I have just returned from a month touring New Zealand and Australia, talking to doctors and other medical professionals who have been badly impacted by their national and state governments’ appalling responses to COVID-19, their lockdown and mandatory-treatment policies and the impact of the vaccines. As part of this tour I spent a day in the Australian National Parliament talking to Senators and other politicians. This was all sponsored by generous donations to the Australian Medical Professionals Society (AMPS) and the New Zealand doctors’ Speak out for Science group (NZD-SOS).
The overwhelming response to my questions was how these top-down Covid-related policies and decisions had destroyed the careers of good and honourable doctors – doctors who’ve been punished for sensibly treating early Covid symptoms, for refusing vaccination on the grounds they had already been vaccinated, and finally for refusing to give vaccine booster jabs to people who had clearly had an adverse response to the first injections.
The scale of this dictatorial savagery I saw was beyond belief. Paul Collits’s article ‘Hunted and hounded – Australia’s dissenting doctors‘, published by TCW in December 2021, describes the tip of an iceberg.
In the U.K. we narrowly escaped mandatory vaccines in the NHS thanks to last-minute interventions with scientific advisors, though care workers did not, leading to significant losses in that already overstretched sector. But New Zealand and Australian health services have been devastated by the loss of doctors, nurses and paramedics who rightly refused to have a vaccine for a non-lethal disease. This has led to severe shortages, a huge loss to the profession, the evidence for which is overwhelming, the Sydney Morning Herald reporting almost 1,000 New South Wales healthcare workers sacked or quitting after refusing to be vaccinated.
This, the Australians have tried to correct, in true NHS style, by urgently recruiting staff from overseas, from not only the U.K. but also many countries that cannot possibly match the standards of care given by the thousands of doctors and paramedics excluded from working by the greatest piece of lethal ideology of my lifetime.
I was accompanied on this tour by Dr. Paul Marik, Chair of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance in the USA and the first doctor to successfully use ivermectin to treat Covid. He is also credited with giving an in-depth analysis of the early data that led to the approval of the Pfizer vaccine – his analysis showing that the published data tried to hide the fact that 42,000 people suffered SAEs (serious adverse events) and 1,220 people died. (How the FDA came to approve this genetic insert in spite of a warning that any drug associated with 50 or more deaths should be immediately withdrawn is simply mind-boggling.)
There is no doubt Australia and New Zealand suffered even more than we did in the U.K. They found themselves under tin-pot dictators like ‘Mad Dan’ Andrews, the former Premier of Victoria (now gone but not disgraced), dictators who competed with each other in the imposing of totalitarian measures. Without doubt the lockdowns imposed in New Zealand under Jacinda Ardern and in Victoria under Dan Andrews eclipsed even those the Scots suffered under Nicola Sturgeon.
I met doctors who had been punished for treating ill or symptomatic Covid patients with sensible drugs and measures (like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine) from early on, treatments for which the authorities refused approval despite the expert advocacy, from early 2021, of doctors such as the senior pathologist Dr. Robert Clancy.
What doctors were clearly required to do, and did do instead, was to follow guidelines similar to those in the U.K. This was to leave their patients untreated until extremely ill, when calling an ambulance became a necessity, and when patients were hospitalised to hasten death with inappropriate ventilation or midazolam or, even worse, FDA-approved remdesivir, which is extremely expensive and significantly increases the chance of dying with renal failure induced in survivors of Covid including those which the drug did not kill when given for the Covid symptoms! No wonder they dubbed it “Rundeathisnear“!
Worse, the many doctors I spoke to had to endure mandatory vaccines themselves, as this was the rule in all medically related professions, transport and hospitality and any occupation receiving monies from the Government.
During my tour I also spoke to a pilot who had refused the vaccines mandatory for Qantas pilots and lost his job as a result only to observe over 100 vaccinated pilots suffer career-destroying side-effects and associated dangerous situations on the flight deck (echoing concerns Virgin Australia pilots reported in 2022). He told me there had been a rise in crashes in single-seat fighters in several air forces, as reported here – something flagged as a particular problem for the USAF – and also a 1,700% rise in military pilots reporting medical incidents.
I also became aware of the former Qantas pilot Graham Hood (Hoodie), who has gone public on this issue and presented much of this data in his talks and podcasts, which you can access here.
While we were there we reviewed all the local data in New Zealand and Australia which showed there were no excess deaths from Covid and the epidemic of excess deaths occurred only following the vaccine rollout. The earliest excess deaths to emerge involved heart attacks, clots and strokes, first highlighted by Dr. Aseem Malhotra across mainstream media in the U.K. as vaccine-induced deaths in the U.K.
The fact so many such deaths occurred in the under-44s was even more disturbing, given that they had zero chance of dying from Covid; unless already seriously ill they should never have had the vaccine.
The Australian data confirmed my original observation made in my St. George’s melanoma clinic that the boosters are clearly involved with cancer relapse. Sadly, such relapse is no longer confined to melanoma but is being seen in all tumour types as tumours present later (i.e., being more aggressive and advanced) and in younger patients.
We reviewed all the scientific evidence that mRNA vaccines can theoretically induce cancer in at least 10 different ways. What this has revealed is that the mRNA vaccines do not as promised disappear in days but can integrate into cells and induce cancer. Indeed, I have just on my return spoken to someone in Australia who has identified the vaccine DNA, from a vaccine of six months ago, in a tumour mass removed at operation. This in addition to all the other early reports, including those by Ryan Cole, of identical observations.
Our joint opinion is that all mRNA vaccines must now be banned. Fortunately five Senators and the town council of Port Hedland, Western Australia, have all agreed with the presentation I sent them. The outcome, their call for the suspension of all Covid vaccines, made the trip extraordinarily worthwhile.
My remote video presentation was just part of a two-and-a-half-hour expert session on the potential health risks posed by synthetic DNA contamination, including the dangers of genomic integration, cancer, hereditary defects and immune-system disruption.
There is a consensus among all the doctors and scientists we met that there is a pressing need to work together to detoxify this spike poison in the vaccinated. Fortunately this may be possible, a significant reduction in damage being reported following treatment with a number of readily accessible natural products including vitD3, bromelain, low-dose naltrexone (LDN) and ivermectin. But we urgently need trials to measure circulating mRNA spike protein before and after treatment with these products singly and in combination.
If I were CMO I would order this tomorrow.
Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at St. George’s Hospital Medical School, London. This article was first published in TCW Defending Freedom.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Great work Professor
One thing puzzled me though: “In the U.K. we narrowly escaped mandatory vaccines in the NHS thanks to last-minute interventions with scientific advisors”.
Maybe the author has inside knowledge but I thought the decision was politically motivated- their hand was forced by the 100,000+ NHS workers who declined the “vaccines”. Sacking that many at a time when the NHS was supposedly “overwhelmed” was a step too far.
I don’t know what the situation was like in the UK. I live in Switzerland and during the pandemic I was also in Hungary quite a lot. Hungarians friends told me that it was the massive prevalence of fake certificates that ultimately made government policy a farce, which was why they were one of the first countries to end all measures. That and an upcoming election of course.
I did hear you could get fake certificates for a few hundred pounds
Yup – the going rate was £350 and what is more frightening was the fact that your medical records could be accessed and the jabberoony data inputted to them.
Yup I heard that people got reminders for follow up injections as if they’d had the first one
There was also a very public confrontation between Savij Jabber and a Senior Registrar (I think) where he took the MP down a few pegs. That guy was brilliant although I forget his name.
Well remembered though I can’t imagine it was crucial in the decision
Steve James
Yep, Steve James – looked him up to remind myself and this BBC Verify fact checking article popped up
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/59929638
Pretty lame attempt to discredit his view IMHO
Absolutely. That was the only reason they had to pull it.
Yet even now now many-and certainly not the MSM – thought to ask exactly why so many actual medics refused, and still refuse. By the way most also refuse the “Flu” jab.
Virtually all none front line employees, roughly 55% of the NHS actual hospital staff, got jabbed which distorts the true figures.
Thanks for this article. But I think we shouldn’t call the frankenjabs “vaccines”. At best they are only treatments. Our governments wanted these treatments to be called “vaccines” in order to deceive us more effectively. Thus, calling the frankenjabs “vaccines” serves only to strengthen the enemy (i.e. our governments).
The question that now needs to be answered is: what is in the frankenjabs that our enemy governments were so desperate for us to take?
Indeed
The word is understood by most people to mean that once you have had one then you won’t suffer from what you have been vaccinated against and you won’t pass it on. Neither of those things are true for the “Covid vaccines”.
I’m no medical expert but from the research I’ve read so far on the history of vaccines and their development, the data suggests that most vaccines are worthless and toxic. Dissolving Illusions and Turtles All the Way Down will give you a better insight into these toxic products and the questionable science behind vaccination.
Quite possibly
Indeed, when pushed into a corner, covid apologists will often talk about polio and smallpox and how these were “totally eradicated” bit are now “coming back” (which seems to me a contradiction). What they won’t admit is that so much else has changed since Victorian times, including hygiene and housing cleaner drinking water and better overall medical care, especially for the poor. It is rather disingenuous to pretend all of this had no effect on child mortality and chalk it all up to their vaccines.
Yes things like Small Pox were greatly reduced before they introduced the vaccines.
Hence in the 1800s they had the first Anti-Vaxx movements. If they were so good, why the need for movements in the first place.
Both correct. In recent years – before the advent of Covid-19 – the definition of “vaccine” has been modified, but without explaining why to most of us. It seems to me that this has had a couple of major effects. One being exploiting the opportunity created by the existing belief that the purpose of “vaccination” was to prevent an illness of whatever kind. But the other is that there has long been a difference between the development of a “vaccine” compared with some other drug to be used as a treatment. Guess which one takes longer and costs the pharmaceutical companies a lot more. Then there is the use Emergency Use Authorization (on the grounds that there is no alternative), and you can see which way the financial wind is blowing.
So, at the end of the day, labelling a drug that is actually some sort of symptoms mitigation drug as a “vaccine” (but not having the capability of actually preventing an infection), was beneficial to the trade. And with some politicians it was like offering a carrot to a horse.
Evidence from the Cleveland Clinic study shows that illness incidence is directly proportional to number of mRNA injections.
The evidence I’ve read about points to “effectiveness” in improving population health to be negative
I remember reading something from a Dutch medical researcher saying that in general they don’t check impact on all cause mortality between vaccinated and control groups – shocking (or maybe not…)
Some say it was no so much what was in the jabs, but the jabs the first step in bringing the digital ID.
Amazing work Mr. Dalgleish. I have no idea how you are still employed. You need a knighthood for all you’ve done. Not from this stinking globalist regime though.
Hopefully the collective voices of leading experts like you are beginning to spread the normally dormant virus of critical thinking.
One of my good friends had a runaway turbo cancer that killed him at 51, I suppose it happens but he was jabbed to the hilt. I suspect a late diagnosis and mrna boosters under the jab didn’t help.
This will be my last post on DS, getting sick of factual posts about our PM being censored, this isn’t the guardian BBC etc, I thought free speech was valued apparently not. Good luck to the excellent ppl who post below the line, a great group of ppl. I might pop in and read yr comments now and then.
Can you ‘allude to’ what you are being censored for?
Excellent article and I expect the hope of eradicating the toxic spike protein from people’s bodies a very welcome piece of news for the vaccinated.
If doctors need to follow policy and are no longer allowed to do what is best for their patients on a case by case basis, basically the medical profession is dead. Might a well replace them by AI drones.
In the our contemporary marxo-fascist states the citizen is being deprived of the right to determine what is best for him/her. Governments are now increasing behaving as though they own our bodies, and that they have the right to determine what medicines we should take – by force if necessary.
Or even if you smoke! I blame the seatbelt laws introduced in the UK in the 70s in I remember correctly.
Been like that for at leat 10 years.
And it’s getting worse.
They simply do whatever the protocol says
Which usually means which particular pharma product they should prescribe.
Doctors have to practise defensive medicine which means do what the computer says.
But where were the sensible voices at the time? Where were the GPs saying that their surgeries were filled with the normal number of patients suffering from the normal number of illnesses? What is COVID-19 supposed to be – what sort of disease, with what set of specific symptoms not appearing with any other normal illness (such as the common cold)? Where were the doctors pointing out that no medication can possibly be considered safe without year-long tests in advance, let alone a so-called ‘vaccine’, which would normally require 10 to 15 years of development and test. Where were the doctors who knew of Thalidomide, a clear case of a disastrous, insufficiently tested medication? Where were the complaints from the hospital doctors and nurses who were left with empty wards because there clearly was no pandemic? Where were the complaints at the ridiculous idea that face masks somehow protect against catching a cold? Where was medical common sense?
There were a few who spoke out but their colleagues did not really object when they were castigated or excluded from work by the medical authorities – there was no massive labour action in reaction to authorities clearly acting irregularly.
Here is a short video directly linking the ‘vaccines’ to death: https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1822527685001970022.
This is the greatest crime in human history. Where were the doctors and nurses at the time, what were they doing?
On Five Live BBC I just heard two Drs interviewed (at least i think one was a Dr) and he was talking about gargling saline for your throat if you have a cold, you should work if you can because time off coset the economy, and just listen to your body. I thought in 2020 we just had to listen to Chriss Whitty! He also mentioned Vit D3 and recommends it in Winter. Where was voices like that in 2020 on the BBC….Censored! I recall Parliament asking Hancock about vitamins in relation to Covid and he brushed aside any suggestions.
He actually denied that there had been any study about vitamin D if memory serves. There had indeed been one.
I think maybe part of the cause is that doctors are selected for obedience. In medical training there is a lot of hierarchical thinking with junior and trainee doctors in hospitals basically being required to be the extended arm of their seniors, with critical thinking not being cultivated. This probably starts even earlier, in schools, where only candidates achieving top grades are even considered for admission into medical school. The best road to the highest grades is through slavish obedience to teachers. This means that doctors are systematically selected for conformity rather than original thinking or challenging the status quo.
Sadly Professor, you are fighting a losing battle. Moderna has signed agreements with the UK, Australian and Canadian governments to set up mRNA vaccine manufacturing plants in those countries. The new Norovirus supposed ‘vaccine’ about to be tested in the UK is an mRNA vaccine. Our political rulers see mRNA vaccines as the future as they allow ‘vaccines’ to be developed quickly. So there are huge political and economic pressures to push mRNA vaccines on us while hiding the negative effects of these products.
I would never entertain them as rulers, more like parasites or Globalists.
You can say the same with net zero. We don’t have to take what they’re forcing at us. I may not win but I plan to be thoroughly ungovernable on both these subjects. I hope others do likewise.
Two queries on this. Was Dr Paul Marik really the first person to successfully use ivermectin to treat Covid? I heard about its success from a doctor in the Dominican Republic very early on, probably Summer 2020. And why would you vaccinate those seriously ill instead of using ivermectin or HCQ?
Because the pharma mob needed to recoup on their investments.
Well done Angus! Where are the Covid authoritarians now?