Roger Scruton was the first to coin the word ‘oikophobia’ to describe fear of home (Greek oikos) in a political context. He used it to refer to disdain for one’s country, culture or majority population. He was not the first to use its sister word ‘xenophilia’, meaning love of stranger or foreigner (Greek xenos), but showed how the words were two sides of one coin. For Scruton, Jean-Paul Sartre was the archetypal oikophobe, a man contemptuous of the bourgeois culture that had enabled him to become France’s most famous philosopher but a xenophilic apologist for Mao’s Cultural Revolution in which Chinese intellectuals like himself were publicly humiliated and put to work in the paddy fields.
Scruton first wrote about oikophobia in 1993, at a time of concern both in Britain and the USA at the spread of a form of multiculturalism based on negative stereotypes of the majority and positive ones of minorities, and of a ‘political correctness’ designed to police the speech of those unhappy about these trends. Elite disdain for the majority was not new. John Carey’s study of the English intelligentsia over the period 1880-1939, published the year before Scruton coined ‘oikophobia’, illustrates the contempt that so many of our great intellectuals had for the masses among whom they felt they had the misfortune of living. Showing that this was by no means a Right-Left split, the socialist George Orwell in 1941 similarly summed up his fellow intellectuals as people who “took their cookery from Paris and their opinions from Moscow”, were ashamed of their country and sniggered at British institutions.
The oikophobia and xenophilia of large parts of our current elites are thus nothing new. It is just much more in the public’s face because of the extent and speed of current communications. Hardly a day passes without a new example.
What drove the recent deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands? The interests of the Chagossians, many of whom are British subjects? Concern for British security? The wish to reduce financial burdens on British taxpayers? No, a wish to be seen in the international community as compliant with international law, even when there was no obligation to do so. As a result, the Chagossians are left high and dry, British taxpayers over the next century look set to fund a £30 billion-plus payment to Mauritius and we hand over ownership of the islands to a power in league with a potential enemy (China).
What drove the recent trade deal with the EU, with its granting of free access to our waters to EU fishermen until 2038, subject to major penalties if we break the agreement? Concern for our coastal and fishing communities, many of them in a depressed state? A wish to honour the Brexit promise to re-establish rights previously granted to our former EU partners? A patriotic desire to give priority to an iconic part of our identity and way of life as an island nation? No – a wish to secure a minor trade deal and to take the first step towards an ever-closer relationship with the EU, in return for a humiliating concession, together with photo opportunities for a Prime Minister who has said he is happier talking to international partners in Davos than having to engage with messy tribal politics at home.
These are just two recent and more visible bits of the iceberg of oikophobia and xenophilia that lies deep inside our institutions.
Universities have long been Oikophobia Central, with an estimated 90% of academics thought to have voted ‘Remain’ in 2016. Academics who have refused to go along with the latest progressive ideologies and been bold enough to express views shared by the majority of the population have been ostracised or driven out altogether (ask Eric Kaufman, Kathleen Stock, Matthew Goodwin and Nigel Biggar among many others). Universities have also been quick to impose restrictions on the traditional everyday speech used by ordinary people, Manchester recommending students not to say ‘mother and father’ and Newcastle banning the affectionate colloquialism ‘pet’.
Schools are not dissimilar, a 2008 survey of the attitudes of teachers finding that three-quarters agreed with the statement that it was their responsibility to warn pupils not to feel good about their country. In the context of views like these, an opinion poll seven years later among 18-24 year olds – a group these teachers would have taught – found, unsurprisingly, that only 15% felt “very patriotic” and 30% “slightly patriotic”. This is a figure higher than one might have expected and gives one hope that all may not be lost, as does the girl who recently turned up at school on a Cultural Celebration Day wearing a Union Jack dress and with a prepared speech about Britishness, only to be banned from taking part. Schools have been so brainwashed into prioritising the interests of minorities that they end up, in this case, telling the girl that the celebration was for other cultures, not hers, as if hers did not count.
Private schools are also far from immune to these pressures. Only fear and panic can explain in 2020 the extraordinary phenomenon of head teachers of leading schools, like so many lemmings, rushing unnecessarily to review their curriculum in light of the death of a man at the hands of the police 4,000 miles away in a country with a history and culture different from that of England. As a result curricula have been ‘decolonised’, Eton College has rushed to appoint a “Director of Inclusion Education“, and the name of Sir Walter Raleigh, a national hero who helped to save England from the Spanish Armada, has been removed from the walls of Exeter School because, in the sanctimonious words of the head teacher, he “no longer represented the values and inclusive nature of the school“.
The cultural bodies that schools look to for support are also deeply embedded in what, tongue in cheek, one might call the Oikophobia Industrial Complex, through which huge sums of public money are granted to projects that are either not even taking place in this country or only affecting a tiny (but ‘oppressed’) minority. Two recent ones stand out in my memory, both from the notorious Arts and Humanities Research Council: £781,276 for ‘Embedding Gypsy Roma Traveller Month in the Public History Calendar’ and £249, 001 (one has to admire the precision of the budgeting) for ‘Theatre-making in careless times: arts-based approaches to care in Mombasa, Kenya’. Think how useful such sums might be for a non-ideological arts-based project in some run down part of the UK, or left in people’s pockets as a result of lower taxation. Even century-old major cultural bodies have succumbed. Look at the Historical Association’s webinars on decolonising the secondary school curriculum or the Classical Association’s guidance on how to ensure that, in classical education, one “queers the past“.
How does one explain the pervasive presence of oikophobia within British elites? In the case of individuals, occasional boredom with one’s inheritance and the attraction of the different and exotic are understandable, but surely unsustainable as a long-term lifestyle choice. Within institutions, oikophobia can easily become a habit carried forward unthinkingly. If one is always prioritising minorities and ‘victims’ and insensitive to the implications this has for the rest of society, one is liable to end up doing something egregious, as with the poor girl in the Union Jack dress.
Scruton traced some of oikophobia’s origins to the Enlightenment as one source of the globalism that aims to replace national citizenship with global citizenship and – dear to the hearts of Starmer and Hermer – aspects of national governance with transnational institutions. Oikophobia that downplays national identity and focuses on the subordinate identities of race, colour, gender and sexuality also shows traces both of Marxism applied to phenomena other than class and of Christianity, whose concern for ‘the poor, and mean and lowly’ is easily distorted into a deification of victimhood. The legacy of empire, the crude association of patriotism with xenophobia and fascism, and the prevailing currents of ethical, cultural and epistemological relativism also play their part in undermining a traditional love of country.
Is there any chance that elite oikophobes are likely to turn into oikophiles any time soon? Scruton believed that “the diseases which are created by thought can be cured by thought” and that this might be achieved long term through a transmission-based liberal education. He may be right, but this would mean radical review of the purposes of education and radical change of mindset across the worlds of media and culture, which at the moment seem inconceivable.
Starmer’s public recognition in May that we risked becoming “an island of strangers” suggested for one short moment that the Government might finally have understood the feelings of ordinary people about how mass immigration they never voted for has turned their familiar world upside down. The phrase was later disavowed and has since been redacted from the speech on the Government website and excised from the public record. That action, by itself, tells us how little to dare to expect from the remaining years of a Labour Government in which oikophobia and xenophilia are deeply engrained.
Dr Nicholas Tate is the author of The Conservative Case for Education and adviser to Mathias Corvinus Collegium (MCC) in Hungary. He was a member of France’s Haut Conseil de l’évaluation de l’école 2001-2007, an advisory body to the French minister of national education.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Covid Inquiry Invites Input From 17 Members of Pro-Lockdown Left-wing Lobby Group ‘Independent SAGE’ Led by Communist Susan Michie”
Sounds fair!
Par for the course..
Protecting themselves, and not real people, perhaps. Anyway, as there was an “independent SAGE”. Perhaps there should be an independent inquiry – indeed, there is one. You don’t have to look too far for that, if it’s organised and ready to dispute the results of the other lot.
Next they will canvass Hancock, Doris, Ferguson, Whitty, Starmer, Sturgeon, Drakeford et al, who will say that they did not do enough, hard enough, fast enough, or deep enough. But there is always next time. Learn from our mistakes, upon reflection, insights etc etc.
“Baroness Heather Hallett, the Chair of the Inquiry, has written to 17 members of Independent Sage which criticised the country’s re-opening and later called for fresh lockdowns.”
in that case, why not just lock her down? She’ll be happy then and can have a whale of a time in solitary confinement!
What a splendid idea.. why didn’t I think of that.. ???
Answer : obviously not as bright as Dinger.. 😉
Well.. Michie’s one red I wouldn’t want under my bed.. and certainly not in it.. perish the thought..
🤣🤣 seriously mate you dont have to be bright to keep up with me, I’m no great shakes! But thankyou anyway 👍
“Independent SAGE” may have been “Independent” of the government, but they are “dependent” on the “pandemic” industry for their existence and importance. Ditto WHO, Big Pharma, “real” SAGE. Goodness knows why so many people took all their pronouncements at face value rather than as people “talking their book”.
MULTI-MILLIONAIRE communist Susan Michie.
Sounds like she’s a little more “equal” than the rest of her comrades!
It’s funny how Communism, whilst claiming to liberate the prolitariate, always seems to have some very rich backers. Could it be that it’s nothing more that a scam to monopolise markets and inflict one’s own hubristic fantasies about the world should be on everyone else?
Susan Michie is probably far right according Marianna Spring.
Everybody is far right according to that lefty tart!
As if the Covid inquiry was anything other than a gaslighting pantomime to mask the greatest looting spree and assault on our lives in modern history.
You know the government is just screwing with us by pretending they are concerned what happened during lockdown , they don’t give a damn.
The COVID inquiry is a political farce supposed to find out that evil Tories killed loads of people by not doing everything-corona earlier, harder, faster and for longer because they cared more about insignificant things like the economy and just don’t care about important things like people. When the select independent SAGE for input but omit HART (for instance) it’s absolutely clear who’s driving the car and where the journey’s supposed to go.
I read of these trips , one journey ended near Durham (or north of Islington) at a beer and curry party that was sanctioned by the police during lockdown.
Right. Instead of asking whether lockdown worked, they are assuming it did. Some inquiry!
Specifically, the Mitch-Thing wanted to keep mandatory public face masking forever as that was never really about COVID. She admitted as such in an interview in 2021, at the height of her pandemic career. She had seen many people with such masks during an earlier holiday in Japan and badly wanted to get Britons to wear them as well to combat unspecific dangerous germs.
“Germs”, such a scientific term
“Independent SAGE”
…
“The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”
…
“German Democratic Republic”
You know when they have to say it, it’s because they aren’t.
‘Independent SAGE’, aka ‘Communist SAGE’!
Anyone expecting a proper Inquiry – listening to both sides of the debate – hasn’t been paying attention for the past 3 years.
If you didn’t agree/conform to the Government “line to take” you were silenced. And the Inquiry will do the same, since there must be only one outcome: “lockdowns were justified; the destruction was necessary; the Government did what the Government had to do.”
Move along ….. nothing to see or discuss.
But “lessons will be learned” so that’s OK then
“Take a lateral flow test before entering the building” WTF?
Nowhere does it say HOW LONG befiore – I’m sure that 2 years will suffice.
Governments are whitewashing all the unnecessary damages, destruction of livelihoods, injuries and deaths they caused with their covid policies. You can bet that any government initiated inquiry will do the same as was done during covid. In Canada a National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) was formed to record and has been holding townhall meetings across country inviting people to give testimony. You can find them at https://nationalcitizensinquiry.ca . Many Doctors have testified how they were threatened and coerced and also how they were prevented from giving treatment and reporting vaccine injuries.
“Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.”
Sorry I really don’t care anymore and if it gets me banned it will be worth it and I’ll cancel my subscription to this site so f it!
ARSEHOLES!!! The lot of them.