We’ve extracted the main points from the Kansas City Attorney General’s legal report on the case against Pfizer that we first mentioned in ‘Due Process‘ — all quotes are taken verbatim.
This is a lengthy post, and we’d recommend having an anger management strategy to hand while reading. If you are making a comment, use the numbering to highlight which points you are referring to, and do let us know if we’ve missed anything.
- Pfizer misled the public.
- In May 2021, Pfizer advertised to Kansans on Facebook about its “life-saving vaccines” and its “cures”. Upon information and belief, Pfizer intended for Kansans to think of its COVID-19 vaccine when it discussed “life-saving vaccines” and “cures”. Pfizer ran three different ads between May 4th 2021 and June 1st 2021 that received 165,000 to 190,000 impressions.
- Pfizer received emergency use authorisation for its COVID-19 vaccine in individuals 16 years of age and older on December 11th 2020.
- Pfizer received FDA approval on August 23rd 2021. From 2021 to 2023, Pfizer received emergency use authorisations in children from six months to 15 years of age.
- Pfizer used confidentiality agreements to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine.
- Pfizer effectively had a veto over the federal Government’s communications.
- Pfizer used its confidentiality agreements with the U.S. Government and others to conceal, suppress and omit material facts relating to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, including the safety and efficacy of the vaccine.
- Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data – the study was repeatedly delayed.
- Pfizer planned to provide researchers with access to patient-level data and full clinical study reports 24 months after study completion. Protocol C4591001
- Pfizer estimated that it would complete the study by January 27th 2023, but that estimated date fell back to February 2024 because of a late vaccination of a single study participant (out of 44,000 participants).
- Pfizer’s control of the data allowed the company to selectively publish results for which the underlying data could not be independently evaluated.
- Pfizer says it will make data from vaccine trials approved in the U.S. available 18 months after the primary study completion date. Pfizer, Data Access Requests.
- Upon information and belief, Pfizer has still not made its complete study data available to researchers.
- The FDA did not make the safety and effectiveness data for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine immediately available.
- The FDA denied expedited processing of PHMPTA’s FOIA request and claimed in litigation that it would take 55 years — until 2076.
- In January 2022, a federal judge rejected the FDA’s proposed production of 500 pages per month and ordered the FDA to instead produce 55,000 pages per month.
- Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group.
- Pfizer planned to follow COVID-19 vaccine study participants, both vaccine and placebo recipients for 24 months to monitor the safety and effectiveness of its vaccine.
- Once the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine through an emergency use authorisation in December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the study participants and offered vaccine placebo recipients the option to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
- Only 1,544 placebo participants had not received the vaccine as of March 13th 2021, just 7% of the original placebo group.
- In its press release announcing emergency use authorisation of its COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer did not disclose that it had excluded immunocompromised individuals from its COVID-19 vaccine trials.
- Instead, in “Important Safety Information” in its press release, Pfizer noted that [i]mmunocompromised persons, including individuals receiving immunosuppressant therapy, may have a diminished immune response to the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
- Pfizer knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis.
- Pfizer maintained its own adverse events database that “contain[ed] cases of [adverse events (AEs)] reported spontaneously to Pfizer, cases reported by the health authorities, cases published in the medical literature, cases from Pfizer-sponsored marketing programmes, non-interventional studies and cases of serious AEs reported from clinical studies regardless of causality assessment.
- Upon information and belief, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained more adverse event data than VAERS because it included both information in VAERS and information not in VAERS.
- The United States military detected a safety signal for myocarditis.
- In early 2021, the U.S. military noticed cases of myocarditis in male military members occurring within four days of administration of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.When the Department of Defence reviewed its health system data for 2021, it found that “[t]hose who were recently vaccinated had a rate ratio that showed their incidences of myocarditis and pericarditis were 2.6 and 2.0 times higher compared to those who were never vaccinated”.
- On March 3rd 2021, Israel’s Ministry of Health contacted the CDC about myocarditis and pericarditis connected to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine: “We are seeing a large number of myocarditis and pericarditis cases in young individuals soon after Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. We would like to discuss the issue with a relevant expert at CDC.”
- Upon information and belief, Pfizer had knowledge of the medical reports in Israel related to its vaccine and myocarditis and pericarditis because Israel agreed to share medical data with Pfizer.
- At the time of Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla’s January 18th 2023 denial of any safety signals, the CDC’s website reported that “[d]ata from multiple studies show a rare risk for myocarditis and/or pericarditis following receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines”.
- According to a leaked confidential February 2022 Pfizer document, “[s]ince April 2021, increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported in the United States after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), particularly in adolescents and young adults (CDC 2021)”.
- After Pfizer obtained FDA approval through emergency use authorisation to provide its COVID-19 vaccine to 12-15-year-olds in August 2021, Pfizer decided to study “how often” its vaccine may cause myocarditis or pericarditis in children by testing 5-16 year-olds for troponin I.
- Pfizer warned children participants that after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine,“[y]ou might get chest pain, shortness of breath, or feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering or pounding heart. You may need to come in to see the study doctor for further assessments if you have these symptoms”.
- Pfizer press releases did not disclose an increased risk of myocarditis from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine until November 2021. Posts falsely claim Pfizer “officially admits” heart inflammation is COvid jab side-effect in 2023.
- Upon information and belief, at the time of Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla’s January 2023 representation that Pfizer had not observed a single safety signal related to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer was aware of a safety signal relating to myocarditis and pericarditis.
- Upon information and belief, Pfizer also detected a safety signal relating to strokes.
- Days before Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla denied any safety signal, the CDC’s and FDA’s “surveillance system flagged a possible link between the new Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and strokes in people aged 65 and over.
- Although CDC later suggested a link was “very unlikely”, an FDA study found that individuals 85 years or older who received both a flu vaccine and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine “saw a 20% increase in the risk of ischemic stroke”.
- Pfizer’s knowledge of a safety signal for increased fatalities
- Upon information and belief, Pfizer also detected a safety signal relating to deaths. As of February 28th 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
- Pfizer only tested the booster shot on 12 trial participants who were in the 65 to 85 year-old age range.
- Pfizer should not have represented that the booster was “safe” for 65 to 85 year-olds after only testing 12 trial participants in that age range.
- Pfizer did not test the booster on any participant older than 85 years old.
- Pfizer should not have represented that the booster was “safe” for individuals 85 years old and older when it had not tested any trial participants in that age range.
- Pfizer did not publicly release adverse event data from its database.
- As of February 28th 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 158,893 adverse events (from 42,086 case reports) from its COVID-19 vaccine.
- As of February 28th 2021, Pfizer’s database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, although Pfizer did not make causality findings.
- Pfizer was receiving so many adverse events reports that it had to hire 600 additional full-time staff and expected to hire more than 1,800 additional resources by June 2021.
- Pfizer had such a backlog of adverse events that it might take 90 days to code “nonserious cases.” Pfizer did not know “the magnitude of under-reporting.
- Pfizer announces study on pregnant women but omits material facts already in its possession.
- More than one-in-10 women (52) who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported a miscarriage, many within days of vaccination.
- Six women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported premature deliveries; several babies died.
- Pfizer’s February 18th 2021 press release also did not disclose other adverse effects on the reproductive systems of women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
- For example, by April 2022, Pfizer knew of tens of thousands of adverse events connected to its COVID-19 vaccine including heavy menstrual bleeding (27,685), menstrual disorders (22,145), irregular periods (15,083), delayed periods (13,989), absence of periods (11,363) and other reproductive system effects.
- Pfizer’s study on pregnant women failed and the results are secret.
- Pfizer sought to study approximately 4,000 healthy pregnant women. Pfizer and BioNTech Commence Global Clinical Trial to Evaluate COVID-19 Vaccine in Pregnant Women, February 18th 2021. However, Pfizer only enrolled a fraction of this amount (683) in its study.
- Upon information and belief, Pfizer destroyed the placebo control group during the study, preventing Pfizer from evaluating differences in safety and efficacy between vaccinated pregnant women and unvaccinated pregnant women.
- Although Pfizer completed its study of its COVID-19 vaccine on pregnant women on July 15th 2022, it still has not completed the quality control review process for the study.
- Pfizer concealed critical safety information from the public
- Pfizer only tested its COVID-19 vaccine on healthy individuals. Pfizer’s representations that its COVID-19 vaccine did not have any safety concerns failed to disclose the material facts that it had only been tested on healthy individuals.
- Pfizer claimed that a “primary endpoint” of the trial of its COVID-19 vaccine was “prevention of COVID-19″ regardless of whether participants have previously been infected by SARS-CoV-2.
- Pfizer’s statement was misleading since it had excluded any individual who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 from its vaccine trial.
- Pfizer misrepresented and concealed material facts relating to the durability of protection provided by its COVID-19 vaccine.
- In November 2020, Pfizer announced, “[p]rimary efficacy analysis demonstrates BNT162b2 to be 95% effective against COVID-19 beginning 28 days after the first dose”.
- Pfizer did not report the absolute risk reduction of its COVID-19 vaccine, which was just 0.84%. On February 25th 2021, when asked in an interview how long Pfizer’s COVID-19 two-dose vaccine provided protection, Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla stated, “at six months, the protection is robust”.
- On April 1st 2021, Pfizer issued a press release that celebrated “high efficacy” in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine through up to six months after the second dose.
- Pfizer represented that “[a]nalysis of 927 confirmed symptomatic cases of COVID-19 demonstrates BNT162b2 is highly effective with 91.3% vaccine efficacy observed against COVID-19, measured seven days through up to six months after the second dose”.
- Pfizer cited data in its press release that also appear in a Pfizer efficacy summary document.
- In its efficacy summary document, Pfizer reported an 83.7% efficacy rate four months after the second dose of its COVID-19 vaccine.
- In its efficacy summary document, Pfizer reported blood sample data showing effectiveness continued to wane at six months.
- Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission even though it knew it had never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission.
- When the FDA issued the Emergency Use Authorisation for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine in December 2020, the FDA reported that there was no “evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person”.
- According to Pfizer’s trial protocol, evaluating transmission was not an objective of the trial.
- Despite admissions by Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla and Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb that Pfizer did not know if its vaccine prevented transmission, Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla warned Kansans on multiple occasions that not receiving a COVID-19 vaccine would affect the lives of those around them, thus implying that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine prevented transmission.
- “I repeat once more, that this choice not to vaccinate will not affect only your health or your life. Unfortunately, it will affect the lives of others and likely the lives of the people you love the most, who are the people that usually you are in contact with.” Pfizer Chairman and CEO Albert Bourla CNBC (December 14th 2020).
- “What I would say to people who fear the vaccine is that they need to recognise that the decision to take it or not will not affect only their own lives. It will affect the lives of others. And most likely it will affect the lives of people that they love the most, who are the people that they socialise the most with.” John Micklethwait, Pfizer CEO Bloomberg, January 28th 2021.
- June 2021: “I try to explain to them that the decision to vaccinate or not is not only going to affect only your life… But unfortunately will affect the health of others and likely will affect the health of people you like and you love the most… When you try to explain that their fear could stand in the way of protecting their loved ones, I think this is the argument that mostly works. CEO, CBS News, June 15th 2021.
- November 2021: “The only thing that stands between the new way of life and the current way of life, frankly, is the hesitancy to get vaccinated, the people that are afraid to get the vaccines, and they create issues not only for them. Unfortunately, they are going to affect the lives of others and, frankly, the lives of the people that they love the most because they are putting at risk the people that they hug, they kiss, [and] they socialise with.” Pfizer’s Albert Bourla
- In December 2021, a Pfizer press release quoted Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla in a manner that again suggested that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine prevented transmission: “Ensuring as many people as possible are fully vaccinated with the first two dose series and a booster remains the best course of action to prevent the spread of COVID-19.”
- Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb also represented to Kansans that Pfizer’s COVID-19 prevented transmission: “And final point, I mean, some of the optimism is also being driven by growing science, suggesting that these vaccines, all the vaccines not only prevent Covid disease, prevent symptoms, but also prevent transmission. So they could have a dramatic effect on reducing the overall tenor of the epidemic.” CBS News, March 7th 2021.
- In 2022, Pfizer partnered with Marvel to produce an Avengers-themed comic book that called individuals waiting for a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine “Everyday Heroes”.
- According to one of the characters in the Pfizer comic book, “it’s also important for entire communities to come together and help fight the threat”. “And that’s exactly what we’re doing today!” says another character. As the group heads to the examination room to get their Pfizer COVID-19 vaccinations, the first character announces, “The Avengers are doing their part to help keep us safe. Now it’s time for us to do ours.”
- One of the final pages reinforces the need for individuals to get a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in order to protect the community. “Everyday heroes don’t wear capes! But they do wear a small bandage on their upper arm after they get their latest COVID-19 vaccination — because everyday heroes are concerned about their health. And they’re people who choose to unite with their communities and do their part to help protect against COVID-19.” See: ‘Avengers Assemble! Teaming Up with Marvel to Illustrate the Importance of COVID-19 Vaccination’ and ‘Avengers: Everyday Heroes‘.
- Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims.
- Pfizer’s view was that “misinformation spreaders” are “criminals” who have“literally cost millions of lives”.
- On July 19th 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb claimed social media companies had an “obligation” and an “affirmative responsibility” to prevent the spread of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on their platforms.
- Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla called people who spread misinformation on COVID-19 vaccines “criminals” who have “literally cost millions of lives.”
- Pfizer worked to conceal and suppress material facts.
- On August 24th 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb contacted Twitter to complain about a column written by Alex Berenson that criticised Dr. Anthony Fauci. “This is whats [sic] promoted on Twitter. This is why Tony needs a security detail.”
- On August 27th 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb had a conference call with Twitter employees to discuss Mr. Berenson. Twitter banned Mr. Berenson the next day.
- On Friday, August 27th 2021, Dr. Brett P. Giroir, who served as the Assistant Secretary for health from 2018 to 2021 and approximately one month as the acting FDA Commissioner in late 2019, posted to Twitter that natural immunity was superior to vaccine immunity.
- In response, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb reached out to Twitter’s top lobbyist in Washington, D.C., to complain that the post was “corrosive”, “draws a sweeping conclusion” and “will end up going viral and driving news coverage”.
- The Twitter lobbyist forwarded Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb’s email to the Twitter “Strategic Response” team, which “later slapped [Girori’s tweet] with a ‘misleading’ label and blocked any ability to like or share the tweet”.
- On December 11th 2020, the same day that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine received emergency use authorisation from the FDA, a Zoom calendar appointment entitled “Vaccine Disinformation Response” invited personnel at the Department of Health and Human Services, Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies and Stanford University to discuss “a coalition to respond to COVID-19 vaccine disinformation”.
- Shortly after the December 11th 2020 meeting, Stanford University co-launched the Virality Project. For at least the next year, Stanford and members of the Virality Project pressured social media companies to conceal and suppress information about Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, including information about safety and efficacy.
Dr. Carl Heneghan is the Oxford Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine. This article was first published on his Substack, Trust The Evidence, which you can subscribe to here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Good spot!
I think we all know the entire thing is based on false pretence, lies and deceit.
I doubt this will be reported, burried under the heading ‘conspiracy’ or ‘fake news’, ‘fact checked’ by Snopes and debunked.
Still, I once heard of an elephant that could fly so, you never know.
However I have just seen the Tele out independent sage as leftie nuts and apparently ministers have voted against injecting kids with experimental drugs!
No, don’t hope, it’s a trap, must resist positivity!!
Until I see bozo eat an ID card (or an iPhone) I’m going to remain heavily sceptical I think.
On the subject of kids, the BBC (Radio 5) News this morning reported the story but followed it with an impassioned defence of the vaccination of children by a Canadian official. (The Canadians have already started vaccinating children, so he was hardly likely to cast doubt on his own policies.) A more intelligent line for BBC to take would have been to ask whether the UK’s scientists’ hesitancy might give the Canadians cause for concern. Instead, and entirely predictably, the BBC allowed him to trot out the usual propaganda that the risk of damaging the children was justified by the need to protect the rest of the population.
The Cowardly Lion knows the likely electoral consequences if news gets out that even one healthy child has been severely disabled or died from having an unnecessary “jab.”
The plan is for everyone to be jabbed so that there is no group to compare with when vaccine damages start occurring which will allow them to claim it’s not related to the jab.
The plan is momentarily derailed with the announcement that children will generally not get it, but that will change shortly. Just watch.
‘ the BBC allowed him to trot out the usual propaganda that the risk of damaging the children was justified by the need to protect the rest of the population.’
The lie that has been promoted by the MSM and governments, flying in the face of what even the jab manufacturers state, that the jab doesn’t stop people catching or transmitting the virus.
Dumbo wasn’t it? Coincidentally a name that could be applied to others…
Another story that should make headlines tomorrow but probably won’t.
False pretence is far and wide
Health Ranger exposes planned takedown of America, ending in martial law, halted elections and Holocaust-level mass extermination via spike protein injections
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-16-health-ranger-exposes-planned-takedown-of-america-ending-in-military-martial-law.html
Stand in South Hill Park Bracknell every Sunday from 10am meet fellow anti lockdown freedom lovers, keep yourself sane, make new friends and have a laugh.
Join our Stand in the Park – Bracknell – Telegram Group
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Home Schooling – Ex-Primary School Teacher on Resistance GB YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZ5oS2ejye0
https://www.hopesussex.co.uk/our-mission
The CDC now 11,000 deaths.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-deaths-injuries-reported-cdc-covid-vaccines-moderna-pregnant-women/
The actual (uncensored numbers) may be as high as 50,000:
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/24/dr-peter-mccullough-reveals-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-bioweapons-and-a-cdc-whistle-blower-has-confirmed-50000-americans-have-died-due-to-the-jabs/
I’ve read that the VAERS data are vastly under-representative – an academic study from a few years ago estimated just 1% of adverse reactions were reported. A generous figure of 10% would mean over 100,000 deaths and millions of significant other reactions. This jab roll-out and the ignoring of the adverse reactions is criminal.
It’s like the vaccine doesn’t do what it’s purported to do.
and Natural immunity is far better…
All the Nu-Experts who suddenly overturned all the previous tried and tested advice have been wrong, who’d have thought?
Wonder why “our” government followed the nudgers orders?
I’m still waiting to hear how many “vaccinated” are dying “with Covid”. Or are these figures not available?
Within 28 days too, isn’t that how we are supposed to count everything these days?
FOIA request shows 5k plus in Scotland. Can’t link – it was posted on Facebook.
That was for deaths arising from the vaccines.
We don’t have similar data for covid deaths vs vaccination status and by age group.
That info is available for England but not UK. You have to select the correct regional tabs on the gov stats site. You can drill down to local authority level and age related info is shown on all records except hospital admissions.
Admissions just differentiate between over and under 50s.
The differentiation by <50 and >50 is actually rather clever.
It allows anything inconvenient in the >50 data to be explained away by the vaccinated group including the most vulnerable and the unvaccinated group being biased to the 50-60 age group. And anything in the <50 data being explained away by the majority being children who don’t get symptomatic covid.
They could resolve these issues by reporting in 10-year groups, but they don’t do that as it would allow inconvenient truths to emerge.
In the USA the CDC report 11,000 deaths.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaers-deaths-injuries-reported-cdc-covid-vaccines-moderna-pregnant-women/
The actual (uncensored numbers) may be as high as 50,000:
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/06/24/dr-peter-mccullough-reveals-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-bioweapons-and-a-cdc-whistle-blower-has-confirmed-50000-americans-have-died-due-to-the-jabs/
Interrogating the gov stats shows the vast majority of deaths occurring in the over 75s and it doesn’t take a great leap of imagination to suppose that they may have already been in hospital for something else when they caught it.
The current infection record shows that the infections are much worse among 15 to 30 year olds, but that there is an uptick in positives for people above 75 who might reasonably suppose weren’t out and about socialising when the got it.
Infection record? Based on the PCR and LF tests? Mostly false positives – and, in the absence of symptoms, it is wrong to equate a positive test result (even if it’s accurate) with infection; that’s falling into the government propaganda trap.
There is relatively recent data for deaths “due to” delta variant. You need to be a bit careful how you interpret it though. At the bottom of page 17 the number of deaths for each vaccination status category is given, i.e.
2 doses 118
1 dose 44
Unvaccinated 92
Reasons to be careful: 1/ More vaxed than unvaxed 2/ Unvaxed younger than double vaxed.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1001358/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_18.pdf
So a quick check on the government dashboard shows about one third of the population not taken either injection dose, and 36% of the deaths you report from people who are “unvaccinated”.
Yes, there are caveats, but if this figure is representative of the whole population, or anywhere close, I would tentatively suggest that coercive “vaccination” with these experimental drugs is not justified.
Isn’t this just more of the same crappy PCR test we’ve had for the last 18 months?
In theory no. Zoe tracks symptoms, not just testing. However as Spector has expanded the list of Covid symptoms the raison d’etre would appear to have been lost.
It’s almost like Tim Spector can’t be trusted!
He should have stuck to Motown.
Seems lots of people have deleted the Zoe app after Spector’s support of injecting children.
He has recently expressed concern about the number of people deleting the tracing pinging app.
His true colours have been revealed over the past few months.
He’s firmly in Johnson’s camp.
Sadly, it looks like another scientist has been reminded who pays his salary…
I deleted the zoe app fairly recently and then there is a form from what I remember to say why, so I explained it was because of his support of the experimental vaccination of children. So that sounds plausible that others have done the same.
Spector should have kept his opinions to himself and stuck solely to the data. He has strayed many times into non-data driven interpretations of the data. Had he kept to the data he would have kept both those experimentally vaccinated and unvaccinated on board, and that way helped good data come in from both groups. His narcissistic like of himself and his own importance got the better of him. It’s not like his opinions are based on good science based on application of the scientific method to the data. They seem to be more based on beliefs mixed in with a need to please his government funders.
And the presentation of the data, in particular in relation to experimental vaccination, has now become super-selective, data that doesn’t confirm the government narrative is not made available. It’s not surprising that the chart mentioned above has been deleted.
Let’s remember Zoe also changed the methodology because lots of people were testing positive after experimental vaccination to exclude some of those positives in the vaccinated. So it has never been a fair comparison between the two groups in particular immediately after vaccination.
I also suspect it is biased towards older people. I suspect that many people currently being infected (teens and twenties) wouldn’t bother with it.
Health Ranger exposes planned takedown of America, ending in martial law, halted elections and Holocaust-level mass extermination via spike protein injections
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-16-health-ranger-exposes-planned-takedown-of-america-ending-in-military-martial-law.html
Stand in South Hill Park Bracknell every Sunday from 10am meet fellow anti lockdown freedom lovers, keep yourself sane, make new friends and have a laugh.
Join our Stand in the Park – Bracknell – Telegram Group
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Home Schooling – Ex-Primary School Teacher on Resistance GB YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZ5oS2ejye0
https://www.hopesussex.co.uk/our-mission
the trend for unvaccinated people is no longer representative.
Representative of what?
That we are just living a normalish exsistance with no need of the vax Bullshittery!!!!
Not statistically valid.
Isn’t it remarkable that the trend only became invalid, statistically, when infections in the vaccinated overtook infections in the unvaccinated….
Very well said Will Jones:
“At what point will the Government accept that these vaccines have limited efficacy in preventing infection and transmission, and thus the whole rationale of being vaccinated to protect others – vaccine passports, compulsory vaccination, and so on – is suspect?”
Never
Chap I work with had two jabs a while back really ill this past week , positive PCR test etc , now if he were able to hold himself together he could theoretically get on a plane & have “access all areas” while us doubters who are not ill can’t !!
They get to everyone.
This isn’t rocket science.
ZOE app uses anyone after a single dose for “vaccinated”.
In most parts of the UK its 80-90% of the eligible population now.
Of course zoe “vaccinated” are going to have more cases when (i) 80% of the sample is “vaccinated” and (ii) we know 2 doses are needed for any useful protection and half that group haven’t had that.
Not a conspiracy, its basic maths.
If 100% of adults got vaccinated then ALL infections would be in the vaccinated cohort. Its meaningless.
You miss the point.
If the jabbed get infected, then vax passports, privileges for the vaxed and restrictions for the unvaxed make no sense.
My thinking exactly , how can you have a jab passport if you can still spread & catch covid ! There can be no such thing , surely it cannot exist – The Dead Parrot sketch was creeping up on me just then ! Come on one of you creative buggers turn what I’ve just said into a parody of that sketch ! We could call it “The Dead VaxPass sketch” Maybe Lozza would film it & get it out there !! .. 👍😉🤪😂
I think you missed the point, the “passport” wouldn’t be issued until three weeks after a second jab, when maximum protection is acquired.
I hasten to add that I am very much opposed to passports and now have doubts about the jab, despite having them some time back (before a lot of the latest data has become available).
It is strange how common this ‘if 100% were vaccinated 100% of infections would be in the vaccinated‘ argument is. It is clearly true, but up until that point inferences could readily be made. Even if there were 99% vaccinated that would still leave close to half a million unvaccinated, which would be fine for statistical purposes.
Of course, they should be reporting ‘cases per 100,000’ instead of totals. I find it odd that they didn’t do this. But then, again and again, they seem to not do obvious things.
Like their seeming inability to ever produce data showing cases/hospitalisations/deaths by vaccination status and age group. You know, like the Israeli data recently that shows that the vaccines are now highly ineffective at reducing cases (still nothing there on hospitalisations and deaths). To me this is something that is obvious to do, because without it you can’t see how the vaccines are performing — but of course that’s the point — they aren’t performing well and the authorities would prefer us to not know about it. I’m sure that if the data supported vaccination they’d be providing daily updates and gushing about it in the briefings.
Of course they do provide data on cases vs vaccination and age in the briefings, but only for >50 and <50 — this is rather clever of them, as this specific age group is the one that allows age effects to be discounted — in the >50 group the vaccinated include the most vulnerable and the unvaccinated are in the lower range (ie ‘of course it shows the vaccinated become ill’) while in the <50 all the children aren’t vaccinated and they very rarely get symptomatic covid (so ‘of course there aren’t many ill in the unvaccinated’). It is all rather clever of them, IMO.
Thank god for LS.org achiving this info. It further shows me that Mr Spector has become Mr Spectre over the past months
I still do the Zoe app. Every day new test? no; vaccination? No; feeling well? Yes. I figure if enough people did the same, it would show our healthiness in the graphs.
I did it, for the same reasons, until Spector came out of jabbing kids. That was a step too far for me.
Well what a surprise…the vaccine that isn’t a vaccine. Why would gene therapy stop you from catching a virus?
One of the things that I ponder over is the spike proteins that your reprogrammed cells would produce if you were mad enough to take the jab. As it is your body producing them, would your immune system treat those spike proteins as invaders, or let them pass?
I have no idea.
So at what point do the vaccinated start to think it very odd that every single one of them is starting to test positive and that some of them die within 28 days of the positive result?
The testing scam and the experimental vaccines are going to become mutually exclusive at some point in the near future. You can’t hold these two things as true at the same time. Even in Covid Clownworld it’s going to become difficult.
Testing for the unvaccinated only? But how can they keep the fear going in the vaccinated without the testing rituals?
Zoe? He who pays the piper plays the tune. And there you have it!
I deleted the Zoe app last month after Tim Spector became one of the star sales reps for pharma. His posts are contradictory as he tries to retain his credibility of a scientist pushing for public health against the incentives (financial or not) to chirrup the government narrative. His refusal to accept that the injections are causing death and injuries on a scale we just don’t know, also prompted me to unfollow him on Twitter. Shame as I thought I could trust him with The Data!
What is very very interesting about the graph is the delay between the unvaccinated and vaccinated peaks.
The absolute values aren’t so interesting — 70% of the population have been vaccinated so you’d expect rather a few cases in the vaccinated. Of course, the data do show that the vaccines now offer little protection against infection, but we already have plenty of different data showing that (despite the efforts by the authorities to suppress it).
No, what’s truly fascinating is the delay between the peak in unvaccinated cases and in the vaccinated (where the peak isn’t clear yet).
This is ‘impossible’ according to our current belief in the effect of the vaccines, because both vaccinated and unvaccinated experience the same infectious pressure in the environment, so you should only see a difference in the size of the case load for vaccinated vs unvaccinated, and no difference in time. There are a few potential explanations, but one leading candidate is that the time course of disease in the vaccinated is slower — ie, the infected caught covid at the same time as the unvaccinated, but that it has taken until now for symptoms to appear (Zoe is largely a measure of symptomatic infection, and will have little input from the asymptomatic infected (unless they’ve had a positive test result through surveillance testing). This then invites a few questions:
So, given all the above, it is clear that it is in the authorities’ best interests to suppress this information — because then the public will go on adoring them for saving them from covid, rather than hating them because they foolishly pursued a policy ended up making things worse.
Great post, thank you.
Quite possibly. If information was emerging that didn’t fit the narrative I am sure they would not rush to publish it. My suspicion however is that they simply are not looking to understand properly what is going on because they are not remotely interested. They know they can manipulate some headline stats to fit what direction they want to go in, they know the media won’t ask awkward questions and neither will most of the medical establishment.
Vaccines nicht macht frei
So can we get to the stage where we awaken to this giant corporate takeover and start trials?
The graph was not very helpful. If you look at the graph there was an uptick in vaccinations at the end of June when younger people were bludgeoned into taking it by scare stories and threats of not being able to go abroad.
That was less than a month ago, which means that most of those people have not reached the end of the 3 week perod before any level of immunity kicks in, and are nowhere near getting a second shot. Arguably the period immediately post-jab makes them particularly susceptible to infection. ZOE only records that they have been jabbed, not whether it has had a chance to become effective.
This coincides with the ending of a period when most of them will have been locked down (no jobs, no training and too old for school) and they then meet up with their mates and celebrate their freedom.
The end result, limited protection and unrestrained mixing.
And all the while, the cases in the unvaccinated plummet, as restrictions are similarly lifted, suggesting endemic equilibrium has been reached in that cohort, yet not in the vaccinated cohort, who should have the same level of protection from the endemic equilibrium, UNLESS the virus has wiped their natural immunity… could that be the spectre Spector is attempting to conceal?
There have been about a million first vaccinations since the end of June to now; this is ‘many’ but really doesn’t change the dynamic at population level by very much.
You’re right that there’s now robust evidence of a 2-3 week period post 1st jab where there is increased risk of catching covid (and of consequential symptomatic covid). This increased risk is only by about 50%, so you wouldn’t expect that to impact that much on the data either.
But the increased risk post jab is clearly important — I find it remarkable that the authorities aren’t warning people to be very careful about mixing with others in this period — it probably would be one of the few behavioural changes that would actually make a significant reduction of individual risk.
Maybe the authorities are, surreptitiously, using their brains, for once, and omitting to divulge this information so that people mix, catch and transmit the virus and (if the jabs haven’t buggered up their immune systems) develop natural (and robust) immunity to the virus. Then, hey presto, the statistics for infection and infectiousness after a second jab suddenly look world beating… the problem they have is New Zealand which might explain why their vaccine rollout is so slow.
People have had plenty of chances to develop natural immunity over the last 18 months, but…
… The evidence (from covid and prior research on coronavirus infections) is that humans don’t generate a long term protective antibody response to coronaviruses. We do generate a acquired cellular response to coronaviruses, but the cellular immune system of the vulnerable is compromised, hence them being so very susceptible to covid.
The evidence looks as though the significant and sustained antibody response arising from the vaccines is not only ineffective against covid, but actually works to suppress the natural immune response to covid (which is dominated by the innate immune system, at least in the early stages).
This does not bode well for the future.
The question that has bothered me all along is whether the “vaccines” also wipe cellular immunity to other diseases? Could we see a measles epidemic?
Then we’ll need a measles booster. Yes I have the same suspicion, outsourcing the immune system to vaccines will lead to more vaccines. Kerching!
“Perhaps ZOE should try to recruit some more unvaccinated people for its survey”. Sorry Will I was, or rather would have been one of the unvaccinated but I stopped using the Zoe app sometime ago. I believe Spector is part of the “controlled opposition”. UK Column featured him once they weren’t very impressed, nor was I. He seems a tad creepy and I think he knows a lot more than he’s letting on. In short I stopped trusting him and his app.
Ah now yes, I feel something has changed about Tim Spector. I started using Zoe last November after I watched him doing one of his video updates. He was speaking about herd immunity and for most people the then expected vaccines would not be necessary, just the vulnerable and health and care workers who could be exposed to greater risk. Since then he has changed to become more everyone should be vaccinated. It would be my guess that he is trying to get funding and to please his potential funders.
Yep I think that was the gist of UK Column’s report, also have a sneaky suspicion the BAMGF was mentioned somewhere – surprise surprise! Thus the controlled opposition comment.
I’m unjabbed (as is the dragon), and we still check in every day. However a do agree that Spector is a tame critic. When it comes down to it he just parrots the party line.
The big problem with Zoe has always been (to my way of thinking) dependent on self reporting and self diagnosis. It is open to all sorts of abuse and is an entirely self selecting (self obsessed?) cohort.
Yes, from some of the questions and answers I see on Zoe the participants are very biased to covidians. I wonder if they might feel anyone still reporting who is unvaccinated is an infiltrator?
So, clearly “Unvaccinated” is the way to go then.
What’s that you say – you’ve already had the “vaccine”?
Oh sorry to hear that, you can’t “undo” that, unfortunately…
I had my doubts about the ZOE app. This censoring of data just confirms those doubts to the point you can throw the app and its data in the bin.
If they had been honest about things, they could have stated why they thought that the data was problematic, and left the data there. But to excise it makes it clear that they made a mistake with their propaganda and now need to show you something else.
I suspect the data shows that there are hardly any cases in the unvaccinated and that cannot be possible as far as they are concerned, and certainly can’t be admitted, because it would obliterate the whole vaccine narrative.
It’s a fraud Will.
The reporting criteria are already different for both, even most sceptics seem to have forgotten that.
The biggest fraud in that regard is of course taking place in the US, with its ct of 28 for the vaccinated but a continued 40 or so for the unvaccinated.
It is impossible to NOT get a reading of 99% of cases being unvaccinated, as Biden crowed yesterday, with this fraudulent double standard applied, which was introduced without any medical reason but with exactly this, sole purpose.
Going to start using a pair of crutches to get around on, just in case I’ve got an asymptomatic broken leg.
ZOE!!?? didn’t et funded by The Gates Foundation !??
even they cant keep the lid on this can of exploding worms the the Vaccinated are getting sick.
Hide the decline. I’ve come across that before. Is Tim Spector mates with Michael Mann?
I am old enough to remember when many sites promoted up-to-the-minute graphs of cases and deaths, even before the pandemic was declared. Worldometers, Ourworldindata, Johns Hopkins, etc. were all in competition to see who would show data first. Isn’t it funny how they are silent about reporting cases & deaths in the vaccinated?
In reading the comments, I notice that there’s no discussion of cycle thresholds used for testing. My understanding is that the WHO, or CDC have amended the protocols, to have the unvaccinated continued to be tested at >40 cycles, and the vaccinated at about 30. That would skew the numbers further, and find many, many false +ves amongst the unvaxxed.