We already know that MHRA does not have a procedure for following up Yellow Card reports, even just the fatal and serious ones or those involving children or pregnancy. Nor does it know how many it has actually followed up to obtain any missing information one would think was critical to investigating reported deaths and serious side-effects of medicines – information like the age of the subject, his or her medical records, time between administration and death or injury, medicine batch data and so on, which are missing from many Yellow Card reports. No, it has no idea.
But even if it doesn’t investigate individual Yellow Card reports, at least it reassured me in 2022 that “the MHRA carefully evaluates reports of serious suspected side-effects as soon as they are received to consider whether the medicine or vaccine may have caused the event, or whether the event was likely to be purely coincidental”. It’s not ideal to be assessing causation without some key information, but it’s better than nothing. Or is it ?
Imagine my surprise when I recently discovered that even that reassurance is hollow. The MHRA just admitted that it doesn’t have a process for assessing causation (consisting of things like: who does the assessment, what medical qualifications he or she must have, his or her seniority, does anyone have to sign it off, what data are required, what categories of probability to use, what to do with the assessment etc.) Worse still, it doesn’t hold any information about how many Covid vaccine Yellow Cards it has assessed for possible causation.
Assuming that it isn’t lying about not holding that information, there are only two possibilities. Either it lied about assessing causation of Yellow Card reports or it doesn’t record the assessment and therefore can’t do anything as a result.
The word ‘negligent’ springs to mind.
Until Nick retired a few years ago, he was a Senior Civil Servant in the Ministry of Defence responsible for the safety and effectiveness of ammunition used by the Armed Forces. He is co-author of the Perseus Group report on U.K. medicines regulator the MHRA.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
So much for chain of custody, proper channels! Whats the point?
What a place this fecking world is becoming!
Yes, the corridors of power have become a tyranny of ignorant people who shout down critical thinkers and people who really know about things.
Funny, the word that comes to my mind is ‘criminal’, but hey-ho – potato, potatoe, negligent, criminal – if only they really would call the whole thing off.
Israel admitted it didn’t keep track of AEs, the FDA and CDC are playing silly beggars, continually saying the other institution is the one who is supposed to keep track, the German authorities admit they didn’t bother to keep track of AEs, now the UK. And yet they still keep trying to shove this poison into people, despite the fact it clearly does not work.
There really needs to be a reckoning.
Maybe it doesn’t do it because it doesn’t want to know the answer, or more accurately has a good idea of the answer but doesn’t want it to become public knowledge.
I would say that the later is highly likely. All of these regulators are obfuscating the truth to keep their paymasters happy. To hell with the repercussions and consequences of their lies.
Why would they have such a process? None of the actions taken during “covid” were anything to do with public health.
The ‘died suddenly’ epidemic continues in a very localized and ‘unexpected’ fashion, however. Will the lethal infection spread to other areas of the UK? Dicktator Khant is said to be ”baffled”.
https://twitter.com/CartlandDavid/status/1701663726154264850
Just chatting to an acquaintance with a diesel just too old for the ULEZ cutoff, great car, nothing wrong with it, family and friends inside the zone, she will have to sell it at a huge loss or pay £12.50 every trip she makes to see anyone. Hopefully another person waking up, hopefully ULEZ proves to be a big own goal for the Satanists.
I am sure they have a process as why would the jab batches differ from deadly to placebo. Someone is monitoring this v closely especially those poor medics and young people who were forced to have the jab.
I read about a study I think in Denmark or Holland that showed huge variation in adverse events between batches, think that was independently undertaken. Not aware of anything like that being done here. Nobody I know who has been jabbed seems remotely worried about it – I doubt they are aware of any of this info.
“I doubt they are aware of any of this info.”
And therein lies the problem tof. Too many bloody muppets who know they have been conned but still won’t listen to us let alone do their own research.
Indeed, though I must admit I am somewhat squeamish about this: “hey there friend/relative, did you know that those jabs you’ve had are slowly, silently killing you and there’s nothing you can do about it?”. I’m not worried about losing friends – goodness knows I’ve lost plenty of “friends” – just don’t want to ruin someone’s life. But perhaps you could argue it’s not my decision to make and they should know what I think to be the truth.
Prof Yeadon revealed that the jab batches could not be so different unless designed to be different as the drug industry is based on regulation and control so a paracetamol tablet is the same formula, otherwise no one would buy them.
The scam is not Covid but the jabs.
What he says sounds plausible, however I am not sure what the motivation would be for doing such a thing. I can think of three scenarios: 1) You want to make £££££s and you don’t care how, so you are negligent. 2) You want to kill everyone so you make almost all of the batches dangerous. 3) You want to kill everyone but not be “caught” so you make the jabs kill people slowly over time, but you make all the batches do this.
Perhaps making some batches much more dangerous was part of some experiment?
I think it is 3) and you kill people over time as it is not so obvious. The batches are the control as you need to let some people survive. Of course those behind the scam need those placebo batches to show, on air, how safe the jabs are which indicates to me how many people must be aware of what is happening.
Possibly. I cannot recall what that study I am referring to thought about the proportion of bad batches was.
The figures would be easy to gather as each National database records patient ID no against batch number. The fact it is silent indicates the scam.
As a researcher by background, I looked carefully at the trial protocols and accompanying documents and I could not see any mechanism for ongoing monitoring. As this was a new experimental injection being rolled out after 6 weeks and the control group had been intentionally contaminated, it rang alarm bells to say the least.
I could see no way that adverse events could be recorded and matched up with batch numbers. Which is what would be necessary if one cared about patient safety.
And the yellow card system is wholly inadequate, as we already know.
I have attached the latest MHRA figures summarised by age group. More details https://t.me/mikes_stuff/1294.
For the age group 10-19, there have been 17 deaths reported to MHRA.
ONS figures for the so-called ‘pandemic’ years 2020-2021, for the age group 10-19:
2,059 (100%) all-cause deaths
61 (3.0%) deaths after a positive covid test
2 (0.1%) deaths due to covid alone
It is abundantly clear that the jabs are many times more deadly than covid. How can anyone in organisations such as the MHRA sleep at night? Why on earth did they not blow the whistle right at the start?
The MHRA is owned and paid for by Big Pharma. They are doing what they are paid to do and it is not to serve and protect us.
Oh dont forget to say that it is NOT a conspiracy But just a coincidence!!