• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

“Put Climate Change and Diversity at Heart of School Curriculum,” Oxford and Cambridge Exam Board Tells Labour

by Dr Nicholas Tate
15 November 2024 1:31 PM

Secretary of State for Education Bridget Phillipson’s review of the school curriculum, announced, alarmingly to anyone in their right mind, as aiming at a “cutting-edge  curriculum” which is “modern”, “innovative” and focused on ‘equity’, is at the stage of seeking views in advance of issuing proposals. One of the documents the review Chair, Professor Becky Francis, is most likely to be looking at is a major report on 11-16 curriculum and assessment by the awarding body OCR, published in July and clearly hoping to shape the outcomes of the review.

Given that the “O” in OCR is Oxford University, my alma mater, and “C”  is Cambridge University, two institutions with a 800-plus year tradition of liberal education, and that “R” is the Royal Society of Arts founded in 1754, with Fellows like Marie Curie and Stephen Hawking as well as my humble self, I assumed, in turning belatedly to this report, that recommendations emerging from such a distinguished source would be anything but embarrassingly “cutting-edge”. Reassurance was confirmed when I saw that the Chair of the OCR review was Charles Clarke whom I had known as a sensible and moderate Labour Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Department of Education and Employment in 1998-99. What, I thought, could possibly go wrong?

My illusions were quickly shattered when early on in this 120-page report Clarke announced “that what is learned needs to be focused far more on the world as it now is and is going to be” than on “the past”, and that what matters are having “the skills and confidence to meet the challenges which [pupils] will face in the future”, instead of out-of-date stuff about “acquiring the canons of knowledge which have been built up over centuries”. In two sentences, without argument and seemingly without any awareness of what he was doing,  Clarke had casually tossed aside the whole rationale for a 2,500 year old tradition of liberal education based on the transmission of Plato’s “the good, the true and the beautiful” and Matthew Arnold’s “the best that has been thought and known”. If this is an augury of the intellectual level of our impending ‘national conversation’ on the school curriculum, heaven help us was my immediate thought.

Most of what follows about the curriculum that is seriously bad in this report can be traced back to these two sentences. The current curriculum is insufficiently focused on the contemporary world, the report says. English therefore needs to be more about “modern” forms of communication such as business and digital writing, film, TV and less about “heritage texts” that are shamefully non-contemporary and shockingly do not reflect issues that affect pupils today. Farewell therefore to the likes of Jane Austen and William Wordsworth, though Mary Shelley, one assumes, despite the deep disadvantage of being dead for a long time, would doubtless be recommended for survival thanks to her highly ‘contemporary’ bisexuality.   

The curriculum is also much too heavy, the report adds, especially in history, mathematics and science. Despite having been already slimmed down to vanishing point, history is singled out for particularly drastic surgery. But how it might be done and with what consequences for young people’s already limited cultural and political literacy – a key basis for any well-functioning democracy according to E. D. Hirsch – it does not say.   

Space in the curriculum needs to be cleared not just for “the contemporary”, but also in  anticipation of “the world [that] is going to be”. What might this involve, we ask, when we do not know the future and events like last week’s U.S. election result keep on surprising us? No need to worry, says OCR, we have the answer: climate change is “the biggest existential crisis of our age”, and “climate change education” must therefore be added to the allegedly overcrowded curriculum. Why this topic should qualify as the main candidate for entry to a slimmed down curriculum – by comparison with demography, mass migration, global poverty, geopolitical change or world peace – is nowhere explained.

Climate change education, the report says, will help pupils become a more “carbon literate” generation, acquire a more sustainable lifestyle and help their families and wider communities to do likewise, enabling them to challenge “unsustainable ways of thinking” in others (I can assure you, kids, this will make you really popular with neighbours, cattle farmers and the elderly). As a topic – by which they surely mean ‘ideology and way of life’ – climate change needs, they say, to be taught and assessed throughout the curriculum and included in GCSEs and vocational qualifications. “Ecotherapy”, an appendix implies en passant, might also help schools in their other new role of tackling what other pressure groups are calling the ‘mental health crisis’ affecting our country.

Most worryingly  the report calls on the Government  to show “leadership… to drive forward the implementation of climate change education with the absolute urgency it needs”. Some of us know exactly what this would mean: even more propaganda promoting a particular version of climate change and a highly contested plan as to how to respond to it, kindly supplied free of charge by the many philanthropically funded agencies linked to the ‘climate industrial complex’. Does OCR really think that Ed Miliband’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, or any other Government agency, would help sponsor materials that put forward the range of views that exist on these issues, or is it that OCR does not care about the fundamental Socratic principle of reaching out to truth via dialectic? Did it consider, in making these recommendations, Hannah Arendt’s widely discussed view that “the function of the school is… not to instruct [children] in the art of living” or encourage them to assume responsibilities and take up views prematurely on controversial issues? Does it not realise that what it is proposing looks as if it is crossing the dangerous line that separates education from indoctrination? One can only assume not.

The other recommendation for change across the curriculum is for more diversity and inclusion. The curriculum, it asserts, needs to be “relevant to modern Britain and encourage diversity”, the current version being insufficiently “inclusive” with texts used in English failing to “engage with students’ identities”. It needs to become a better reflection of the diversity of British society and of “the interconnected, globalised world in which we live”. As with climate change education the one thing the report never does is explain why this theme should permeate the curriculum rather than any other. It praises initiatives to increase the take-up of science subjects by girls and efforts to improve the representation of black, Asian and ethnically diverse artists in teaching materials, but at no point shows any recognition that the consistently most under-performing group in examinations is white working-class boys. As an English national awarding body there is also never any recognition that the most important thing it might be expected to do is to help the development of a sense of national identity. The emphasis is on encouraging diversity and children’s own cultural and ethnic identities, alongside our membership of a wider world, with virtually no recognition that those taking its examinations are inhabitants of England and citizens of the U.K.

The report has much elsewhere within it that is of value. Indeed, when writing about assessment – which is its main purpose – it is generally measured and thoughtful. Reducing the amount of assessment risks limiting what is studied in school and moving away from a reliance on timed examinations risks weakening the reliability of assessment, but OCR is well aware of the advantages and disadvantages at play here and has no wish to put itself out of business. It is a pity it did not confine itself to its main area of expertise.

What strikes me most about OCR’s preoccupation with climate change and diversity is the way this illustrates how isolated the small group of people who run most of our cultural institutions and public bodies – David Goodhart’s “Anywheres” and Matthew Goodwin’s “liberal elite class” – are from the rest of the population and what is happening outside their bubble. It is extraordinary that, faced with the massive problems being experienced in this and many other Western countries by what Amartya Sen has called “plurally monocultural” societies – the riots last summer, grooming gangs, the recent pogrom in Amsterdam – the plea should be to encourage diversity rather than promote unity. It is equally extraordinary that priority is given to groups deemed to be high up in the hierarchy of oppression through which the ‘elite liberal class’ sees the world – girls and ethnic minorities – rather than to those – white working class boys – who most urgently need attention. Behind this blindness lie assumptions about race and identity, the place of the nation state, our relationship with the past, the value of Western civilisation, the importance of knowledge and in the case of climate change the very notion of  a climate ‘crisis’, that, as this report shows, remain unexamined and uncriticised because everyone in the same bubble shares them and takes them for granted.

Some commentators, over-excited by levels of hostility to our new Labour Government and by the Trump victory in the USA, have recently been suggesting that ‘elite liberal’ ideology might at last have begun to have its comeuppance. This report shows it still alive and well this side of the pond, at least as far as schools are concerned.

Dr. Nicholas Tate was Chief Executive of the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (1994-7) and the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (1997-2000). He is the author of What is Education for? and The Conservative Case for Education.

Tags: Bridget PhillipsonCambridgeClimate AlarmismDiversity and InclusionExamsLabourNational CurriculumOCROxfordPropagandaWoke Gobbledegook

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Trump’s Nomination of RFK Jr. to Health Sends Moderna and Pfizer Shares Crashing

Next Post

Police Investigate Nine Year-Old for “Hate Incident” of Playground Name-Calling

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
davidcraig68
davidcraig68
5 months ago

It’s clear to me that Ed Miliband is a much more important scientist than Newton or Einstein and David Lammy is a much greater intellectual than Shakespeare or Orwell. So I fully support the complete destruction of anything resembling education in our schools and universities and its replacement by propagandising which someone like Goebbels would envy.

28
0
Tonka Rigger
Tonka Rigger
5 months ago
Reply to  davidcraig68

To quote one of my favourite YouTubers, “David Lammy has the IQ of a pull-along duck!” 🤣

15
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
5 months ago
Reply to  Tonka Rigger

Is it really as high as that? But then it might be a cunning shield of his actual agenda. Probably not the good of Britain!

1
0
Gezza England
Gezza England
5 months ago
Reply to  Tonka Rigger

But is of less use…

0
0
Douglas Brodie
Douglas Brodie
5 months ago
Reply to  davidcraig68

The Scottish education system used to be one of the best in the world but it has been going downhill for decades thanks to leftist teaching union influence, culminating in the SNP’s introduction of its “Curriculum for Excellence”, which it is anything but.

0
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
5 months ago

Perhaps they are worried that if they teach too much history then someone might learn from it

19
0
RW
RW
5 months ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

Teaching English and European history to people who are later supposed to accept their eternal white guilt because there was really no difference between the Empire and the mythological Nazis except that it was even worse would obviously be counterproductive.

If the goal is to create a suitably malleable mass of future voters, these must remain uneducated in anything beyond what we’d call political opinions they’re supposed to accept as dogmas which are beyond questioning.

4
0
Tonka Rigger
Tonka Rigger
5 months ago

What, MORE at the centre?!

2
0
Ardandearg
Ardandearg
5 months ago
Reply to  Tonka Rigger

It gives a whole new meaning to the line from Yeats: “Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold”. If you overstuff the centre, everything at the increasingly remote edges will fall off the cliff.

Last edited 5 months ago by Ardandearg
2
0
Arum
Arum
5 months ago
Reply to  Ardandearg

I’m not sure Sir Keir Starmer is full of passionate intensity

3
0
MajorMajor
MajorMajor
5 months ago

In a marxo-fascist system the primary purpose of the education system is compliance training.
Students must unquestioningly accept the latest dogma. Independent thinking should be discouraged and, if necessary, penalized.
Educating the slaves beyond the basics is unnecessary. Adolph’s idea for the sub-aryan slave races was the minimum necessary for them to be able to perform simple manual labour for the master race.

17
0
nige.oldfart
nige.oldfart
5 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Yep. Indoctrination not Education.

7
0
FerdIII
FerdIII
5 months ago
Reply to  nige.oldfart

Time to end nationalised, statism, state owned education.
We are not smarter than our forbears.
I remember taking an exit high school exam (North America) from 1898. I did not score that well. I doubt today most 17 yr olds would have a prayer passing it.
Education deflation + grade inflation.

8
0
RW
RW
5 months ago

So, the story is basically Labour guys from Oxford recommends that Labour government use the opportunity to replace the curriculum with the Labour party manifesto because that’s more relevant to the world of today than mathematics or knowing about (doubtlessly ‘terribly white’) English monarchs of the past.

That’s basically the same story as the Essex police report just for education: Left-wing politicians extending their tentacles into all areas of society because they’re seriously convinced that their political opinions are really universal truths while everything else is as untrue and as it is evil.

12
0
sskinner
sskinner
5 months ago

The Civil Service is mostly OxBridge and have done their damnedest to run the country irrespective of government and electoral wishes. The Russians have recruited their spies from Oxford and Cambridge.

“England is perhaps the only great country whose intellectuals are ashamed of their own nationality.”
George Orwell

8
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
5 months ago
Reply to  sskinner

The top maybe all Oxbridge but the rest seem to be dolts. WFH; 4 day week ; no progression except increments of salary. Why do there seem to be few capable CS?

1
0
Hardliner
Hardliner
5 months ago

Oxbridge is long lost, and can’t be trusted – they’d sell anything, especially to China.. “For those who are in, the things that are in are out”. JW, Cantab

2
0
Norfolk-Sceptic
Norfolk-Sceptic
5 months ago
Reply to  Hardliner

Didn’t Brown sell our Gold for Euros?

2
0
DontPanic
DontPanic
5 months ago

Yes teaching that the Earth is flat was also once part of the curriculum.

2
0
DontPanic
DontPanic
5 months ago

I guess they will also be blocking X (see article in this edition) in the UK and websites such as The Daily Sceptic because only the elite have the right to exchange ideas and think.

1
0
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
5 months ago

Education Endless Marxist Propaganda 

2
0
Judith pelham
Judith pelham
5 months ago

As a chemistry teacher 2000-2020 i was made to teach / indoctrinate global warming etc and carbon capture as fact for OCR exams. I was well known for my sceptisim in the science dept.

4
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
5 months ago
Reply to  Judith pelham

I wonder what method of “carbon” capture was taught? The energy equations must have been interesting or perhaps too difficult! The process will produce more emissions than it removes unless wind and solar are free and infinite. Never mind!

0
0
Myra
Myra
5 months ago

I wonder how many parents are thinking of home schooling or partnering up with other parents to do this.
If I had children of school going age, I would seriously consider it.

2
0
carter20
carter20
5 months ago

As a retired Headteacher, may I compliment you on a wonderful book. I am a ministerial appointment as a Director to CCEA, the N.Ireland curriculum and exam board. I have frequently bemoaned the absence of any professional debate around the topic of “What is education for” and this, again as you remark, means the latest government or public hobby horse becomes the central issue. Our children are not being taught to read and count yet at board level we are spending our time debating what is appropriate and what age is age appropriate for sex education. Our Dept of Education is pressing ahead despite CASS and despite me repeatedly contesting the “scientifically accurate ” mantra. I have regularly quoted your views!

5
0
RW
RW
5 months ago
Reply to  carter20

The answer to this question (Which age ...) is extremely simple: Sex is by definition private and hence, the government has absolutely no business in this area. Not at 5, not at 10 and not at 15, just never. That some half-ossified UN perverts believe differently would warrant paying more attention to their hobbies than they’d probably like instead of forcing children into not-so-covert sexting with adults.

0
0
carter20
carter20
5 months ago
Reply to  RW

and implemented via the inspection process. https://hughmccarthy.substack.com/p/brownstone-look-whos-in-the-classroom

0
0
carter20
carter20
5 months ago

and 70 + articles entitled “What are we doing to our children?” as I opposed government restrictions on children and, indeed, on all of us-based on the evidence and the data eg the youngest person to die OF Covid in N.Ireland was 38 , yet we closed schools, harmed children and no one is responsible.

3
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
5 months ago
Reply to  carter20

The harm from the useless lies we were fed daily on TV by the supposed “scientists” and clearly didn’t have a clue was a crime against humanity. Why there are no prosecutions is completely insane.

0
0
RTSC
RTSC
5 months ago

Basically, they’re planning to ditch education for concentrated brainwashing. We should be grateful that their intentions are so clear …. so those who have them can properly educate their children themselves.

2
0
The Real Engineer
The Real Engineer
5 months ago

They have broken Universities and now they have nearly broken schools with their hard left rubbish. Neither subject is important in the big picture. It is all a game to the fools.

1
0
Gezza England
Gezza England
5 months ago

Just when you thought our children couldn’t become less educated. along comes the Wendolene-lookalike with a further round of dumbing down.

0
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
5 months ago

If I had a school aged child I would pull him or her out of any British school so fast their little head would be spinning!. This country is going downhill so fast it is frightening.

0
0
carter20
carter20
5 months ago

and Dr Tate’s article in action. Rousseau. Implemented via the inspection process-this is how it is done.
https://hughmccarthy.substack.com/p/brownstone-look-whos-in-the-classroom

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

21

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

19

News Round-Up

27

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

18

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

26

News Round-Up

10 May 2025

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

Nature Paper Claims to Pin Liability for ‘Climate Damages’ on Oil Companies

9 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Oct   Dec »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences