• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Guardian Finally Publishes an Anti-Lockdown Op-Ed – Two and a Half Years Late

by Will Jones
13 October 2022 4:00 PM

More than two and a half years since Boris Johnson confined the nation to its homes, the Guardian has finally decided it’s time to run some criticism of it. In what I’m sure you’ll agree is a timely piece entitled “Boris Johnson’s Covid laws took away our rights with flick of a pen. Don’t let that happen again” (as though Boris did it without any encouragement from, I don’t know, the Labour Party and the Guardian, whose only objections were that he hadn’t gone harder and faster) barrister Adam Wagner (who has written a book on the subject, Emergency State: How We Lost Our Liberties in the Pandemic and Why it Matters) sets out the case against the Government’s illiberal response to the pandemic.

It’s just over two and a half years since Boris Johnson gave us a “very simple instruction”, that we “must stay at home”, followed – three days later – by a law that for the first time in our history would impose a 24-hour curfew on almost the entire population. The years, months, weeks and days since have been so relentless – and at times almost beyond belief – that it is difficult to begin to process them. Many of us have experienced personal bereavement, and everyone has been touched in some way.

But as tempting as it is to move on, to focus on other important issues vexing our society, there are some aspects of the past three years we must face up to.

There are a hundred lenses through which to view this important period in modern history, but as a barrister I have looked at the more than 100 laws that placed England in lockdown, imposed hotel quarantine, international travel restrictions, self-isolation, face coverings and business closures.

These were probably the strangest and most extraordinary laws in England’s history, imposing previously unimaginable restrictions on our social lives, bringing into the realm of the criminal law areas of life – where we could worship, when we could leave home, even who we could hug – that had previously been purely a matter of personal choice.

By early 2020, the Johnson government already had form for seeing democracy as a gadfly to be swatted away, having tried, and failed – thanks to the Supreme Court – to shut down Parliament for weeks to ram through a Brexit deal. When the pandemic hit, it is no surprise that it took the same approach to involving parliament in the most consequential decisions and laws in living memory.

The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 allowed for ministers to enact the coronavirus regulations with almost no parliamentary scrutiny. Of 109 lockdown laws, only eight were considered by parliament before coming into force, usually only a day before. The rest became law (literally) as soon as Matt Hancock, the then Health Secretary, put his signature at the bottom of the page.

I am not suggesting that emergency law-making would ever be straightforward and neat, following all the processes of ordinary legislation. During public emergencies, events move swiftly and mercilessly. But it did not have to be like this.

Also troubling was the constant refrain that the Government was ‘following the science’, by which it meant its scientific advisory group, SAGE. But decisions were ultimately taken in the extremely powerful but opaque COVID-19 Cabinet committees, presided over by four ministers – Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak, Matt Hancock and Michael Gove. No minutes were released and no explanation offered of how decisions were made. This was the most powerful Government committee since the Second World War, but received no scrutiny. Important political decisions need to be understood, scrutinised and tested. These hardly were.

Parliament relegated itself to a “1,400-person rubber stamp”, Wagner says; the police, “floundered between excessive and unjustified intrusions into our private lives” and “attempting to stay out of the fray altogether”; the courts ducked responsibility, repeatedly ruling that pandemic policy, “even when it interfered with fundamental rights” was “a matter for Government and Parliament, not judges”.

It should be a wake-up call, he says – “the ease with which ancient freedoms such as the right to protest, to worship, to see our families, were removed essentially by decisions of a tiny group of ministers” – as it is only a matter of time before a new crisis will arise.

Many of the comments underneath the article agree Wagner’s got a point, but say it’s about the principle of how the emergency laws were made and scrutinised rather than the measures themselves being wrong or harmful.

Baby steps.

Worth reading in full.

Tags: Boris JohnsonCourtsCOVID-19GuardianLockdownLockdown ScepticsParliamentPublic Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Will I Be PayPal’s Downfall?

Next Post

Is the Risk of Nuclear War really One in Six? It is Hard to Envisage a Scenario in Which Putin Would Gain From Using Nuclear Weapons

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

42 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
stewart
stewart
2 years ago

The short answer is enough to have to mobilise the general population and start a draft.

Very depressing.

30
-10
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

They are not mobilising the general population. They are specifically mobilising reservists.
It is Ukraine which is mobilising the general population, and they have recently included women

Last edited 2 years ago by For a fist full of roubles
72
-1
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
2 years ago
Reply to  For a fist full of roubles

I have to correct myself. The conscription of women is currently being rubber-stamped by the Ukrainian government; it is not law yet.

19
0
ebygum
ebygum
2 years ago
Reply to  stewart

It’s amazing what I’ve learned reading and and listening to this stuff, and I’m not sure you would call it all useful…LOL!…….but because it’s designated a Special Military Operation it would currently be against Russian Law to use conscripted soldiers….

4
0
Monro
Monro
2 years ago

Very difficult to get accurate casualty figures due to the disparate nature of ‘Russian’ forces deployed

The ‘Russian’ army in Ukraine is not a single organisation, but several factions with their own commanders, control system and structure.

Prigozhin/Wagner answers to Putin personally.

Troops from the DNR and LNR

Regular Russian Army

Rosgvardia National Guard (OMON Special Forces report direct to their Director Victor Zolotov)

Kadyrovite Chechen Militia 

The BBC found a thousand killed Russian Army officers just from open source data and analysis. In all, 750 of them are low-ranking officers, lieutenants, captains. All are those who work “on the ground” – directly in charge in combat. Typically officers represent 8%-11% of losses.

Make of that what you will.

Last edited 2 years ago by Monro
1
-12
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

And of course, if the BBC said it ………

31
0
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  For a fist full of roubles

‘The journalists compiled the statistics based on reports from local authorities, the media, and relatives of the dead (while, as noted, heads of Russian regions are speaking publicly about the deaths of military personnel with increasing frequency). They estimate that their list contains 40-60% fewer names than the actual number who’ve been buried in Russia.

Of the 5,701 identified Russian military personnel killed in Ukraine, 966 (17%) were officers. Junior officers accounted for the largest share of casualties. Four generals and 34 colonels were also among the dead.’

BBC 19 Aug 22

‘“I think it’s safe to suggest that the Russians have probably taken 70 or 80,000 casualties in the less than six months. Now that is a combination of killed in action and wounded in action, that number might be a little lower, little higher, but I think that’s kind of in the ballpark,” 

US Deputy Secretary of Defense for Political Affairs Colin Kahl 08 Aug 22

Everyone on here is, of course, entitled to their own opinion.

Due to the size of the Ukrainian front, Russia has been well short of troops since day one.

Mobilising 300,000 reservists won’t change that. What equipment will they receive, I wonder?

2
-19
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
2 years ago
Reply to  Monro

As you say, everyone here is entitled to their own opinion. The figures you are quoting are just that – someone’s opinion.

19
0
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  For a fist full of roubles

That is why I make clear where the figures come from, obviously.

0
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
2 years ago

In all previous international conflicts I recall breathless reports from flak-jacket clad reporters on the front line, some embedded with the troops. We got a sense of life on the front line from them.
What has been completely absent in Ukraine has been live reporting from independent journalists (and even Ukrainian journalists) commenting on the successes of the “home team”.
I can’t help wondering what Ukraine and the Western media are trying to hide by preventing such reporting. All that is published comes fully sanitised from “official Ukrainian sources” aka Zelensky’s script writers.
There is however plenty of reporting from the other side of the border, by Western and Russian journalists which of course is never mentioned to us, but which can be found on-line.

56
-4
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
2 years ago
Reply to  For a fist full of roubles

Well, going back to Vietnam, it was arguably the reports of embedded reporters that scuppered the war.

And it has been said that WWII couldn’t have been won with the same type and amount of reporting and if the ‘home front’ had their eyes glued to the telly.

Make your own mind up what truth there is in that and whether a good or bad thing.

Me, if I was in Putin’s shoes, I would want what was on Russian telly controlled strictly as possible.

0
0
Monro
Monro
2 years ago
Reply to  For a fist full of roubles

Plenty of ‘reporting’ from the other side of the border which you do not quote, reference.

Why would that be?

Here you are:

‘Everything is simple. “Musicians” [nickname for Wagner PMC] arrived in the LPR around mid-March. The approximate number of their contingent at that time was up to 1,500 people. It’s a regiment, but a castrated one: there is a lot of infantry, little armor, artillery and other things. They were not prepared for such a war. Their task was to chase negroes and to take away oil fields in favor of hucksters.
 
In the very first couple of weeks, they suffered huge losses in Popasna – killed, wounded and refuseniks.
 
Gradually, in the course of hostilities, the professional “dogs of war” started running out, and there was nothing to replenish them with. Thus, the task has been set, the budgets have been assigned, the Star of the Hero of Russia has been awarded, but there are not enough performers.
 
And that is why social networks are now flooded with military-romantic advertisements for PMCs, designed for juvenile fuckers, and a search goes through prisons. Requirements for applicants are sharply reduced. Because not professionals are required, but meat for the assault infantry.
 
Of course, the recruitment of convicts in PMCs is not an alternative to mobilisation. They carry out assault missions in very narrow directions there. The entire burden of the war is being carried by the very “iron helmets” – the mobilised men of the LPR and the DPR. And here a question should be asked to the owners of Prigozhin: how did it happen that you started the war, having cartoons instead of a combat-ready army, since now you have to recruit repeat offenders?’

Blog “Leon 1967” Russian LiveJournal 17 Sept 22

0
-1
JXB
JXB
2 years ago

RT (which we are not allowed to read) reports Russian Defence Minister says Russian deaths are 5 937 versus Ukraine deaths 61 207.

it also reports Russia to begin partial mobilisation and that Russian forces have thwarted attempts by Ukraine to mount an offensive in southern part of the Country.

23
-3
NeilParkin
NeilParkin
2 years ago

This is a ‘Truman Show’ War, and I don’t believe anything either side says…

35
0
JohnMcCarthy
JohnMcCarthy
2 years ago

The only conclusion I draw from this article is that there has been a great deal of unnecessary human suffering. I assume the author, in the interests of balance, will similarly address the quantification of the numbers of dead and wounded Ukrainians in this tragic and unnecessary conflict.

25
0
morganlefey
morganlefey
2 years ago

where are the peace brokers?

21
0
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
2 years ago
Reply to  morganlefey

Shades of “Life of Brian”?

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
7

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

White Actors in Brian Cox Play Forced to Take Anti-Oppression Course

26 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

What Happened to Systemic Common Sense?

26 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

News Round-Up

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

GB News’s ‘Anti-woke’ Comedy Show Faces Axe After Thousands of Complaints

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

How Jubilation Turned to Tragedy on Liverpool’s Darkest Day Since Hillsborough

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

What Happened to Systemic Common Sense?

53

How Jubilation Turned to Tragedy on Liverpool’s Darkest Day Since Hillsborough

29

News Round-Up

23

GB News’s ‘Anti-woke’ Comedy Show Faces Axe After Thousands of Complaints

22

Tommy Robinson Released From Prison

15

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

Lies, Damned Lies and Casualty Numbers in Ancient History

26 May 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Lord Frost: “The Boriswave Was a Catastrophic Error”

26 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

25 May 2025
by Eugyppius

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

25 May 2025
by James Alexander

POSTS BY DATE

October 2022
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Sep   Nov »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

October 2022
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Sep   Nov »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

White Actors in Brian Cox Play Forced to Take Anti-Oppression Course

26 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

What Happened to Systemic Common Sense?

26 May 2025
by C.J. Strachan

News Round-Up

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

GB News’s ‘Anti-woke’ Comedy Show Faces Axe After Thousands of Complaints

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

How Jubilation Turned to Tragedy on Liverpool’s Darkest Day Since Hillsborough

27 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

What Happened to Systemic Common Sense?

53

How Jubilation Turned to Tragedy on Liverpool’s Darkest Day Since Hillsborough

29

News Round-Up

23

GB News’s ‘Anti-woke’ Comedy Show Faces Axe After Thousands of Complaints

22

Tommy Robinson Released From Prison

15

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

Lies, Damned Lies and Casualty Numbers in Ancient History

26 May 2025
by Guy de la Bédoyère

Lord Frost: “The Boriswave Was a Catastrophic Error”

26 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

The Legal Case Against the AfD Has Collapsed

25 May 2025
by Eugyppius

Plebeians Can No Longer Rant About Bloody Murder

25 May 2025
by James Alexander

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences