What Women Really Hate About Sydney Sweeney

Sydney Sweeney is under fire from female athletes, who accuse her of "sexualising women's sport". From his years of teaching at a girls' school, Guy de la Bédoyère thinks he knows why women really hate the busty actress.

5 min read
Subscribe to Listen

There’s been much in the press in recent days about the famously upholstered actress and entrepreneur Sydney Sweeney’s new ‘naked betting advert’. The Telegraph was one of many media outlets to cover the fusillade of protest from female athletes for “sexualising women’s sport“:

The 29 year-old Euphoria star has been criticised by female athletes, who have accused her of setting back women in sport.

Amy Hunt, the British sprint champion, stared directly down the camera after the women’s 200-metre final at the World Athletics Ultimate Championship on Sunday and said: “Sydney Sweeney, this is what women’s sport looks like. Hard work, sweat, blood, tears. This is a beautiful evening.”

Ariarne Titmus, an Australian Olympic gold medal-winning swimmer, said: “How do we live in a world where monetising a woman’s body and sexualising women’s sport is still a thing?”

She described the campaign as “a kick in the face to every woman who has dedicated her life to perfecting her craft” and to “every woman who enjoys sports for what it really is – teamwork, friendship, dedication, excellence, unity”.

Apart from the fact that Ariarne Titmus must be naïve beyond measurement, one thing all humans are is great at attempting to rationalise what are fundamentally the irrational emotions that drive so much of what we do and think.

I took part in Channel 4’s long-running series Time Team for many years in various guises, mainly as its Roman expert but also as a historian for WW2 digs and occasional others. For Series 17 and 18, which aired in 2010-11, Channel 4 had ordered that the classicist and presenter Bettany Hughes be added to the line-up for certain episodes.

The argument was simple. Time Team’s audience was dominated by men, often fathers watching with their children. For the right-on Channel 4 that was no good: there had to be more women viewers and Bettany, an effusive and blousy screen presence together with a scholarly and published background, was bound to help solve the problem.

She didn’t. No fault of hers, of course. Back then I knew Bettany because I’d worked with her on other shows. She’s very good at her job. It was one of the show’s executive producers who told me what went wrong.

Female viewers turned off rather than on. It turned out that the wives or partners of the enthusiastic male viewers loathed sitting on the couch next to a man ogling Bettany, a highly intelligent and attractive woman of around their own age. Or to be blunt, probably more intelligent and attractive than them. And there was the rub.

But there’s more to it. For nine years I was a girls’ grammar school History and Classics teacher. I worked with my wife, a much more experienced teacher. We both taught History, but I taught Classical Civilisation on my own, and my life was dominated by Sixth Form teaching. I was fascinated by how Bettany had bombed on Time Team, because I’d already discovered a similar problem.

Bettany had made several excellent TV films on the Bronze Age Mycenaean and Minoan Civilisation in Greece and the Aegean. Since that was a core component of the course I taught it was obvious to me that I should use them. So, I did. After all, she was surely also a positive role model for young women and all that. What could possibly go wrong?

The films were a disaster in the classroom. Why? The girls hated her. I mean, really hated her. They tried to rationalise their loathing, but I knew them well enough for them to be more expansive and to explain in more detail why they had taken such exception to her.

They found Bettany to be threatening, the embodiment of female success, intellect and accomplishment as a presenter and she intimidated them. The scene about Minoan pearl divers which she presented in a low-cut swimsuit while bobbing about in the water, so to speak, provoked the greatest disgust.

Far from being inspired, my students seemed to be consumed by a resentful jealousy, that Bettany was being depicted as who they ought to aspire to be but felt they could never match.

I had to abandon using the films altogether.

As a father with four sons this was a revelation to me, a portal to a world I’d never experienced before. It showed me just how wide of the mark TV executives, female ones included, can be when it comes to understanding what women want, or rather what they don’t want.

I tried using Classics films made by other female presenters, and it made no difference, regardless of their looks or age. The problem for the students seemed to be confident and accomplished women, women who know what they want and who are comfortable with who they are – which describes Sweeney perfectly.

If on the other hand, I put on a film presented by Dan Snow, the ridiculously good-looking Roger Moore of history and archaeology TV, the students were gripped from start to finish. Simple: they weren’t threatened by him.

Now, you could just blithely dismiss all of what I’ve described, except that I was there and saw it for myself.

Obviously, it would be absurd to say that all women react like the way I’ve described. Camilla Tominey wrote a Telegraph piece in which she expressed her admiration for Sweeney, asking “Why shouldn’t the actress leverage her all-natural assets for commercial gain?

“And who can blame her? If I looked like Ms Sweeney, I would walk around topless as often as humanly possible. Most women would, if they were being honest,” said Tominey.

She’d cut right to the heart of the matter. Indeed, she encouraged me to write this piece when I told her about my experiences.

Back to the Telegraph piece I started with, and another quote:

Tilly Kearns, an Australian water polo silver medallist, posted a montage of her sport with the caption: “I absolutely f—ing hate Sydney Sweeney’s new sports ad.”

Yes, I bet she does. Experto credite, says the Roman poet Vergil in his poem the Aeneid, “trust one who knows”.

Guy de la Bédoyère is a historian and writer with numerous books to his credit, most concerned with the ancient world, though his latest is The Confessions of Samuel Pepys (Abacus 2025). Between 2007 and 2016 he taught History and Classics to hundreds of girls, many of whom went on to study History or Classics at university. He has contributed to the Daily Sceptic since its earliest days.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

39 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
sskinner
sskinner
1 hour ago

Amy Hunt, the British sprint champion, stared directly down the camera after the women’s 200-metre final at the World Athletics Ultimate Championship on Sunday and said: “Sydney Sweeney, this is what women’s sport looks like. Hard work, sweat, blood, tears. This is a beautiful evening.”
And?

Ariarne Titmus, an Australian Olympic gold medal-winning swimmer, said: “How do we live in a world where monetising a woman’s body and sexualising women’s sport is still a thing?”
Women’s sport is still there and you will receive monitary reward for your body. Sidney Sweeney is not be able to sexualise the womens 800metres or long jump, unless there is an athlete that is like Sidney, oh wait! How about Sofia Tsarsitalidou? Is she putting women’s athletics back decades?

She described the campaign as “a kick in the face to every woman who has dedicated her life to perfecting her craft” and to “every woman who enjoys sports for what it really is – teamwork, friendship, dedication, excellence, unity”.
How has she done that? What about the damage done by men identifying as women taking women’s medals?

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 hour ago

While were on the subject, where is Mogwai these days. Did she flounce or just stop posting.?

Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
2 hours ago

I seem to remember in the late 90s, British Olympic Athlete Denise Lewis (subsequently Dame) appearing in an interview and photo shoot for some magazine or other, perhaps sports illustrated wearing nothing but red, white and blue body paint representing her team’s (Great Britain) sports kit. It was probably just pre internet but I do not remember any outcry then.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
3 hours ago

I just don’t understand why men like SS, and women don’t. She’s just a well-equipped girl-next-door.

zebedee
zebedee
3 hours ago

Are they forgetting about Linford Christie’s lunchbox?

NickR
NickR
3 hours ago

The women in my life play loads of sport, but while I will happily watch women’s rugby, football and tennis, they won’t.
They love watching men play. They love playing. But watching women play? No thanks.

GunnerBill
GunnerBill
3 hours ago

That with very few exceptions she’s way, way better looking than any of them.

I’d also add that her voice and personality is captivating.

Miss Sweeny is peak female.

GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
1 hour ago
Reply to  GunnerBill

Sweeney is certainly peak, but I also enjoy her zero-fks approach. I read that it was her idea (or her PR) and she was paid in equity. She part owns the company now.

And the shrillness of the outrage only served to boost the ad, and the value of her stake. The first thing I did after hearing about it was to seek it out. I’m only human.

Bettany Hughes is/was also quite pleasant to look at. I don’t think it’s bad to acknowledge that.

All this outrage is particularly amusing when you consider the left’s complete lack of response to Bonnie Blue and her f–kathons. Empowering apparently.

10navigator
10navigator
5 hours ago

As Norman Stanley Fletcher said to Godber in ‘Porridge’ regarding ‘Pan’s People’, “There’s one special one, beautiful Babs, Dunno what her name is though,”

GasBoy75
GasBoy75
5 hours ago

Anyone remember Nick Kamen in the 80’s Levi’s jeans ads?
God, I used to hate him…

BillT
BillT
5 hours ago

Guy,

I’m currently reading your book about Samuel Pepys and his strong heterosexual desires. First off, I have to thank you for telling me how to pronounce “Pepys”. I remember as a small boy nearly getting it right “Pepis” but my mother corrected me. Incorrectly.

You repeatedly touch on Elizabeth Pepys’s wariness of nice looking female servants and visitors. Things don’t change. Sydney Sweeny is a beauty and Pepys would have been in there, if possible. Females rank themselves against others: how do I compare with her? If she’s better looking than me, then she’s a threat. Bethany Hughes is up there, a beauty and clever. Blokes just don’t think like that: either he’s interesting or a bore.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
3 hours ago
Reply to  BillT

Is Bethany Hughes the one who always favoured calf-length boots?
It’s a long time since I watched live TV, so I’m well out of touch (or perhaps just well out of it).

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 hour ago
Reply to  stillonlplates

Bethany is thinking mans totty. Still a handsome woman.

GasBoy75
GasBoy75
7 hours ago

It’s the usual old problem of idiots trying to project their own “politics” onto the wrong target.
How dare she sexualise women’s sport?
Well, she hasn’t, has she? If anything, she’s sexualised” the advertising of online betting apps.
Now, if these athletes had come out and said “I totally disagree with her getting her kit off to sell this morally repugnant business model, designed to rob people of their hard earned money”, then I might be inclined to agree with them…maybe.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
6 hours ago
Reply to  GasBoy75

Betting seems like a terrible idea to me, but I drink alcohol and that probably seems like a terrible idea to many.

GasBoy75
GasBoy75
5 hours ago

Fully agree. I enjoy a glass of red wine on a pretty regular basis. I also have a little flutter on the Grand National from one year to the next.

What I can’t get my head round is how Sydney Sweeny’s managed to ruin women’s sports by advertising a betting app.?

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
5 hours ago
Reply to  GasBoy75

Yeah they are talking bollocks – I think they are either jealous or upset they didn’t get the contract or they have been goaded into it by left wing media. I don’t think people who follow women’s sports are under the impression that the competitors have to look like Sweeney and I am sure there are many who appreciate both how Sweeney looks and also appreciate a more purely athletic physique. I’m sure lots of males used in sports related advertising are actors not athletes.
I drink too much but not ridiculously so – at least I don’t think I do. I’m glad you are able to enjoy betting in a healthy way. I knew a couple of people who bet on horses as a hobby – they did fairly well sometimes and at other times their hobby cost them what lots of other hobbies cost.

jeepybee
jeepybee
8 hours ago

The thing I find hilarious is the hypocrisy of the blue hairs. What happened to female empowerment? “My body my choice?” What about all the topless unwashed fatties at Pride events?

Tonka Rigger
Tonka Rigger
6 hours ago
Reply to  jeepybee

Precisely. Those sorts have got a sh1tty on because absolutely no-one with functioning eyesight wants to see some rotund hairy-pitted monstrosity spilling out all over the show. Sorry, but aesthetics are important.

davidcraig68
davidcraig68
9 hours ago

She is a target purely because she is a Republican and that enrages the woke lefties.

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
5 hours ago
Reply to  davidcraig68

I suspect this is entirely the reason.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
3 hours ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

I have a sneaking suspicion that her attributes figure in there somewhere.

Heretic
Heretic
9 hours ago

The author puts forward the bog-standard, jaded old argument blaming ordinary people for wanting to uphold traditional standards of DECENCY & MORALITY, which does not include deliberate partial exposure of reproductive organs to excite a sexual response in the viewer in public, in a work situation, film, news or other television programme, regardless of age or sex.

It’s the usual double standard: Imagine the outcry if David Attenborough had chosen to present his programmes with his shirt unbuttoned halfway down to reveal his chest, or while wearing speedos, or a G-string bathing suit.

Ditto the male Time Team presenters. Get a grip, people. There’s a time and a place for everything. Otherwise it’s just promoting soft porn.

factsnotfiction
factsnotfiction
6 hours ago
Reply to  Heretic

Heretic my friend, I like your posts but on this occasion I find your Attenborough comparison (deliberately?) ridiculous. You’ve built an entire moral panic around the idea that Sydney is somehow single‑handedly dismantling civilisation with a neckline. Meanwhile, your Attenborough-in-a-G‑string analogy is doing more to excite the public imagination than anything she’s worn on screen (I’m glad I’d already eaten breakfast before reading this).

Different jobs have different dress codes. Attenborough isn’t hosting Love Island, and Sydney isn’t narrating the mating habits of penguins. If we’re calling every glimpse of skin ‘soft porn’, we’re going to have to cancel half of human history, most of art, and every beach between here and the equator.

A little perspective goes a long way.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
3 hours ago

I’m completely disgusted by that pic ‘The Birth of Venus’. Couldn’t she have worn a vest and pants?

Stewardship
Stewardship
4 hours ago
Reply to  Heretic

Goohgle David Attenborough naked. He has ”chosen to present his programmes with his shirt unbuttoned halfway down to reveal his chest,” and” while wearing speedos,” and ” a G-string bathing suit.” This is a matter of public record. No one is forced to watch him or Sydney. People who do this kind of thing among the general public, are stopped by the authorities.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
3 hours ago
Reply to  Heretic

Imagine the outcry if Attenborough had been involved in a programme that showed walruses falling to their deaths off a cliff and blaming ‘Climate Change’, when they were actually trying to escape a predator?

AndrewDevine
AndrewDevine
10 hours ago

I’ve noticed over the years how some women’s magazines have a penchant for highlighting the physical imperfections of now ageing female celebrities or catching a younger female celebrity having a bad hair day. The fact that these magazines are quite popular with a significant cohort of women tells us a lot about how envy plays a predominant role in the psychology of some (not all) women.

An ex of mine told me her worst working environments were where women were the majority as according to her the backstabbing and envy/jealousy were rife.

Heretic
Heretic
9 hours ago
Reply to  AndrewDevine

Those are all very good points, and true.
However, ordinary people objecting to the deliberate partial exposure of reproductive organs in public are not motivated by envy, but by a desire to uphold traditional standards of decency and morality.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
6 hours ago
Reply to  Heretic

I think both can be true

factsnotfiction
factsnotfiction
6 hours ago
Reply to  Heretic

On this occasion, it’s definitely envy and jealousy.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
3 hours ago

At one place I worked, an unbecoming female favoured low-cut trousers, such that, when seated in the canteen, her flabby arse-cheeks were on show. My appetite for food was diminished. But I doubt that Sydney Sweeney in the same outfit would have had the same effect.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
10 hours ago

A slight re-wording of ‘A few good men’ courtroom scene:

You don’t want the truth because deep down in places you don’t talk about at parties, you want the recognition of men — you need me not competing for that recognition.

Tonka Rigger
Tonka Rigger
11 hours ago

Yes, it’s not surprising that many women feel resentful towards Sydney Sweeney, I mean, look at her. My answer to them would be “She is successful, savvy and is using what God gave her to her advantage, just as countless other attractive women have for ever”.

And what about “My Body, My Choice”? Or does that only apply when terminating pregnancies…?

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
10 hours ago
Reply to  Tonka Rigger

I also think that the left wing media and their cheerleaders sense that she’s not particularly woke and not apologetic and they find that threatening and annoying.

I find all these hangups a bit bizarre. I enjoy looking at good looking people with nice physiques, of both sexes, however with an emphasis on the women as I am a heterosexual male. My wife of many decades enjoys the same thing with an emphasis on the men as she’s a heterosexual woman. That’s natural. But looking is as far as it goes, because we control our urges and respect each other and respect the institution of marriage and the commitment we have made to each other and our children.

Sports Illustrated has for many years had a regular edition with actual famous athletes of both sexes posing nude with bits strategically covered. I wonder if their fellow sports stars are going to mona about that as well now.

Tonka Rigger
Tonka Rigger
9 hours ago

I agree – I think her “anti-wokeness” is definitely a factor. Had she been a vocal Free Palestiner or an outspoken “trans ally” the same people now deriding her would be celebrating her “powerful embrace of her femininity” or some such.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
9 hours ago
Reply to  Tonka Rigger

I think she’s a target because of the “great jeans” campaign, for which she quite rightly refused to apologise.

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
5 hours ago

I don’t know who she is, but then as an old git who doesn’t really watch anything of that ilk then I suppose I wouldn’t.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
5 hours ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

I saw her in Americana which was quite fun. I rarely watch new stuff. Other than that I read about the “great jeans” supposed controversy on DS I think.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.