- “Asylum seeker posed as child before murdering aspiring Marine” – Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai, an Afghan asylum seeker, murdered an aspiring Royal Marine outside a Subwat, reports the Mail.
- “Prepare for Starmer to let in millions more migrants” – We must leave the ECHR and cap immigration, writes David Frost in the Telegraph.
- “Lammy is turning Britain into a global laughing stock” – The Foreign Secretary has managed to create a rift not only with Israel, but with the United States too, says Con Coughlin in the Telegraph.
- “‘Our’ National Health Service is becoming a cesspit of hate” – The NHS spends £40 million a year on Diversity, Equality and Inclusion. But this ‘inclusivity’ does not seem to apply to Jews, writes Nicole Lampert in the Telegraph.
- “Israel accuses Facebook Oversight Board of endorsing ‘genocidal rallying cry’” – Israel has accused Facebook’s oversight board of “endorsing a genocidal rallying cry” by ruling that the phrase “From the river to the sea” did not always glorify Hamas, reports the Telegraph.
- “Offenders could serve sentence in Estonian prisons to ease overcrowding” – The Government has not ruled out sending offenders to Estonia as a way of alleviating overcrowding in U.K. prisons, says Sky News.
- “In Australia, the tobacco war has been a disaster” – Britain’s black market in tobacco is thriving. But a glance at Australia shows just how explosive and perilous it can become, writes Hugo Timms in Spiked.
- “The winter fuel rebellion is a small taste of the welfare battles to come” – Labour’s winter fuel cut reveals a deeper problem that Starmer must fix or face a political winter of discontent, says Fraser Nelson in the Telegraph.
- “Shadow Energy Secretary casts doubt on Ed Miliband’s GB Energy plans, after bill passes vote” – Claire Coutinho says Ed Miliband’s plans to create a state-owned energy company that would reduce Britain’s reliance on fossil fuels “makes no sense”, according to LBC.
- “Miliband’s empty energy promise” – Labour has committed itself to decarbonising by 2030 without having any idea of how that can be done, says Ross Clark in the Spectator.
- “The elitism of electric cars” – EVs are still only viable for the well-off, urban-dwelling, laptop class, writes Hugo Griffiths in Spiked.
- “Lucy Letby appoints new barrister to try to overturn murder conviction” – Lucy Letby has appointed a new barrister who will try to overturn her murder convictions, according to the Telegraph.
- “Who gets to talk about Lucy Letby?” – On the WATN? Substack, Prof. Norman Fenton argues that Lucy Letby’s conviction is unsafe.
- “Top health official admits in court that ‘independent’ pandemic expert advice was steered by politicians, that virus risk assessments were political and that vaccine mandates had no scientific rationale” – The President of the Robert Koch Institute (Germany’s CDC) has shattered public myths about the pandemic response in court, says Eugyppius on Substack.
- “Court finds Kennedy has standing in our consolidated case” – A court ruling has granted Robert F. Kennedy Jr. standing in a case against the Biden administration over alleged government-directed censorship on social media, writes Dr. Aaron Kheriaty on his Substack.
- “Harvard, Columbia rank last in nonprofit’s 2025 college free speech scorecard” – For the second year in a row, Harvard University’s “abysmal” free speech climate earned it the lowest ranking among 251 colleges and universities scored by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, reports Fox News.
- “The truth about World War II” – In the Free Press, Victor Davis Hanson takes on fellow historian Darryl Cooper’s flawed WWII theories from his recent Tucker Carlson interview, emphasising Britain’s role as a defender against Hitler’s aggression, not the war’s instigator.
- “How AI will embolden the tyranny of Big Tech” – The power of the Silicon Valley oligarchs is set to expand exponentially, warns Joel Kotkin in Spiked.
- “Ed Miliband is a zealot” – Tim Montgomerie gives his verdict on Ed Miliband on Mike Graham’s show on TalkTV.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
A look at our ever-dwindling freedom of speech in the West and the facade of democracy;
”Over the last five years, American, British, Canadian and Brazilian governments unleashed unprecedented waves of repression against political opponents using martial law, military occupations of major cities, government censorship of the internet, nationwide manhunts, televised raids and extended detentions without trial. Most of those arrested were guilty of political speech and protests generally far less violent than leftist riots by regime supporters.
Three of those leftist governments, the Biden-Harris administration, the Starmer and Lula regimes, unleashed crackdowns after taking power using various pretexts. The fourth crackdown, in Canada under the Trudeau regime, took place during an election year.
The pretexts, J6, Brazil’s election protests or the UK’s anti-migrant rallies, are far less significant than the pattern of leftist regimes taking power and launching crackdowns against opponents who disputed elections or, in the case of the Starmer regime, protested against policies.
Governments that moan about “authoritarianism” abroad eagerly adopted every element of the authoritarian playbook from endless investigations of political opponents like Trump and Bolsonaro to declaring states of emergency over political protests and censoring speech. They often justify their authoritarian measures as necessary to stop their “authoritarian” opponents.
In the first stage of authoritarianism, the law is applied unequally, in the second stage of authoritarianism, inequality is written into the law, and in the final stage, the regime is the law.
The only thing free about any of this is that there are still elections and people are still allowed to vote in them. But democracy, as residents of North Korea’s Democratic People’s Republic of Korea could tell you if they had any free speech, isn’t actually freedom. Bringing democracy to Iraq just turned it into a totalitarian Islamic state run by the Shiite majority. In actual free countries, people have more political freedom than just casting a ballot once every few years.
A democracy without a meaningful political opposition able to speak out, advocate for its views and protest is like a race with only one runner. It’s the end of a contest, not the beginning of one.”
https://www.frontpagemag.com/an-iron-curtain-is-descending-on-us/
Bringing democracy to Iraq …
After bombing the place to smithereens on how many occasions? Akin to bringing democracy to Libya, Syria and so on: were they asked if they wanted our version of democracy?
And we ourselves are experiencing that democracy has its faults, i.e. that leaders are chosen who are only voted for by a minority in the country, as well as the recent US problems with mail voting and voting without confirmation of identity.
Democracy somehow needs a bit of fine tuning.
How do you ask the citizens of a totalitarian state if they want ‘our version of democracy’?
‘The speaker for Albania stressed that, “when you vote at gunpoint, the process is more expedited”.
U.N. So-Called Referenda during Armed Conflict 2022
An interesting question. A necessary clarification is what is meant by ‘totalitarian’? Google states it is “relating to a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state”, which is a pretty accurate description of the current UK government!
In the days of the Cold War, any criticism of a communist country would be answered with the standard “You are interfering in the internal affairs of the country”. With increasing age, I have come to fully support this attitude, i.e. leave others to get on with their own lives, unless a country is really committing some awful crime, like murdering its own citizens (e.g. Ukraine), in which case a remedy needs to be found.
USA considers itself very much to be the world’s ‘international policeman’ but it only intervenes to its own benefit: there has to be oil involved or a lack of subservience to the US system for it to apply sanctions or intervene.
Are the Arabian states totalitarian? Many would say “yes” but is anyone bothered? If you read books written by people who have escaped from North Korea, you would definitely class North Korea as totalitarian but does anyone care? Is anyone attempting to change anything there?
Many regard Islam as denigrating women’s rights but is anyone going to march into all the muslim countries and ‘sort them out’? It is less than 100 years ago that women were allowed to vote in UK. The last person to be tried under the Witchcraft Act of 1735 was in 1944, so I am not sure we should regard ourselves or our way of life as superior to the rest of the world.
To summarize, I think we should let people get on with their lives and decide how they want to live without us imposing our ideas of ‘civilization’ on them.
I asked ‘how’, not whether the question should be asked at all; an entirely different matter.
The answer, which you avoid, is, of course, that you cannot ask the citizens of a totalitarian fascist dictatorship whether they would prefer democracy.
You can never know what system of government they prefer.
‘Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal, will of man as a historic entity. It is opposed to classical liberalism which arose as a reaction to absolutism and exhausted its historical function when the State became the expression of the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts.’
Mussolini 1932
I agree that overseas interventionism is, for the most part (with exceptions: the 1991 liberation of Kuwait and in 2000 that of Sierra Leone) a very bad idea.
That is only one (although a very good one) reason why I believe the barbaric and inhuman Russian invasion of Ukraine to be a criminal undertaking.
‘In public, the Kremlin tries to present the war as a battle for Russia’s survival as a sovereign nation. The most important stake, however, is the survival of the Russian ruling class and its model of political capitalism…….Political capitalism is characterized by the exploitation of political office to accumulate private wealth.
For Putin, this is essentially another stage in the process of post-Soviet consolidation that he began in the early 2000s by taming Russia’s oligarchs.
There was no way to integrate post-Soviet political capitalists into Western-led institutions that explicitly sought to eliminate them as a class by depriving them of their main competitive advantage: selective benefits bestowed by the post-Soviet states.
By launching the war in Ukraine, (Putin) protects the rational collective interests of the Russian ruling class……..To put it crudely, one cannot steal from the same source forever.’
Behind Russia’s War Is Thirty Years of Post-Soviet Class Conflict
VOLODYMYR ISHCHENKO
How? You can ask anyone anything. Under circumstances, it may be prudent to be aware who else is listening to your question.
Firstly, living in a totalitarian state is not necessarily a bad thing. Secondly, how really democratic are many democratic governments? Did any government ask you if you agreed to your country’s industry being destroyed to ostensibly save the planet, or if you agreed to mandatory vaccination, or if you agreed to financing the war in Ukraine (I am sure you agree but I am also sure nobody asked)?
Pavel Durov, the Telegram CEO, told Tucker Carlson that he was happiest working in the United Arab Emirates because it was the only country where the government had not attempted to influence his work, as opposed to the other, ‘democratic’ countries, such as USA, France, and other places I forget, which he had all had to leave because of their interference (and threats).
The UK government (among others) is becoming increasingly totalitarian: ask Julian Assange or anyone protesting against immigration.
So where is the ideal place to live, with a minimum of government interference? I have no idea.
Two-tier justice: Exhibit 731;
Remember the couple who threw a bottle at police during a protest? The lady got 20 months and the man banged up for well over 2 years? Maybe it’s a combo of chucking a projectile at the ‘far right’ and being called ‘Mohammed’ that gives you an automatic ‘Get out of jail free’ pass;
”A man has been jailed for his role in last month’s riot in Bristol city centre. Mohamed Osman, of Easton, admitted throwing a can at protesters in Castle Park on Saturday 3 August.
The 37-year-old pleaded guilty to violent disorder and was sentenced earlier today at Bristol Crown Court to a two-year prison sentence suspended for nine months and was also ordered to carry out 150 hours of unpaid work.”
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/bristol-riot-man-sentenced-disorder-9533517
Check out the lenient sentences here as a comparison. It seems posting memes, shouting at dogs and throwing a single bottle, all while being white and protesting government policies ensures you’ll always get a lengthier sentence than a Muslim that beats up a white person. If this were vice versa you can bet the farm white people would be sent down for much longer. Do judges just pluck these sentences out of their backsides, I wonder??
”Two men have been jailed for attacking an innocent man during violent disorder in Darlington.
Arian Ahmed and Mujmain Uddin chased the man before attacking him in what was described as a ‘racially motivated’ attack.
The violent assault was captured on CCTV and showed the man being knocked to the ground before being kicked and punched.
The pair wrongly thought the victim had been making racial slurs towards them during violent disorder, which happened on the evening of August 5 in the North Lodge Park area.
Dozens of police officers were deployed to the area after small pockets of serious violence erupted between two groups of mostly males.
Ahmed handed himself in to police after seeing his picture posted in a police social media appeal and was later charged with violent disorder, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and possession of an offensive weapon.
Uddin was also arrested and charged with the same offences.
The pair pleaded guilty and appeared at Teesside Crown Court on Monday (September 2) for sentencing.
The judge sentenced 19-year-old Ahmed to ten months detention in a young offenders’ institute, while 21-year-old Uddin was jailed for 12 months.”
https://www.durham.police.uk/news/durham/court-results/2024/6.-september/two-sentenced-for-assaulting-man-during-violent-disorder
Does Estonia have more prisons than the UK despite being a much smaller country, or less prisoners?
Why not extend this idea to Nigeria? There, if a person is given a custodial sentence and is tall, they are incarcerated in a ‘short prison’ where facilities such as beds are just too small for comfort. If they want a drink they are given a mug filled with dirty water.
Surely such a country would be ideal to house these ‘far-Right’ white incendiaries who want to burn down the Reichstag or something.
There would be the added benefit that whoever we send to Nigeria would not be subject to racism. Only white people can be racist.
Could everyone please shut up about World War Two.
It was a lifetime ago. Most people now living in Britain were not alive at the time, nor do they know anyone who was an adult then. Moreover, the people who lived in Britain during the War were vastly different from us today.
Britain’s part in the War is dredged up from the abyssal depths of history to serve the politics of today. Just as in Germany, though it isn’t full of national socialists, the electoral success of new parties is constrained by raising the spectres nazism as if the country was still in 1949 and having to deal with those who still lived at that time.
Harking back to the War and the different world in which it happened prevents the challenges of today being addressed with the novelty and flexibility these new situations require.
Certain Americans have never been keen on Churchill. Some have lived in the White House. However, Churchill was not responsible for the mess he inherited in 1940, whatever else he can be criticised for.
History is everyone’s servant, before becoming their master.
Many of the problems of today’s Europe derive from WW2.
Nevertheless WW2 led to the long peace in Western Europe.
Just about everyone would like to get back to ‘The Long Peace’
The post WW2 settlement in Western Europe shows us the way:
‘Opposite this (Russian) Army in Central Europe, the nations of the Atlantic Community maintain an army structured into 26 divisions and about 1600 tactical aircraft…….for almost 30 years, it has accomplished the basic mission for which it was formed-to deter (Russian) attack on Western Europe.
Can we any longer accept maldeployments; lack of war reserve equipment; shortages in ammunition stocks; inferiorities in artillery, tanks, chemical and electronic warfare capabilities; nonstandardization of equipment and tactical doctrine; and vulnerabilities of lines of communication? It is not just the current but the future effectiveness of this army which is in question. While agitation for the reduction of US forces in Europe has subsided for the moment, it could rise again if within the US it is thought or perceived, however fairly or unfairly, that Atlantic partners are not bearing an equitable burden.
Erosion of the effectiveness of the Atlantic army will inevitably result in an erosion of political will, strategic flexibility, and freedom of action. As a bare minimum, it is the role of the Atlantic army to replace the strategic nuclear deterrent as the instrument with which the attack option is foreclosed to (Russia).
But that is a bare minimum. In a modern strategy the Atlantic army must provide for the West a sense of security to a degree that will encourage it to act and react in respect to global events with confidence. That forecloses to Russia the options of intimidation, blackmail, and political leverage.’
LAND FORCES IN MODERN STRATEGY by LIEUTENANT GENERAL DE WITT C. SMITH, JR. US ARMY 1977
The British Army on the Rhine was the army of Churchill, Alanbrooke and Montgomery.
That army has been destroyed by dim witted, short sighted and self serving politicians
And guess what?
The shades of war now loom once more to our East.
‘Those who ignore the lessons of the past, will be doomed to repeat them.’
Santayana
The truth about World War II
‘In Mein Kampf, during the lead-up to the war, and even through the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact years, Hitler had planned eventually to invade Russia, destroy the Soviet Union, put an end to what he called Jewish Bolshevism, and annex and then eventually resettle almost all of European Russia.’
The German totalitatian dictator told the world what he intended at a very early stage.
‘Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal, will of man as a historic entity. It is opposed to classical liberalism which arose as a reaction to absolutism and exhausted its historical function when the State became the expression of the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts.’
‘Fascism is therefore opposed to all individualistic abstractions based on eighteenth century materialism; and it is opposed to all Jacobinistic utopias and innovations……It does not believe in the possibility of “happiness” on earth.’
“The Doctrine of Fascism” (1932), Benito Mussolini
The Italian totalitarian dictator told the world what he intended at a very early stage.
‘And, if you believe the forecasts and the estimates are based on actual work, the real work of people who understand this, who have devoted their whole lives to this, in 15 years, there may be 22 million fewer Russians. I ask you to think about this figure: a seventh of the country’s population. If the current trend continues, the nation’s survival will be in jeopardy’
In his first address to the Federation Council in 2000, Putin framed demographic problems as a threat to national security
And then told the world what he was going to do about it:
“First and foremost it is worth acknowledging that the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century,”
“We are a free nation and our place in the modern world will be defined only by how successful and strong we are,”
Putin 2005
And Russian state security agencies then began the implementation
‘While the 9th Directorate of the FSB’s Fifth Service Department for Operational Information prepared for the occupation of Ukraine from July 2021, the 11th Unit of the Department for Operational Information, responsible for Moldova, was assessing plans for the next round of operations under the direction of Major General Dmitry Milyutin.
In November 2020, the FSB’s strategic objective in Moldova was to bring about ‘The full restoration of the strategic partnership between Moldova and the Russian Federation’
FSB Outline of Operational Aims and Means, 21 November 2021.
“In Australia, the tobacco war has been a disaster”
If only we had previous examples of what happened when you (mindlessly, well-meaning even…) prohibit lawful products enjoyed by a large section of the citizens.
Fortunately, we have plenty of examples of what happens when damaging ‘products’ are, effectively, made lawful:
‘Marijuana is the second most widely used intoxicant in adolescence, and teens who engage in heavy marijuana use often show disadvantages in neurocognitive performance, macrostructural and microstructural brain development, and alterations in brain functioning….’
Effects of Cannabis on the Adolescent Brain 2014
‘Teens who use cannabis recreationally are two to four times as likely to develop psychiatric disorders, such as depression and suicidality, than teens who don’t use cannabis at all.’
Recreational Cannabis Use By Teens Linked to Risk of Depression, Suicidality 2023
‘In 2022, 30.7% of US high school 12th graders reported using cannabis in the past year……Cannabis use has been linked to a range of mental health problems, such as depression and social anxiety.2 People who use cannabis are more likely to develop temporary psychosis (not knowing what is real, hallucinations, and paranoia) and long-lasting mental disorders, including schizophrenia……’
Cannabis and Teens 2024
Of course the aim is not to stop smokers smoking but rather to force them in to semi criminality and the sort of violence that is occurring in Australia. These authoritarian and freedom depriving measures are deliberate and intended to enrage.
“Offenders could serve sentence in Estonian prisons to ease overcrowding”
And how does a small ex commy country have ample prison space compared to the UK? Because its justice system works, and I’ll bet it has far tougher sentences than the soft uk! Deterant works!
I guess they would smash through your door with their jack boots and drag you off to a long long prison sentence for serious crimes!
We all know that we won’t send prisoners out to Estonia. The human rights lawyers will say it breaches their right to a family life by not being able to have visitors and cause mental distress. And it will harm the prisoners’ children by preventing them seeing their parent.
That’s actually true, if we consider prison as the remedy for burglary, GBH and the like, most of whom are young offenders. Even more so when we think of today’s political prisoners. Were I banged up for my writing, to be denied prison visits from my family because I’d been sentenced to transportation to a foreign land would be more than double the punishment.
The upside is that Estonian jails may be state-run corrective institutions, whereas our prisons are criminal-run hell-holes.
This BBC News article, about the possibility that Lucy Letby may be innocent, makes two statements as if they are indisputable facts:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3d93kpkl83o
“Letby, a former neonatal nurse, is one of the UK’s most notorious modern serial killers.”
“At the end of her first trial, Letby was sentenced to multiple whole-life terms, meaning she will spend the rest of her life in prison.”
Very odd.
The primary purpose of the press appears to be to instruct us who to like and who to hate, and so discourage us from asking questions about truth.
The motives are seldom entirely clear, though in Lucy Letby’s case covering up the gaping holes in the hull of NHS Glorious is a strong possibility they consider worth destroying a young life for.
Celebrities like Prince Harry’s and Meghan’s characters are actually irrelevant, but keeping public hatred (or in other cases adulation) on the simmer is an effective distraction from significant issues.
We have been taught to hate Donald Trump mindlessly (even recently a “well-educated” friend was scandalised to hear someone, ie me, actually defend him). We have been taught to hate Tommy Robinson in an utterly consistent and successful campaign ensuring that very few know anything about him except that he’s bad. We have been taught to hate Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orban as anti-democratic when both have stronger voting mandates than any Western globalist puppet. And of course we’ve been taught to hate imaginary bogeymen like the “Far Right” (to the extent that even sceptics condemn the “Far Right rioters” before speaking up for ordinary folk, rather than wondering if black-clad hooded gangs might actually be agents provocateurs).
In every case a little research reveals blatant lies from the press – not to mention from elected representatives, police and intelligence chiefs, judges and leaders of other institutions strangely lock-stepped.
Orban/Putin have ‘stronger voting mandates than any Western globalist puppet’
Hmmm……let’s see……..
Orban:
‘For most of his twelve-year rule, Orbán’s base of support has hovered around a third of the electorate. Orbán has not had majority support at any point in his tenure…’
‘As the 2022 election neared and the unity of the opposition coalition became clear, Orbán adapted again: He changed the voters without changing the districts. He did this by means of a November 2021 law that legalized “voter tourism.” Suddenly, voters could register to vote anywhere in the country even if they did not live in their new district.’
‘In 2016, the European Court of Human Rights judged Hungary’s practice of fining the opposition for attempting to speak in parliament to be a violation of freedom of expression under the European Convention on Human Rights. Years later, nothing has changed……
‘Orbán’s 2022 election giveaways were so expensive that they put the state budget deeply in the red. He has already spent much of the money that the EU had allocated to Hungary in the current budget cycle, but the European Commission notified Hungary the day after the election that it would start the procedure to cut Hungary’s EU funds. While Russia has come to Hungary’s aid in the past, sanctions for the Ukraine war will limit Russia’s largesse. China has also been a big funder of Hungarian projects, but a coming global slowdown may limit China’s willingness to foot Orbán’s bills.’
Journal of Democracy 2022: How Viktor Orban wins
Putin:
‘As many as half of all the votes reported for Vladimir Putin in Russia’s presidential election last week were fraudulent, according to Russian independent media reports using a statistical method devised by analyst Sergey Shpilkin to estimate the extent of voter manipulation.’
‘All three estimates suggest that “fraud on a scale unprecedented in Russian electoral history” was committed, added Matthew Wyman, a specialist in Russian politics at Keele University in the UK.
The three news outlets all used the same algorithmic method to estimate the extent of voter fraud. It is named after Russian statistician Sergey Shpilkin, who developed it a decade ago.
Shpilkin’s work analysing Russian elections has won him several prestigious independent awards in Russia, including the PolitProsvet prize for electoral research awarded in 2012 by the Liberal Mission Foundation.
However, he has also made some powerful enemies by denouncing electoral fraud. In February 2023, Shpilkin was added to Russia’s list of “foreign agents”
Those don’t look like strong voter endorsements to me
As the learned gentleman from Albania said:
“When you vote at gunpoint, the process is more expedited”
Is an algorithmic method the same as data modelling? We all know the accuracy of modelling.
Home secretary chairs summit on tackling boat gangs says the BBC.
I’ve had a brilliant idea! Why don’t we make people smuggling illegal?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c89wneepgj3o
Taking the firkin piss.
“Offenders could serve sentence in Estonian prisons to ease overcrowding”
Well, that’s handy for Two-Tier and the Great Replacement Project!
You can be sure that the ones he wants to send to rot in Estonian prisons, as far away from their families as a Russian Gulag, are NOT Third World criminals in Britain, but the Indigenous English, Welsh, Scots & Irish who dared to protest against the Mass Third World Invasion that nobody ever voted for.
Two-Tier is following in the footsteps of Closet Stalinist Clement Attlee, who started rounding up 100,000 English children from poor families after WW2 and transporting them to Australia like tiny criminals.
Then Attlee and his successors started importing 200,000 Third World ethnics to replace them (which eventually turned into millions), threatening English War Widows with heavy fines and imprisonment for refusing to welcome Indians and Africans into their homes as Bed & Breakfast lodgers, sleeping in the empty beds of the widows’ children killed in WW2.
Funny how that is never taught in history lessons, at school or university.
“Prepare for Starmer to let in millions more migrants” – We must leave the ECHR and cap immigration, writes David Frost”
No, Mr. Frost, we have been promised “caps on immigration” for years now, and we see the result.
We need a TOTAL MORATORIUM ON ALL ASYLUM SEEKERS, REFUGEES, and other THIRD WORLD PARASITES, for at least Five Years, renewable indefinitely, and a total ban on any kind of welfare benefit for anyone except BRITISH CITIZENS.
We also need the Coast Guard, the Royal Navy, and civilian volunteer seafarers to board and arrest the crew of any RNLI lifeboat or other craft going out into the Channel in order to operate a ferry service for hostile, criminal illegal aliens in dinghies.