• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

No, the CrowdStrike Debacle is Not a Warning of What Could Happen if we Introduce CBDCs

by Anonymous IT Reporter
22 July 2024 9:00 AM

I was waiting for it and I wasn’t disappointed – the Daily Sceptic article linking the CrowdStrike debacle to CBDCs. There are many arguments against CBDCs but “if it went offline all transactions would stop” isn’t one of them. Anyone making that argument does not understand how money works. It is wrong to say, as the DS article does, that: “A country reliant on a CBDC instead of cash would see an end to all transactions as a consequence of a similar failure affecting a component within whatever software stack was being used to operate CBDC infrastructure.” As an aside, you don’t hear this criticism levelled against Bitcoin. Perhaps Libertarians have access to computer architectures denied to Governments, or perhaps it’s just politics.

How do I justify my rebuttal of the usually excellent Dr. R P? We don’t know what the CBDC system architecture will be because it hasn’t been designed yet, but however it’s constituted it will only manage CBDC transactions. CBDCs are proposed as an alternative to physical cash, particularly for online transactions where notes and coins don’t work. According to the British Retail Consortium, physical cash accounts for about 11% of consumer spend, with an average transaction value around £25. And that’s just retail activity which is a subset of all transactions. The remaining 89% are cards, gift cards, bank transfers, asset transfers and so on. These are nothing to do with the Bank of England and therefore would go nowhere near any future CBDC system. That’s just retail transactions. High value transactions are handled by CHAPS. Funnily enough, CHAPS was down on July 18th. It handles £360 billion per day, which is 90% of sterling payments by value. That was bad, but still not “all transactions” and the economy didn’t stop. Indeed, most people didn’t even realise it had happened.

Dear reader, if you take nothing else away from this article, remember that just because it has a pound sign in-front of it does not mean it would be controlled by any future CBDC system. This is why there is little to fear from CBDCs. If you still oppose them if they ever come to fruition, just don’t use them, there are dozens of alternatives.

In some ways CBDCs would not be so different from all the other electronic money that we have all been using for decades and those systems do run into difficulties from time to time. But if Visa, Mastercard, NatWest or literally thousands of other parts of the global money system go offline, it is not as Dr. R P says “an end to all transactions”. This is partly because unlike airport check-in systems, financial transactions very often have alternative means of settlement. We know this because we have all experienced it: “Sorry that card isn’t working. Try another one.”

Don’t get me wrong. The CrowdStrike debacle is a catastrophe and an almost unbelievable single point of failure in otherwise disconnected corporate IT systems. Who knew that simultaneously injecting files into Windows’ kernels in millions of machines around the globe with no canary testing would one day go wrong? The folly of corporate IT knows no bounds. Indeed, one of the objections to CBDCs is that it would be a government system (if we stretch government to include the Bank of England) which in this context should be seen as a benefit. Yes, government has an appalling track record of IT system delivery, but that is not so much the case these days. If a CBDC system ever does gets built, it will be a government system classified as Critical National Infrastructure. That puts it in the same category as things such as the Electricity System Operator’s grid balancing mechanism and therefore subject to extraordinary levels of resilience planning. These are systems that you seldom hear of because they are extraordinarily reliable, and yes, expensive in a way that only governments can afford. The people running them do have a clue what they are doing, unlike your typical globalist CIO diversity hire who is in the seat for the kudos, the salary and the ability to manage suppliers and keep costs down. There is plenty to debate about CBDCs but let’s get over this idea that they will take down the economy.

Stop Press: Microsoft has blamed EU rules for preventing it from making security changes that would have protected its computers from CrowdStrike’s faulty security update. The Telegraph has more.

Tags: CBDCsCrowdStrikeSingle Point of FailureWindows

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

The Office of Budget Intractability 

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

75 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 36 of the Sceptic: Karl Williams on Starmer’s Phoney Immigration Crackdown, Dan Hitchens on the Assisted Suicide Bill and Tom Jones on Reform’s Local Council Challenge

by Richard Eldred
16 May 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

15 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

16 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

16 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

29

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

26

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

19

News Round-Up

18

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

27

Trump’s Lesson in Remedial Education

16 May 2025
by Dr James Allan

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

15 May 2025
by Dr Nicholas Tate

‘Why Can’t We Talk About This?’

15 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

POSTS BY DATE

July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Jun   Aug »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences