This post is headed by a mugshot of Axel Rudakubana, the young man who stabbed three little girls to death, and injured many more, in Southport last year at a summer holiday Taylor Swift-themed dance club.
It is an extraordinary portrait. Rudakubana’s eyes somehow manage to convey sorrow, hatred, wickedness and fear all at the same time – with a viscerality that is almost physical. There are some people (there are two or three I can think of who I have encountered in my own lifetime) whose malice seems to emanate from them in a cold miasma – whose very presence in a room refrigerates it. That is the sensation that one gets when looking at this photograph. But at the same time one can see suffering and pain in the face it depicts, too; it does not excuse Rudakubana’s actions for one second to observe that his own evil has traumatised him. He is said to have told police in the aftermath of his stabbing spree that he was happy he had done it and that the girls were dead, but he doesn’t look at all happy; in fact he looks as though he is already in a personal hell.
The Rudakubana case, as always with such events, has become an empty vessel into which all kinds of meanings can be poured. Was it just a genuine, freak act of savagery perpetrated by a lone lunatic, and therefore having nothing to do with wider trends? Was it the fault of social media? Does it say something about the problem of young male outcasts withdrawing from society? Is it indicative of a growing misogyny in the culture?
But the fact that Rudakubana was the son of Rwandan immigrants and that his malevolence appears to have been directed at the country in which he was raised has caused the case to resonate against the backdrop of the Pakistani rape gangs scandal, which erupted into public consciousness a few weeks ago and has refused to go away. The confluence of these two stories – not on the face of it related, but seeming to come together in a dismal rhyme – has resulted in a bleak calculus being performed in the minds of much of the population: whatever the rights and wrongs of Britain’s very liberal immigration policy, if it had been stricter Rudakubana would almost certainly not have been born here and the girls he killed would still be alive, and a very large number of other girls – 100,000 is a conservative estimate – would have escaped degrading sexual exploitation and abuse at the hands of men who despised them for the sin of being white.
All of the usual caveats naturally apply to this – not all immigrants, etc. (I should know; I’m married to one) – but it does at least disrupt, and I think disrupts in a foundational way, a specific political kitsch that has been dominant in the culture for many years and which has been hitherto invincible in the grip it exerts on the chattering classes in particular.
You all know what I am describing, because you are familiar with its contours. It is not rational or thoughtful, because a political kitsch by definition never is. It is, rather, like all kitsches, a jumbled collection of mutually reinforcing emotional resonances that derives its power from the fact that it unites people in self-consciously shared emotion: it makes people feel a certain way, and also simultaneously makes them aware that others feel the same way too. This produces a powerful sense of unified feeling that propels a given social movement forward. That social movement is what might be called progressive multiculturalism, and the driving force I am describing is what I will label ‘diversity kitsch’.
Diversity kitsch is all around us – in the books we read, the films we watch, the music we listen to – but it is at its most obvious and simplistic in children’s literature and TV programmes. And the paradigm example, against which all others stand to be compared, is called The Smeds and the Smoos.
Have you by any chance heard of this? Unless you have small children and you live in the UK there’s no particular reason why you should. It is a book by Julia Donaldson, a doggerel poet who churns out volumes for children recited in rhyming couplets, and who has earned umpteen millions of pounds by doing so (she is, astonishingly, the biggest selling British author ever, in any genre, in terms of units sold). Donaldson has, in fairness, written some charming books – The Gruffalo, Room on the Broom, Monkey Puzzle, The Smartest Giant in Town, Stickman and Superworm being firm favourites in our house. But she has a tendency to stray away from her basic role of writing entertaining bedtime stories in order to make unutterably banal political points – and The Smeds and the Smoos is the perfect illustration of this.
The basic idea of the story is not complicated. On an alien planet there are two species, red and blue (the Smeds and Smoos), and they do not intermingle. Indeed, the children are told by their parents and grandparents that they must under no circumstances play with anybody from the opposing species:
There are no surprises in Julia Donaldson world: you can probably guess the plot from here already. And, sure enough, in the fullness of time, the Smeds and Smoos learn to get along, that everyone is the same deep down inside, etc., etc., and that one should play with whomever one wants to play with. The twist, such as it is, is a Romeo and Juliet-style plot in which a young Smed falls in love with a young Smoo; they duly get married and have a purple baby at the end:
Leaving aside the blatant disinformation being purveyed here about the colour of the baby’s toes, the political anthropology of The Smeds and the Smoos is written on its sleeve. Donaldson’s dedication of the book is “to the children of Europe”. And those with an aptitude for rat-smelling will note the publication date: 2019. Yes, it is a book explicitly inspired by Brexit. Because, you see, people who voted to leave the EU were racists. And if only they had realised that everybody is the same, and that everybody will get along if only they give each other a chance, they would have known that their silly notions about leaving the EU were rooted in archaic prejudices that any right-thinking person would abandon. There is in the end only a brother/sisterhood of man. And commitment to the nation state, since it works against the existence of that brotherhood, is therefore mankind’s great sin.
It didn’t matter to Donaldson that every British child has heard the basic, unobjectionable message of her book approximately a billion times by their sixth birthday, and that the number of parents in the country who would actually tell their kids not to play with those from other races is infinitesimally small. What mattered was the perpetuation of what I have described here as a kitsch. Donaldson got warm fuzzies from imagining the beauty of the global integration of humanity which the EU (forged in the aftermath of the Second World War to bring the continent together and put an end to the scourge of war, and so on) seemed to symbolise. This was reinforced by what makes a kitsch kitsch: the sensation that right-thinking people everywhere felt the same way as her. And she got not-warm fuzzies (cold spikeys?) from Brexit, which seemed to be about placing a barrier in the way of the march toward worldwide unity.
And that really explains not just The Smeds and the Smoos, of course, but the entire extremely-online #FBPE phenomenon – a group of people who simply found Brexit very disagreeable because it spoiled a nice idea they had about the future and which they shared with other people who they thought were on the side of the angels.
But it also exemplifies the vision of immigration and multiculturalism that exists in the heads of our national adults-in-the-room: one in which the only thing getting in the way of the wonderful dream of universal peace and harmony among people of all creeds and backgrounds is the lamentable, petty, grubby, neanderthal clinging-on to the vestiges of the nation state that persists among the deplorables. In this vision, everybody around the world is presumptively nice and lovely at heart, and all that is needed is for their inherent niceness and loveliness to be allowed to emerge in the optimal circumstances of tolerance and celebration. If people would only all try very hard to be tolerant and celebratory, the resultant niceness and loveliness explosion would positively rocket us into a better future.
When it comes to matters of immigration and diversity, in other words, the chattering classes, broadly conceived, in the West, are in the grip not of reason but of certain ideas which are rooted in repositories of shared emotion, and which take hold in their minds and direct them to the bizarre conclusions which they typically reach. They live, essentially, in a Smeds and Smoos universe, wherein there are no downsides or complexities to mass immigration whatsoever, and everybody on the planet is revealed to be a nice, polite, bourgeois Western liberal deep down inside if you just spend long enough getting to know them. This gives these people warm fuzzies which they like to share with the fellow like-minded. And the thought that anybody might ask any awkward questions about any of this – that anybody might interfere with the beauty of this shared vision – is the source of nasty cold spikeys that must be vigorously suppressed.
Because the chattering classes are so influential, it is this vision which has hitherto permeated polite society, and diversity kitsch which has held the so-called ‘new elite’ in its vice-like grip. But there are signs that this might actually be shifting. Last Sunday Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament, went on the usual merry-go-round of morning talk shows to make the case that Britain is not a hotel, as she put it, and even to assert that – shock! horror! – Axel Rudakubana should have loved the country that had given his family asylum rather than hated it. And she was not, as would have been the case even two or three years ago, reviled or aggressively challenged on this. She was given a fair hearing. Anecdotally, this change in mood is evident to me in my interactions with friends and family, who are increasingly willing to venture the opinion that immigration is too high and that the people who are coming seem to have no interest in integrating. Even some academics of my acquaintance – academia being the very engine room of diversity kitsch as I have here described it – have in private conversation expressed similar sentiments.
It is to early to say if this incipient ‘vibe shift’, as I feel compelled to call it, will continue to grow, but if so we may look back at the Rudakubana case as a genuine inflection point. The thing about political kitsches is that, because they are not reasoned in the first place – they inhabit a realm of pure emotion – they cannot be dispelled through reason, either. They can only be replaced by being gradually subverted – or shattered – by a stronger set of emotional resonances. The brutality of what happened in Southport last summer, and the fact that we have all been reminded about it at the very peak of concern about the rape gangs scandal, may have the emotional power to achieve such a subversion or even a shattering. This is because it has displayed, in all of its awful glory, the grim truth about human beings: that they are not all nice and lovely, and they are not all polite bourgeois liberals, and that when literally a million of them are entering the country each year, there will inevitably be a very large number indeed of decidedly nasty and unlovely persons among that million.
The realisation of this may have the effect of sweeping away the Smeds and Smoos miasma that lies across the country like a pall, because it will force people to confront the fact that diversity kitsch, which postulates a future in which everybody gets along through tolerance and celebration, is rooted in fantasy. The reality is that human beings are complicated. People can indeed live peaceably beside each other most of the time, but they also possess the capacity to be malevolent, cruel and pitiless, and those traits are often most manifest when it comes to people who are identifiably of a different group. Human beings, that is, manifestly do not always just all rub along wonderfully together irrespective of their backgrounds if they just learn to get along. Sometimes they do that. But sometimes they rape, murder and enslave people on the basis of possessing the wrong racial, religious or linguistic characteristics. And sometimes they are imbued with racial malice that has no end except in bloodshed and mayhem.
This realisation, it is to be hoped, will be a cause for serious thought about immigration in the round. Immigration is – I speak with some experience of the subject, having been an immigrant myself in a foreign country at one time, and now being married to an immigrant in turn – complicated. It is complicated personally, and it is complicated socially and economically. And mass immigration makes those complications yet more vexed. I would be a hypocrite to put myself into the camp of people who are opposed to it, since I personally have benefited so much from having had the freedom to go and settle overseas (a freedom which I may again exercise if life here in Britain becomes intolerable). And I am personally acquainted, as we all are, with immigrants who have made very positive contributions to the life of the country. But I have seen first hand the complexities to which immigration gives rise, from both sides, and they are far from trivial.
Careful consideration of this point is long overdue. In a post I wrote some time ago, I made the observation that Britain’s big problem is that its elite no longer think of it as a home. If you think of your country as a home, then it matters a great deal to you who you allow into it, and you will vigorously eject those who have through their conduct made themselves unwelcome. If you don’t think of it as a home, however, then it’s all the same to you whoever chooses to come or go. This of course is at the root of diversity kitsch: the idea that borders, and by extension that home itself, are barriers to true progress. But it follows that, with the dispersal of that notion, will come the realisation that a concept of home actually matters. The product of that realisation will I think be political dynamite in the right (or wrong) hands, because it will both be extremely popular and will upend every cherished notion that our current regime holds faith in. The result will be chaotic. But from that chaos a more realistic and humane political settlement – one which does not eschew immigration per se but emphasises that immigrants are migrating not just to any old place but somebody’s home – may ultimately be forged.
Dr David McGrogan is an Associate Professor of Law at Northumbria Law School. You can subscribe to his Substack – News From Uncibal – here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Surely, just detail…. Bet this isn’t reported by the PR team responsible for the attack
Bridgen seems to be Covid’s answer to Saint Paul.
We need a lot more Andrew Bridgens to replace all those silent cowards in Parliament and the ones who prop up this corruption.
Speaking of misinformation
“As a nation we should be very proud of what has been achieved through the vaccine programme. The vaccine is the best defence against Covid that we have.”
Get thee to Wannsee Simon Hart.
That’s got Simon Hart well and truly by the goolies.
Next.
What is wrong with saying the Holocaust is the worst crime against humanity and the Covid response was the next worst.
Well, maybe Stalin’s scourges were second? But I take your point.
Or Chairman Mao’s “Great Leap Forward”.
Or pol pots year zero
Nothing, obviously. But that’s not how this is being reported. It’s being reported as
Andrew Bridgen has been suspended as a Conservative MP for spreading misinformation about Covid vaccination.
It comes after the North West Leicestershire MP posted a tweet that compared vaccines to the Holocaust.
Tory chief whip Simon Hart said the comments had “crossed a line” and caused great offence.
[BBC]
As I already wrote elsewhere: This is the woke establishment going full-scale Life of Brian: Everybody heard Bridgen say Jehova! Stone him! As the statement of the BBC is factually wrong and seriously defamatory, I hope the BBC will end up having to do another embarrassing climbdown of the kind which was inflicted on them when they wrongly accused Cliff Richard of paedophilia.
.
.
.
Coming to think of this, this doesn’t seem likely because of the careful weaselwording of the BBC statement: They mean to imply (and everybody’s going to understand that) likened but they didn’t actually write it, just compared. And The Holocaust was worse than X is certainly technically a comparison of X and the Holocaust.
So here is the thing. With his very statement Bridgen is trying to force a debate about the issue. And it’s a bit of “check” move. If the government wants to rebut the statement it is left with some difficult options.
I’m not sure why simply not saying anything wasn’t an option. Maybe they tried for a while and he just wouldn’t shut up and go away, so they’ve dealt with him with option 3.
This is why ultimately I have no respect or trust in our system or the people in it. The accusation of anti-semetism leaves no room for debate or discussion. They are signalling to Bridgen that the only exit for him is total submission to them. Toe the line or get destroyed.
Bridgen has a tricky few days in front of him to decide whether he bows to them or commits political suicide, at least for the immediate future.
The people who run our state are psychopathic gangsters. They know they’ve committed an awful crime (if not legally, morally) and will do anything and everything to try to get away with it
Sounds like a spot on assessment.
Because it’s worse than the Holocaust.
The jabs are going to kill far, far more people than the 2.25-2.5 million Jews murdered by the Germans and their allies.
Indeed. A very sly piece of evasion.
As usual, the hamfisted response has compounded the ‘problem’.
The ‘anti semitism’ allegation is silly.
The ‘misinformation about the vaccine’ disprovable by reference to peer reviewed and published papers.
And Mr Bridgen now has a bigger soapbox.
Good on you, Mr Bridgen. A great pity that there aren’t too many more MPs like you.
Worse than silly. Years of transparent propaganda against “anti-vaxxers” is strongly reminiscent of fascistic anti-semitism. Unthinking hypocrisy.
This is a ‘democratic’ socialist fascist government.
This country has been governed by socialist fascist governments since 1990.
The party whip, the government payroll, is too strong.
This country needs MPs with more independence.
Double their pay and make them more accountable to their constituencies.
Silly, but it’s going onto his Wikipedia page where it will remain.
I’m curious as to how calculated Bridgen’s statement is – whether he chose the words quite deliberately knowing it would bring bigger attention to the issue or whether he was inadvertently giving another example of Godwin’s law.
This is a calculated concerted response from the Establishment to an innocuous remark.
And it is great because it puts the issues firmly onto the political map.
It is now up to as many people as possible to write to their MPs and complain about the silence from them and the cowardice in keeping silent whilst millions have died because of corruption in W.H.O. and government health departments worldwide.
Not to mention the prevailing health fascism.
I’m Jewish and can think of nothing worse than the cry of ‘antisemitic’ by the establishment, whenever a convenient and emotive distraction is needed to evade criticism. Disgraceful, predictable and in boy who cried wolf terms, a very dangerous game to play.
Just to add, I have relatives with connections to North London and who have Jewish friends, I was willing to consider giving Peking Piffle the benefit of the doubt in the 2019 election over concerns of anti-semitism in the Labour party. And I stayed up half the night writing a lengthy post on this forum some months back defending and explaining the existence of the state of Israel. And I completely back your comments.
Correct.
And it isn’t as if our Beloved Leaders have even a reasonable record of action against genuine antisemitism.
The Labia wing of the Uniparty being only the most blatant example.
They have to get rid of Andrew Bridgen because he is bringing a focus on the truth, they the Conservatives and Labour etc cannot allow debate, acknowledgment of any sort regarding the devastating and life changing effects these forced injections have had on hundreds of thousands perhaps millions of lives. Careers, reputations, sources of income and influence will all disappear, the very real possibility of criminal convictions and the disgrace to themselves and generations of their families. So these people will now enter a very literal fight to the death where they will do anything, say anything even to the point of killing people to cover up what they have done. What is being done to Mr Bridgen and to others who have spoken out is only the start.
However they are by doing this drawing greater attention to that which they are desperate to hide.
“Truth is like a Lion, you don’t have to defend it, let it loose, it will defend itself”
These people in Governments and their advisors know nothing about truth, they have lived in dirt so long.
The people responsible have already killed a great many people.
exactly a few more added to the tally won’t matter as long as they can protect themselves.
Terrific post
Let’s just hope that this is the over-sized hand grenade that finally blows the top off this disgusting scandal.
Those complicit need to hang their heads in shame.
Don’t mean to be a stickler for grammar, but I think your last sentence might have about four words too many
Just joking, of course. Far being it from me to decide what should happen to those complicit. Of course, I can’t say what the many vaxxed injured and their families might be wont to do – particularly those pushed, cajoled or coerced into having just one more booster long after knowledge of the harms caused by the vaxx was well known.
Too good to miss.
Having heard first hand some of the coercive tactics used by actual medical staff in hospitals who tried to get patients to have a “vaccine” I know exactly what you mean about my final sentence.
I hope that when it comes to it I can stick to my principles about capital punishment. There could be people who will struggle if they are more directly connected to those that have died from this toxic injection.
Fishy’s criticisms are carefully worded waffle although he drops a major bollock by effectively coming out against free speech. He probably thinks he was being smart in avoiding an ad hominem attack.
As my Dad always says – “always sleep on it.”
Rushing for a place on the podium Fishy comes across as a pissed-off school boy.
Must try harder lad.
Bit dumb of Rishi. People are already leery of him, this won’t win them over. Had he been smarter, he’d say that although he believes the vaxxes are the best thing since sliced bread and are
wildly profitabletotally safe and totally effective, he does believe that even 1 death due to the vaxx is 1 too many and they must therefore be investigated post haste. And then reference BoJo’s super-vaxx rollout that he was so proud of and indicate that perhaps it was a little too fast. But, too late, Rishi has decided to go down with the vaxx.If BoJo really wants to make a come-back, this would be the place to start. Mea culpa on being too hasty, throw the pharma companies and MHRA under the bus and all the political opponents who still want to pump people full of poison and say he’ll get to the bottom of this ghastly affair and ensure it never happens again. Sure, opportunistic as f-k, but whatever it takes to make the great poisoning stop.
MP Michael Fabricant said that if Mr Bridgen’s comment deters people from being vaccinated and causes deaths as a direct consequence, he’ll have blood on his hands. Right back at ya, Mikey baby, right back at ya. If you keep telling people to get this poison despite all the safety signals and refuse to investigate said signals, and cause deaths as a direct consequence, not only will you have blood on your hands, with a little luck you will be facing criminal charges.
Deter someone from getting vaxxed – seriously, how bloody embarrassing. Even if you believe that the vaxx is not toxic, it is beyond any doubt and dispute that it DOES NOT WORK. If it ever did, it most certainly no longer does, pfisser itself admitted that months ago. Their bivalent 8-mouse vaxx hasn’t changed that.
Brilliant. Agree entirely
Fishy can’t do anything other than endorse the bioweapon injections – the Narrative has to be adhered to otherwise he, like the previous two PMs, will be removed. He only got the job because when told to jump he asked ‘How high?’
Exactly this.
Comments presently allowed in DT article on this overwhelmingly supporting Andrew.No doubt will be disappeared soon .
Of course it was not anti semitic. The Chief Whip has effectively denied Tory MPs the right to question nthe most disastrous UK policy for decades, and the PM appointed the Chief Whip.
Peterson has been threatened with a struggle session for retraining or lose his license, interestingly recently he has started to speak out against the clot shots/mandates etc…
They’ve been after Peterson for a long time, starting with his standing up to the gender/trans agenda, the only purpose of which seems to be to harm vulnerable people, particularly kids.
Besides the opportunism of crying anti-semitism when it suits and ignoring real anti-semitism when that suits, whether or not a comparison can be made to the holocaust cannot be determined at this point.
It has been admitted that all of the vaxxes have led to the deaths of people. First that was denied, until that was no longer possible, so slowly a handful of deaths have been admitted and payments have been made. There have been precious few autopsies and a lot of denial, we have no idea how many people died directly due to the vaxx. It will, of course, ultimately come out that and how people died – cardiac events and cancers undoubtedly leading the way, followed by debilitating neurological and autoimmune diseases. When this has been fully established, as it will be, then we can start totting up numbers. Having administered this toxic garbage to several billion people worldwide, it is not a far stretch to say that over a number of years we may easily be looking at 6 million or more deaths, certainly if they keep pumping this carp into people. All due to governmental malfeasance. The comparison may well be more apt than it appears at first.
Most people on here will have seen the vid clip with the vid clip with Billy:
“Well if we do a good job with the vaccines we can reduce that figure by 10 maybe 15%.”
He was talking about the world population reaching 9 billion and reducing that figure. Let’s say 10% of 9 billion. That is a lot of people.
Given that all of this has been planned years in advance I wouldn’t bet on his “vaccines” not having that 10% mortality baked in. What we don’t know is the time-scale but my money would be on 2030.
It could be that if someone else stands as the Tory candidate in his constituency, he could be elected as an independent. Depends on how switched on the local residents are, but that seat could be a cause célèbre at the next GE, if it’s well organised.
Yes, a poor choice of words for a tweet but the swiftness and severity of the response suggests to me – and I say this as a Jew – that purported anti-semitism (which I do not see here by the way) is being used as a smokescreen when there are growing questions about the vaccines themselves. Debate on this issue should not be limited in any way. It is much too important.
An antisemitic statement would need to be about jews, methinks. And Only the Holocaust was worse than X certainly isn’t one.
“Debate on this issue should not be limited in any way. It is much too important.”
That’s all that has to be said. Everything about these poisonous injections should be up for debate.
I think what this boils down to, as alluded to here by Will, is that nobody had a counter-argument worth a carrot to levy against the nuts-and-bolts substance of Mr Bridgen’s arguments; the arguments condemning his speech as containing “misinformation” obviously hold no water. For example, it is merely stated and not backed up, that “the vaccines are the best protection we have against Covid” and that they have “saved millions of lives” (something that can never be demonstrated to be beyond reasonable doubt).
All they have left in their pitiful arsenal is a spurious, ad-hominem-style claim of antisemitism. Imagining the case that this guy really was a racist intent on trivializing the Holocaust, it STILL would not invalidate the substance of the arguments he put forward in his speech, backed up by real world data!
But he’s not even that… his allusion to the Holocaust was intended to illustrate how tragic a death toll has and potentially will continue to be caused by the vaccine roll-out, by invoking such a comparison with this tragic historical mass-genocide event – not intended to trivialize it!
Exactly right. You posted my thoughts.
The whole anti-semitic slur is just a farcical, transparent act of desperation to pin something, *anything*, on this MP gone rogue in order to shut him down. They are beyond pathetic in their tactics and showing themselves up to be the devious, democide-loving psychopaths they are. I’ve read tweets by MPs defending the jabs who also previously tweeted about testing positive for Covid despite being multi-jabbed, but all hail the precious Jabs of Doom anyways. Bloody idiotic zealots! Yes they are indeed pitiful because, much like Dr McCullough or Steve Kirsch, nobody will go head to head in an actual, intelligent debate because they have nothing, whereas the aforementioned and their fellow truth-seeking colleagues have all the evidence, the winning hand, and you really can’t do sh*t against that can you? So the establishment scumbags must resort to scraping the barrel-tactics in order to cancel a dissident outlier. Well I hope this now has the opposite effect and Andrew goes on to do interviews with anyone who will give him air time or column inches. May our A.B go viral! But where are Bridgen’s fellow dissenting MPs? The few that took part in that Parliamentary debate? Why aren’t they Tweeting their support of their colleague and admonishing these idiot colleagues who are slandering Bridgen? I sincerely hope we hear from them PDQ and they haven’t slunk into the shadows, content with someone else taking all the flack for what they were all essentially saying recently.
You would have to be pretty bloody illiterate to read his remarks as somehow containing Jew-hatred. We have fallen far in terms of anti-intellectualism but not this far. I suspect that this will be part of their undoing. And Andrew Bridgen is certainly becoming part of that..He has come clean about his conduct in the past and he refuses to behave like an imbecile.
“You would have to be pretty bloody illiterate to read his remarks as somehow containing Jew-hatred. “
I very much doubt anyone think he hates Jews. Possibly some people are genuinely offended by whatever he said, but most of those condemning it are just seizing on it as a convenient way to smear and silence him.
He’s over the target. The bastards have got the wind up ’em.
The situation is breaking we shouldn’t torture ourselves about the pace because we won’t have that issue for much longer, quite the contrary. When the general population gets the truth I have no idea where that will lead. Beause if you know how to measure energy, the enrgy that will come from this will just blow things apart, hence the slow and grudging acceptance by the media. And if you are unvaxxed you probably didn’t escape given the profile of these substances. Your life is likely also significantly shortened, you might’ve noticed it already in terms of cardiovascular health. It will certainly lead to a very intersting situation.
The very notion is completely absurd and involves several obvoious category errors. The point being that if this is the best that the enemy can throw then they are clearly on shaky ground and know themselves to be so. Trust me in three months time these people willl be searching for hideouts. The issue is worldwide there will be no safe havens.
The proposition is absurd and makes no sense. You could even argue that his remark is philo-semitic given that he is comparing an issue he cares about to the closest possible parallel he can come up with. Don’t let them shut down your thought processes an inch. That is the real game, essentially to drive us all to mush.
Bridgen could yet be our ‘Winston’
unless the current useless cycle of politics is broken before the next GE our children + the UK has no future
He needs a Rich Person to back him but to stay out of it
The formula to achieve political success very simple
Reform are not the solution
We elect these people, over 600 of them and we have one who might speak out. What does that tell you about the whole situation. And this wasn’t a sublte and clever plan it was obvious from the start. The engineering or remaing behind of the intelliglnt people is also part of the plan, admitted in the 1980s by a French scientist. This is no way to judge people. We carry everyone even if they are retarded because we know that yhe truth is greater than our priorities.
Anti-Semitism is just the initial smear to make people look away, deter them from looking any closer and making Bridgen a pariah.
He only cites and, if anything, he, or rather the source, compares the crime with Nagasaki, Stalin’s, Mao’s&co, the Vietnam war, the 500.000 children killed in Iraq that were ‘worth it’ or with Thalidomide&co, but certainly not with the Big H. and, if anything, he is not relativizing the Big H. thereby, but cementing it further on its pedestal.
But as the statement of Mr. Hart shows, they fully know that and are basically just using this to put into writing and action that any criticism of the holy gene-therapies is completely verboten.
This is, of course, a move now born out of sheer desperation and, as Berenson just remarked, solely made to shield everyone involved from any liability.
There is only one thing that is really wrong with Mr. Bridgen and his source’s statement: they might eventually be proven right, personally I think they will, but at the moment, the bigger and biggest crime since the Big H. is the deliberate sabotage of early Covid treatment options and cocktails on the basis of readily available cheap medicines like Ivermectin, HCQ&co.
That crime is enhanced further and really constitutes a hate crime, because it was done not just out of neglect, but primarily to obtain the EUA for the gene therapies.
And that hate crime was made even more heinous, when they also went for the children, solely to obtain liability protection for the fully approved product versions.
So, even if Mao&co might have killed more people as of yet, the viciousness is already larger and really unparalled since the Big H..
Speaking of Jews and the Holocaust, this 86 year old Jewish lady, originally from Ukraine, is apparently to be forcibly removed from her flat, sectioned in some mental hospital and Covid jabbed against her will, as ordered by a court in Germany. I’ve no idea if something is lost in translation from the original German article but it seems unclear what the hell is going on here. Perhaps any German ( RW, Jaybee? ) poster can shed some light or is it literally what it says here?
“The facts of the case seem unbelievable, because Germany has probably really learned nothing at all from history. Confidants of a Ukrainian-born composer, famous in her homeland, turned to Report24. A court in Stuttgart has decided on a year of forced confinement in a closed psychiatric ward. First, however, the old lady is to be “vaccinated against Covid-19” twice – also with the use of force. An exclusive video shows: She is neither insane nor a danger to herself or others. She is simply afraid for her life.”
https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/vaccination/tomorrow-she-will-be-taken-away-german-court-sentences-holocaust-survivor-85-to-forced-vaccination/
Oh my god!
I can’t watch mogwais video of the old Jewish lady ( it sounds too unreal ) but what could warrant such perverse treatment of her .
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said that he “completely condemn[ed] those types of comments in the strongest possible terms”.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak
a man without a brain
a man without a backbone
a man without a conscience
Stand in the Park
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Make friends & keep sane
Elms Field
Wokingham RG40 2FE
(near Everyman Cinema and play area)
We no longer have a democracy nor legal or human rights.
Andrew Bridgen is being attacked for expressing his political/philosophical beliefs – which is unlawful discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
To the extent it inhibits his freedom of expression in Parliament it is a breach of privilege. So much for the Mother of all Parliaments.
The House of Lords confirmed that freedom of speech is an English common law right [no need for ECHR or Human Rights Act].
It includes not merely the right to exercise free speech but the right of everyone to know.
Per Lord Steyn in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127.
However, the right to freedom of expression under the HRA is directly actionable. It is a personal right. [HRA s7].
Unfortunately it will not help my writing to my MP who attacked Andrew Bridgen publicly today.
Fascism rules.
And the only people standing up for democratic rights are a few on the right.
Sadly, Starmer’s mob believe in the rule of the mob to shut us all up.
And the Wiberals wobble and say nothing as democracy dies before our eyes.
Welcome to ChEngland. President Xi for our next Prime Minister. Hurrah!
Shutting people up was another feature of the Holocaust. Many were shut up permanently.
A few days ago on GB News Andrew Bridgen asked people who wanted to help to write to their MPs.
So pick your main points well – there are plenty here to choose from and write remembering to confirm you are a constituent.
And if you get no response write again. And again. And again.
If you want to cut the head off the serpent there is no doubt whatsoever that corruption in Whitehall enables all of this.
In the 1980s, Whitehall civil servants were first allowed to develop contacts to and ties with commerce and industry. It was predictable then that would lead to an increase in corruption and it has. It has had 40 years to develop to where it is now.
Direct experience of corrupt practices in Government agencies and some statutory bodies is that corruption can only take place at the grace and favour or direction of the most senior civil servants. Whilst I am sure they will all disagree with this view, to me it is the only consistent coherent and indeed inevitable explanation. Even our security services are tainted.
Thatcher’s favourite sitcom “Yes Minister” was in truth a comedy about Whitehall corruption in the proper sense of the word.
Most troubling is the silence about it from politicians – especially the majority of UK MPs – who never address it.
And of course the left are happy to have democracy undermined so keep silent to control us all when they get power.
A public example of the web of Whitehall corruption is the recent Greensill scandal. Greensill was reportedly first brought in by the cabinet secretary at the time. The government’s chief commercial officer began working as an adviser to Greensill Capital in 2015 – while still employed in the civil service. He was given official approval to do this. And then in 2016, after leaving office, David Cameron became an adviser to Greensill Capital. He was given share options reportedly worth tens of millions of pounds. Clearly, if it was not for the actions of the civil servants, Cameron would not have been exposed to a person and company which he presumably believed from his civil servants was beyond reproach. His subsequent actions were however still unwise.
There are many other examples the public never gets to learn about.
There is reason to believe manipulation from Whitehall is far more common than anyone realises and is across the board and includes at least several statutory bodies.
Former Whitehall civil servants appointed as executive day-to-day management to run some agencies and statutory bodies can oil the wheels of and ease the way for manipulation.
How is it the Statistics Authority is able to publish false statistics like the Covid death statistics? It is only possible if sanctioned at the highest levels in Whitehall in my view.
It is unlikely the UK is alone in this. A recent example is Dr Fauci of the USA, made public in Robert F Kennedy Jnr’s book The Real Anthony Fauci. It is now in a documentary film. The book had sold over 1.1 million copies by early last year and had 22,144 Amazon ratings [more now no doubt] giving it 4.8 out of 5 stars.
Why is the UK NHS costing 40% of GDP when historical scientific knowledge tells us our generations should be the healthiest to have trodden the earth?
And why are there so many chronic illnesses with only palliative treatments and not cures?
Thank you Whitehall.
On the Irreverend podcast in December Bridgen said words to the effect that he would be forced out of his position before the summer. I suspect someone dropped him hints