• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

The Epping Protesters Have Had Enough of Being Ignored and Lied To

by David Shipley
18 July 2025 3:00 PM

Last night’s violence around the Bell Hotel in Epping Forest saw Metropolitan and British Transport police deployed alongside Essex constabulary. According to social media posts and police statements the hotel was damaged and officers were attacked. Social media posts seem to show a protester being run over by a police van driving at speed.

https://twitter.com/TheNorfolkLion/status/1945929144816025814

Today, police and politicians have condemned the violence, with the local MP, Neil Hudson, tweeting: “This is completely unacceptable… these violent scenes are no us, not Epping, not what we stand for.” The message from the police is similar, with their statement drawing a distinction between peaceful protesters and “others intent on offending”.. The message is clear. Violent protest is illegal and un-British.

But this violence has not appeared by chance. The most recent trigger was the arrest on July 8th of Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a 38 year-old man who’d arrived in the country from Ethiopia via a small boat on June 29th, claimed asylum, and then been housed at the Bell Hotel. On July 10th, Kebatu was remanded in custody while awaiting his trial, likely to be in August. This wasn’t enough for locals though, who gathered outside the hotel last Sunday in order to protest. Meanwhile, two security staff responsible for protecting the hotel were seriously assaulted by a group of men. Of course, the police are treating this incident as racially aggravated.

Many locals want this hotel closed. Councillor Chris Whitbread, Leader of Epping Forest District Council, even issued a statement saying:

Let me be absolutely clear. Epping Forest District Council has consistently and repeatedly opposed the use of the Bell Hotel to accommodate asylum seekers. From the outset, we warned the Home Office that this site is entirely inappropriate.

Placing vulnerable individuals from a wide range of cultural backgrounds into an unsupervised setting, in the centre of a small town, without the proper infrastructure, support or services, is both reckless and unacceptable. It puts pressure on local services, causes understandable concern for residents, and is unfair on those placed in the hotel.

The Home Office must now face the reality of the situation. The Bell Hotel must be closed without delay. Our warnings have been ignored for too long.

So the local council has opposed this hotel being used to house asylum seekers “from the outset”. They want the hotel closed. This is not unreasonable. No one wants hundreds of strange single men, statistically far more likely to commit sexual offences, living alongside them and their families. The local school is less than 500 yards from the hotel. The fact that these men live at our expense makes it even more galling.

The majority of protesters were angry, but entirely peaceful, something which even Essex police recognised in their statements. Many parents attended, worried for the safety of their children. They mostly seem to be local people who have just had enough. As one mother said:

Every child’s right is to walk to school and not fear that they are going to be sexually assaulted or raped. We do not live in a Third World country. This is the United Kingdom the last time I looked.

https://twitter.com/L_Wastell/status/1946180301404750088

It’s hard to argue with her words (and worth listening to all of them), and I’m sure they will have stirred the hearts of those hearing them. But words alone are not enough.

Should all the protesters have remained peaceful? Why didn’t they follow the proper processes? A letter to their MP or a Parliamentary petition perhaps. Perhaps they knew those options would make no difference. The British regime has ignored decades of elections where people voted against mass migration. This week we learned it gagged the press and Parliament in order to hide the migration of tens of thousands of Afghans at great cost. Politicians and civil servants from across the parties have consistently demonstrated that they place the safety of foreign men above that of British men, women and children.

So what are the people of Epping supposed to do? Democracy is a machine for keeping the peace and ensuring that power is handed-on peacefully. We vote because we trust that the system, however imperfectly, will reflect our will. But if people come to realise that their votes are ignored, that they are lied to and betrayed, what then?

It is no surprise that people turn to violence in such circumstances, and we are likely to see more such violence if the state doesn’t change course. This is made even more likely by the examples of the Harehills riot last year and the protests after the Manchester Airport attacks. In both cases concerted force caused the police and the state to back down. Similarly, last summer we saw a police officer persuading a group of Muslim men to leave their weapons in the mosque and go home.

We live in an anarcho-tyranny where the regime punishes those who are weak and compliant, while backing-down in the face of concerted opposition and force. People watch. They see who gets punished and who doesn’t. And they learn.

So what, really, did the regime – politicians and the police – expect? When everything else is exhausted, people will turn to violence, because violence is the only way of being heard. If the state doesn’t change course, and fast, we will see many Eppings.

David Shipley has sold fork lift trucks, worked in corporate finance, produced a film and served a prison sentence for committing fraud. He now campaigns for prison reform and works as a prison inspector. You can find his website here.

Tags: DemocracyEpping ForestHotelsIllegal ImmigrationMass immigrationPolicePolitical ViolenceProtestSmall boats crisis

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

From Vaccine Passports in 2021 to ‘Britcard’ in 2025 – Why We Need a Digital Bill of Rights

Next Post

Kneecap ‘Two-Tier Justice’ Row After Glastonbury Case Dropped by Police

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kev
kev
11 months ago

Ed Miliband is an imbecile, Labour are deranged.

Even if we were to somehow miraculously reach the (Agenda) 2030 net Zero goals (absolutely no chance at all), we represent about 1% of the worlds population and therefore only 1% of global so-called emissions – so totally and utterly irrelevant. China and the US (plus others) are increasing their so-called emissions, and our paltry contribution comes nowhere near offsetting their increases.

Britain is leading the world in blind stupidity! How marvelous.

Last edited 11 months ago by kev
26
0
stewart
stewart
11 months ago
Reply to  kev

Sorry, if you don’t mind my asking, in which way was the policy of the Conservative Party government’s any different?

The most recent most aggressive Net Zero targets were passed into law by Theresa May’s government.

9
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
11 months ago
Reply to  stewart

…in which way was the policy of the Conservative Party government’s any different?

It wasn’t.

“Over the top, lads,” shouts the Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband with all the righteous self-belief of a cross-carrying crusader, only to look behind and find that nobody is following.

I think the analogy would be more like a WW1 general ordering the advance while safely tucked away nowhere near the front line.

‘Lions lead by donkeys’.

Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood,
Disguise fair nature with hard-favour’d rage;

Let the anger build. We need rage.

6
0
Valerie_London
Valerie_London
11 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

I will never forgive Boris for his “build back better” speech, at a time when we were deep in lockdown and we wouldn’t have had to build back at all if they hadn’t F*cking taken a bulldozer to our way of life already!

Last edited 11 months ago by Valerie_London
16
0
Freddy Boy
Freddy Boy
11 months ago
Reply to  Valerie_London

Correct 👍

4
0
kev
kev
11 months ago
Reply to  stewart

I never claimed they were, the article was about Labour (insofar as they are the incumbent government) and thick Ed.

The Tories were equally deranged, as were the plans put forward by the imbecile Lib Dems and even worse Greens.

I put forward no defence of any of the Uniparty. They are all braindead when it comes to Energy and “Climate”. It’s hard to believe any of them actually believe the insane rhetoric, but it appears some most certainly do, they appear to believe endless amounts of money can fix a non-existent problem!

Last edited 11 months ago by kev
11
0
varmint
varmint
11 months ago
Reply to  kev

Yes—-But they are NOT braindead about energy and climate. They know what they are doing. ———Following orders from the Davos World Government people who think the wealthy west living standard is too high, and Miliband is rubbing his hands with glee that he now has 5 years at least to lower that living standard drastically and he isn’t wasting much time.

6
0
varmint
varmint
11 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Yes I think the Tories thought they would do us a favour and not have us pretend to save the planet till 2035, but apart from that they are all in on it, except Reform (at the moment) They all waved Net Zero through with no vote and no debate. They are all complicit in our impoverishment just so they can get a little gold star on their lapel from the UN/WEF.

7
0
Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
11 months ago
Reply to  stewart

The Tory policy was better in that they were doing it slower 🙂

0
-1
Smudger
Smudger
11 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Good point! All establishment parties are signed up to this madness which makes you wonder why so many people opposed to Net Zero still lent their votes to them just two months ago. Those who did appear just as crazy as the parties they voted for.

1
0
Freddy Boy
Freddy Boy
11 months ago
Reply to  kev

Will these morons leave the country once they have finished it off ??

