The saving grace of conservatives is that they do not like to think very hard, particularly when it comes to abstract theory. But this is also an affliction. On the one hand, conservatives’ distaste for thought seems crucial to their vital role as the ones who prevent society from floating away on flights of utopian fancy. But on the other hand, this leaves them bereft of coherent political philosophy – and this can weaken them at crucial moments.
We see this problem in the current predicament of the U.K.’s Conservative Party. The Tory conference is currently in full swing at the time of writing, and the talk is very much of division. On the one hand, the Thatcherite wing, embodied in Liz Truss (her tenure as Prime Minister was so short it hardly seems appropriate to refer to her as an ‘ex-PM’, though of course she is one), think that conservatism is about a small state and a free market. On the other, the ‘NatCon’ wing, embodied in Suella Braverman, think that conservatism is about national identity. In the middle, figures such as Jeremy Hunt and Michael Gove try to triangulate. Another wild card is what one might call the ‘anti-woke’ brigade, whose avatar is Kemi Badenoch, and who sit uneasily to one side; instinctively small-statist, but keen to use the state’s power to push back on culture war issues.
Nothing quite seems to tie all of these strands together except a mutual distrust of the Labour Party. As somebody who grew up on Merseyside in the 1980s in a Labour-voting household, I share this distrust. But ‘keeping Labour out of power’ is in itself not usually a proposition attractive enough to win over the electorate. Conservatives are going to have to do something which they hate: they are going to have to think. Why should there be a Conservative Party in 2023 and, if so, what should it be for?
Readers who like to play News from Uncibal bingo will not be surprised to hear me argue that the answer has to take us back to the dawn of modern politics, and therefore the figure of Machiavelli. As Leo Strauss convincingly argues in his Thoughts on Machiavelli, the modern era is defined above all by the subject of political power divorced from a doctrine of divine or natural right. And Machiavelli, as the figure who first deliberately and specifically sets out a theory of Government without reference to God or theology, is therefore the first truly modern political philosopher. In understanding modern politics, we must begin with Machiavelli, because he is the one who stated the case for modernity most strongly, at its very inception, when pre-modernity was at its zenith.
Machiavelli lays out the case clearly. If political power is not to rely on a theological justification (and the Conservative Party would obviously be wise to avoid such a justification!) then it has two options. Either it must present itself as a republic or a principality. A republic’s claim to rule is based on the fact that it represents the people: not necessarily in the sense that it is a democracy, but in the sense that it puts in place a system of law which reflects the norms, or nomos, of the populace, so as to maintain the stability of society across time. A republic, in other words, is concerned with keeping the ship on an even keel: making sure that society, in which each member of the population has a stake, continues to exist indefinitely in the manner in which its population is accustomed. A principality’s claim to rule, on the other hand, is based on the fact that it makes material or moral improvements in the lives of the population, and thus retains their loyalty. It does nice things for people, and they therefore like it.
An awful lot follows from the distinction between these two different justifications for government, but the main emphasis that Machiavelli himself lays on the subject is what he calls virtù, which is properly understood as the capacity for self-rule. Where the population are thought to possess this quality, then obviously the state they live in should look like a republic. Where the population are thought to lack it, then they need the rulership of a prince. What Machiavelli doesn’t say, but which naturally follows from this connection between virtù and the form government takes, is that there is therefore an incentive for a ruler who wishes to govern like a prince to construct the population as lacking in virtù – in modern parlance, to conceptualise them as ‘vulnerable’, so he can justify his own position by then doing things on their behalf. (This is the subject of a previous post on Machiavelli.)
This alone, as I hope you can see for yourself, explains an awful lot with regard to modern politics. But it also tells us where conservative parties in general and the Conservative Party in particular are going wrong: they can’t make up their mind what they actually think the job of government is. Do they think it is supposed to instantiate the model of a republic or a principality? And, lacking a coherent understanding, they get sidetracked into blind alleys.
Two such blind alleys are as follows. The first of them is obvious. There is already, in any jurisdiction, one political party which has the selling point of governing like a prince sewn-up. A hint: in the U.K., this party begins with the letter ‘L’ and ends with the letters ‘abour party’. The stock-in-trade of the centre-Left is identifying groups of the population that it can label as being vulnerable and therefore in need of the state’s assistance, and purporting to provide that assistance accordingly. ‘Give me your loyalty and I will give you nice things’ is the manifesto of every centre-Left political party that ever was; all that changes is the nice thing being offered. (Sometimes the nice thing is the avoidance of a nasty thing, as in ‘vote for us and we will prevent climate change’.) Conservatives are foolish to play that game, just as I would be foolish to try to take on Pete Sampras on Centre Court at tennis.
The second blind alley is thinking there is an important division between national ‘populist’ conservatism and free market, small-state conservatism in the first place. And this is where we really see the failure to properly think bear its distasteful fruit. To govern in the republican mode means, as we saw, to administer a system of law deriving from the nomos of the populace, who are perceived in general to have the capacity to govern themselves (since they possess virtù), and as a consequence to maintain the stability of society across time. This is almost the definition of conservatism, and you will see in it no dispute between anyone who has a feeling of patriotism and anyone who believes there should be a small state. In the republican model the point of the state is to be small: its job is not to do nice things for the population, but to do what is necessary to ensure that society remains stable – i.e., making and enforcing rules. And in this we see the distinctions between figures like Liz Truss and Suella Braverman evaporate (or, at least, we should do). The virtues of a free market are obvious, and they are consonant with the virtues of keeping the state’s nose out of society insofar as it is possible to do so, and in reflecting the stable norms of the society in question. Where the job of the state is merely to reflect in law the settled customs and habits, and moral sensibilities, of the population, then it will be small with respect to most things – there simply is no conflict.
Seeing the matter in these terms, of course, helps us deal in particular with the thorny subject of immigration. While a free market is basically a good thing, and strictly speaking free movement of labour supports a free market, open borders are undesirable because of the destabilising effects on society – and immigration should therefore be limited to what is manageable. There is no reason why sensible conservatives, beginning from first principles, should really argue about this, and it is here that we see the real difference emerge, indeed, between centre-right and centre-left. To a party like the Labour party, open borders are a fabulous idea because thereby the pool of vulnerable people, who are reliant on the state’s largesse, will increase. To a conservative political party, borders are (or should be) vital, because they are one of the central legal mechanisms by which social stability is maintained. Nobody should be against immigration on racial grounds, and nobody should be against immigration per se; the point is only that immigration must take place in accordance with legal rules which reflect what the members of the society in question consider to be appropriate.
The standard centre-Left argument against reflecting the will of the people with respect to immigration is always, straightforwardly, ‘Yes, but what if the members of the society in question are racists?’ And hence, of course, princely rule makes its appearance: the population cannot be relied upon to exercise virtù, and hence we must do it on their behalf. Conservatives need to be clear in their own minds why this is not the only sensible answer, and they will find that this clarity, once again, demonstrates no need for fundamental conflict within their midst.
The prospect of defeat has a way of focusing minds, and the U.K. Tory Party, facing a trouncing at the next general election, is showing signs of beginning to go through such a process. But this cannot be cast in terms of a fundamental dispute between free marketeers and national populists, because there is no such fundamental dispute. Obviously, it is totally unrealistic to imagine that we can ever return to A.J.P. Taylor’s prelapsarian world of July 1914, in which “a sensible, law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the state, beyond the post office and the policeman”. But the conservative vision of the state must nonetheless be a republican one: that its primary function is to administer and enforce a system of law which reflects the settled norms of the population, with a view to maintaining a stable social order which survives intact from one generation to the next. And nothing about this suggests that the state must be particularly big or that it must interfere extensively in the market. This would be a useful starting point for the intellectual project which the Tory Party in particular and conservative political parties in general have ahead of them: divisions between free marketeers and ‘national conservatives’ are relatively minor and can be reconciled. But you have to think about things first.
Dr. David McGrogan is an Associate Professor of Law at Northumbria Law School. This article first appeared on his Substack. You can subscribe here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The whole covipanic since March 2020 has been akin to the medieval dancing plagues – not just long covid.
Covid is and always was largely benign but the politicians went mental egged on by the media and guardian readers
The Covid “projcet” required that the politicians went mental…that was the important point!
I get paid more than $90 to $120 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills .
Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…. http://www.WorkPay1.com
I am reminded of the “Dancing Epidemic” of 1518 every time I move amongst the masked. I await the studies of the “Masking Lunacy” of the 2020s.
At some point in the next few years some group of scientists is going to show without argument masks did statistically nothing for us. It will take a.few years after that. Then like recovering cult members, they will become zealots against their former tribe.
Masks were the magic amulet of our day. There will always be the GOOP crowd, but normal people will eventually awake.
“Is Long Covid Just Another Example of Post-Freudian Hysteria?”
I’m going to go with “yes”.
Showalter is as smart as a whip and always interesting.
I know people who are delighted to discover and reveal that they have a “disorder” or “syndrome”. They look at me with a kind of dubious pity when I can’t supply one of my own. (Being annoyed or sad from time to time, according to the circumstances, just doesn’t cut it).
The moment I heard of “Long Covid”, I knew there would be people who would have some of that. Having a cold that lingers just isn’t in the same class.
Note that Showalter is describing “some patients”, not all, as “addicted to their symptoms”. They are the ones with a kind of perverse pride in their “condition”; the ones who tell you that they have an anxiety disorder, rather than that they worry a lot.
Absolutely.
My perspective on it is that in part it reflects the near complete loss in our cultures (and this is true in Australia as well as in the UK, in all the anglo-saxon nations, to varying degrees) of the defences against victim-worship and hence this kind of hysteria. We shifted from it being normal to point and laugh at hysterics, and to tell people to pull themselves together and get on with life, to it being unacceptable (in “polite society”) to do so.
Granted the former cultural attitude had costs for some genuine genuine unfortunates, but it just goes to reinforce that there is no pure “progress” in social and cultural matters, just benefits mixed with costs, and changes in who, whom.
Agreed, but what is also sad is that now some of the unvaxxed and none-mask wearers are constantly portraying themselves as victims with often repeated stories of being ‘glared at’ or ‘unfriended’ etc!
“Agreed, but what is also sad is that now some of the unvaxxed and none-mask wearers are constantly portraying themselves as victims with often repeated stories of being ‘glared at’ or ‘unfriended’ etc!”
We use the weapons we are taught to see as effective.
You have a fair point, up to a point. But pointing out that we have a cultural problem here doesn’t mean that there are no real wrongs or real victims in society. In the specific cases to which you refer, the issue being raised is not necessarily “poor me”, but rather the sheer, systematic and institutionalised dishonesty behind the attitudes described.
What dishonesty, and by whom?
“What dishonesty, and by whom?”
The dishonesty that makes people view their betters who don’t bother with masks or “vaccines” as bad.
As I suspect you knew full well,
No, I didn’t understand your comment at all, why would I query if I did? And how is one query sealioning?
‘Betters’?
Please try not to put your constructions on others comments.
OK, from your comment below (“I have never worn a mask or been vaxxed”), it’s clear I misinterpreted your line of questioning. I thought you were one of the occasional pro-coronapanic trolls we get here. I apologise.
Thank you, Mark.
Interesting to see what the trendy lefties mean by “sealioning” in action, though.
I don’t get out much ……..
I have never worn a mask and I have never been ‘glared at’. If they are unfriended that’s their own fault for using Facebook. I think it’s very sad when people can only place relevance on their lives and actions by constant reference to how people appear to think of them and react to them. I think this is all part of being a snowflake. Why don’t people just stand up for themselves and not give a feck?
I agree. I have never worn a mask or been vaxxed, and have also not been glared at, etc. and live in the People’s Republic of Wales!
I’ve been glared at and challenged quite a few times over not wearing a face nappy in shops and on trains. Yes, sure, I can (and did!) stand up to them but it gets very wearing when it happens repeatedly. The situation should simply never have existed where it was necessary to justify not wearing a piece of rag over your face.
Very little of it over last Christmas though – I think most companies were well aware that many people had had enough of it all, and repeated questions about muzzles would likely lead to plenty of tirades of four-letter words…
I have long practiced the art of having a resting bitch face, this means I am rarely approached by beggars, chuggers or many others – it certainly keeps the mask police at bay anyway!
Yes. Victim worship is so much easier than practical assistance. That might take the form of advising people to “get a grip”, which offers the respect of believing that they have the capacity to solve a good many of their problems themselves.
Better that than pious, useless pity.
Wanna know how you can feel depressed? Hang around with a load of people who keep going on about how depressed they are. Unfortunately , if you watch TV or listen to the radio you will bombarded with these types of people
Yes is the right answer
Long Covid? Just another “Sir” Whitty invention! ( Formerly known as ‘post viral syndrome’.)
Yes, it used to be called hypochondria
Yes indeed a far more “appropriate” medical term!
Absolutely … or health anxiety as they call it now.
I am credible enough to think that *some* people have long-running medical problems triggered by Covid; I am credible enough to think that *some* people have long-running medical problems triggered by X, where X can be any one of a large number of things. But my credulity does not stretch to thinking that there are a large number, I strongly suspect that most are imagined (or use whatever term takes your fancy). Not that we should ignore that some people do have problems, rather we should not believe large numbers of self-reported conditions. Since “long covid” seems to include symptoms that overlap with lots of other illnesses, the opportunity to misidentify is very present even without imagined symptoms.
The wife and I got Omicron at Christmas. I was over it in a few days, she has only just rid herself of the cough. But no way is she calling that “long” anything, it is (was) just a long-running cough.
Doubtless there’s an element of this, but I think the main point about Long Covid is that it’s part of the Big Lie – once it became more obvious that not enough people were dying to justify the insanity, the narrative switched to Long Covid as it’s easy to lie about.
I suspect you’re right. I’d like a dollar for every time I’ve been asked, “But what about Long Covid!?!”
The world has forgotten many things which we knew of prior to 2020 (natural immunity for example, or the definition of a vaccine). Another appears to be post-viral fatigue.
Many elements are not understood (rather like the climate!) – regional, ethnic, dietary differences. The effects of chemical farming, herbicides, pesticides, fertilisers, hormones, pollution – though there are enough warning flags!
While I suppose that few folk would deny some psychological, psychosomatic effects, there are enough factors in known science which can be addressed, yet they are being avoided … they do not suit those who hold the power, status, money…
We / the scientists do not understand the virus genome – yet they have played with it synthetically to induce an effect in the human system which they also do not understand – the hubris is breath-taking in its folly.
We could use a lot more humility – it may well be that humility will be forced upon us.
We should distinguish the phoney black death covid from the actual mental illnesses induced by cruel and evil governments in its name.
People under the cosh, living in fear, obeying nonsense, enforcing insanity, that was the REAL illness. And many will never recover from it.
Long Covid is a loose label for many real or imagined symptoms, perhaps caused by societal dread and psychosomatic in nature.
I have never tested positive for covid still multiple times I diagnosed myself with ‘long covid’. I always came to the conclusion that the abusing government is playing with my mental health.
Like ADHD, Anxiety and all the other labels people who can’t be arsed to go to work give themselves, expect Long Covid to be the latest free meal ticket to a Welfare lifestyle
I know loads of people who bunked off work with “long COVID” before widespread “testing” was in place. Exactly the workshy people who you would have predicted to take the piss. Several months later the same people got lucky on their umpteenth PCR test and got a positive – demonstrating that either the test result was wrong, or their long-covid sickness was no such thing.
It`s the new fibromyalgia.
Have you tried to live on <£70 per week, it’s not a lifestyle, it’s government induced business closing gaol sentence.
Free meal ticket…. *profanity* off
I doubt it is the people on statutory sick pay who are off with “long COVID”. It’s the fortunate ones who have a safety blanket of six months’ full pay with no questions asked (because “long-covid” is off-limits for HR departments to challenge). Strangely, at my workplace they all suddenly got better in exactly six months.
Hmmm, let’s ponder on that. Yes, it is a hysteria.
Long covid, a gift that keeps on giving to the work shy and public sector workers. Sorry I repeated myself.
What would Socrates have asked the covidians? Perhaps…
How would you know there had been a pandemic if there had been no:
the actual disease was barely apparent over the last 2 years. We only ever saw the response to it. like shamans shouting at fake gods
Agree. Especially point 2. A more direct way of putting it would be ‘was it all crap?’
Hmm, so if she disagrees with some detail of a particular feminist sect’s dogma, she’s not allowed to call herself a feminist?
Ok, if you say so. I suspect she might disagree.
Imo, the term feminist, for whatever useful content it might have had in the early C20th, was utterly discredited decades ago now. People like Showalter just haven’t caught up yet. Perhaps being excommunicated by the mainstream feminist sect for offending against their dogma might help her along.
There clearly has not been a pandemic BUT my wife and I have had what we call a cold in September 2021 that resulted in complete loss of taste and smell. Both are mostly back now but many things don’t smell right. The effect is described in this article:
https://www.healthline.com/health/weird-smell-in-nose-covid
If I start to experience weird smells I know that my sinuses are infected again, as often happens after a heavy cold.
I have had this effect after ‘flu – a complete loss of taste and smell during the acute phase, followed by an ‘altered state’ of taste and smell for many weeks. Metal taste and burning rubber smells were the principle ones as far as I remember – it was in the 70s, so a long time ago.
I think there is definitely something called Long Covid – and have a friend who is very disabled by it even now, a year after covid. She is fine in the morning but gets tired very easily, and has to rest a lot, and at times can hardly even talk.
On the other hand the official definition is really unclear. It seems to be about having symptoms (often miild) after 4 weeks or 8 weeks. I had symptoms for 7 weeks but didn’t consider this to be Long Covid, just normal post viral symptoms (ie I couldn’t walk as far or fast as usual, but could still manage a few miles) as someone would get after flu.
So in summary, I believe that while for some people Long Covid is a serious condition, for most it is very mild. But unfortunately these people are put in the same category, which inflates the numbers.
That’s just chronic fatigue syndrome, it existed before Covid too.
Quite – it’s just been given a scary new name. I have no trouble believing that it happens with this virus as with various other viruses, but I’ve seen no evidence that it’s any worse or more common.
I’ve known several people who have had post-viral fatigue badly, pre-Covid – in one case genuinely unable to work for several years as a result – but this level of severity is rare.
Yes I agree – it isn’t anything new – it existed before Covid.
I’d assume that when you are so quick to diagnose your friend with Long Covid, that she has had the gene therapies and boosters.
The gene therapies and boosters programme human cells to produce spike proteins. These spike proteins grow from the walls of blood vessel cells and project into the veins and capillaries.
The interior linings of vein and capillaries are designed to be smooth, so as to improve the flow of blood through them. When the spike proteins grow and project inwards into the veins and capillaries, they obstruct the flow of blood, which means the heart has to work harder.
Worse than this though is that the immune system attacks these spike proteins as alien pathogens. When the immune system finds these pathogens projecting from the linings of veins and capillaries, the first response is to form blood clots around them.
Capillaries with these spike proteins will be found all over the bodies of people that have taken the gene therapies. They will be particularly found in capillaries in the hearts and lungs of “vaccinated” people. Many microscopic blood clots will have formed around these spike proteins as an immune response in the affected capillaries. These clots slow the flow of blood and starves the heart and lungs of oxygen.
To counteract all this, the heart tries to work harder but is hindered in doing so by the lack of oxygen. The result to the sickened person’s health is fatigue, dizziness and shortness of breath.
If anyone wants to lower the risk that their capillaries and veins are constricted by foreign particles, a good defence would be to eat a couple of raw cloves of garlic at day. Garlic is extremely good at removing plaque from inside blood vessels. If it removes plaque, it might well break down other foreign objects in veins and capillaries.
I hope your friend gets over whatever it is that ails her. But advise her to stay away from any booster shots.
Fraud does seem to be a sensible way to get the majority of the population to voluntarily hand over their DNA to the state
Kevin McCairn PhD Neuro Scientist has a hypothesis it’s all linked to a kind of “impulse control disorder” (Covid Karens) he specialised in studying Tourettes in live monkey neuroscience experiments. He links it to prion type diseases, MS, Alzheimer’s etc. and has shown brain biopsies with very similar effects. There’s plenty of literature for entry pathways for covid/spike and other virus to get past the BB Barrier, and pleanty of evidence for neurological disorder signals in some of the symptoms.
It’s interesting stuff, and given the implications from condon optimisation in the mRNA jabs (see Kevin McKernans twitter, the R&D lead on the human genome project) creating misfolded proteins, which are effectively prions, it can’t be armwaved away with any credibility IMO.
Here’s a paper discussing vax/prion disease signals in the UK yellow card system
https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-vaccine-associated-parkinsons-disease-a-prion-disease-signal-in-the-uk-yellow-card-adverse-event-database-1746.pdf
Long Covid, Pah!!
What they need to be worried about is Long Vaccine
It is important to note that there are some people with a chronic condition resulting from covid infection.
It is just that they are relatively uncommon — the mysterious ‘long covid’ appears to be largely a mix of post-viral lethargy (a real thing, but only lasting a month or two) and ‘hysteria’, as suggested in the article.
The important point about there being some (not many) instances of ‘long covid’ is that this real condition appears to be due to autoimmune complications resulting from the immune response to the infection — and as the vaccines stimulate an immune response similar in intensity to those hospitalised with covid then it would seem prudent to search for similar types of condition in the vaccinated.
Many are suffering from FOMO
Good God! I’ve had Long Covid every Monday all of my life. Well, not my entire life, only since I started drinking when I was 6.
You started late at 6. My mother us to like telling the story of my first drinks party when I was 3 and taking the bottles off the drinks trolley at my grandparents and sitting on the door step about to have a swig of something.
I think I will need at least 5 years and funding in the $millions to even start to give you the reasoning behind the answer to that question.
You can have the actual answer now, for free, YES.
My theory about the hysteria of Long Covid has to do with the very large number of people in the UK that use A&E departments as social venues.
If you visited A&E waiting rooms prior to the plandemic you’d invariably find they were packed with people. All sitting there patiently waiting to see a doctor. I greatly suspect that if these people had been asked to pay an entrance fee of £20, the vast majority of them would have turned away and went home and somehow got over their “illness”.
A mixture of people, some meeting friends, some seeking new friends, some eagerly wanting attention from a person in authority. Only a small number of them actually needing emergency medical treatment in the first place.
Long Covid is a god-send for these people. They again can fill up the free to enter and nicely heated and comfortable A&E waiting areas to meet their long-lost friends. And get the attention and cosseting they need from a person in authority. All under the cover of an impossible to diagnose theorised disease.
Long Covid may be just another case where the medical authorities push a line of fake BS, only for it to turn around and bite them on the butt, by giving shameless people a legitimate sounding excuse to clog up hospital waiting areas whilst meeting their old friends.
I still unfondly remember summer 2020 because I had a runny nose for months on end, a hitherto unprecedented experience. I also got an initially very loud tinnitus which has still not entirely subsided. Meanwhile, it’s more of a background noise and I have days where it’s entirely gone. There were also some other effects I can’t really describe in words (and some I won’t mention despite I know the word).
NB: Obviously, none of this was anyhow improved by piling Corona measures on top of it.
The idea of a “disinterested” academic is poop.
If people don’t see how that relates to patriarchy, they need to give their heads a good shake and probably their personalities too.
Okay, I mostly agree but, not entirely. First because we know there is some people have underlying health issues triggered by viral infections. Not in their head but real actual diagnosed health issues.
But second, because I am one of those who got Lyme Disease. It was diagnosed for 5 years (I got dumped in the CF and Fibromyalgia camp). Only when my doctor had me do a far more expensive blood test (living in America then), and it was diagnosed and then treated for 2.5 years with intravenous IV antibiotics. I worked (mostly) during that time. Yes, some people use it as an excuse but, there are real spirochetes from real ticks. Not in our heads…real, actual, infections. It’s just too easy to dismiss everything as psychosomatic or mass movement induced (like 95% of transgendered people today). But yes, lots who are simply caught in a psychological movement.
We know lockdown created massive issues with depression and anxiety (we evolved as social creatures). We know that depression Dan aggravate pain, fatigue, etc. Anxiety too. So, at this point, long Covid is probably 90% the impact of lockdown. But we know they aren’t going to accept that answer. So Long Covid, it must be something else.
I read some time ago that the highest incidence of ‘long covid’ is within the NHS. I bet if a survey was done about the employment of so called sufferers, the majority would be in jobs with generous and credulous sick pay systems. I should think if you are hourly paid in a job with no sick pay (other than statutory) or self employed, your chances of contracting long covid are severely reduced.
Incidentally I have just seen an article highlighting the ‘fact’ that long covid causes heart problems…well, well, well – who’d would have thought that, eh?
I not only don’t usually go to a doctor (ie, only if it really can’t be avoided), I also wasn’t a single day off sick during the period I mentioned in the earlier comment.
I posted a while ago on the subject of inflammation and the links with anxiety and depression. Research seems to suggest that some SSRI and Tricyclic antidepressants have anti-inflammatory properties and that their possible success is nothing to do with serotonin and more to do with reducing inflammation. This could be why scientists have been testing one particular antidepressant for use against Covid (can’t remember the name without looking it up).
My hunch is that “Long Covid” may well occur as a result of inflammation from the virus itself, from the jabs or from the stress of lockdown as DrCOxford says.
Post-viral syndrome is far from unknown – and affects some people seriously. That said, the current climate probably binds in the psychological effects of hysteria and hypochondria to the definition.
Long Covid is rife amongst the chattering classes – the Islington set/middle-classes/public sector type. You won’t find many working class people with it. It’s a skivers disease.
Islington?
Maybe Long Covid is an excuse the denizens of this borough use as a reason to not venture outside.
The neighbouring borough of Camden has become a bit of a hellhole. Chaps in broad daylight on Camden High Street aggressively selling drugs – and have been seen to get aggressively annoyed when people refuse to purchase from them. I believe the lockdown made them even more aggressive, due to their normal customers not being around as often.
They get swept up every now and then, but replacements are on scene within hours. Equality and equity means the ethnic populations of jails have to reflect the ethnic percentages in the general population – if the percentages don’t reflect, the authorities will be accused of being racist for claiming that one ethnicity commits more crime than another.
To make these percentages reflect correctly, one ethnicity of criminals must be punished less severely than another. Which means less jail sentences for one group of criminals with the effect that more of these are quickly back on the streets after being caught committing crimes. And this quick turnaround leads to more emboldened criminals, because they know they can practically get away with crime.
I remember Camden back in the day. It was a good spot for musical talent and a lively night scene. Now there’s hardly anything that is European about it at all. Even normal shopping during the day is a highly unpleasant task.
It’s become a place that is now very unpleasant to live in, and a lot of the taxpayers have migrated to Islington – to say nothing of the multitude that have moved out of London altogether. The problem with moving to a nearby borough, though, is that the predators are smart enough to follow the prey.
Buying an expensive home in Islington will for a while keep you from living next door to ruffians, and from having to put up with them when you visit your local shops, restaurants or pubs.
But it doesn’t stop the ruffians from coming and staking out patches in your neighbourhood and prowling the streets at night. As more and more predators show up, the taxpayers migrate even further. Then rent becomes cheaper and the predators find they can then live there.
And in a quick few years, Islington is like Camden. You have to study the progressive in his/her habitat and experience the consequences of their actions, and you’ll clearly see that these people are actually really stupid.
I had Covid, afterwards I had a little post viral fatigue, same as you get after Flu lasts about two weeks.
Long Covid is actually mental depression caused by lockdown, if you’re not mentally tough enough to deal with the real strain that WEF controlled governments imposed on us, clinical depression.
That’s what it actually is.
Never forgive, never forget.
What vaccine is about as “effective” as the COVID vaccine? The flu vaccines. I don’t know if I’m supposed to point this out, but I did with this article.
https://uncoverdc.com/2022/02/14/flu-vaccines-of-dubious-effectiveness-helped-pave-the-way-for-covid-vaccines-of-dubious-effectiveness/
Anecdotical data point: I’ve never heard of a flu vaccine before the so-called bird flu of 2004.
The article & discussion below it reinforces the point that while Long Covid might be a thing it is an absolute pussycat compared to the much more lifethreatening
“Long Vaccine”
Or the pervasive but disturbing and draining “Long Moron”!
While I fully support the Daily Sceptic’s general aims and abhor vaccine mandates and lockdowns, the tendency for those on this side of the fence to diminish the suffering of those with Long Covid as ‘psychogenic’ is misguided and damaging.
Most experts in this field regard Long Covid and Myalgic Encephalomyeltis to be the same or very similar with the same underlying pathology having been identified in both. M.E. sufferers have faced the same kind of stigma historically as if it is reasonable to assume that millions of patients around the world with the same core symptoms are taking part in some kind of hypochondriacal pact. Parkinsons and MS patients also faced this in the past.
Prof. Scheibenbogen of Charite University, Berlin, has published a series of three papers that piece together the likely core pathophysiology of M.E. The illness is likely driven by autonomic disturbance, autoimmunity and excessive vasoconstriction, this latter leading to a reduction in blood flow by 20% throughout the entire body, including the brain. The body recognises this as an emergency state and tries to rectify it by releasing emergency vasodilatory systems. These ultimately fail and also have the knock on effect of downregulating the body’s blood volume retention mechanisms, leading M.E. patients also to be short of blood, by about 1 litre in fact (the healthy norm is 5 litres). There are many other factors, but that is the gist of the likely score mechanisms of the condition.
I have been in touch with Klaus Wirth, her co-author, who states that these same mechanisms are occurring in Long Covid.
Put all this together: autonomic disturbance, 20% less blood flow, 1 litre less blood and you have a serious pathology that constitutes a living nightmare for many with the illness. It also explains the exercise intolerance such patients experience: their cardiovascular system is seriously compromised and the anaerobic threshold is reached upon minimal exertion.
Anyone who wishes to learn more should go to The Health Rising blog which features the latest research into M.E. and Long Covid in an accessible form.
It is right to be critical of the disastrous public health response to Covid. But that doesn’t mean that the illness isn’t real or doesn’t seriously damage people’s lives. There is nothing scientific about Freudian interpretations of these health problems – by definition that is the pinnacle of anti-scientific thinking. The difference between a Freudian understanding of a patient’s suffering, which is by its nature narcissistic and full of a ‘blame the victim’ approach (which was characteristic of Freud himself!), and recognising that that suffering is real, is usually just more time and further research.