Donald Trump’s announcement of tariffs on EU products was met with outrage from Ursula von der Leyen and European elites and appears to have sparked a veritable trade war, with both sides brandishing the threat of further tariffs. But in a long, detailed – and quite funny – article for the German collective blog Achse des Guten (Axis of Good), the consultant and commentator Michael Alberts argues that the only reason there has not been a trade war much earlier is because the US was not fighting back. Donald Trump is right. The EU started the war by imposing tariffs and all sorts of other encumbrances on US (and other foreign) products.
Using a traditional German saying, Alberts wryly observes that when the Europeans point the finger at Trump, “three fingers of their hand are pointing back at them”. He notes that the EU’s notoriously complex web of regulations already represents a massive trade barrier for non-EU manufacturers, who often would need to alter their products even just to enter the EU market. But EU protectionism is also more explicit. Alberts explains:
To read the rest of this article, you need to donate at least £5/month or £50/year to the Daily Sceptic, then create an account on this website. The easiest way to create an account after you’ve made a donation is to click on the ‘Log In’ button on the main menu bar, click ‘Register’ underneath the sign-in box, then create an account, making sure you enter the same email address as the one you used when making a donation. Once you’re logged in, you can then read all our paywalled content, including this article. Being a donor will also entitle you to comment below the line, discuss articles with our contributors and editors in a members-only Discord forum and access the premium content in the Sceptic, our weekly podcast. A one-off donation of at least £5 will also entitle you to the same benefits for one month. You can donate here.
There are more details about how to create an account, and a number of things you can try if you’re already a donor – and have an account – but cannot access the above perks on our Premium page.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
No surprise. Same as the Kindergarten Canadians. Some tariffs as high as 300%. Then they complain that The Tronald is mean and Adolf Hitler (as always).
The EU has always been a protectionist regime since its foundation as a political-economic rival to the US.
So if I’m reading this right, The Donald is merely Taking Back Control?
Meanwhile, like Tory predecessors, Sir Two-Tier blithely gives away control to all and sundry.
Interviewer in 2023: Westminster or Davos?
Starmer: Davos.
My memory is foggy. I recall in prior Trump administration the US Gov’t worked hard with UK to get a post-Brexit Trade Agreement.
My memory is that UK resisted. Reasons are many, probably.
I don’t see any current media reports to re-start this bilateral US/UK Trade Agreement. Certainly such an agreement is the process to alleviate this issue–better than what seems to be happening now, IMHO.
My memory may be flawed or it was reported erroneously at the time. I of course was not in the meetings.
The Bidentard regime was pro EU. No interest in a trade deal with the UK. Went nowhere. The Tronald has issued 25% tariffs on UK steel, mfg. This will likely be rescinded after some behind the doors discussions. There is no point in a tariff escalation war. Keep the baby toys in the pram.
Gene-manipulated food is meanwhile sold in the UK¹. This suggests that some sort of agreement must have been reached.
¹ I recently bought some “extended shelf life” cooking oil because I had to. The small print on the bottle stated that it had been produced from genetically manipulated soy beans.
there are no no-genetically modified soybeans , anywhere in the world.
Maybe. But I’ve never encountered label stating that before and importing this into the EU wouldn’t be allowed.
Yes it would. Genetically modified crops are grown in EU and products on shelves too.
The problem is we are still linked to the Fourth Reich Customs Union, so making trade agreements with other Countries has to take into account what the Fourth Reich wants.
Much of this is due to non-tariffs, where the UK has to apply the same “standards” to its own goods and those coming in from outside the Fourth Reich. This makes exporting goods from the UK into the Fourth Reich less complicated because “standards” are the same.
Also if the import has a lower tariff than it would if imported into the Fourth Reich, and if that good is re-exported from UK to Fourth Reich, the UK must collect that tariff difference and remit it to the IVth Reich. This makes things very complex, so easier to use IVth Reich tariffs/non-tariffs. In fact nearly all the post-Brexit trade agreements were just roll-over agreements to what the UK had when it was part of the Reich.
In other words, Brexit In Name Only. The purpose of Brexit was to regain our border control – FAIL, and for better trade (more choice, lower prices for consumers, easier export markets) with non-Reich Countries – FAIL.
The political will to get away from that European midden was never there nor is it now.
