summary of ‘the plan’ a good readable account of where we are is Roddy Duncan http://www.ordo-ab-covid
Zammo McGuire was right!
This creature will be known as Dr AIDS in due course. Profoundly sinister and cold. And like a lot of others driving this evil agenda.
They won’t win, humanity (or enough of humanity) will make sure of that.
..
SAGE has what’s called a BUST case scenario.
Why do they continue to lie?
Because the alternative is admitting they were wrong from the start
I have a friend who is a teacher in one of the regional schools. She is the only member of staff who does not believe in the propaganda, is unvaxxed and goes unmasked.
However her local council have required parental consent before vaxxing the children. They do not appear to be confident enough to rely on Gillick competence.
I put up a link to the Chinese Cultural Revolution on another page, as it struck me that there was a parallel in the destruction of education in China during the revolution which educational loss lasted about a decade.
I think the disruption in education serves two (or more) purposes, – to put pressure on parents and the rest of society, to cause disruption, and to deny education to children, rendering them more susceptible to cultural changes which will be introduced at a later stage.
At the moment across the country the percentage that comply and want their children to be vaxxed seems quite low – the numbers I am hearing are about 30-45%
Anyone got any more information?
Borne out in my school. About a third.
Nor in my council/school. Absolutely parental content only.
each of my children’s schools are operating like this too. No idea on the uptake but around 1/3 sounds reasonable estimate.
I’ve literally just heard a sad story – one of my son’s friends was jabbed today despite not wanting it (having had a short chat with me in the summer hols!); they took him into the room and told him that “life would be really hard for him if he didn’t have it.” This was a nurse. Nothing about the, you know, medical benefits or anything. Honestly. Where do you even start..?
With a complaint against the nurse for coercion.
One complaint on its own will of course be ignored, but if enough people did it that would become progesssively harder for the government to brush off – and nurses would probably become increasingly unwilling to apply this sort of pressure.
GET HER SACKED
That ‘nurse’ should be struck off the professional register, along with the rest of his / her complicit, coercive colleagues. They bring shame to what should be an honourable profession.
They were back in today and I was tempted to follow it up and find out who had so appallingly coerced him. But it would have opened a can of worms and I didn’t have the stomach for it…
Harmful. It’s harmful.
The Chinese Virus should be viewed like chickenpox: the earlier you get it, the better.
And chickenpox actually has something close to a real vaccine, unlike the Chinese Virus. The argument for natural immunity becomes even stronger for COVID-1984 and children.
> The main rationale for closing schools was to help ‘flatten the curve’ of total infections, and thereby prevent the NHS from being overwhelmed.
The *real* reason for closing the schools…it was critical to their covid narrative that everyone see this virus as an unprecedented threat. In order for the Great Unwashed to accept their “solutions” (DNA vax/social compliance app) then the problem had to appear immense. As we all know this entire thing has been deliberately hyped and exaggerated to hell. But they seem to be getting away with it.
Goul.
Yes – and reminding me about the eternal burning question of whether ghosties have ghoulies!
You can never “unsee” that face unfortunately.
It really is the stuff of nightmares.
But these ” vaccines” will boost childrens’ mental health (?), so it’s only “right” to coerce them into taking experimental drugs which will protect them from absolutely nothing! This is a perfectly rational and decent stand point, if you are a power-crazed psychopath! Parents who support the inoculation program need their heads examining.
“Offering the vaccine to those with an underlying health condition makes sense,”
WTF? The vulnerable whether young or old should be kept even further away from this vile experimental gene therapy treatment. And certainly blindly injecting this stuff into the arms of people sick with other ailments is stupidity itself with out a full assessment of the situation. End of.