4
0
Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
11 months ago
Reply to  Freddy Boy

Once they cease to be useful, they will disappear, though they don’t know that yet.

2
0
stewart
stewart
11 months ago

Why is the question?

The UK and Europe are stuck between a rock and a hard place.

They can stick to their green policy and failed attempt to get the world to follow the lead and crater demand for oil and gas.

Or they can go out into the market and buy oil and gas as the supplicant they are, to the nations they have hitherto controlled, or influenced or messed around with with various regime change shenanigans. That would mean accepting these nations as equals or even, God forbid superiors and relinquishing the status of world leading nations.

That’s what’s at play.

It’s going to be a tough next few decades for the former great powers.

5
0
RichardTechnik
RichardTechnik
11 months ago
Reply to  stewart

It’s going to be a tough next few decades for us, the indigenous population.

10
0
sskinner
sskinner
11 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Saudi Arabia was never colonized. Here are the top 10 oil producers showing yearly production in Barrels.
1 United States 14,837,639,510
2 Saudi Arabia 12,402,761,040
3 Russia 11,262,746,200
4 China 4,905,070,874
5 Canada 4,596,724,820
6 Iraq 4,443,457,393
7 Iran 4,376,194,355
8 United Arab Emirates 3,772,788,273
9 Brazil 3,242,957,836
10 Kuwait 2,990,544,137

6
0
sskinner
sskinner
11 months ago
Reply to  sskinner

Britain acted as a protectorate for the UAE and helped stop Marxist revolutionaries getting a foot hold – this is a good thing. Britain’s involvement in Iraq and Iran was similar to the UAE and that was to protect British and Western interests from Marxist revolutionaries.

1
0
RW
RW
11 months ago
Reply to  stewart

These “green fantasies” are imposed onto us by the unholy duopoly of the US democrats and the UN and they’re implemented by a bunch of better fifth columnists lording over us in the name of their American and globalist masters.

0
0
RW
RW
11 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Nonsense really deserves a second reply: European countries have been importing oil and gas ever since they started that as it was cheaper than continuing to mine their domestic coal reserves. Mining operations started to be shut down in the 1980s, ie about 40 years ago, and by that time, they were already only still running because the state subsidized them in order to enable them to compete with cheaper imported fuels. The OPEC had its heyday in the 1970s when the exercised a sort-of power globally but has again fallen by the wayside because there’s more money to be made by selling oil than by withholding it in order to play tradewar. Considering the time, mass oil and gas imports into Europe have probably been going on 60 – 70 years, IOW, the situation you predict for the future and you claim to be the secret motivation behind the idiotic Renewables! project must long since have happened. In reality, the second gulf war happened (driving the Iranians out of Kuweit) and the Russian wet dream of becoming a raw materials superpower won’t. Raw materials are useless on their own.

That about as many people fall for that as keep falling for Putin’s nuke-wanking doesn’t mean it makes any sense.

1
0
sskinner
sskinner
11 months ago

Here is a graph showing the different sources of energy for most countries. All fossil fuels are shown in black, nuclear – red, hydro – blue, ‘renewables’ -,green.
The UK’s energy mix is inconsequential compared to the rest of the world, and it is interesting that the smaller (or poorer) the country there is more ‘renewable’ as a proportion of that countries energy.

Energy-Consumption-by-source
Last edited 11 months ago by sskinner
4
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
11 months ago
Reply to  sskinner

Interesting. Source please.

0
0
sskinner
sskinner
11 months ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

https://ourworldindata.org/energy-mix
I downloaded the .csv and saved as .xlsx. I filtered and extracted the data for each country on 2021 and rounded to zero (no decimal places).

3
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
11 months ago
Reply to  sskinner

Cheers mate. My own analysis of the ONS data is what made me 100% sure the ‘vaccine’ was a load of shite

1
0
sskinner
sskinner
11 months ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

Quite, Also, I’ve been in software testing for nearly a quarter of a century and I know that if you don’t test software properly you introduce risk, known and unknown. Boeing should also know this by now. When the pharmaceuticals received emergency authorization as well as immunity from prosecution that jumped out as a big red flag, but they don’t seem to care..

4
0
varmint
varmint
11 months ago
Reply to  sskinner

Yep—–About 85% of the worlds energy comes from fossil fuels, and that is NOT going to change anytime soon, which means nothing we do in this country will make any difference to global climate even if their junk science modelling is remotely accurate, which it isn’t. It is ECO FRAUD. The pathway to global socialism and Miliband is in his element.

3
0
sskinner
sskinner
11 months ago
Reply to  varmint

Here is another view showing consumption over the years. The trajectory of renewables is not that impressive considering all the economic, environmental and social harm caused by Year-Zero Net-Zero. Notice the small dip during the plandemic.

OWID-Energy-Consumption-By-Source
Last edited 11 months ago by sskinner
4
0
Baldrick
Baldrick
11 months ago

Ian Pilmer does a nice but long winded demolition of all this in Green Murder. He even questions that man made co2 has caused a significant rise in co2.

1
0
soundofreason
soundofreason
11 months ago
Reply to  Baldrick

Even?

0
0
varmint
varmint
11 months ago

Why does the UK always have to be “world leaders” in every absurdity going? Take a look at the puss on that Moron above and it might help explain it.

6
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
11 months ago
Reply to  varmint

We’re definitely world leaders in Orwellian propaganda and surveillance – something else to be proud of.

6
0
Phil Warner
Phil Warner
11 months ago

They seem to have fallen for Net Zero hook, line and sinker. Klaus must be very pleased.

2
0
varmint
varmint
11 months ago
Reply to  Phil Warner

The Uk as one of the originators of the Industrial Revolution and who benefitted from fossil fuels the most, must now according to the Eco Socialists at the UN, get rid of those fuels first.———–And our UN lackey Politicians , the likes of Miliband being the worst, are only too happy to oblige by reducing our standard of living. That standard of living is going to noticeably drop as Labour now have this huge majority. We will all be coerced into smart meters, heat pumps and EV’s.

2
0
RTSC
RTSC
11 months ago

If we had a halfway sensible King, we could at least expect that he would ask the Prime Minister whether it is wise to destroy the economy and millions of lives on the altar of Net Zero.

But we’ve got Charlie-Boy, who supports the madness (and expects to make a very pretty penny out of it).

The rot starts at the top.

3
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 45: Jack Hadfield on the Anti-Asylum Protests, Alan Miller on the Tyranny of Digital ID and James Graham on the Net Zero Pension Threat

by Richard Eldred
25 July 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

25 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

24 July 2025
by Charlie Cole

Britain Could Be Sued Over Climate Change, Says UN Court

24 July 2025
by Will Jones

Corbyn Launches Hard-Left ‘Your Party’ to Challenge Starmer

24 July 2025
by Will Jones

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

41

Corbyn Launches Hard-Left ‘Your Party’ to Challenge Starmer

26

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24

Britain Could Be Sued Over Climate Change, Says UN Court

24

News Round-Up

14

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

24 July 2025
by Charlie Cole

Twice as Many People Work in Environment ‘Charities’ Than in Wind Power Generation: ONS Report Reveals Shocking Truth About UK’s ‘Green Jobs’

24 July 2025
by Chris Morrison

‘Schools of Sanctuary’ Brings US Open Borders Ideology into UK Schools

24 July 2025
by Charlotte Gill

POSTS BY DATE

July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jun    

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Jun    

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

25 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

24 July 2025
by Charlie Cole

Britain Could Be Sued Over Climate Change, Says UN Court

24 July 2025
by Will Jones

Corbyn Launches Hard-Left ‘Your Party’ to Challenge Starmer

24 July 2025
by Will Jones

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

41

Corbyn Launches Hard-Left ‘Your Party’ to Challenge Starmer

26

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24

Britain Could Be Sued Over Climate Change, Says UN Court

24

News Round-Up

14

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

24 July 2025
by Charlie Cole

Twice as Many People Work in Environment ‘Charities’ Than in Wind Power Generation: ONS Report Reveals Shocking Truth About UK’s ‘Green Jobs’

24 July 2025
by Chris Morrison

‘Schools of Sanctuary’ Brings US Open Borders Ideology into UK Schools

24 July 2025
by Charlotte Gill

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences