Let me say right away that I have met Steve Baker, and like him as a person.
He is a good Christian and I believe tries to act in a moral fashion. However, his recent bizarre tweet is as clear an example of any of how woke, and how lost, the Conservative Party really is.
— Rt Hon Steve Baker MP FRSA
As part of my #NewYearResolutions, I pledge to be an ally to the LGBT+ community.
We must continue to support the LGBT+ community and continue to work to ensure that our society is one where LGBT+ people can live their lives free from hate.@LGBTCons
(@SteveBakerFRSA) January 11, 2023
As a general rule, you know you are in trouble when Tom Harwood is agreeing with you.
As many have observed, we voters are now faced with a choice between various Left-wing parties, with minor differences about how to manage the country.
The Tories are Lefties who occasionally say something like “The woke Civil Service has gone too far”, or “Perhaps we should stop some of these boats, eh?”. Labour are Lefties who, since Starmer realised he actually wanted to get elected, will throw in something like “People were right to want to Take Back Control”, or “Maybe we should train some British nurses lol”.
Even the Reform Party is running with policies that could be straight out of a 90s Lib Dem manifesto. “Raise the threshold of income tax” is their big idea. And it’s a good one, but it does not address any of the moral or social Leftism that is destroying the country.
As Steven Edginton pointed out, in Reform UK’s 2023 plan, “Immigration was featured on the third slide and was the 16th bullet point.”
The battle for the next election, it seems, is being fought almost solely over competence.
We became used to the idea of the end of ideology in the Blair/Cameron years. We were presented with managerial politicians who claimed to be sensible Centrists.
In reality, the Blair years were incredibly radical when it came to social issues, such as the deliberate breaking down of the traditional marriage, or the imposition of mass immigration upon the country.
Cameron, having failed in his younger years to get anywhere with actual Conservative positions, continued this legacy with his disproportionate obsession with issues like same-sex marriage, and making the Conservative Party more diverse. In fact, we have his diversity-focused “A-List” to thank for Liz Truss.
What has been sold to us as the end of ideology is actually the complete triumph of Left-wing ideology, to the point that it even employs the word ‘ideology’ to quash any dissent.
Notice that when Liz Truss tried to nudge our economy ever-so-slightly Rightwards, she was immediately attacked as a rabid ideologue. I suppose that’ll teach her for being ungrateful to the Left-wing ‘equality of outcome’ thinking that got her into her position in the first place.
The political tensions not acknowledged by our political parties ended up violently entering via the back door in the form of Brexit.
That is because our political differences are real and cannot ever be truly suppressed. Much like the war on masculinity, the testosterone will find its way out somewhere. If it is not allowed in the mainstream, it will find other channels. In this way you might say Brexit is the Andrew Tate of political phenomena.
Once they removed Truss, we returned to the war over competence. In other words, who can best manage this failing country, while avoiding real change.
This was confirmed once again just a few days ago by Claire Perry O’Neill, a cabinet minister under Theresa May who now claims the Tories are “beholden by ideology and self-obsession”, while praising Labour’s “sober, fact-driven, competent political leadership”.
Golly.
Of course, I agree with the suspicion of ideology in one sense. The origins of conservatism as we know it go back to Edmund Burke and the idea of inductive reasoning. Conservatism proceeds from empirical truth to draw conclusions about the general, i.e., “These things seem to work and we like them.” While the Left imposes top-down policies that work in theory, but not in fact.
So what we need is in fact a lack of utopian ideology, but clearly this is not what our political and media establishment mean when they talk about ideology. They mean that whichever party they happen to belong to will manage our decline into a dysfunctional Socialist dystopia slightly better than the other lot.
Our failed political parties will not stop illegal immigration, strikes, the breakdown of marriage, the destruction of education or the desecration of Britain’s history and heritage. None of these can be solved by Left-wing thinking, because they are caused by such thinking (or lack of it).
What we will continue to get is big state economics along with ultra-Leftie social and moral causes.
All one can do is vote against the Tories and deliver the archetypal ‘bloody nose’. Temporarily satisfying, perhaps, but ultimately achieving very little. And probably followed immediately by a cringe joke from a newly-elected Keir Starmer about ‘sticking plaster politics‘.
Lord, spare us.
Nick Dixon is Deputy Editor of the Daily Sceptic. You can follow him on Twitter and Substack.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-is-unlikely-to-abandon-ukraineand-might-even-escalate-the-war-356a2825
What’s really going on?
For the first time, Sports Handle, which aggregates political betting odds, said Trump has a 57.2% chance of winning the November election. By comparison, Biden’s odds of reelection have fallen to 40.9%, down from 47.1% at the end of April.
What would a Trump Presidency mean for Ukraine?
Maybe not quite what, until recently, many might have expected.
‘Between 2017 and 2021, he made no concessions on Ukrainian territory: He didn’t recognize Russia’s annexation of Crimea or its military presence in Eastern Ukraine. Trump also broke with Obama administration policy by sending lethal military assistance to Ukraine, including Javelin antitank missiles, which were invaluable to Ukraine in the early stages of Russia’s 2022 invasion. Two new countries, Montenegro and North Macedonia, were admitted to NATO with the Trump administration’s approval. In Syria, the U.S. took military action against Russia in 2018, killing several hundred Russian mercenaries.’
‘In 2017, the GOP-led Congress levied sanctions against Russia that the White House didn’t want, and today, a strong vein of pro-Ukraine sentiment persists among Republican lawmakers and within the Republican electorate.
Highly sensitive to this dynamic, Trump has accommodated it and is aware of how much the pullout from Afghanistan damaged Biden’s popularity. Before Speaker of the House Mike Johnson went ahead with a funding package for Ukraine in April, in defiance of much of the Republican caucus, he made a pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago, where he presumably got a green light from the former president.’
‘For Trump, an additional hurdle to abandoning Ukraine would be the war itself. As president, Trump never had to deal directly with war. Between 2017 and 2021, Russia wasn’t on the march. By early 2025, Ukraine—and with it, the U.S.—could be on the cusp of losing Europe’s first major war since 1945.’
‘If it unfolded with Trump in the White House, it would force him to contend with his cardinal fear in politics and in life: being seen as a loser.’
You know and I know that isn’t going to happen……
‘Responding to the battlefield, Trump might change the U.S. calculus and furnish Ukraine with weapons systems that the Biden administration was reluctant to allow. He might let Kyiv use U.S.-supplied weapons on Russian territory.’
‘Like Putin, Trump might refuse to declare tactical nuclear weapons off limits in Ukraine.’
‘He could approach the question of nuclear war not according to the cautious old orthodoxies but according to his own unknowable rules.’
‘Alternately, Trump might escalate without wishing to escalate. His anarchic style of communication creates risks, and he doesn’t work through layers of professional staff’
‘Unable to end the war in 24 hours, Trump might up the ante, and Putin might respond in kind.’
On the war in Ukraine, voters have a choice in 2024 that is not simply binary……two different ways of supporting Ukraine: one that is predictable and operates according to careful assumptions and one that is ad hoc and thus dangerously prone to escalation.’
‘Whoever is elected in November, the war stands little chance of ending in the months and years to come. Because of the election, however, an entirely new phase of the war might begin in late January.’
But Trump has a skill that Biden does not. He is a seasoned negotiator. He is also sensitive to battlefield losses. If this war is to be brought to some kind of cessation, however temporary that might be, a Trump Presidency might be the only way to bring that about.
There are two intractable problems.
Many thanks to Biden and his cronies for thinking that they could topple Putin in this ill-conceived proxy war.
As for Trump, the first issue that the Don has is getting past a corrupt election, as it will surely be.
Trump will be elected. That is clear.
Regarding Ukraine, the U.S. has two intractable problems.
Putin will not negotiate in good faith.
Western European NATO members are not willing to provide for their own security, let alone that of Ukraine.
President Trump has the skill set to competently address, ameliorate, if not solve, those two problems.
I want a recording of the first meeting between Trump, Starmer, Lammy and Rayner (plus interpreter).
Remind me, how did Biden persuade Putin to invade Ukraine (twice) and set up a Presidential Administration department solely responsible for issuing various strategy documents and plans as to how to take over Belarus (accomplished), Ukraine (partly accomplished), Moldova (work in progress) and the Baltic States (just started the other day, at sea)?
I admire your enquiring mind, but from where I stand, everything from the Colour Revolution to the current day has been orchestrated by the CIA. Why did Putin decide to invade? Because he saw, as we all did, the Biden administration has been poking him with a pointy stick, and breaking its own 2005 promises. Add in the shocking failure in how the US withdrew from Afghanistan, and he must have felt the time is now. I can only think that China are just biding their time over Taiwan, but they were similarly emboldened by how the US administration is dealing with foreign policy.
Please don’t see this as an opportunity to dazzle me with your extended analysis of the situation. I could be right or I could be wrong, but as far as I’m concerned I’m right, and thats that. Its just an opinion.
Colour revolutions, plural. However the attempt in Belarus failed.
And you are, of course, entitled to your opinion.
Debate is all about different opinions backed by evidence.
That is why I do not share your opinion regarding CIA orchestration.
For example, what evidence is there for any ‘2005 promises’?
I am indeed so entitled. Also I am under no obligation to provide evidence. That is what opinions are about. As I have said before, one mans evidence is another man’s disinformation.
It is truly unbelievable that the “champion of democracy”, the USA, is still supporting the dictator Zelensky and opposing the recently re-elected Putin.
It used to be unbelievable.
The rumour is that the story really develops from the Maiden Coup, in February 2014, and the West rejecting the now very generous looking Minsk Agreements, and all when Biden was VP!
What a coincidence!
With regard to international affairs, meetings are documented, records of the minutes available, signed agreement texts in the public domain.
I like a good story, but a story is fiction, if unsupported by fact.
How naive can you be?
Well done, you got this far without issuing a direct insult.
The DS community should be proud, we trained you well.
There is no such thing as “the DS community”, and who do you think you are trying to deny Freedom of Speech to anyone but your own little gang?
“Training” like Communist Re-education you mean?
Get lost!
Seconded.
Speaking personally, I belong to no tribe. I come and go as I see fit. Someone may deserve respect for having engineered the best solution for yesterday’s problems, but today is another day and today’s problems reset the counter.
Anarchy.. it ain’t for everyone.
That is an excellent point you made about “resetting the counter”.
It’s also really encouraging, as a way of looking at the world.
Would an anarchist feel the need to convince people they don’t know of how individual they are?
No.
As our previous conversations have highlighted, I’m all for freedom of speech whereas you advocate censorship.
“Training” as in training an algorithm or training an influencer to be taken more seriously by avoiding insults.
Oh dear, you sound upset. Ironic that you want to deny DHJ the free speech you claim to be concerned about.
In a spirit of helpfulness:
‘Well done.
You got this far without use of insult.
The DS community should be proud.
We trained you well.’
FYI: “community” is an unpopular term for the collection of accounts on here even although a community does not require shared ideas or beliefs.
In a spirit of helpfulness:
‘For your information:
‘Community’ is apparently an unpopular collective term for commentators on here, despite the word ‘community’ itself not implying shared ideas or beliefs.’
“a corrupt election, as it will surely be”
There comes a point where it becomes impossible to get away with corruption in the election process, without it being absolutely obvious to all. If the margin between the two main candidates is so wide that the establishment believes it can’t get away with the level of vote-rigging necessary, it would resort to a Plan B.
In my view, they will not allow Trump to become President. So Plan B might be to trigger some kind of emergency (financial collapse, civil war, nuclear war?) which would allow the Election to be suspended. Or Plan B might simply be the JFK option. Who knows?
‘‘Whoever is elected in November, the war stands little chance of ending in the months and years to come.”
Can Ukraine and Russia continue to pour troops into the horrendous slaughter that is the human horror of this war? Will we get to the point where there are no more troops left to pour into the slaughter machine? If so, what happens then?
‘Can Ukraine and Russia……?’
Yes.
‘Will we get to the point……?’
Not without use of lethal CBRN.
‘What happens then?’
The U.S.A. will use shock and awe…….at first……….
Let’s hope we are in the middle of the biggest sting operation that the World has ever known.
Quite so.
As the great man said:
‘To urge the preparation of defence is not to assert the imminence of war.
On the contrary, if war were imminent, preparations for defence would be too late.’
There will come a time, probably in the not too distant future, when one side will run out of troops. According to Budanov that moment is not far off. He has said that he has no reserves left and implies that a serious offensive on another front by Russia will be impossible to repel.
What happens then?
I think that any sort of Ukrainian victory is out of the question, and the West will be too late to come to the party without using the big nuclear stick. So it is Russian victory or oblivion for all of us.
The war only continues because the Biden administration (acting for the military-industrial complex) wants it to continue, since defeat would eliminate his chance of re-election. Putin wants the war to end and has, from day 1 virtually, been willing to agree a peace deal. If Trump is elected, the war will stop. If the USA and Russia don’t want the war to continue, it will stop. Ukraine is totally helpless without US support.
“AI will replace all human jobs but there will be ‘no shortage of goods or services’, says Musk”
From my experiences so far, Artificial Intelligence is still some way from beating the real thing. I’m still waiting for the ‘paperless office’ which we have been told will be here from the 1980’s onward.
It may not have to initially beat the real thing, just be good enough at a speed and scale that is unlikely to be achieved using people. Over-time, it could be assumed to improve.
Here’s one use in the area of anti-money laundering.
https://www.thetaray.com/
I remember 4G languages were going to put all computer programmers out of work.
How did that work out?
It’s moving in that direction.
4G languages are in some areas but even they can currently require a high level of technical skill to make best use of them.
Popular development tools like Visual Studio are semi-automated already with code completion and predictive suggestions. AI is making in-roads in development environments also.
For Cloud-based systems, software developers can now replace traditional IT teams by selecting hardware using ‘code’ (really a set of configuration settings).
With centralised code repositories, there’s now a vast amount of solutions to real-world problems (good and bad) that can be analysed by AI.
I’d suggest children consider training as plumbers, electricians etc. and if they are interested in software development do it as a sideline unless you’re supremely gifted in hardcore computer science.
Hi DHJ, what’s your background in the world of IT?
Just wondering, because you’re making the implication that functionality like code hints in IDEs like Visual Studio indicates the presence (and success!) of AI…
That is telling me you don’t know the first thing about IT. What say you?
“you’re making the implication functionality like code hints in IDEs like Visual Studio indicates the presence (and success!) of AI…”
I think you’ve misunderstood my comment. Those were examples of semi-automation – more automation usually reduces the requirement for staff over time. I then went on to add that AI is making in-roads, not that it was fully there and already a success.
I normally wouldn’t use the term IT in the context of software development because it’s a different field. So you’re correct to some extent as I’m not in the world of IT.
“Popular development tools like Visual Studio are semi-automated already with code completion and predictive suggestions.”
Code completion [hints] and predictive suggestions are not examples of automation.
“…more automation usually reduces the requirement for staff over time”
For all sorts of reasons (not least human nature) this
neververy rarely happens. Toyota and the car manufacturing industry in general are one of the few exceptions. But the people just get employed in other fields. So no overall drop in the need for staff.Whether those staff are doing anything useful or rewarding or necessary is another subject!
What is “semi-automated”? I think you’re confusing
1. labour-saving systems/devices with
2. the removal of human oversight and decision-making
“The two faces of EVs: brilliant in town, hopeless in the fast lane”
As this article points out, with current heavy lithium-ion battery technology, for most low/middle income private motorists, EVs will reduce the car to something for local utility use only. Future battery technology developments could change this but that is very much something for the future. For now, for most of us hoi-polloi if we are pushed into EVs it will be something like the BYD Seagull and a trip to Sainsbury’s if the smart meter lets us charge our car.
This will be a huge change, leisure motoring for most will be finished. Cars have always offered the lure and the dream of ‘Born to Be Wild, Easy Rider, Thelma and Louse but EVs will put an end to this aspect of motoring, buying a new EV is about as exiting as buying a new saucepan. This article concludes by asking if they will allow the continued use of rented diesels for long distance leisure motoring? In the UK the answer seems to be a firm NO to that one, the current uni-party general election seems to regard net-zero as a done deal and it is not featured as an election issue.
And the next on on the list is “Toyota shuns electric cars with new generation of combustion engines” . I haven’t read it as it is in the T, but I’m familiar with the manufacturer. It could be that some other ones are betting on the horses, and they might lose a fair bit of cash.
Easy Rider was motor bikes.
Indeed, and motor-bikes are suffering the same problem, possibly worse. Imagine a chapter of the local bike club all queuing at the EV points on the services on the M4. When Harley Davidson had the Electra Glide in Blue, it was meant to be the spirit of the freedom of the open road, not a huge battery bike with a low mileage range. Motor bikes will be reduced to city e bikes for pizza deliveries.
The journalist road trip was utterly atypical, in nearly 60 years of motoring, I have never driven 700 miles in a day.
Years ago, I drove the length of California, over 600 miles, in one day with a full load of luggage and family and it was knackering. We had frequent stops for petrol, food, toilets, and rest. If that trip had been in an EV there would have been plenty of opportunities for charging without introducing significant additional delay.
Next Oxford Union debate: “This house would rather be Orthodox than dead…”
I wonder which side would win.
There are an awful lot of jobs that AI will not replace because it doesn’t have hands, or care about people.
“Angela Rayner council house probe: Police say no further action to be taken as investigation concludes”
Why on earth had it got anything to do with the police in the first place? Tax is a civil matter and is investigated by the tax office, it certainly would be if it was you or I that were fiddling the books and not the future deputy pm!
The police investigation was into possible breach of electoral law and that is potentially a criminal matter.
If she had been found guilty of infringing electoral law by registering to vote at an address she did not live at that might have fed into the civil investigation about capital gains tax from selling a second home. HMRC’s separate investigation can now proceed without deferring to the police investigation. Pretty much whatever HMRC decide won’t get published – its a civil matter between her and them.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayner-cleared-hmrc-over-29260877
She’s been cleared by HMRC. I do believe there’s a saying about there’s no smoke without fire? So many MPs must be wearing Teflon coated jackets.
The Rayner case was pushed over to GMP in order to provide the illusion that such a serious matter was being investigated. Burnham treats GMP as his personal police force and is thick as thieves with the Sunak / WEF government and as he controls who gets the chief plod job he could obviously tell Chief Constable Stephen Watson to bury the case. Which is exactly what has happened.
All very cosy. Job done.
“European Council approves ‘rapid response teams’ to combat ‘disinformation”
I dont think even North Korea or China have thought this one up yet?
Spetsnaz disinformation flying squad!
“Tories cut gap with Labour to 12 points: Sunak makes shock recovery”
Really? It’s always useful to look at who is conducting these polls. This one was conducted by J.L. Partners (Johnson-Lubbock):
“James Johnson is a New York City-based political adviser and pollster, having previously served as the Senior Opinion Research and Strategy Adviser to the British Prime Minister, Theresa May. In that capacity he conducted opinion research and private polling, and presented recommendations to the Prime Minister and the Cabinet, as well as the rest of Whitehall and the Conservative Party.”
“Dr Tom Lubbock is a public opinion specialist having previously worked as an academic behavioral scientist at the University of Oxford, specializing in research methods and referendum campaigns. Between 2017 and 2019 he ran analytics and polling at Conservative Campaign Headquarters (CCHQ), working on tracking polling for the Prime Minister…”
So no bias there, then…
“Pope Francis apologises after using homophobic term” – The Vatican says the Pope did not intend to use homophobic language after the Italian media quoted him saying there was “an air of f*****ry” in the church”
This is the only thing the Marxist Pope has ever said that has made me laugh.
They didn’t say what “f*****ry” was but RT wasn’t so coy “Pope sorry for ‘faggotry’ remark – Vatican”. I thought it was fruitery.
There’s always been falconry in the Catholic Church. Francis is quite right to call it out as a vain pastime…
Story Tip 2023 Nobel Laureate for Physics, Dr John Clauser exposes IPCC fraud. https://www.icsf.ie/lecture-series-2024