• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Barrister Who Drafted Hunting Ban Admits it Was Driven by ‘Moral Outrage’, Not Animal Welfare

by Toby Young
26 December 2022 1:30 PM

As Labour pushes to strengthen the Hunting Ban the Blair Government imposed in 2004, the barrister who drafted the legislation has admitted it had little to do with animal welfare. MailOnline has more.

Daniel Greenberg, who drafted the Hunting Act 2004, is reportedly “troubled” by the ban and argues it is “ineffective” because it was introduced for moral reasons.

Mr. Greenberg told the Daily Telegraph the law is an example of “unfinished business” and does not respect the “minority cultural opinions” or traditions of the hunting community.

The barrister’s remarks come as more than 200 packs get ready for traditional Boxing Day hunts. The parades, which were previously disrupted by Covid restrictions, are going ahead in full today for the first time in three years.

More than 430 convictions under the Hunting Act have been secured over a decade, figures reveal amid demands to strengthen the law.

Mr. Greenberg, who has spent 20 years of drafting legislation as Parliamentary Counsel, has now revealed that drafting the hunting ban made him uncomfortable.

He said it was “troubling” that the law was “driven more by a moral outrage angle than animal welfare”.

“As a result of the way that the Act came out, I think that there is unfinished business and that includes aiming to maximise the animal welfare impact and also to consider the respect of minority cultural values and moral opinions,” he said.

“The difference between a parliamentary democracy and a parliamentary dictatorship is the respect shown to minority opinions and rights.”

Mr. Greenberg, who next month will take up a new role as Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, has warned that Parliament must be “very careful” before it moves to ban hunting, as the Labour Party has recommitted to closing “loopholes” in the law.

The party claimed trail hunting, where a scent is laid for hounds to follow, is being used as a “smokescreen” for the illegal hunting of foxes.

Worth reading in full.

Stop Press: The League Against Cruel Sports is urging Labour to close the “loophole” in the Hunting Act, arguing that the 438 convictions for hunting that have been secured since 2010 proves it is still widespread. But as Nick Herbert of the Countryside Alliance points out in the Spectator, the large number of prosecutions under the Hunting Act shows that the legislation is effective and doesn’t need to be revisited.

Stop Press: An 82 year-old aristocrat was beaten over the head and knocked to the ground by a hunt saboteur and left bleeding and disorientated. His sin? He was observing a melee between hunt participants and sabs, not participating in one himself, and had picked up a video camera he found on the ground and asked who it belonged to. MailOnline has more.

Tags: Boxing DayDaniel GreenburgHunting ActLabour PartyNick Herbert

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

NHS Orders Interview Panels to Justify Hiring White Job Applicants

Next Post

What’s the Point of Consulting Residents About Traffic Measures if the Results Are Always Ignored?

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Monro
Monro
2 years ago

Opposition to hunting is either politically motivated or factually ignorant.

The Burns report that led to the hunting act was chaired by an individual who knew little about hunting and ignored the most recent information available. The tyranny of the majority couldn’t even ensure that the hunting act was passed without an entirely inappropriate use of the parliament act to force this profoundly silly piece of legislation through.

Blair, whose wife instigated this cruel act, later admitted, in his dreadful book ‘A journey’, that it was a mistake.

In France, under a proportional voting democratic system, the countryside has its own party and a significant minority of support.

Obstructing hunting in France can land you with a Euro 30K fine and a year in jail.

Allez France!

53
-21
amanuensis
amanuensis
2 years ago

I don’t really like fox hunting very much.

But I do regard the ban as being an attack on British traditional culture. This is odd given the steps taken to encourage non-British traditional culture in the UK.

63
-17
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

Indeed.

I don’t like Morris dancing or football very much, struggle to tell the difference, but I do not think that they should be banned…..

47
-12
Hoppy Uniatz
Hoppy Uniatz
2 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

You know none of the other ways a wild animal can die (famine, disease etc) make very nice photographs either?

No… of course you do. In fact this last 2 years have shown us that we don’t make a very good show at ensuring a good death even for our own species, once they’re safely out of the way in care homes.

9
-1
wokeman
wokeman
2 years ago

It doesn’t say alot for a hunter gatherer species when they ban something that totally aligns to our instincts.

32
-18
Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 years ago

I’m not really getting what he means by moral outrage, as opposed to animal welfare. If he had said class reasons I would have understood.

34
-2
Jonathan M
Jonathan M
2 years ago

It’s worth pointing out that very few of the 438 convictions secured under the Hunting Act were of people connected with registered packs of hounds. Most were for offences which would more accurately be described as poaching; the Merseyside Police seem to have been particularly keen on using the Act in this way.

Last edited 2 years ago by Jonathan M
36
-3
RTSC
RTSC
2 years ago

Of course it was Class War.

No Government, or animal welfare obsessive, could possibly claim to be concerned about animal welfare when they support the installation of thousands of rare bird and bat slaughtering windmills.

18
-1
Human Resource 19510203
Human Resource 19510203
2 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

Or do nothing about halal slaughter methods.

15
0
Less government
Less government
2 years ago

The hunting ban is all about jealousy, not animal welfare. It’s about having a pop at the country toffs, though most are ordinary decent people. Anyway, too many cars on the roads now for it to be safe for horses.

10
-4

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
4

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

10 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

Hugely Influential Covid Vaccine Study Claiming the Jabs Saved Millions of Lives Torn to Shreds in Medical Journal

10 May 2025

Ed Miliband’s Housing Energy Plan Will Decimate the Rental Market and Send Rents Spiralling

10 May 2025

News Round-Up

53

Teenage Girl Banned by the Football Association For Asking Transgender Opponent “Are You a Man?” Wins Appeal With Help of Free Speech Union

21

Hugely Influential Covid Vaccine Study Claiming the Jabs Saved Millions of Lives Torn to Shreds in Medical Journal

14

Ed Miliband’s Housing Energy Plan Will Decimate the Rental Market and Send Rents Spiralling

14

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

27

Major British Chemical Plant Faces Closure as Energy Prices Soar

10 May 2025

NHS Nurse “Forced Out for Mocking Trans Flag” to Sue Hospital

10 May 2025

Hugely Influential Covid Vaccine Study Claiming the Jabs Saved Millions of Lives Torn to Shreds in Medical Journal

10 May 2025

Teenage Girl Banned by the Football Association For Asking Transgender Opponent “Are You a Man?” Wins Appeal With Help of Free Speech Union

10 May 2025

Reflections on Empire, Papacy and States

10 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

December 2022
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Nov   Jan »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences