Some time ago, the so-called ‘Danish study’ swept through the digital underground. The authors showed that Pfizer’s Covid vaccines in Denmark had a suspicious safety profile: A few small batches, distributed early in the campaign, were associated with unacceptably high number of adverse events (almost one in 10 recipients reported an AE), while the later batches showed orders of magnitude less AEs. Even more fascinating than the study itself was the story how difficult it was to get it published.
We could not wait to repeat the study in the Czech Republic. We asked the State Institute for Drug Control (SUKL) for similar data. We reported the results in an article for the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. Our findings are even more disturbing than that of the Danish team.
From the start of the vaccination campaign until the beginning of summer 2023, the Czech SUKL received a total of 14,386 reports of suspected AEs for covid vaccines. This number far exceeds the number of AEs reported for all other drugs combined in normal years.
Incredibly, the SUKL did not bother to link the AE reports with the corresponding batch numbers for almost half of the reported AEs. Even in the case of death after a vaccine (216 reported cases), SUKL did not pair 117 of the deaths to a batch number. This is serious negligence, especially because information about batch numbers is readily available in another state-run database. Both these databases are easy to pair though the so-called “birth number” which is a compulsory state-provided citizen ID in the Czech Republic. What if all the 117 deaths for which the SUKL did not bother to trace the batch came from a single batch of vaccine? How would the SUKL recognise that this batch is a mortal threat to the Czech population and that it is necessary to pull it out urgently, which is its legal obligation?
The very fact that only 216 deaths after a Covid vaccine were reported is also interesting. We know from another government dataset that 1,688 people died in the Czech Republic within a week after a dose of one of the covid vaccines. We believe that death truly is an adverse event, and in the case of an experimental vaccine, all deaths that occurred within a week of the vaccine should have been reported to the SUKL. Even if all the 216 reported deaths occurred within a week of the vaccine (which we don’t know from the data), that would still be less than 13% of all cases. For less serious AEs, underreporting is likely to be much greater. This is a disturbing finding and a rare quantification of the elusive under-reporting factor.
A total of nine specific Pfizer batches appeared both in Denmark and Czech Republic. The AE counts for these batches correlate very well. Batches that had a lot of AEs in Denmark also had a lot of AEs in the Czech Republic, and vice versa. This significantly strengthens the hypothesis that individual batches really differ from each other in some genuine way, and that it is not just a fluctuation in reporting patterns.
The most interesting finding is the relationship between the size and type of the batch, the date of its release, and the number of reported AEs associated with this batch (see the figure below). Vaccines are divided into three panels. The top panel shows Pfizer products, the middle panel shows Moderna products, and the bottom panel shows all others. Each colored dot represents a single batch of vaccines. Individual vaccine types are color coded. The size of the dot shows the number of doses that the batch contained (the scale is logarithmic). The horizontal axis shows the date of release of the respective batch to the Czech market, and the vertical axis shows the number of AE reports per thousand doses in the batch. Note that the lower panel has a different scale on the vertical axis (shown in red) because the AstraZeneca products were really bad (they were also later quietly withdrawn from the market).
The most striking feature of the graph above is the dramatic decrease in the number of AE reports with the date of release. Batches that were released in spring 2021 showed a much higher number of AEs than batches released in 2022. In this sense, our findings correspond very well with the Danish study – the most problematic batches in Denmark were also the ones used at the beginning of the campaign.
What could be the reason for this disturbing difference among the batches?
- The high number of AEs in the spring of 2021 may be a result of vaccinating people during an ongoing epidemic, which used to be considered a bad idea before Covid. Moreover, the most vulnerable population was preferentially vaccinated at that time. However, this hypothesis is contradicted by the fact that during the booster campaign in the autumn wave of the epidemic (which also included the most vulnerable population), the number of AE reports did not increase.
- The batches from the spring of 2021 were used almost completely (because there was a shortage of vaccines then), while much of the later batches was left unused. So, maybe if we divided the number of AE reports by the number of doses used (instead of the number of doses contained in the batch), the differences would disappear. Unfortunately, we did not have this data. But this hypothesis is very improbable because the greater part of the miraculous decrease still takes place during the first half of 2021, when there was a shortage of vaccines, i.e. the batches were used almost entirely.
- Another possibility is a change in the willingness of people to report adverse events. But in this case, the effect is rather the opposite. While it was almost an act of civil disobedience to report an AE in the spring of 2021, later on – as the pressure to get everyone vaccinated increased – the motivation for people to report AEs rather increased. However, the graph above shows the opposite relationship.
- There remains the last possibility, which is the most disturbing of all. Perhaps the rush was such that the pharmaceutical companies did not have the production process completely mastered. We already know (from the testimony of USC Professor Phillip Buckhaults before the South Carolina Senate) that the technology of mRNA vaccine production changed fundamentally sometime between the registration studies and the start of mass production. The vaccine for which Pfizer received an EUA, and whose efficacy and safety is described in the registration study, is not produced by the same process as the vaccine that was injected into the arms of billions. It is therefore possible that the start of mass production by the new process was not well mastered, and the initial batches were simply not manufactured correctly. The explosion of AE reports in pharmacovigilance databases immediately after the start of the vaccination campaign may have caused minor ripples of panic and may have forced the companies to make some changes in the manufacturing process.
This last hypothesis is quite worrying because it would cast a shadow of doubt on the capabilities of regulators in many countries and – if ever proven correct – would have dramatic legal consequences for the vaccine manufacturers.
Tomas Fürst teaches applied mathematics at Palacky University, Czech Republic. His background is in mathematical modelling and Data Science. He is a co-founder of the Association of Microbiologists, Immunologists and Statisticians (SMIS, smis-lab.cz) which has been providing the Czech public with data-based and honest information about the coronavirus epidemic. He is also a co-founder of a ‘samizdat’ journal dZurnal (dzurnal.cz) which focuses on uncovering scientific misconduct in Czech science.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
If there’s any justice or such thing as an unrigged election in the U.S Trump will cruise into the White House, it’s surely a foregone conclusion, because if this ultimate DEI hire is who he’s now going up against then it’ll be a cake walk. The woman showed us all not just how insufferable she is, but her proven ineptitude as VP doesn’t exactly give even the most hardcore Leftards a whole lot of confidence. Also, this isn’t exactly going to be winning her any votes either;
”A reminder of why DEI Kamala polled at only 3% before dropping out in her previous Presidential campaign.
“Kamala Harris put over 1500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana.
“She blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so.
“She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the State of California.
“And she fought to keep a cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way.”
https://x.com/BillboardChris/status/1815142351154667579
The gap between the Don and Kamala is so wide that there is no credible way to cheat a win. Not that it will stop the Dems trying, but The Don should have enough, especially with Musk and others funding a legal presence in every counting location.
Unless they find an excuse to cancel the election. Something like a major war, Scamdemic ll or the inevitable financial crash.
When Kameltoe appears in public she’s either pissed or High on wacky baccy.
Or Colombian Marching Powder.
https://x.com/leokearse/status/1815288158478639429?s=48
This clip of Harris is even better than the above embedded. All 22 seconds of it. Seriously
When a candidate seeking election makes your skin crawl with embarrassment for them when they speak, they’re probably not the best person for the job… watching this my shin is crawling the equivalent of the Sandakan Death March.
“Labour goes to war on nail bars in fight against illegal immigration”
…and Turkish barbers, Labour. Turkish barbers…
One in three. And, regardless of the techniques used to identify untruthful answers, I believe this number is higher – anecdotally, I would say more like one in two. And this brings me to the debate about free speech and democratic ‘jokes’ in which the ‘joke’ is that they wished Trump had been killed. They’re not jokes. Anyone that thinks they are have seriously underestimated the unhinged hatred the left have for Trump and for the right-of-centre beliefs Trump voices. Trump is a figurehead for a set of beliefs that many people hold; in other words their hatred and wish for his death is also hatred and wish for death of millions of others.
If Trump had been killed the ‘jokers’ would show no embarrassment, no remorse, no regret. Quite the opposite – they would be genuinely pleased and celebrate. So, should these comments be seen as crass jokes or should they be seen as incitement? In a world where we have no common moral playlist which guides commonsense, we have to differentiate between reasonable free speech and unreasonable free speech. Incitement to assassinate a president doesn’t seem that reasonable to me. And, I’m afraid, we’re not going to win this culture war by always playing nicely; the left fight dirty, very dirty, it’s well past time we also smashed some bottles.
I suppose in the day, You would have probably found similar numbers of Labour voters feeling the same way about Margaret Thatcher. Certainly there was a palpable sense of indifference to the Brighton bombing. It seems to be the way that if you have a political ideology that everyone must ascribe to, in all its details, anyone who sharply goes against it will be viewed as an enemy to be destroyed.
I’m reminded of the celebrations of her death…
Coming from the Notts coal mining area I realise the people hated Thatcher personally for what she did to the miners, not democracy itself!
The Dematwats hate democracy, If it doesn’t allow them to win, they would argee to any apponent being ‘removed’ by any means nessasary.
I think that’s a critically important distinction.
You’re playing into their hands if you think bottle-smashing is a good idea. As you observe, Trump represents real, decent people. We should be very careful not to descend into the madness of the left but call it out and laugh at them. Ordinary people still mesmerised by their nonsense ideology don’t want civil war and will wake up eventually.
And where has playing nicely got us? Playing into their hands is exactly what we’ve been doing for the last decade or two. Whilst we still insist on fighting under the Queensbury Rules, they’re biting ears and gouging eyes. And this has been the case for so long that we’re at the cliff edge of complete and total defeat with no ladder to climb back. Every actions needs an appropriate reaction, and that reaction has to be considered within the context of circumstances and environment of the action. It’s not where I want to be, believe me, but I’ve become 100% certain that appealing to their sense of decency will never work; for the simple reason that they have a polar opposite belief of what decency is. By stubbornly sticking to our sense of right and wrong, and doing nothing else to combat the hysteria, we empower these people and allow them to grow.
I always want to fight fairly, but if someone wants to fight a different way then I’m happy to oblige. After being imprisoned with socialist chains, I’m not going to look my kids in the eye and say ‘Pity. Well, I was always polite”.
Civil war would suit the Davos Deviants admirably.
Many of Trump’s opponents accuse him of being a threat to democracy, yet democracy thrived throughout his previous presidency.
The real threat to true democracy has come through the actions of Biden’s administration, especially with green and DEI legislation and the failure to control the southern border
Also, use of censorship, propaganda and the power of the state (FBI, CIA, DOJ) to intimidate political opponents and their supporters.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-says-it-wont-accept-ultimatum-type-invitations-second-ukraine-peace-2024-07-18/
‘They prepared for the ‘deal of the century’ for quite a long time, but it did not end in anything, and under Biden, on the contrary, a colossal historical tragedy happened’
Maria Zakharova
What’s really going on?
Trump’s plan for Ukraine is simple.
Freeze the conflict with an immediate ceasefire.
Haggle about how much of Eastern Ukraine Russia keeps.
Haggle over Ukraine/Georgia neutrality
His levers?
On Russia: Massive support for Ukraine particularly air power, air defence and de-restricted use of long range weapon systems, build up of Ukrainian defence industry.
On Ukraine: Withdrawal of U.S. financial and military support.
On Europe: U.S. withdrawal of all land forces from Europe.
So, essentially, Minsk 3 with bells on.
Three problems:
A frozen conflict requires a buffer zone patrolled by peacekeeping forces. The buffer zone will be one thousand kilometres in length. The green line in Cyprus is 180 km in length and requires two brigades to police it. Five divisions, essentially, two army corps will be required, forward located to police a Ukraine/Russia buffer zone. Where will that Army come from? Russia will not accept a NATO Army on its border. Ukraine will insist on at least one division from the United Kingdom, which does not possess such a deployable formation.
Ukraine may accept the loss of Crimea, packaged as some kind of ‘special status free zone’, but Atesh local resistance is active and unlikely to cease activity in such a scenario, pushing for Crimean nationhood; likewise the rest of Eastern Ukraine. Russian (Army) ‘little green men’ are likely to once more deploy.
The Minsk agreements resulted in a second Russian invasion.
The reality is that the Ukraine situation cannot finish as Black or White. It has to end as some shade of grey. Enough lives have been lost trying to draw lines on the map. It has to stop…
It had stopped 1994-2014.
Minsk 1 and 2 were shades of grey, resulting in a further invasion in 2022.
Any endgame will, realistically, require a policed buffer zone in order for Ukraine to have any confidence in a new settlement..
Who will police it?
Serious question.
There wasn’t an invasion in 2014, although there was a coup, initiated and supported by the USA.
What resulted in a “further” invasion in 2022 was 2 things – shelling and persecution of ethnic Russians living in eastern Ukraine for 7-8 years in massive contravention of the Minsk Accords; and continuing insistence by the USA that Ukraine would join NATO, contrary to Russia’s legitimate security concerns.
‘“In order to block and disarm 20,000 well-armed [Ukrainian soldiers], you need a specific set of personnel. And not just in numbers, but with skill. We needed specialists who know how to do it,” Putin said in the documentary.
“That’s why I gave orders to the Defense Ministry — why hide it? — to deploy special forces of the GRU (military intelligence) as well as marines and commandos there under the guise of reinforcing security for our military facilities in Crimea,”
Putin, March 2015
‘Strelkov was quoted as saying. However, by early August, Russian servicemen supposedly on “vacation” from the army had begun to arrive, he said.
According to Strelkov, the assault on the Black Sea town of Mariupol in September, which prompted concerns in Ukraine and the West that Russia has entered the conflict on a large scale, was conducted mostly by the Russian military “vacationers.”
This war has thus become a testing ground for the Kremlin in creating new tools of population management. It is developing a new type of biopolitical imperialism to manage the crisis in social reproduction.
‘And, if you believe the forecasts and the estimates are based on actual work, the real work of people who understand this, who have devoted their whole lives to this, in 15 years, there may be 22 million fewer Russians. I ask you to think about this figure: a seventh of the country’s population. If the current trend continues, the nation’s survival will be in jeopardy’ (Putin 2000)
As a result, the Kremlin accumulates cheap labor power, appropriating Ukrainian state investment in the birth, care, and education of its former citizens; their reproductive labor; and even their personal relations that allow them to survive in Russia without state support. This — together with the appropriation of companies and the devastation of territories now to be redeveloped — is a typical process of imperialist accumulation by dispossession.
Failure by the West and Ukraine to honour the last Minsk agreement and Kiev agression against Donbas resulted in Russia inervening to protect Donbas residents.
The fourth problem is that Russia has little incentive to freeze anything, unless of course you believe Western disinformation.
“English schools to phase out ‘cruel’ behaviour rules as Labour plans major education changes”
First of all, the ‘consequences’ systems run by many schools with increasing isolation from school life for wrong-doers clearly doesn’t work. It especially doesn’t work for boys. Boys and girls respond differently to different punishments. Sitting quietly for 30 minutes personal reflection, isn’t going to do the trick.
Secondly, and I’ve noticed this with all leftie thinking, why do all their proposals appear to hurt the majority in favouring often tiny minorities. If you have a disruptive child in class, why wouldn’t you want them kicked out so the 29 who want to learn and behave can do so.
Which brings us to…why are we still trying to force all kids down academic routes, when they could be electricians, plumbers and cooks. A lot of bad behaviour is down to boredom. Teach them to read and write, then gather the bright ones together to polish as fine gemstones. The rest, teach them something practical they can enjoy and earn a living doing.
Watching the programme about Daley Thompson it struck me how he said his school for difficult children did sports every single day. And that’s what disruptive children need. Use up energy, channel it into a competitive discipline or teamwork. Schools should do more sports…if their playing field hasn’t been built on.
“Third of Democrats wish Donald Trump had been killed”
So they agree with Putins answer to democracy then?
I thought the Dematwats were the protectors of democracy?
“Moderna was more deadly than Pfizer”
That’s like saying strychnine is more deadly than arsenic! F@#k all of them!
Damned with faint praise.
I don’t like Harris – she just seems to be one of life’s idiots to me – but am I the only one that doesn’t think this is as comical as it’s being made out to be? I mean, it’s not exactly cryptic – by understanding the past, I see the potential for a better future. Maybe I’m missing something?
How long before the female agent “shielding” Trump accuses him of groping her?
Is it me or were the women in the detail chosen for the thickness of their torso..?
And short legs.
“Police hunt for ‘hate crime’ suspect after Pride flags vandalised”
Meanwhile in other news, England burns with riots in Leeds and London , police responded strongly by leaving the areas quickly!
Spot on Dinger.
Personally I find Pride flags grotesque and insulting.
“Trump Is now certain to win…”. Has Jake Wallis Simons done well at betting on the horses then?