For six months, the MHRA and other national regulators have been sitting on a Pfizer report about Covid vaccine safety. Worryingly, the abstract which I have just found online doesn’t look good at all:
- the vaccinated cohort have at least 23-40% higher risk of some heart-related conditions; and
- the risk is higher than in Pfizer’s previous report (i.e., it is increasing over time since vaccination).
The report in question is Pfizer’s report C4591021 ‘Interim Report 5’ dated March 12th 2024. It is a Post Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) of Pfizer’s Covid vaccine. In summary, national regulators routinely require pharmaceutical manufacturers to conduct PASS studies as a condition of authorisation of most new medicines. The regulators provide data to the manufacturer covering millions of patients registered in national healthcare systems. The manufacturer then conducts analysis to determine whether the medicine has increased the risk of specified health conditions.
I have previously written a couple of articles about Covid vaccine PASS studies. First, in October 2023, to raise awareness of the studies and the fact that most of them were not being published. Second, in January 2024, to report that I had obtained copies of PASS studies by Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca via a Freedom of Information request to the MHRA. In the second article I picked out three health conditions (arrhythmia, heart failure and acute coronary artery disease) from Pfizer’s ‘Interim Report 4’ where there was a higher incident rate in the vaccinated cohort.
Knowing that Pfizer had completed its ‘Interim Report 5’ in March 2024, in April I submitted FOI 24/075 to MHRA asking for a copy. MHRA applied a Section 22 Exemption: “information intended for future publication.” This seemed very odd given that it had sent me previous ones only three months before. However, helpfully, it stated that it “will be published in the fourth quarter of 2024”.
So in late August, I submitted another FOI (24/475) to check that this was still MHRA’s intention. Imagine my surprise when it backtracked: “We cannot confirm whether the Pfizer C4591021 Interim Study Report 5 prior to December 31st 2024 is still due to be published. We have contacted the company, who have informed us that the final report is due for submission at the end of 2024 and plans for publication will be decided at this point.” I read that as: “We’re worried about the results in Interim Report 5, so we’ve decided to wait for Pfizer’s Final Report before deciding if and when to publish either of them.”
Imagine my further surprise when I just found an abstract of Pfizer’s ‘Interim Report 5’ online. As I said at the start, it doesn’t look good. Here are the first six conditions mentioned in the abstract:
Now, a Hazard Ratio of 1.23 means that the condition is 23% more likely in the vaccinated cohort, and “CI” mean confidence interval, i.e., we can be 95% confident that the ‘true’ number lies between the following two numbers. So those data are extremely worrying. This is the manufacturer bearing out the numerous anecdotal reports of increasing heart issues since 2020 as well as various independent research reports.
Worse, those data are worse than the corresponding figures in Pfizer’s previous ‘Interim Report 4’. In other words, the risk appears to be increasing over time since Covid vaccination.
And by the way, none of the above can be attributed to Covid itself: the exposure to Covid will be broadly the same in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts, which comprise millions of individual patients.
That said, there are potential confounders. The abstract suggests two:
- that for any condition, the seriousness might vary within and between the cohorts; and
- ‘healthy vaccinee’ bias – the argument that vaccinated individuals are more likely to seek medical attention.
But that’s one reason why we need to see the whole Pfizer report – to see the whole dataset, results and argumentation which lead to Pfizer’s explanation about confounding.
Even more importantly, we need to see the whole report because the Hazard Ratio will vary by age: younger people are normally much less prone to heart-related conditions than older people. Imagine how surprised I will be if the Hazard Ratios in the full report for younger age groups are even worse than those in the abstract (which are averages across all age groups). Is MHRA sitting on information which actually confirms the many siren warnings that it was reckless for MHRA to authorise, and JCVI to recommend, Covid vaccination of younger people who were at extremely low risk from Covid when it was known at the time that the Covid vaccines didn’t stop transmission and there were no long term safety data?
In summary, if, as I suspect, MHRA is worried by the results in Pfizer’s ‘Interim Report 5’ then no wonder it is sitting on it.
One final thought. The Covid Inquiry Module 4 (Vaccine & Therapeutics) oral hearings are scheduled for January 14th-25th 2025. It would be a travesty if Pfizer’s ‘Interim Report 5’ and ‘Final Report’ were withheld from the inquiry. Perhaps one of the core participants or their legal representatives will request copies or question MHRA about the data at the oral hearings.
Until Nick retired a few years ago, he was a Senior Civil Servant in the Ministry of Defence responsible for the safety and effectiveness of ammunition used by the Armed Forces. He is co-author of the Perseus Group report on U.K. medicines regulator the MHRA.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
A good piece on some unintended consequences, or non-specific effects, of vaccines, positive and negative.
Get traditional, live ones only.
https://rudolphrigger.substack.com/p/pharmaceutical-carnage
I will never take another “vaccine.” Ever.
Nor me, HP, we must become our own doctors now.
Same here. I’ve always resisted medical interventions anyway and looked after my own health. I’ve not had many vaccines and I’ll never have another one.
A truly sad and depressing story. The fact that no compensation has yet been offered beggars belief.
There are people in this country who are still in positions of authority and are still pushing these poisons. Given what is now known these people are wholly complicit in wilfully harming the people of this nation. Actually, given what is known these people must now be determined to be guilty in many instances, of murder. Indeed there are some people who have pushed this dangerous injection programme no longer in positions of responsibility, that does not however absolve them of guilt.
Will any of us see justice?
Not unless we take back control.
We must always remember:
Never forget. Never forgive.
Sad story, and similar to several cases I have seen. I am unaware of any of my patients qualifying for government payments for their injuries.
And still I am unable to work in health unless double jabbed, or unable to visit my father in a care home without a RAT each time and mask.
And new laws will deregister me for even discussing the down side of the jabs or lockdown.
The response by our bureaucracy and politicians in the face of incontrovertible evidence is to double down even harder.
As many have commentated, be self-reliant and avoid doctors as much as possible.
Thank you firstly for providing the Australian perspective. Your second paragraph says it all and what a sad indictment of your profession that is.
Let’s remember those given damehoods for the AZ Vax development. I don’t recognise any benefit from this vaccine, but I know several people with injuries somewhat less severe than this case.
Do we think Dame Professor Sarah Gilbert, who co-developed the AZ vaccine, knew at the time of its roll-out that it was so dangerous? When she received a standing ovation as a guest in the Royal Box at Wimbledon in 2021, I thought her “embarrassment” was merely humility and shyness, but it might in retrospect have been shame or guilt. Any thoughts?
I had exactly the same thoughts Michael M.
Perhaps the development team should have spent more time on the design of their offering, if memory serves they made their decision over a very short period, days if not hours. How can there have been time to determine whether this design met basic safety requirements?
Absolutely she knew the risks: thrombocytopenia has long been associated with adenovirus viral vectors:
https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/109/7/2832/125650/Adenovirus-induced-thrombocytopenia-the-role-of
Look at the date on that: 2006
She’s a murderer & she knows it. I’d have topped myself in her position.
This poor guy.
I hope his health can improve some more over time and his quality of life can be regained somewhat. I feel absolutely sh*t for him. His only downfall was trusting the experts. Heads need to fecking roll for what these vile psychopaths have done to people. If they aren’t responsible for killing people they’re ensuring they are disabled for life. It makes me livid. Reading stories like this also makes me appreciate my own health more and I don’t think anyone will take the fact they’re able-bodied for granted after reading how Adrien and others have now been massively impacted, where even the mundane activities of daily living are a huge challenge.
A kindly, generous post Mogs.
I wonder if dame sarah giblet sleeps well at night knowing it was her snake oil that has killed and mamed so many that even the vaccine fanatics had to withdraw it before it became too obvious how dangerous it is. No more jabs for me, I just don’t trust these people any more.
To be fair on whatshername, I’m presuming she just developed the technologies – a legitimate activity whether the end product turns out to be fit for use or not.
The real villains are those responsible for monitoring the safety and whether it is fit to be put to general use. Stand up the MHRA and much of the medical profession. They’re the ones who shouldn’t be sleeping at night – and if not because of any guilt they probably don’t feel, for the retribution I hope they can see is coming their way.
I imagine the millions she made from the flotation of Vaccitech will help her sleep at night.
https://news.sky.com/story/astrazeneca-vaccine-co-inventors-float-on-us-market-is-a-blow-to-the-uk-but-its-not-all-bad-news-12269388
I note that the University of Oxford also had a financial interest in the ‘vaccine’. As the institution tasked with evaluating therapeutics such as Ivermectin, it looks like a potential conflict of interest to me.
I’d like to pick up Adrian Walker in my car and go round to Elliot Colburn’s (the pro-vaccine MP in the recent Vaccine Injury debate in Westminster) house and show him what a real vaccine injured person looks and acts like. Adrian’s life is ruined because he listened to people like Colburn and yet he, Colburn, still advocates and encourages people to get the ‘vaccine’. If possible I would get a busload of the vaccine injured and drop them off at parliament. This is a crime against humanity and someone must pay. Someone WILL pay and if one of the vaccination enablers is reading this, remember that we have long memories and we will not forget. We have all the evidence, which is increasing all the time and we WILL have our day in court.
My thoughts bang on.
Elliot Colburn is a pompous, ignorant little shit.
(And I make a rule of not posting anything on line that I wouldn’t say to their face.)
Another heart-rending story.
Couple of points:
His haematologist told him that one of the main reasons that he survived was because he was previously so fit and healthy.
Yeh, and another doctor worthy of the name knew that anyone in their 40s who was ‘fit and healthy’ didn’t need to go near that jab.
Adrian did the the ‘right thing’ – he had his AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination for the good of the nation.
I can’t let that pass. He did what he did presumably because he was told it was the right thing to do, ‘for the good of the nation’. But he, and tens of millions of others, were lied to. I hope to God there is a reckoning about this.
Most of all though, good luck Adrian, and all the others like him. It’s clear from this article that – unlike the criminals, monsters and nobodies responsible for doing this – he has immense courage. And it’s sometimes amazing where courage can get you.
And good luck VIBUK. doubtless you’ll have a load of shit thrown at you and obstacles put in your way, but the momentum and right is firmly with you.
So, not to sound all ‘click-baity’ but this is actually mind-blowing. This scientist and her team from around the world tested 2,300 vials of all the Covid jabs and what they found was just shocking, but if you’ve watched other videos on a similar theme you won’t be too surprised. So if you want to skip the parts on their credentials, how Pfizer made their formula in Jan 2020 in just a few hours and the actual listed ingredients in these shots then fast-forward to 45 mins, where she goes through her findings.
Just a few of the findings are; zero biological ingredients were detected, so no mRNA and no spike protein subunits. But many chemicals were found, so she therefore refers to them not as a biological weapon but as chemical weapons. Many toxic metals were found ( trillions of nanoparticles ) and hydrogel ( made by the Dept of Defense ) and graphene oxide among them. She explains how the hydrogel and polymers are used as nano-antennas and have magnetic properties and also are able to self-crystalize. Graphene oxide is magnetic and thermodynamic and does not break down in the body.
What is interesting is that she said ALL vials tested, regardless of manufacturer, has exactly the same ingredients just in different doses. The team found 35 different toxicity levels, ranging from mild to highly toxic. It is their consensus that these products will reduce recipients’ lifespans by 10-15 years. They found *no placebos*. It is her opinion that they were introduced on the global population as part of a depopulation agenda and thereafter for technocratic totalitarian control over the remainder of the population. She mentions there’s no such thing as shedding because there is no biological material within these 2,300 identical vials so it would be impossible. Fascinating stuff.
https://beforeitsnews.com/eu/2022/10/dr-poornima-waghs-team-test-ingredients-2305-vials-of-covid-19-injection-the-shocking-facts-2696815.html
My friend whose cancer was thought to be in remission, was partly paralysed a day after his 1st AZ jab. Then his cancer returned with a vengeance. Now he is dead.
His doctor never once considered it was a possible adverse reaction, so no yellow card. No way I can prove it, but I know.
It would help to have an analysis of the criteria used by triage teams to decide who got into hospital. If only a minority died, did the rest really need to be there?
The Government’s refusal to admit that the Covid jabs have and are causing immense harm is just one of their disgusting actions. One of many.
Only a tiny handful of MPs bothered to attend the recent “debate” about the Jab-Injured in Parliament.
They will thoroughly deserve the electoral annihilation they get in 2024.
Talk of electoral annihilation raises an important question – whether we still have a legitimate democracy in this country (and the wider western world, as well). Do we have a government “of the people, by the people and for the people”? Are MPs acting in good faith in the best interests of their constituents, or is something else driving them?
And, if we believe we no longer have a legitimate democracy, what should we (the People) do? For example, should we continue to pay taxes if the Government (as is very likely, I suggest) introduces bribes and punishments (carrots and sticks) to get people to sign up to digital IDs?
And should we, as individuals, continue to vote?
Any other thoughts?
To answer your question, NO we do not have a legitimate democracy nor do we have a government of the people for the people and no the MPs are not acting in good faith. There is no point in voting it doesn’t work – its been corrupted.