Honesty left the EU building a long time ago.. actually I suspect it never entered in the first place.
Isn’t that the whole point of the EU – if you have to join the club and jump through hoops to do business freely within the EU, they are hardly going to make it easy for anyone outside the EU to do business with them.
The whole point of the Customs Union is protectionism …. and not just against American products.
It protects domestic producers – those with political clout and which are Government cronies.
The consumer pays and is made poorer.
I didn’t really know about this tariff imbalance but it doesn’t surprise me – assuming it’s the full picture.
I’m not sure it is though, is it?
Don’t things like subsidies play a significant role as well?
They might also be skewed in the EU’s favour, I don’t know. I am under the impression that US industries have strong lobbies and get all sorts of favourable terms for themselves.
I just have a feeling this is all a lot more complicated than this, which I won’t tire of saying should not be the case. It’s all different modes of central planning which ultimately just screws ordinary people.
The remark about VAT is obviously bovine manure because exporters don’t pay consumption taxes, the people paying for their goods do¹.
¹ Consumption taxes, like all other indirect taxes, are a rip-off of poor people in favour of rich people. Rich people only pay direct taxes on a large part of their income because they don’t have to consume it. Poor people pay double taxes on all of their income because it’s taxed once before they get it and taxed again, possibly multiple times, as indirect taxes often stack up, when they spend it.
I concur with your comment. If a German car factory purchased parts from another German factory it would pay VAT (input tax) on those purchases. However it would charge the German public VAT (output tax) on the sales of its finished cars. That’s how VAT works – the public, as tail-end-charlie, picks up the tab.
If the German car factory imported car parts from the USA at the same unit price to help manufacture its cars in Germany, the VAT payments and receipts flow would be the same. Therefore, the US exporter is not being charged in any different way to domestic German suppliers.
So, as far as VAT is concerned, the US exporter are not at any competitive disadvantage to German domestic suppliers.
The German article is pretty rambling and actually mostly about China. It sort-of only mentions the usual grievance of US-based megacorps that countries which are not part of the USA have all kinds of different standards for stuff – How dare they! – and that they need to comply with them if they want to sell their products there. And then, of course, gene-manipulated foodstuffs, chlorinated chicken and all the usual stuff. Even the huge US navy gets a mentioned favourably as if it somehow wasn’t an instrument of global US politics/ dominance but a benefit the USA donated to the world which simply couldn’t do without it.
The new US Government is also denouncing the EU’s import VAT. The intricacies of tax law are confusing, but considered in the abstract, Donald Trump’s complaints are not far-fetched:the result of the VAT is to directly place a burden on the consumption of end users… “
That is not the argument those in the US use where how VAT works is not understood – even when patiently explained.
They see VAT on imported goods as a tariff which is not paid if goods are purchased from a domestic producer – not true – and do not understand that VAT is paid on all purchases by a seller, not just on goods, and that VAT paid out is offset by VAT collected when a sale is made.
The net effect is that VAT paid on import does not make US imports more expensive or less competitive than a UK produced product.
” if there were only income taxes in one country and only taxes on consumption in another, exporters from the first to the second country would be double-taxed,”
Eh?
Except the net effect of VAT is revenue neutral. Income tax + VAT = Income tax alone, or consumption tax alone.
It very complex. Even in the EU it seems to be a problem. A product purchased online has to be taxed for VAT on the country of consumption. So if an online purchase is made say from Germany, the German VAT is deducted and the country of consumption VAT is added. So great for big companies but a nightmare for small ones.
so if you buy something say from Amazon, which is dealt with by Amazon the VAT will be adjusted automatically. But sometimes it seems to prevent small companies selling outside their country, even within the EU. So it’s not truly a single market!
Then of course there are the non tariff trade barriers. Big corporations have systems in place to automate the process. The poor old consumer has to jump through hoops to purchase something from outside the EU. Even from the UK where there is a trade agreement it can takes considerable amount of time to fill out the paperwork, this will cost about £10 per delivery for the post office or courier to clear customs. If you try clearing yourself the whole process takes forever. Obviously consumers and small companies suffer the most.
I had a conversation with a courier, complaining that they were asking me too many questions. The man said it’s much worse than you think and that he was making it easy. £10 down the bureaucratic drain.