Heavier and longer summer monsoon rains are said to be fuelling a rise in child marriages in Pakistan, reports Agence France-Presse (AFP). Human rights workers are warning such weddings are on the rise “due to climate-driven economic insecurity”. Great story since it holds out a small hope that banning hydrocarbon use can help solve a problem of forced and under-aged female abuse that has been endemic in many cultures since time immemorial. It is just a shame about the facts. According to the World Bank climate change knowledge portal, monsoon rains in June, July and August in the period 1991-2020 were marginally less in Pakistan than fell during 1961-1990.
In an error-strewn article reproduced in many publications around the world, the French State-owned agency claimed that flooding in Pakistan in 2022 plunged a third of the country under water. Looking at a contour map would show this is unlikely – impossible even – and the true level of inundation was around 8-10%. Even the BBC’s statistical programme More or Less confirmed the much lower figures. AFP claims that “scientists say” climate change is making the monsoons heavier and longer, “raising the risk of landslides, floods and long-term crop damage”. This is said to have led to a new trend of “monsoon brides” as families give away their female children in exchange for money. But massive flooding in low-lying parts of Pakistan is not new. In the recent past – in 1950, 1992, 1993 and 2010 – it killed more people than it did in 2022.
The AFP nonsense story is just the latest in a tidal wave of mainstream fear-mongering designed to boost Net Zero. It takes an emotional theme and tacks on unprovable claims of climate damage caused by humans. The emotion is obvious, but false claims about the volume of rainfall and the inundation of a recent flood are made. Do the people who write this stuff think that nobody will check their facts and sources? Apparently not.
AGF is an organ of the French State and it is all in on grooming the world to accept Net Zero. The climate side is run by Marlowe Hood who describes himself as the “Herald of the Anthropocene”. Certainly, all this heralding seems to be very profitable for Hood who was recently awarded £88,000 by the Foundation arm of a Spanish bank heavily involved in financing green technologies. Recently, he played a major part in organising the eventual retraction of a paper written by a number of Italian physics professors who examined climate and weather data put out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and concluded there was no climate emergency.
Led by Professor Gianluca Alimonti of Milan University, the professors found that rainfall intensity and frequency was static in many parts of the world. Other meteorological categories including natural disasters, floods, droughts and ecosystem productivity showed no “clear positive trend of extreme events”. None of this would be much of a surprise to anyone who has read the IPCC reports, but Hood claimed the data was “grossly manipulated” and “fundamentally flawed”. The distinguished science writer Roger Pielke Jr. has covered the Alimonti scandal in great detail and notes: “Shenanigans continue in climate science with influential scientists teaming up with journalists to corrupt peer review”.
Three AFP writers are currently taking a six-month sabbatical on the latest Oxford Climate Journalism Network (OCJN) course which is funded by elite billionaire money including contributions from Sir Christopher Hohn, a past provider for the eco louts at Extinction Rebellion. They are Ivan Couronne, Future of the Planet editor, Sara Hussein, Future of the Planet reporter and agency editor Linda Tonn. The course provides an immersion in the correct political narrative surrounding climate ‘collapse’, the so-called ‘settled’ science and the need for extreme Net Zero measures. This term, BBC participants include senior climate data reporter Becky Dale and Samah Hanaysha, a London-based broadcaster for BBC Arabic. Interestingly, all these participants will be joined by Ellen Ormesher of DeSmog, a foundation-funded operation that publishes a ‘blacklist’ of so-called climate deniers. Sadly, the list does not appear to be regularly updated these days, possibly on the grounds that it has become too large!
Past speakers at the OCJN have suggested “fines and imprisonment” for those expressing scepticism about “well supported” science and cautioned journalists against the use of photographs of people enjoying themselves in the open air at times of “extreme” summer weather. Infantile suggestions are provided asking participants to write a story about a mango, discussing why it isn’t as tasty as the year before due to climate change.
All of which explains how stories about climate change leading to more child marriages end up in the increasingly unpopular prints. For the last three years, Paul Homewood has chronicled the climate bloopers at the BBC and he summarised this year’s edition in yesterday’s Daily Sceptic. It notes numerous howlers which have added to the gaiety of the nation. How we laughed when we were reminded of Matt – “Yes, we have no bananas” – McGrath reporting that climate change posed an enormous threat to banana supply. Production has increased six-fold since the 1960s. Or the no more beer piss-take. Apparently, it could get too hot to grow hops in Kent although that is not a problem for growers in warmer central European climes, but again don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story. Then there are the coral reefs about to die off, while in the real world the Great Barrier Reef continue to show stonking levels of record growth. Finally, we have the much loved rare bird sighting story. Last year it was the turn of the black-winged stilt that is moving north due to climate change. As it appears to have done for hundreds of years, according to ornithological reports. One unfortunate passing passerine even being shot in 1684. Again, as with the child bride story, why are basic facts not checked to stop all this alarmist drivel being printed in the first place? Attending climate grooming courses funded by elite billionaires with an obvious political agenda would fill any independent, investigating journalist with horror.
As Homewood notes, many have concluded that the BBC’s coverage of climate change cannot be trusted. His comments could equally apply to many other mainstream outlets. “For years their treatment has been one-sided, full of misinformation and at times factual errors, along with the omission of alternative views and inconvenient facts,” he observes. Quite so.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Let’s make Climate Change the central organising principle of civilisation” —John Kerry.
There is nothing that the One World Government people won’t do to do stuff climate change panic down everyone’s throats. They will say anything, do anything, lie, cheat, steal and brainwash———But all for the “greater good”. ——Assuming that the “greater good” is a world run by technocrats at the UN/ WEF who no one ever heard of or voted for.
Exactomondo ( again ), and I think Ivor Cummins does a great job at explaining where all of this crazy BS originates in this 20min vid. This’ll be teaching you how to suck eggs but for others less well read I think he provides a fantastic explainer here.
Sorry not sorry to the resident misogynists and obsessives but Ivor doesn’t mention feminism as being the cause of the downfall of civilization once. Perhaps try following the money for a change. In fact, ”Gender equality and the empowerment of women” is yet another agenda being pushed by these *largely male-dominated* elites and globalist entities, along with climate, Digi I.D, mass immigration and Scamdemics. As ever, I apportion blame for the decimation of society where it rightly belongs, which this vid covers very clearly;
”Fascism, Communism or something else – which is it running the world today?”
https://x.com/FatEmperor/status/1765361884641845527
These guys seem to be mad keen on all things gender identity and DEI-related. I think the ‘Alphabet Mafia’ must be happy to receive support from such big players. From 2020;
”As the world continues to grapple with the unprecedented global health crisis of COVID-19, the scale of the related global economic crisis is becoming increasingly clear. We are facing the sharpest economic contraction since the Great Depression in the 1930s, according to the United Nations – threatening to roll back decades of progress in the fight against poverty.
At the same time as taking emergency measures to minimize the immediate economic impacts of the pandemic, governments around the world are looking to position themselves for recovery. A new analysis of economic resilience offers a potential clue to which economies may be able to recover faster: LGBT+ inclusion is correlated to the resilience of a country’s economy.
The analysis by Open For Business, a coalition of companies advancing LGBT+ equality, shows a strong positive correlation (0.67) between how resilient an economy is and how accepting it is of LGBT+ people (see the chart below). This is a significant finding: a one-point increase in social acceptance suggests a three-point increase in that economy’s economic resilience index, even when controlling for GDP per capita. Could LGBT+ inclusion be a secret ingredient for economic resilience?
The connection between resilience and inclusion is widely accepted by policy-makers. The World Bank describes “inclusive communities” as a key dimension of sustainable, resilient cities. The OECD identifies “inclusive society” as a driver of resilience in a city. The IMF contends that an economy is “more fragile and less resilient when it is not inclusive”. A report by UN Habitat finds that inclusion is required for a “successful urban resilience agenda”.
Now is the time to be embracing LGBT+ communities, not stigmatizing them. Creating inclusive societies isn’t just the right thing to do; as the evidence shows, it’s an important part of an economic strategy focused on resilience and recovery.”
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/lgbt-inclusion-cities-post-covid-reset-recovery/
Useful summary, but I did find myself trying to predict the next “Yadda, yadda, yadda.”
Cheers——–I am in the Climate Change Department when it comes to attacking the Progressive left and their One World Government aspirations all based on a pack of lies. You know they are lying when they want to lock you up for being a “denier”. ——-So that is where my focus is and has been since 2007. I won’t therefore be as knowledgeable on Gender, pandemics and vaccine stuff as others like yourself. But I can see that if anything comes out of the UN where 70% of the Nations are run by Kings, Colonels, Tyrants and Dictators, then I want NOTHING TO DO WITH IT, and neither should anyone who appreciates freedom and prosperity, because these people have a goal. That goal is to remove all of that.
Yes, but that’s because they want population reduction and “gender, equality and the empowerment of women” is part of the process to achieve it.
Yes but you can’t have it both ways. We constantly hear about how many countries have a birth rate below replacement level, on the surface the ‘solution’ to this is to just keep shipping in migrants from far away lands. That’s their excuse anyway. And yet we scratch the surface and see who is behind the orchestration of this, from way back when, and all other agendas being pushed. It’s the usual suspects; Rockefeller, Club of Rome, UN, WEF, ‘Big Finance’, the WHO obviously play a big role with the scamdemic element. But all of the agendas our governments are pushing are coming from the same shady organizations. They create the ‘problem’ then supply the ‘solution’, thereby deconstructing and reconfiguring our societies to their liking. How many cabinets do you suppose Schwab has penetrated by now in order to make this all possible? We refer to them as ‘puppet politicians’ for a reason, after all.
Agreed. Feminism, gender equality, and empowerment of women are not the problem per se at all. Rather, it has been co-opted, appropriated, neutered, watered down, and twisted and perverted by the oligarchy for their own nefarious ends.
Yes, quite. It reminds me of the whole ‘Pride’/LGB movement, whereby once the T+ people got onboard and hijacked it we now have something unrecognizable from what its original objective was, not to mention extremely toxic and sinister for kids and vulnerable young people to be exposed to. Operating like a cult, essentially. No wonder at all that gays, lesbians and bis wish to distance themselves from the ‘Transtifa’ banshee mob.
Similarly, I’d hazard a guess that most women who identify themselves as feminists don’t go around hating men, looking to score ‘microaggression’ points wherever they can and advocating that a woman should have the right to abort a baby at full term. These people are both deranged and heinous.
You don’t need to wear the label of ‘feminist’ to fight the trans agenda and speak out about protecting female sports and single-sex spaces because obviously men should be onboard with doing this anyway. Fathers do have daughters and they should be stepping up to the plate just as much as women, who are impacted the most. Huge respect too for the self-identified feminists who are doing great work in third world countries and tackling gender apartheid and all the horrific abuses/stories we’re all well aware of which come out of certain countries by now. I think we all know that Islam plays a major part here. But again, I would argue that the whole ‘feminism’ angle is now unnecessary and obsolete because what we have here is a human rights issue, therefore is it not better to refer to oneself as a ”human rights activist” as opposed to ”feminist”? Also this way it involves men and non-feminist women.
I personally just feel feminism as a movement has had its time, everything nowadays, whether in the Western world or developing ( including Muslim/Arab ) world falls under ‘human rights abuses’. The ‘F’ word has now become quite a divisive and out dated concept.
Anyhoo True, don’t be a stranger.
Well-said.
Do you think this lady’s a raging militant feminist or just an assertive woman sticking up for her human rights? I do hope she’s okay though as I’ve seen how the evil f***ers operate over there;
”In Iran, the ‘morality police’ gets shouted at by woman who refuses to cover up:
“Shut the f*ck up. I sh*t on your law.”
https://x.com/NiohBerg/status/1825101102682939897
I personally consider her a hero.
My recent debunking of the climate change hoax: can anyone rebut it?https://metatron.substack.com/p/debunking-the-climate-change-hoax
You posted that link a month or so ago. ——I read it back then ad I have been saying pretty much the same as that since I first started to investigate this issue back in 2007. –cheers
Child bride marriages found are exclusively in the cults of Muhammad and the Hindu cult.
These travesties of abuse and slavery have nothing to do with the weather.
There, fixed the article for everyone.
Hopefully I won’t be imprisoned for stating the truth.
Ah yes “The Truth”——What is that again? —-Or as Mark Twain joked “A lie spreads half way around the world while the truth is still tying it’s laces”——The Progressive left’s lies have spread all over the western world and the only way they can avoid being exposed is to silence all debate, and call your truth a hate crime.
A couple of years ago it was Covid that was causing an increase in child marriages.
I wish the propagandists would make their mind up.
Personally, I think it’s because Pakistan is a backward, Islamic State where females are treated like property and like any “commodity” they can be bought and sold for a price.
The article suggests that economic insecurity drives child
abusemarriage. I’m not convinced that a reasonable response to economic insecurity is to rape a child.However, the biggest recent cause of economic insecurity was the lockdowns. People in the developing world lost their livelihoods when the West stopped buying tat for a while.
And the same can be said for most of the BBC’s output.
Drought de signeur!
Copied from elsewhere.
Classic Horseshoe Theory in action.
Where does this sit relative to Mrs Balls’ proposal for extreme mysogeny = terrorism? Has she thought it through, or do cultural norms get a pass?
Cultural Norm? Yeeha! Squeal piggy, squeal!