• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

British Censorship Group Linked to Starmer and Kamala Harris Plots to “Kill Musk’s Twitter”, Leaked Documents Show

by Will Jones
23 October 2024 9:00 AM

Leaked documents from the Centre for Countering Digital Hate – the censorship outfit founded by Keir Starmer’s new Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney – show the group plans to “kill Musk’s Twitter” while strengthening ties with the Democrats. Paul D. Thacker and Matt Taibbi have the story in the DisInformation Chronicle.

In an explosive leak with ramifications for the upcoming U.S. Presidential election, internal documents from the Centre for Countering Digital Hate — whose founder is British political operative Morgan McSweeney, now advising the Kamala Harris campaign — show the group plans in writing to “kill Musk’s Twitter” while strengthening ties with the Biden/Harris administration and Democrats like Senator Amy Klobuchar, who has introduced multiple bills to regulate online “misinformation”.

KILL, KILL, KILL: No matter what else the CCDH talks about, “Kill Musk’s Twitter” is its first item of business

Senator Klobuchar’s office did not respond to request for comment.

The documents obtained by the DisInformation Chronicle and Racket show CCDH’s hyperfocus on Musk — “Kill Musk’s Twitter” is the first item in the template of its monthly agenda notes dating back to the early months of this year.

The Centre for Countering Digital Hate is the anti-disinformation activist ally of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, and a messaging vehicle for Labour’s neoliberal think tank, Labour Together. Both the CCDH and Labour Together were founded by Morgan McSweeney, a Svengali credited with piloting Starmer’s rise to Downing Street, much as Karl Rove is credited with guiding George W. Bush to the White House.

The CCDH documents carry particular importance because McSweeney’s Labour Together political operatives have been teaching election strategy to Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, leading Politico to call Labour and the Democrats “sister parties”. CCDH’s focus on “Kill Musk’s Twitter” also adds to legal questions about the nonprofit’s tax-exempt status as a 501(c)(3) organisation.

According to the IRS, CCDH could lose its special tax status if “a substantial part of its activities is attempting to influence legislation”. Yet, CCDH’s third item on its annual priority list is “Trigger EU and U.K. regulatory action” and the group previously employed the firm Lot 16 to lobby congressional offices on “misinformation” in Washington.

Both the DisInformation Chronicle and Racket have sent multiple, extensive questions to CCDH’s current CEO Imran Ahmed, another British political operative tied to McSweeney’s Labour Together. Despite repeated requests for comment, Ahmed has refused to respond.

In the last two months, the Washington Post and Politico, among others, have run a series of features about British advisors from Labour Together rescuing the distressed political damsel that is the Harris/Walz campaign. Politico casts McSweeney as the “election mastermind” who first helped Keir Starmer defeat Leftist Jeremy Corbyn to become the head of Labour, all the way to Starmer’s “landslide” win over Conservatives to become Prime Minister this past July, implying that McSweeney and his team can perform a similar miracle for Harris.

McSweeney is an ascendant figure, having just been promoted to Starmer’s Chief of Staff in something of a palace coup after the abrupt resignation of longtime Labour fixture [sic] Sue Gray. McSweeney is lionised, not just for a Carville-style Rightward tilt within the party, but for mastery of fundraising and dark money, having reportedly pulled a host of new wealthy donors to Labour in the last two years.

After 25 years of the “special relationship” being essentially “one-way traffic”, with Washington politicos advising the Brits, the Democrats “now believe they actually have something to learn from Labour”, as Politico explained. Democrats will supposedly learn from Labour’s tactical brilliance. 

Worth reading in full.

“Tactical brilliance” that convinced just 20% of eligible voters to cast their ballots for the party, gaining a paltry 33.8% vote share. I suppose it’s all relative. If the Democrat leadership can’t understand that Starmer only won because the Right was divided and the Tories utterly discredited then it seems they really do have a lot to learn – though not from Labour, obviously.

Stop Press: Musk, naturally, has declared war on CCDH and its donors, calling it illegal election interference. (The Telegraph has the story.) Popcorn time.

This is war https://t.co/tesncwEoXE

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 22, 2024
Tags: CensorshipCentre for Countering Digital HateElon MuskKamala HarrisKeir StarmerLabourMorgan McSweeneyTwitterX

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

2023’s ‘Record Temperatures’ Were Not Driven by CO2 Emissions, New Science Paper Finds

Next Post

Does the Kaba Case Reflect “Deeply Rooted Patterns of Racial Disproportionality”?

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

47 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
THE REAL NORMAL PODCAST
THE REAL NORMAL PODCAST
2 years ago

This, dear friends, is the next battleground.

Remember it’s people like you who spread the word of the covid madness. The crazy lockdowns. The fact masks don’t work. The fact Covid is age stratifying and goes after fatties.

Now you need to bring to the dinner table the FACTS on climate change. Don’t let your greeny nephew at 6th form shout you down.

Get your facts straight..

Get your armour on…

Get ready foor the fight!
–
–
–
If you guys want to hear our latest podcast, then check it out and subscribe below:
Ep. 51 BANNED FROM TWITTER (Find out why)

We’ve been banned from Twitter for a week…find out why! Plus we talk Canada and Justin Trudeau, your first ‘Listener Rant’, Climate change madness, University PHD’s gone mad, Scotland’s gone crazy, The return of the Big Breakfast and MUCH MORE!
https://therealnormalpodcast.buzzsprout.com/1268768/11142910-ep-51-banned-from-twitter-find-out-why

Logo beer faces.jpg
119
-4
Bill Hickling
Bill Hickling
2 years ago
Reply to  THE REAL NORMAL PODCAST

I love your podcast guys.

14
0
THE REAL NORMAL PODCAST
THE REAL NORMAL PODCAST
2 years ago
Reply to  Bill Hickling

Thanks Bill. Should have recorded on Saturday morning but Syfret was at a wedding. Next episode out next Tuesday!

5
0
wokeman
wokeman
2 years ago

The notion that earth’s climate is dictated by 0.04% of it’s atmosphere which is co2, of which human emissions are a tiny fraction of the 0.04% has to be the most preposterous idea even inflicted. Marxists like Monbiot use the fear mongering to further push their hard left agenda, supposedly conservative governments then do their bidding banning cars and abolishing choice in the energy market. We need to get back burning coal ASAP!

244
-1
THE REAL NORMAL PODCAST
THE REAL NORMAL PODCAST
2 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

Spot on!

76
-3
Dr G
Dr G
2 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

To paraphrase Prof Ian Plumber (a geologist), in order to blame climate change on the 3 percent of CO2 emissions caused by human activity, we also need to explain why the 97 percent CO2 release from natural processes are not responsible.

112
-1
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
2 years ago
Reply to  Dr G

Do you mean the Australian geology professor Ian Plimer? Autocorrecting keyboard?!!

8
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

There is at least 400 years of coal reserves beneath our feet. Add in the shale gas, natural gas, North Sea oil, top up with nuclear and we become exporters.

And yet we are expected to destroy ourselves by leaving all this in the ground.

101
0
JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

And now that other trace gas methane is being demonised to ban agriculture.

61
-1
Hugh
Hugh
2 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

Yes. The “Great Moonbat” (as the late, great Christopher Booker called him) featured on Mark Steyn’s GB News show (yesterday?) saying that meat and dairy farming needs to stop. I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised about the acceptance by many of the preposterous CO2 notion, after all, a surprising amount of people believe in homeopathy.

Just to put it into perspective, does anyone know the details of the extent of the current UK restrictions and taxes on coal production at the moment – and the value of goods we nonetheless import from the coal dependent PRC? Utter madness.

28
-2
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Hugh

“…a surprising amount of people believe in homeopathy.”

The pharmacological era only really took off about about 100 years ago and was pushed, and pushed by surprise, surprise, the Rockefellers. Within about twenty years from 1900 or so they managed to wipe out, certainly in the USA, the folk medicine developed over thousands of years. And now they have turned medicine against the people.

Homeopathy belongs, it is accumulated wisdom. Look where the test tube concoctions have brought us – Bioweapons.

28
-2
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
2 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

Can we use Monbiot as a firelighter?

1
0
DrDan
DrDan
2 years ago
Reply to  wokeman

This guy works through just what it would take to make the switch from current energy sources to renewables. While listening it becomes obvious that no one has bothered to do the calculations before. The scale of mining required to source copper, nickel, lithium etc is mind blowing (796) Assoc Prof Simon Michaux – The quantity of metals required to manufacture just one generation of… – YouTube

0
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
2 years ago

It must be infuriating for real scientists to watch the sponges lap up the words of the Climate Schoolgirl, a magnificent advertising Coup. Those who have spent a lifetime of indulgence are now insisting we must deliberately trash our own lives, trash all the advantages of the modern age which has actually saved billions from starvation. Net zero and returning us to the era of our ancestors is not the way to go.

167
0
pjar
pjar
2 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

As with most things, their demands that we renounce everything would hold more water if they lead the way…

82
0
JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  pjar

That’s for the peasants not for the kings.

26
0
wokeman
wokeman
2 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

Net zero is just Marxism in brides clothing, same result.

83
0
ebygum
ebygum
2 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

..you might enjoy this..
https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/andrew-bolt/obsessed-with-doom-greta-thunberg-has-gone-bust/video/126e6eb2bb418caa34bbfbf861cd7007
Sky News host Andrew Bolt says the Greta Thunberg cult has “gone bust”. 
“A mere child, full of rage, obsessed with doom, totally devoid of any practical solutions – but here she was lecturing the world on how to fuel their 21st century economies,” Mr Bolt said. 
“Thunberg is now a victim of her own success in scaring people into doing very, very stupid things that we’re now paying for.”

86
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
2 years ago
Reply to  ebygum

Will never forget UK politicians gaping in wonder when she stood berating them….

81
0
Alan M
Alan M
2 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

It amazed me when she made her “how dare you mortgage our future” speech last year that nobody in the audience responded along the lines of “Yes, how dare we increase life expectancy, reduce childhood mortality and raise the living standards of billions of people”

57
0
psychedelia smith
psychedelia smith
2 years ago

If George Monbiot were dried out, seasoned and stored properly, he could keep a family warm for a good week.

86
0
A Y M
A Y M
2 years ago
Reply to  psychedelia smith

Yes but the fumes would be unendurable.

81
0
A Y M
A Y M
2 years ago

Monbiot is a particularly vile element of the climate cultists. A useful idiot with typical extreme Marxist viewpoints garnered from his middle class roots in student activism; caviar Marxist.

Much like Tony Blair, he’s a weather vane on policies. If he supports it, you know it will be terrible.

Unfortunately, Guardianites think he’s amazing, kind of like those odd people who worship that toad James O’Brian on LBC.

The parallels with the Covid debate are amazing. Opposition to the globalist narratives will be shouted down by the moron Woke brigade, policies will be fatal to society especially those on the lower end, enrich the lizard people at the top, be supported by the MSM, secondary effects will be blamed on some other reason.

The end result, more crisis, more totalitarianism.

120
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

Spot on.

19
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
2 years ago
Reply to  A Y M

I’m not too sure how Monbiot manages to find time to work in between his appointments with his psychiatrist.

8
0
HicManemus
HicManemus
2 years ago

If friends query it…for example a friend (with young son at university) stated in a message to me that coral bleaching is a phenomenon of climate change. Instead of just ignoring this sort of thing, I now send back a polite email attaching a link to the recent Australian report here: https://www.aims.gov.au/monitoring-great-barrier-reef/gbr-condition-summary-2021-22 referencing the massive regrowth of corals on the Great Barrier Reef in recent years.

