One could be forgiven for thinking there’s a secret blacklist somewhere, and that Nigel Farage and his family are on it. Increasingly, people and organisations who don’t think the right way are being refused service by their bank – or in Farage’s case, eight banks. The targets have included those associated with UKIP and the Brexit Party (including two former MEPs), Laurence Fox’s Reclaim Party, Wings Over Scotland, a Church of England vicar – and probably many more that we don’t know about.
But I don’t agree with Mr. Brexit’s hypothesis that this happened to him because he’s a “politically exposed person” – he doesn’t meet the definition. In my view, this “cancellation” is a political attack that signals the left-wing/woke blob’s capture of the banking system – a new and very dangerous phase of the culture war where everything including one’s ability to pay the rent is under threat.
As evidence of this general trend, last year PayPal tried to cancel Toby Young, the Daily Sceptic and the Free Speech Union (before reversing course under considerable pressure), but it’s worth remembering some of the other victims: the children’s rights group UsForThem, Gays Against Groomers, the gender-critical evolutionary biologist Colin Wright, alternative news site The Exposé, the conservative group Moms for Liberty, socialist outlets Consortium News and MintPress News, the UK Medical Freedom Alliance, Left Lockdown Sceptics and Law or Fiction, as well as probably many more who either don’t have the clout to draw attention to their plight, or who decided it was best to keep quiet.
The above people and organisations have expressed views that are gender-critical or anti-lockdown, or which don’t fit the narrative on Ukraine. To adopt any of these is to make make one an enemy of the woke blob. But particularly irritating for me, in this respect, is Chris Bryant’s claim last year in the House of Commons that Nigel Farage took £548,573 from RT (formerly Russia Today) in the 2018 calendar year – which may have been the pretext for his banking cancellation.
On this point, it probably won’t surprise readers to know that (besides writing articles on the topic) I wear a pro-Ukraine lapel pin, have a set of “Russian warship, go f— yourself” stamps and other pro-Ukraine artwork framed on my walls, sometimes wear a Zelenskyy-style trident sweater, teach English to Ukrainian soldiers and veterans and support other pro-Ukrainian charities. From the comfort of my own home, I’m pretty much all-in when it comes to Ukraine. If they were a football team, I’d have a season ticket. So I’m predisposed to have deep suspicions about anyone who has appeared on RT (as Nigel Farage has done) or who trots out the usual excuses for the invasion (as Nigel Farage has done), but I’m calling bulls—t on Chris Bryant’s allegations.
The fact that these allegations were made in the chamber of the House of Commons, taking advantage of parliamentary privilege to make a defamatory allegation about an individual who, by virtue of parliamentary privilege, isn’t able to take legal action to defend his reputation, is a disgrace. The last time someone did that, it didn’t work out too well – although like Tom Watson, it probably won’t stop Chris Bryant from getting a peerage. However, the reason he did it is because, like Harry Reid, he knows it can be effective. And the reasons I don’t believe Bryant are because: (a) I think Nigel Farage is an honourable person; (b) because RT wouldn’t pay someone half a million pounds unless they were on screen almost constantly (and Farage denies appearing on RT at all in 2018 – a claim that could easily be challenged if it were false); and (c) because if Bryant had any evidence to back up his allegations, he’d have made them outside parliament instead of hiding behind parliamentary privilege. The coward! And also, I think Farage could beat him in a cage fight.
However, these are side-issues. The ability to have a bank account is about as necessary for modern life as electricity or running water. I could make legal arguments dating back to the 17th Century Lord Chief Justice Sir Matthew Hale and his De Portibus Mari, or by referring to modern-day legal scholars. But the simple fact is that we all need access to certain things like telephones, the internet, roads and railways, etc. And I don’t need to resile from a pure free market position to say that when banks act in concert – presumably influenced by governmental or quasi-governmental organisations in some way – to deny a service on apparently political grounds, this becomes a matter “affected with the publick interest”.
We cannot have a democratic society if our political enemies can deny us (both individually, and in respect of political organisations we might create, like the Reclaim Party) access to common goods and the means to transact business. This is a modern way of stating the underlying principle of all public accommodation laws that exist in the world, which we now tend to call “civil rights”. And silly people like Kay Burley should be aware that if society allows the use of these political weapons, then, like poison gas, when the political wind changes, they will blow back in their faces.
Stop Press: I have learned that the Free Speech Union has records of 10 cases where they are supporting or have supported members suffering financial exclusion (including debanking, being kicked off crowdfunding platforms, etc.). Additionally, there have been 31 reports from members of financial exclusion cases (often historical) in which no action was requested or expected, and 7 of these members had written to their MP. But this is likely the tip of the iceberg. As ever, if your right to free speech is being infringed or you are being penalised in some way for exercising your lawful right to free speech please email help@freespeechunion.org.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Elgin marbles you say,…Yaaaawn!
The RSC recently spent a small fortune looking at decolonising Hamlet. Hamlet was written in 1600. Our 1st colony wasn’t established until 1607.
Wow, it just shows how pathetic these virtue signalling entities and governments have become!
I didn’t know that. The RSC is funded by taxpayers. One more thing to add to the long list of things our tax money should not be spent on. If people think “the arts” are so important they can put their hands in their own pockets, not in mine.
Very interesting listening to an enthusiastic Italian eloquently defending British cultural history. Have all the British historians been ‘cancelled’ or converted to anti-Imperialism?
Why don’t they put the Elgin marbles and the Benin bronzes on a big space rocket and fuck them all off into space? My electric bill is a bigger concern !
Superb watching. It was a timely reminder, Dr Mario said that the vultures are circling over the dying body of Western Civilisation because good people don’t do anything. Well, that is a wake up call for us British. Thank you for enlightening us.