Allison Pearson in the Telegraph thinks she’s put her finger on what’s really driving the U.K. labour crisis and putting older people off working: the unrelenting, soul-destroying wokery that now permeates every workplace and makes anyone to the Right of Chairman Mao feel like they don’t belong. Here’s an excerpt:
It’s true that lockdown showed a lot of busy people that time at home with family could be more rewarding than the gerbil-wheel of a daily commute. But something else is going on here, I think: increasingly, the modern office feels like hostile territory to baby boomers. Relentless wokery is driving the more mature into retirement before it drives us round the bend.
Gareth, a Planet Normal listener, wrote to tell me he retired last year from his job as a lawyer to a major public inquiry after three-and-a-half years engaged by the Cabinet Office. “The CO strives hard to promote a ‘woker than thou’ attitude (about the only department in which it does strive hard!) and since the pandemic this went into overdrive,” says Gareth. “It encompassed the entire woke canon from compulsory ‘unconscious bias’ training through finger-wagging lectures on ‘micro-aggressions’, ‘white fragility/privilege’, critical race theory, BLM and structural racism, aka all the shibboleths of the progressive Left, but under a supposedly Conservative Government.”
According to Gareth, the Cabinet Office “is symptomatic of the whole civil-service culture which treats the elected Government with disdain and pursues its own ultra-woke agenda which is entirely contrary to official policy”.
Like many members of staff his age, he was appalled by the “all-pervasive propaganda”. He couldn’t stand a climate in which often entirely innocuous comments were treated as “micro-aggressions” and any deviation from the official view (formerly known as “a difference of opinion”) was treated as heretical.
The civil service, the NHS, higher education and far too many private companies have become a paradise for “recreational offence-takers” who love to air their concocted grievances. On one occasion, Gareth had a complaint lodged against him for using the term Anglo-Saxon. “Apparently, it has negative connotations for the woke. Who knew?”
I reckon there are an awful lot of Gareths out there. Talented, hard-working men and women in their 50s, 60s and 70s who, earlier in their careers, were not exposed to this relentless and rather scary politicisation of the workplace and don’t want to tiptoe about in what Jon calls “this divisive and pernicious Maoist culture”.
Why would any 56-year-old wish to return to work when chances are they will be judged for the crime of not being in possession of the correct pronoun (or even comprehending what that means)? Only recently, a reader told me that a position in the NHS trust where he worked remained unfilled because no one sufficiently “diverse” had applied. It was an important job, one which really needed doing, but far better to leave it vacant than appoint some old white bloke with the right experience, eh?
Allison says that if the Government is serious about persuading over-50s to stay in their jobs, a good start would be to punish employers who discriminate against them.
But that would involve overhauling (or scrapping) the Equality Act, with its ‘protected characteristics’, public sector equality duty and licence for ‘positive’ discrimination, which is the legal fountainhead of all wokery in the U.K. But that’s not something the Tories have shown any interest in in all their 12 years in power.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
There is no tyranny worse than the one that hounds you for YOUR OWN GOOD. They NEVER sleep.
How does the weakening of encryption for the purposes of increased
surveillancesafety square with the inexorable push to force us to use CBDC which – theoretically – would require more than currently available tocontrolprotect all those additional digital payments? Or is the answer self-evident?If you believe this is about protecting children you’re probably desperate for your next booster.
Ah yes, protecting children. They haven’t managed that so far with grooming gangs rife in this country:
Manchester – the sainted Maggie Oliver lifted the lid.
Oldham – OMBC and Fuerher Burnham still refusing a proper inquiry.
Rochdale – still problems after a few token convictions.
Rotherham – ongoing.
Norwich, Bristol and most Northern towns.
And now we have the sexualisation of children in schools with bloody Queer Hour and Drag Queens and masturbation for four year olds. So obviously The Online Safety Bill is designed to protect children. A more direct lie could not be invented.
David Davies has at least raised his voice but it is too little too late. This crap has been in the planning for years.
The real fightback should have kicked in to gear March 20th 1920 but the cowards in Westminster rolled over and each month privacies and freedoms have been stolen and nothing said bar a lot of lies.
“To protect the children.”
Oh do firk off!
My thoughts exactly.
Contrast the purported concerns about protecting the children with the recent article concerning the teacher sacked for not using the “correct pronouns” for an 8 year old who thinks they are in the wrong body!
Spot on Dr.
Steve Martin said it all many years ago in this famous skit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uVUSBi3u0E
In fact they can’t wait to inject our children with another lethal shot…
Good for him for saying so but you wonder how he can continue to be a member of the Conservative party.
Davis and a few others such as Redwood and Baker appear to play a strategic role in playing to centre Right voter base but are party loyalists to the top of their boots.
This theatrical group have not changed the Leftwards drift of the party for thirty years. Fake Tories like the rest of them
Redwood apparently claimed to TCW that he voted against all the lockdown measures. Not true. He was late to the party. I think only Swayne voted NO in all of them. Hard to credit anyone who stays in that party and claims to be conservative with any credibility.
Page 1, section A of How To Start A Dictatorship. Invoke the safety of The Children.
The government concerned about online child abuse they are taking the p**s.
Covid psyop and fear mongering
Climate emergancy fear porn
Forced to wear face masks
School closures
Toxic gene therapies
Sex education/gender realignment
Add to the list as you see fit.
The online safety bills are happening across the globe these are top down instructions coming from the WEF. They don’t give 2 s**ts about children.
100%