Here is some of what I say: “There are plenty of other factors, weather events such as El Nino for example, that have contributed to coral bleaching. It has even been shown that rat populations on islands (Chagos) can have a huge impact on the quality of coral reefs and their fish populations. Yet we have the hubris to think that we can control these things.
 
I reckon the corals will be around long after the human race has disappeared off the face of this planet. Look at Bikini Atoll for example. Bombed to hell in the 40s/50s and yet now has a thriving coral reef that really amazed scientists. https://www.livescience.com/2438-bikini-atoll-corals-recovering-atomic-blast.html ” (End quote)

This is the only way to get to these people. Facts in the face of religion. Thanks Toby for providing the facts to help us non-believers (climate deniers – what a rubbish term) fight back against these sadly misled folk. Monbiot is a side show and is more of a danger to himself than the rest of us but heaven help us if he ever gets into a position of power.

64
0
The old bat
The old bat
2 years ago
Reply to  HicManemus

I agree with you, but I get very tired of the little sighs, the averted eyes and the change of subject that often ensues – it’s like being treated as a child or someone with limited capacity.

52
0
stewart
stewart
2 years ago

I think climate change ideology is in a particularly febrile state because the pushers of the ideology have realised they can take advantage of the same drone-like idiots that served as the useful idiots of the corona virus panic.

They are the collectivists in our society, driven by a compulsion to tell others how they must live their lives, a compulsion they mask with claims that they only want what is best for everyone and that it can only be achieved if everyone pulls together.

The drones are like a machine that has been fired up and is running on a high gear, fueled by covid fear. And with the covid fuel dying out the climate fanatics are only too happy to take over the machine and feed it with climate catastrophe fear.

50
0
Uncle Monty
Uncle Monty
2 years ago

Carbon DIOXIDE (not that dirty black stuff ‘carbon’ as the Greenies would have it) is plant food. The more CO2 in our atmosphere, the more abundantly our planet’s flora will grow.
The poly-tunnels in Spain are pumped full of the stuff to increase yields of the tomatoes we import.
The basis for Net Zero is entirely Malthusian with the simple goal to to reduce the human population so that the elite predator class can enjoy the planet to themselves. AI and robotics have replaced manual labour so rapidly that the vast majority of humanity will no longer have a purposeful existence. Our fate will be that of the equine population when car and train usage became widespread, we are to be put out to pasture and discouraged from breeding.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2022/08/22/europes-population-halve-surging-house-prices-force-couples/

Last edited 2 years ago by Uncle Monty
49
0
JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Monty

Climies can’t speak in whole molecules.

14
0
stewart
stewart
2 years ago
Reply to  Uncle Monty

The opinion that the world is overpopulated and would be better off with fewer people is extremely common. Anyone can see it from their own conversations.

It would be delusional to think that amongst all those that believe that there are too many of us, there aren’t plenty who would act on the idea if they could.

And it would be wishful thinking to expect that amongst those that would act on it there aren’t any that actually can.

In short, it’s not only possible but extremely likely that there are those that are actively working towards depopulating the planet. The extent to which they can succeed or not is a different matter.

Not conspiracy theory, just plain logical deduction.

From there looking at how they would go about it is a small step. The “climate crisis”? Definitely a candidate.

27
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago

An excellent article.

Monobot? Not worth mentioning even in passing. Complete Nutter.

Last edited 2 years ago by huxleypiggles
29
0
jburns75
jburns75
2 years ago

Were Lysenko alive today, he wouldn’t dismiss statistics and the scientific method as tools of his enemies – he would take a social sciences course at some third-rate university where he would be coached in how to cherry pick data that supported his ideas; which statistical processing algorithms to use regardless of their validity, to give the appearance of credibility without any of the substance. Besides this, the parallels between the destruction and politicisation of science in Lysenkoism and the rise of the climate cult are so striking as to rightly be considered more as a repeat of history.

Political ideologues have always needed to spin their own ‘truth’ in the form of a narrative, in order to protect their fragile, simplistic answers from the sobering complexity of reality. The Soviet elites didn’t even need – or probably want – to understand Lysenko’s nonsense theory. All that mattered was that he told them what they wanted to hear – that human nature can be quickly and easily reshaped; that mankind has the power to command nature on a whim (a great way to stem incompetence-caused famine).

Of course, the climate cult haven’t yet been able to report academics who fail into line for execution or a trip to the gulag, though in the USSR, totalitarianism was already in full swing, whereas today it remains a firm goal for our eager Lysenkoists. It isn’t hard to imagine Extinction Rebellion activists in increasingly scuzzy (thanks to them) parts of Oxford and Bristol as the next boneheaded little pampered commissars following the Great Reset, enthusiastically denouncing traitors and dissenters. The purging of dissent in scientific journals and academia through bullying, insult, smear, gaslighting, insinuation leading to the loss of career for anyone unretired or without tenure who dares speak out or ask questions is just the same though. Even in the the case of tenure, who wants to be an honest professor if it means being labelled a pariah and branded ‘far right’ in a leftist world?

It’s heartening to see some stand up for the truth and for integrity as reported here. No doubt there are thousands more academics and scientists silently waiting in the wings who are starting to feel ‘climate science’ is nothing more than an ugly, hastily sewn together corpse of the scientific method, twitching on strings held by activists and billionaires (or a ‘cargo cult’ as Richard Feynman better put it). I hope it helps gives them the courage to investigate claims for themselves rather than rely on the groupthink of ‘consensus’ for safety, and allows them to sleep better at night knowing there is some integrity left in their field. Hopefully before the most successful civilisation in history is extinguished under the shadow of regressive totalitarianism, they might have the courage to stand up as heroes themselves.

Last edited 2 years ago by jburns75
27
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
2 years ago
Reply to  jburns75

Well said 👏👏

6
0
Stuart
Stuart
2 years ago

The Great Barrier Reef Declaration…sounds familiar

15
0
JXB
JXB
2 years ago

The climate zealots have refused ever to debate publicly anyone who challenges their assertions. Their first line is to discount anyone who isn’t a scientist or if a scientist not a climate scientist.

When confronted with a dissenting climate scientist, their excuse is that to debate them would give them and their opposing argument credibility and create doubt in the absolute certainty of ‘climate change’ being ‘real’.

So they are frightened of debate because they know they have no evidence to support their claims, and on the contrary, evidence refutes it.

But when Western Governments, international bodies, business interests and rich and powerful are backing them, they can get away with it. Just like the whole CoVid Fakedemic and vaccine menace.

36
0
AethelredTheReadier
AethelredTheReadier
2 years ago
Reply to  JXB

This avoiding serious challenging debate thing seems to be a pattern among certain types, especially the fanatics whose eyes burn with righteous zeal and who will shout you down again and again rather than sit quietly and talk about it. Sadly, I have a very good friend who just doesn’t want to even talk about the possibility that climate change might not be real. I’ve broached the subject a few times and he immediately gets all defensive. Not going there. Taboo subject etc. Greta Thunberg is a saint in his eyes with her ‘how dare you’ and ‘you have stolen my childhood’ rants at the UN among her highlights.

There was a meme I saw recently with all these very young children working in what were meant to be lithium mines. There were nine panels in total with a picture of child in eight of them, each armed with a shovel or a pickaxe, – they might have been mining lithium or maybe not, the point being that the ninth panel had Greta Thunberg sailing on a yacht and the caption read ‘Which of these children had their childhoods stolen?’ A powerful image especially if it was lithium, the raw material for the electric batteries that her crowd seem to be clamouring for.

Last edited 2 years ago by AethelredTheReadier
30
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
2 years ago
Reply to  JXB

“Climate Scientist” – someone who is not a scientist and who doesn’t understand climate. Someone who can spot a grant providing opportunity at 1,000 paces

11
0
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
2 years ago

Industrial Degeneration: Crippling Cost of Subsidised Wind & Solar Destroying Our Economic Future
https://stopthesethings.com/2022/08/23/industrial-degeneration-crippling-cost-of-subsidised-wind-solar-destroying-our-economic-future/
by stopthesethings 

Our leaders have destroyed so many lives, but we must never be defeated.  

 Yellow Boards By The Road  BUILD BACK FREEDOM ..Britain under occupation

Friday 26th August 11am to 12pm 
Yellow Boards  
Junction (A321) Marshall Rd 
& A30 London Rd, College Town, 
Camberley GU47 0FD

Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane 

Wokingham 
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD   

Bracknell  
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA

Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

12
-2
petrograde
petrograde
2 years ago

PLEASE download and read this incredibly concise analysis of how the climate works by a lifetime gas turbine designer, aeronautical engineer. These are the people who can actually work this stuff out because it’s fundamentally a thermodynamics problem – not a geology / oceanography / meterology problem.

Link:
https://gvigurs.wordpress.com/2019/04/28/the-emperors-new-climate/

With that in mind, thermodynamics problems are essentially expressed in terms of gas properties. So we first have to (“should”) as “what is this magical gas property that allows a gas to pass heat in one direction and not another and that defines a gas as a “greenhouse gas” ? It turns out to be “emissivity”.

But refer to Page 14 of that document (“Planetary Atmospheres”). If you read nothing else, just read page 14. It shows that, at thermal equilibrium, emissivity has no ZIP impact on the equilibrium temperture. This is why the climate is NOT warming because of Co2. Emissivity make make a small difference to the RATE at which the gas reaches that equilibrium temperature but its determines by the influx of solar radiation and the atmospheric density. Nothing to do with “greenhouse gases”.

See PAGE 14.

3
0
SimCS
SimCS
2 years ago

“climate science, the whore of politics.” about sums it up.

14
0
Welshp
Welshp
2 years ago

With science being completely and utterly trashed over the last 2.5 years by globalists shills and greed, it’s encouraging to hear real scientists starting to shout from the roof tops about this climate hoax. Hopefully, a win for common sense here, they will be able to restore the reputation of real scientists.

9
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago

“In the U.K., the spike in international gas prices, and an increasing reliance on unreliable renewables, means the consumer energy price cap could be raised to £6,000”

We should not let our feelings/beliefs about climate change interfere with rational judgement.

Solar and wind are cheaper than gas, currently vastly cheaper, so the more solar and wind we have, the less expensive gas we use. The less gas we use the more stable energy costs become.

Of course we still need gas as a backup to unreliable solar and wind, and we desperately need much larger gas storage facilities to even out price fluctuations and ensure continuity of supply.

2
0
allanplaskett
allanplaskett
2 years ago
Reply to  Anthony_Blighe

Un-reliables are not cheaper if the subsidies are subtracted.

4
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago
Reply to  allanplaskett

Real life example – I paid £7000 for my solar panels in 2014, there was no subsidy on the purchase price.

My panels generate 4,500 kWh/year. If they last 20 years, which is conservative given that there has been no drop in output so far, their lifetime generation will be 90,000 kWh.

£7,000 / 90,000 kWh = 7.8p per kWh.

Solar panels, inverters etc are now cheaper than they were eight years ago.

Mine is a 4kWp domestic system, obviously it would be cheaper per kWp to install a much larger system (economies of scale) on the ground (no scaffolding).

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

Sun-Dimming Quango has £800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow – and a CEO on £450k

8 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

27

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

19

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

18

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

26

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

13

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

Nature Paper Claims to Pin Liability for ‘Climate Damages’ on Oil Companies

9 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Sep   Nov »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences