There will be some district-level recounts, some numbers might fluctuate slightly, but the preliminary results of Sunday’s cataclysmic election in Sachsen-Anhalt will not meaningfully change.
- Alternative für Deutschland won 43.8% of the vote and 39 seats in the Landtag – just three short of an absolute majority. No party since reunification has ever performed this strongly in Sachsen-Anhalt before.
- The CDU substantially underperformed polls and logged its worst-ever result in this state since 1990, with just 17.2% of the vote and 15 Landtag seats. It is an unmitigated and deeply deserved disaster for the hapless Union.
- Die Linke (the Left Party), the Social Democrats and the Greens split the Left vote more or less equally among themselves, after a (to me) unexpectedly successful tactical voting initiative. Each achieved eight seats with 8-9% of the vote – 24 seats in total for the entire Left-party spectrum.
- The old-Left Linke-offshoot party Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) substantially outperformed polls with 5.3% of the vote and five Landtag seats.

What this means is simple: The AfD has no majority of its own, but the anti-AfD cartel parties (CDU, SPD and Greens) with their would-be collaborators in Die Linke do not have any majority against the AfD either. Both blocs stand against each other in effective stalemate with 39 votes each. This leaves the BSW as kingmaker, and the BSW has already ruled out the possibility of working with the CDU, and so all possibilities accrue to the AfD side of things. As I said on the night of the vote, Ulrich Siegmund’s repeated pledges to rule alone or not at all were a campaign strategy, and now they have also emerged as a negotiating tactic. Siegmund has established his willingness to walk away if the BSW does not give him what he wants.
As for what will happen now, it is easiest to imagine that the AfD and the BSW will reach some kind of understanding and that Ulrich Siegmund will be sworn in after procedural wrangling as the first AfD Minister President of the Federal Republic. There would be no formal coalition with the BSW, but rather a toleration arrangement with the AfD in a minority government.
Ironically, AfD strength has all but foreclosed the possibility that CDU defectors might elect Siegmund to the premiership without BSW support. Three such defectors would be required for a parliamentary majority, which would be fully one fifth of the minuscule CDU faction. That is already a hard ask, and it becomes a still harder one when you recognise that the tattered remnants of the Union returning to Magdeburg will be nothing but the most loyal party functionaries.
Everyone who matters – including the CDU – have ruled out the worst conceivable outcome, namely another anti-AfD firewall coalition under Union stewardship. Yet some variant of this scenario remains distantly possible, because the BSW continues to voice its idiotic preference for a “cross-party” Minister President, and – as I said above – Siegmund might just walk away and refuse to stand for the top office at all. The “cross-party” premier would be a magical somebody voted into office either a) by everyone but the AfD, or b) by the BSW and the AfD together. In the former variant, this Minister President would have no clear mandate and no consistent majority for any conceivable agenda. In the latter variant, the AfD would propose some figurehead Minister President, the BSW would co-sign it, and this figurehead would then fill his cabinet with AfD and BSW ministers.
Yes, that is as dumb as it sounds, but there’s maybe only a one-in-20 chance that it comes to that. There’s not much fight Left in the cartel parties of Sachsen-Anhalt. Multiple prominent CDU figures, including failed Union lead candidate Sven Schulze, have said the CDU should go into opposition in Sachsen-Anahlt, and Schulze has acknowledged that voters have given the Regierungsauftrag (the responsibility of forming a government) to Siegmund’s AfD.
In other amusing developments:
Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Sven Schulze gave a shell-shocked press conference yesterday.
Merz in particular seemed surprised at the Sachsen-Anhalt result. “We are all deeply shocked,” he said, “we did not expect it to happen like this.” This must raise serious questions about Merz’s information environment, given that the outcome of the Sunday vote has been eminently predictable for months. Merz further asked himself “how things could have come to this” and confided that he is “looking for the reasons within myself too” – acknowledging that his own controversies have been a constant theme in this year’s elections. As has become customary for failed politicians, Merz ultimately concluded that he needs to communicate better, but then upon realising that this is a shop-worn cliché he added bizarrely that he must “try to connect with people more deeply on an emotional level”, because that will make everything better.
For some reason the firewall against the AfD is no longer the flavour of the month within the Union. Angela Merkel, once its staunchest enforcer, just today said that “I didn’t come up with it and I don’t particularly like it either“. Boris Rhein, CDU Minister President of Hessen, has called the Brandmauer “the wrongest path“, declaring with newfound democratic sentiment that his party should “talk to everyone, talk about everything, build bridges to the centre and not push people beyond firewalls”. This shift in sentiment is to be expected, as Unioners realise that they and not the AfD are the ones whom the firewall will shut out of government.
Naturally, not everybody is equally introspective. Arch-Merkelian Hendrik Wüst, CDU press favourite and Minister President of Nordrhein-Westphalen, has developed a new interest in banning the AfD, calling for a federal and state “working group” to look into this possibility.
The Turkish Association in Germany has declared that Sunday’s AfD victory means that all migrants in Sachsen-Anhalt face serious danger. Our hysterical activists have demanded that the Government cease sending asylum seekers to Sachsen-Anhalt and also release all refugees presently in that state from their residence requirements. This follows earlier warnings from an advocacy organisation that as many as 80% of migrants in Sachsen-Anahlt might leave the state should the AfD enter government there.
This article originally appeared on Eugyppius’s Substack newsletter. You can subscribe here.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“cease sending asylum seekers to Sachsen-Anhalt and also release all refugees presently in that state from their residence requirements” sounds like threatening the Anhalters with a good time
Eugyppius did highlight Far Left propaganda on the scary things that an AfD state government would bring read like a tick list of reasons to vote AfD. The key was BSW scraping over the 5% level to win any seats and deny AfD a clear majority.
I wonder if they will ever inspect the postal voting for this election. Funny how the postal votes broke overwhelmingly against the AfD in the election with the mostest votes everhhhh. Run out of paper?
Followers of the DemoTwat fraud in the US will recognise this. I was surprised by 25% of votes being postal. At least there are not days of ‘counting’ while votes are printed but you wonder about the voter rolls. Did care homes vote 100%, were there any voters over 100 years old etc.
(Please click “read more” to restore paragraphs)
A simple search gives us:
Friedrich Merz served as the chairman of the supervisory board for BlackRock Germanyy (BlackRock Asset Management Deutschland AG) from 2016 to 2020
Maybe Merz should ask himself if his rallying cry “prepare for war with Russia!” makes all decent German voters feel SICK. This is not 1941, when the Germans had the most powerful army in Europe and and air force which had crushed all others ( until it came up against Great Britain’s RAF ), and Russia was militarily weak.
This is 2026, where the situation is reversed, and Russia has NUCLEAR WEAPONS Friedrich, and a nuclear weapons policy which is not confined to simple second-strike retaliation, but also includes the scenario where Russia feels its existence is “under existential threat” (i.e right now).
Cue Bueno? Who benefits from this warmongering? Why Blackrock of course! Quelle Surprise!
“US giant BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager and former employer of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, is one of the major beneficiaries of the ReArm Europe program, the European Commission’s war policy.
fact, the North American fund is among the institutional shareholders of some of the leading arms companies… Read more »
If they had taken advice from Tim Stanley I am sure they would have a supermajority now.
‘As has become customary for failed politicians, Merz ultimately concluded that he needs to communicate better, . . .’ Calls to mind our current government, which has found it expedient to replace a leader with all the easy going charm of a Speak-Your-Weight-Machine with one who at least comes across as human, even if not very bright and more or less inumerate.
What a great photo of Merz looking doleful like Eeyore.
Lol yeah except Eeyore is wise and a creature of honour, whereas Merz is a fool and a weasel.
Error
Whoever downvoted this – I could not find how to delete my post, so I typed “error” for it. It’s not related to the post it hangs on in any way.