Children were forgotten by policymakers during Covid lockdowns because they rarely got seriously ill from the virus itself, a report from University College London has found. The Telegraph has the story.
Infants, children and teenagers endured numerous lockdowns during their most formative years, despite accounting for a diminutive proportion of Covid hospitalisations and deaths.
A group led by University College London (UCL) found that because the elderly and vulnerable were more likely to get sick and die, the development and well-being of children were deprioritised.
UCL scientists created a paper looking at the impact of the coronavirus global health emergency on children worldwide, specifically in England, Brazil and South Africa.
It found that politicians did not consider children and young people a “priority group” when English lockdowns were enforced. Large policy gaps were created as a result of the ad hoc and ever-changing nature of the lockdowns, which the scientists say disproportionately affected children.
The impact of lockdowns on children and the knock-on effects are expected to feature heavily in the Covid inquiry which last week heard from ex-Prime Minister David Cameron and former Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt.
This week Matt Hancock – the Health Secretary when Covid emerged – will give evidence, as will Nicola Sturgeon.
The report found that childhood access to food, education, the internet and playtime was curbed, and schemes to fix the flaws “took too long to be equally implemented”.
“What is apparent is that the voices of children and young people in England were mostly ignored during the pandemic as this age group was not considered as a priority nor ‘at-risk’ from a public health perspective,” the report states.
“In a context where the response to COVID-19 has been driven by science but also politics, strategies and policies in the future need to adequately consider, and include, children and young people’s priorities.
“Children, young people and the most vulnerable of this group need to be engaged more thoroughly to tackle resilience and social justice.”
They add that the impact of closing schools and keeping children inside their homes for days on end will be felt for decades and in myriad ways, many of which will not be apparent for years to come.
“The impact of the pandemic [sic] will have detrimental consequences for children and young people in the short and long-term, with many not yet visible,” the report said.
“It will have continuing consequences for their future in terms of professional life trajectories, healthy lifestyles, mental well-being, educational opportunities, self-confidence and more besides.”
Many children before Covid did not have computers at home as all education was done in schools and it is estimated that a quarter of children had no internet access during Covid.
This not only impacted their education but also their social sphere and shut them off from the world outside their home.
Why do they insist on blaming the ‘pandemic’ when what they mean is the lockdowns and school closures? It wasn’t Covid that closed the schools. It was the Government.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
A very good and thorough article from the PANDA team focusing on if SARS-CoV-2 was really novel or particularly dangerous.
”Fourth, is this virus entirely new to our immune system? Certainly not, for it was known from early on in the Covid-era that a significant percentage of people were immune to this supposedly novel virus. We previously observed that only 19% (712 of 3711) of the people on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship tested positive for the virus, and of these only a smaller fraction yet actually became ill. Similarly, a group of researchers from Singapore “detected SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells in individuals with no history of SARS [or] Covid-19.” Remarkably, they also detected T cells in people that had no known contact with anyone that had had either SARS or Covid.
Likewise, a study in the UK found that many health care workers repeatedly tested negative despite repeated exposure to Covid. The authors of that study concluded that “some individuals may clear subclinical infection before seroconversion.” Why did so many people never get Covid? Multiple researchers have concluded that it was likely a result of memory T-cells from a previous infection with a common cold or flu.”
https://pandauncut.substack.com/p/was-sars-cov-2-entirely-novel-or
SPAM!
The scamdemic that keeps on giving. “Scientists” getting paid to point out the bleeding obvious, all of which and more was raised by sceptics at the beginning for which we were vilified.
I think the general thrust of all of these kinds of study, analysis and report is not that the whole thing was approached wrongly but that “next time” we should do more to mitigate all of the collateral damage, probably by shovelling taxpayers’ money at it.
Despite all the “no shit, Sherlock” evidence and conclusions that are being talked about more in the MSM, I am not at all optimistic about the future because the fundamental points (there was no pandemic, ability to carry on a normal life must be given a huge weight in any cost benefit analysis, saving lives at all costs is stupid and evil, the state must not have “emergency” powers to suspend basic rights) are still only grasped by a tiny number of people. The reality is that rich world populations seem to want to be told what to do, and are happy to sacrifice liberty for “safety”.
The scientists are excluding themselves with the comment “politicians did not consider children and young people”. Politicians should be deciding the course of action but they’re weak and pliable and therefore ripe for manipulation by those with the appropriate psychological skills.
Weren’t concerns repeatedly raised and disregarded?
UCL has a close relationship with the Behavioural Insights Team, the very group that helped manufacture this situation.
SPAM!
The naturally occurring “pandemic” is blamed as blaming government mandated “lockdowns”, would be an admission of liability. That would never do now, would it?
Children weren’t forgotten. They were banned from going to school, forced to wear useless masks, demonised for wanting to ‘kill granny’ and forced into taking “safe and effective vaccines” All in all children were front and centre of the despicable propaganda pushed out to combat a non-existent ‘pandemic’