Keir Starmer must be remarkably stupid or remarkably brazen if he thinks that the British public cannot work out what he is up to. Perhaps he is both brazen and stupid.
Operation Early Dawn, announced this week, will involve keeping prisoners waiting for court appearances in police cells for longer to make room for the nearly 1000 ‘far-Right’ protesters arrested in the wake of the protests and riots on August 3rd this year. This comes on top of over 5000 prisoners being released almost as soon as the Labour Government assumed power to ease overcrowding in prison.
Referred to by one writer as ‘crime and no punishment’, reference was made at that time by the Justice Secretary with the quintessentially English name of Shaban Mahmood to the ‘inevitable’ overcrowding by September. Conspiracy theories ought to be avoided, but I cannot be alone in thinking that the Government was preparing for August 3rd.
Here at the New Conservative we have been at pains to indicate that we do not condone violent protest. It is counterproductive, people get hurt and people get arrested. But how many of those arrested over the events on August 3rd were involved in vandalism, violence or even incitement to hatred or violence? All of them according to the Government.
Yet we hear reports of people simply caught watching the riots being considered to be committing a crime, and people shouting at the police likewise. That, and some awful people who seemed genuinely upset that their town centres were being taken over by young, male, Muslim asylum seekers, and were not afraid to express themselves.
Meantime, on a weekly basis, thousands of headscarved hooligans descend on almost every city centre calling for genocide against Israel, displaying logos of an explicitly antisemitic kind and intimidating any passers-by who provoke them by being ‘openly Jewish’ (an expression invented, incidentally, by the rigidly ‘single-tier’ Metropolitan Police). Few, if any, arrests have been made. It is clearly one law for us and no law for them.
In some inner cities groups of immigrants of various hues and religions who claim to have fled violence and destruction knock ten bells out of each other with impunity, Muslims throw stones at passers-by from an Islamic centre in Hull and members of the Romanian Caravan Club riot and burn cars in Leeds. The only arrest to date is a lady who asked the police, who up to that point had been enjoying her mugs of tea, why they were not arresting anyone. She experienced single-tier policing at its finest.
Others have been arrested and hefty prison sentences already handed down to many who, as opposed to rioting and vandalism, used hurty words on Twitter, re-tweeted film of the riots (which the BBC seemed only too happy to broadcast in the first place) and generally explained that they could understand people’s frustration at mass immigration, both legal and illegal. We can thank our lucky Starmers that these vile people are off the streets. Lord only knows how upset they would be or what they would do if they bumped into an immigrant rapist who had been given a suspended sentence or, in fact, any rapist who was not even being sent to jail to make room for proper criminals guilty of the ultimate crime of being labelled ‘far-Right’.
But back to Operation Early Dawn. The fact that prisons are being cleared and that fewer potential criminals are being sent there on remand means that legal eagle Sir Kier Starmer and his associates have already adjudged that those arrested in the wake of August 3rd are guilty. Our Government has become judge, jury and executioner of anyone who has the audacity to express their opposition to the main plank of their policy to bring the U.K. to its financial, social and cultural knees – that of unrestricted immigration.
Predictions are dangerous, but this present situation in which we find ourselves cannot continue. Elon Musk’s claims of civil war may be exaggerated; it is to be hoped that they are, and that he is doing nothing to encourage that. But Starmer, for whom very few voted in the first place, has alienated most voters now. We may not be lucky enough to see an early General Election. Labour will not make the same mistake as Theresa May and put their lack of popularity to the test. The Conservatives (remember them?) seem to have left the building.
Our only hope is Reform, who must do what they can to coalesce the other minority parties with similar views – principally on immigration – around them and sweep the board at the next opportunity. To do otherwise will be a dereliction of duty.
Dr. Roger Watson is Academic Dean of Nursing at Southwest Medical University, China. He has a PhD in biochemistry. He writes in a personal capacity. This article was first published in the New Conservative.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
So objective biological truth is important when it comes to ethnic identification but not sexual identification? How was she “outed”? Perhaps one of her siblings got results from DNA testing and said, “Hey, wait a minute, sis.” Never underestimate the power of sibling rivalry!
I identify as a beneficiary of a trust with billions of investments but I haven’t had any money yet.
How come?
You forgot to answer the e-mails from Nigeria.
Haha, love this ( including video with James Corbett, 24mins ) and I especially love Bob’s cartoon. I’m digging the fact I’m not alone in clocking those dreadful sausage fingers! He’s really not popular at all is he? I know that even anti-monarchists when the Queen was alive wouldn’t have treat her in this fashion, the shouts and pelting with eggs. The monarchy basically died with her as far as I’m concerned. Hopefully it’s not a case of ”long live the King”. I’ve had more than enough of him already.
”I wonder how many of the naïve, moronic NPCs in “Normieland” have any clue about the truth as they clap or bang their pans or whatever dumb-arse act of servitude they’ve been programmed to do today?
Oh year, swearing out loud, or something? I think even I can manage that!
If you haven’t worked it out yet, all these things are connected – COVID, “climate change”, CBDCs… The smart ones are well-prepared for what comes next.
So, rather than “Meet King Charles”, meet King Sausage Fingers I instead – the inbred, pedo-loving, WEF puppet who is really Britain’s next Head of State.”
https://metatron.substack.com/p/not-my-king
I have to say I was disappointed by this offering from Joel Smalley. I know what he means and have been aware of all Charlie’s New- age twittery over the decades. I know Charles is a bit of a pillock but somehow cannot quite sign up to the nastiness implied in the Corbett report and Bob’s cartoon.
Maybe it’s the obstinate church-goer in me but this was just horrible and I want nothing to do with it. It pains me to write this because I’m as big an objector to the current madness as anyone here (and I have the worn shoe leather and ruined fingernails from posting leaflets to prove it).
There has to be a way to win our case without descending to this level.
Yes Jane, it seems the monarchy is quite the contentious subject. I was always very pro when the Queen was alive ( admittedly I was very ignorant about the history of the royal family tbh ) but with Charles we have a completely different kettle of fish and he is not a likeable chap, due to all that we know about him both historically and his visions for the future. In fact, I’ve disliked him since his marriage to Diana went down the pan and all the facts that were subsequently revealed around that particular subject.
However, with my above post I am taking a leaf out of the resident Jeremy Clarkson Fanclub’s book, and if they can defend him for wishing Meghan whatserface would walk down the street naked and have poo chucked at her then I shall defend the hideous portrait of Charles by Bob, in all of its beautiful originality and attention to detail.
I don’t see Bob’s cartoon as nasty.
It harks back to many 18th/19th century cartoons of previous Monarchs who thoroughly deserved to be lampooned.
I’m just slightly surprised Bob left out any reference to Charles’ WEF/Net Zero obsession.
Why does it matter? She identified as one. If people have a problem with that, it tells us more about them and their extremist prejudices than anything. I myself identify as a black veteran astronaut of 178 Apollo missions.
Sometimes I feel like identifying as a Tourettes sufferer just to see what it takes to get banned…
Firkin hell Mogs.
And I don’t know if anyone’s seen this video yet of a soldier at Cardiff castle collapsing today, but it definitely isn’t ”fainting”, not that I’ve ever witnessed anyway. Usually people regain consciousness as soon as they hit the deck but this guy stays completely out for the count, as you can see by his lack of movement or tension in his body as they drag him away. And no I’m not suggesting the you-know-what did it, but I would like to hear some follow up on how this guy’s doing. Any updates would be appreciated. They didn’t even check his breathing.
https://theglobalherald.com/news/soldier-faints-during-coronation-ceremony-at-cardiff-castle/
I don’t know what caused this soldier to collapse but I do know from personal experience that when a person faints, they don’t necessarily regain consciousness when they hit the ground, they can be unconscious for a few minutes after they faint.
What if she had said she identifies as Mohawk?
EDIT can’t get out of the habit of commenting before reading the comments
I identify as no one but myself
************************************
Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field
near play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE
I’m struggling to understand the difference between identifying as something you clearly aren’t, and being a delusional fantasist.
Still ….. we have learned something: apparently it’s OK for someone who is clearly male to announce they’re really a woman. But it’s not OK for someone who may (or may not) have a few Native American genes to decide that they have that ancestry.
So I guess any idea that I (who looks female, white with freckles and red hair) can identify as a black man wouldn’t be acceptable. But I could identify as a man?
Is that right?
Fortunately, I’m not a delusional fantasist.
Did you here about the bloke who identified as a pair of curtains.. the shrink told him to pull his-self together..