• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

UK in Race to Opt Out of WHO Lockdown Powers

by Will Jones
21 April 2025 11:06 AM

Britain has just weeks to escape new powers allowing the World Health Organisation to recommend imposing lockdowns in future pandemics, a group of MPs and peers has warned. The Telegraph has more.

The UK must opt out of the WHO’s new international health regulations (IHRs) by July 19th to avoid the body co-ordinating the response to any future Covid-style pandemic.

In a letter to the Foreign Office, 14 leading Parliamentarians urge the Government to exercise Britain’s right to ignore amendments to the regulations before the looming deadline.

The IHRs were drawn up by member states of the WHO in the aftermath of the Covid pandemic, and increase the organisation’s powers to co-ordinate future global responses to pandemics.

But critics have warned they give too much power to the WHO and risk undermining individual countries’ right to manage their own affairs.

The regulations say WHO member states must “support WHO-coordinated response activities”, which critics argue could amount to an obligation to support the body’s recommendation to lock down in a future pandemic.

A Government spokesman told the Telegraph “no decision” had yet been made on which of the amendments were in the “national interest”.

Writing for the Telegraph, Suella Braverman, a former home secretary, warned that the regulations “present the most serious threat to national sovereignty in a generation”.

She wrote: “What the British public sees – what they intuit – is not just bureaucratic overreach but a creeping usurpation of their democratic rights. They voted to leave the European Union precisely because they were tired of decisions being made by people they could not name and could not remove. The WHO, as it currently stands, is another iteration of the same problem.”

A WHO spokesman said the body “does not have the right or ability to take any decision concerning health within a sovereign state,” adding: “Such authority will and always remain with the countries themselves.

“These recommendations are always based on advice provided by an emergency committee of international experts, and information provided by countries. The goal is to prevent or reduce the international spread of disease and avoid unnecessary interference with international trade and travel.”

Ms Braverman is joined in the letter by the Conservative MPs Danny Kruger, Sir Iain Duncan Smith, Esther McVey and Jack Rankin. Labour’s Graham Stringer, the DUP’s Sammy Wilson, and the former Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe have also signed it alongside Lord Frost, the Tory peer and former chief Brexit negotiator.

They warn that it would be “premature and pre-emptive” for the UK to agree to new pandemic-related regulations before the conclusion of the Covid Inquiry, which is ongoing.

They also argue that “serious doubts” have been raised about the legality of the WHO’s process for updating the IHRs, and warn that the package could “amount to a breach of international law”.

The WHO said it had fulfilled all legal requirements in the ratification process for the IHRs, including consulting the UK Government.

The US has already opted out of the IHRs by withdrawing completely from the WHO in the first days of the second Donald Trump administration.

“The executive order withdrawing the USA cited serious concerns, including in relation to the poor performance of the WHO and its leadership during the pandemic, its failure to adopt urgently needed reforms, and its inability to demonstrate independence from inappropriate political influence,” the Parliamentarians’ letter said.

While earlier proposed amendments to the IHRs suggested that the WHO could have the power to impose public health measures on member states, the latest version only gives it the ability to recommend an approach.

Worth reading in full.

Dr Meryl Nass says she is “relieved” that “all the controversial ideas have been kicked down the road” and there is “nothing binding” that will be a problem:

  • This version of the treaty does not commit any nation to doing anything it does not want to do.
  • Nor does it promise nations anything of value: no privileges or benefits.
  • You might be lucky and get some free or cheap vaccine or drugs if manufacturers agree in future to give them away.
  • All the controversial areas have been kicked down the road.
  • There is nothing binding in this document that is a problem for nations.

If this was the level of agreement at 3.5 years, we can assume they won’t get much further over the next few years. The US and Argentina will be out. I imagine all the nations will approve this document, since it is virtually meaningless, only providing a skeleton — which the globalists hope can be dressed up later with the awful provisions. But since the globalists just had their biggest funding stream turned off (USAID) they made no obvious attempt to use bribery to gain agreement on more restrictive provisions. And even this meagre document required an extra negotiating day and meetings to the wee hours.

Never say never, but I am very relieved.

It is good news that the pandemic treaty has been largely neutered. But the idea that the WHO should be empowered to recommend lockdowns still seems very unwise to me. Would our politicians and officials really have the testicular fortitude to rely on their own cool assessments of the evidence rather than just go along with what the WHO is telling them to do, and which would inevitably have the jumpy public behind it as well? The UK would be sensible to listen to this letter, then, and opt out of the ‘advisory’ WHO powers as well.

Tags: International Health RegulationsLockdownPandemic treatyWHOWorld Health Organisation

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

DOGE UK Launch: Join Us in the Fight Against Woke Waste

Next Post

Meet the Ecosexuals: People Who Have Sex With Trees, Mud and Lumps of Coal to Somehow Save the Planet

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

35 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pilla
Pilla
2 years ago

I’ve missed the last two or three episodes of London Calling, so was glad to be able to listen to this one. It reminded me why I love it – because Toby and James talking together (arguing?!) make me laugh so much!! Very cheering.
BTW, the Light Truth Paper (which I think is its full title), mentioned by Toby, is only free because someone has paid for enough copies to give away. If you want to subscribe to a hard copy, it is £5 per issue (monthly), so quite expensive. However, it is free to look at online. It has good stuff in it, but some slightly weird adverts!

3
0
funkmaster
funkmaster
2 years ago

Didn’t have you down, Toby, as a dead ringer for Pat Sharp…!

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 36 of the Sceptic: Karl Williams on Starmer’s Phoney Immigration Crackdown, Dan Hitchens on the Assisted Suicide Bill and Tom Jones on Reform’s Local Council Challenge

by Richard Eldred
16 May 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

15 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

16 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

16 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

29

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

26

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

19

News Round-Up

18

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

27

Trump’s Lesson in Remedial Education

16 May 2025
by Dr James Allan

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

15 May 2025
by Dr Nicholas Tate

‘Why Can’t We Talk About This?’

15 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

POSTS BY DATE

April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences