• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Excess Deaths in the Spotlight Once Again

by Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson
8 June 2024 7:00 AM

This week, David Davis MP tweeted that “the potential link between Covid vaccines and excess deaths needs to be properly investigated”. Now, David may be looking for last-minute votes, but he’s forgetting that the current Government has already refused to look into the issue.

Due to our frustration with the lack of interest in excess deaths, we launched TTE In August 2022, publishing ‘Why it’s Time to Investigate Excess Deaths in England and Wales‘. The signals in the data suggested something wasn’t quite right: excess deaths were 18% above the five-year average.  

By mid-October, deaths were still 17% above the average. Therese Coffey, the new Health Secretary, was in post, but she remained ignorant. 

But in January 2023, Steve Barclay, the Health Secretary, woke up to the issue. He told Sky News that “it’s extremely complicated as to what the drive of those excess deaths are” and called the year-ending report of the excess deaths “concerning.” Even Owen Jones was aware of the issue: he thought “the excess death rate” was at a “disastrous high”.

The Government’s Chief Medical Officer – remember him – considered excess deaths were due to a lack of access to cardiovascular drugs, blood pressure monitoring and cancer services. As we reported, the first two were evidence-free statements. 

In May 2023, we published our most-read post of all time: ‘Breaking news: His Majesty’s Government is not going to investigate excess deaths.’

The Right Hon. Esther McVey MP continued to ask questions, prompting routine escape and evasion answers from HMG. Along with TTE’s favourite friend, Mr. O’Brien MP, HMG announced it has no intention of investigating the causes of excess mortality in England and Wales.

The dial is slowly shifting. Last month, the Australian Senate voted to investigate excess deaths. This week, the Telegraph broke ranks to question whether Covid vaccines could be partly to blame for the rise in excess deaths since the pandemic — reports of more than three million excess deaths across Europe, the U.S. and Australia since 2020. As we have consistently reported, the rollout of lockdowns and vaccines did not halt the trend.

Suddenly, it’s okay to question the vaccine narrative. The Lancet estimated that vaccinations prevented 19·8 million excess deaths. Mathematical modelling should not be used to justify the policy — the latest report shows the numbers don’t add up.

We’ve continued to bang on about excess deaths: the overcrowded TTE office staff count 35 posts in all with the term ‘excess mortality’. We plan to continue, as it’s unclear if the next Government will take up the mantle or whether there will be more escape and evasion at Westminster.

Dr. Carl Heneghan is the Oxford Professor of Evidence Based Medicine and Dr. Tom Jefferson is an epidemiologist based in Rome who works with Professor Heneghan on the Cochrane Collaboration. This article was first published on their Substack, Trust The Evidence, which you can subscribe to here.

Tags: AustraliaCensorshipCOVID-19Excess deathsLockdownTelegraphVaccine

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

“The Climate Scare Will Crumble Sooner Than You Expect”: An Interview With Climate: The Movie Producer Tom Nelson

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
burke19
burke19
4 years ago

It hardly kills anyone, so it was made in China as part of a biological weapon program then they are doing a pretty poor job; no worries there.
But anyway, who really cares where it came from? Because Covid is just the excuse for this artificial pandemic which has been created by powerful interests demanding profits as they drive the world towards a Garden of Eden. That’s what needs researching.

23
0
steve_w
steve_w
4 years ago
Reply to  burke19

They could serve covid to me with my burger and fries and I wouldn’t care. I got a lung infection from a dodgy kebab once. I think your question – why has something so mild caused such repercussions – is the important one.

12
0
Mayo
Mayo
4 years ago
Reply to  steve_w

It’s a bit more than mild. Not much perhaps but definitely a cut above bad flu.

2
-1
Ken Garoo
Ken Garoo
4 years ago
Reply to  Mayo

People speak of it as a static disease. It is not. It is caused by a rapidly mutating RNA virus. Providing the pathogen isn’t rapidly fatal to everyone, natural selection will ensure that an end point is reached where the pathogen can inhabit a host without killing it, cf common cold, flu, etc.

That can be seen in its falling case fatality rate (and associated IFR) – ~20% March 2020, ~2% September 2020, probably ~0.2% now. The IFRs are probably less than 1/10 of the corresponding CFR. Whitty himself said the virus was harmless to the great majority of people in May 2020, and not so long back confirmed it was endemic just like the flu and the common cold.

Last edited 4 years ago by Ken Garoo
5
-1
micoh
micoh
4 years ago
Reply to  Ken Garoo

It’s more likely that with the variation in individual immune response to the virus some people are more vunerable than others. The virus will only kill those vunerable within the population and so as the vunerable group declines in size the death rate from covid reduces accordingly.The problem with considering the virus it’s self becoming less deadly is that selection relies on some advantage to the virus in doing so and there is no obvious reason what this would be. Covid has no problem infecting people and those who die are not sufficient to limit it’s spread. Natural selection has nothing to drive the evolution of a milder form. Drift could do it, but genetic drift is random and could equally make it more deadly. Yet the group vunerable to death from it are finite and replaced at a slow rate. To the observer the end result looks the same ie with each outbreak deaths decline always reducing the vunerable population until very few are left to die even the common cold still kills a few people each year.

1
0
RickH
RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  burke19

“It hardly kills anyone, so it was made in China as part of a biological weapon program then they are doing a pretty poor job”

You’ve been watching too many Hollywood films.

Causing this much disruption with a relatively moderate virus is far more effective and controllable – if this was the source and objective.

After all, it is known that this precise area of ‘gain of function’ research was/is going on in Wuhan. Bloody big coincidence.

Thinking that lethality is a key issue for this theory isn’t very perceptive.

I’m not backing either theory of origin – after all, what is ‘known’ about the virus is, in large part, fictional. But the ‘Escape’ theory remains as viable as any.

Last edited 4 years ago by RickH
9
-1
karenovirus
karenovirus
4 years ago
Reply to  RickH

A well known battlefield tactic is to inflict injury rather than death as looking after an injured comrade requires the immediate use of much more manpower and resources than coming back later for a dead one.

14
0
Nessimmersion
Nessimmersion
4 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Also don’t ignore the complicity of the Faustus at the centre of the spiders web.
That particular evil bureaucrat is even more responsible than Ferguson for this entire s***show.
So proving he lied under oath and taking him out of the picture immensely weakens the “forces of darkness”

11
0
Jez Hewitt
Jez Hewitt
4 years ago
Reply to  RickH

Not forgetting the coincidence that Merkel visited Wuhan in Sept 2019, subsequently took a meeting at a company called Webasto (if my memory serves), followed 5 months later by an employee of said company becoming Germany’s ground zero importer of Covid?

Nothing to see here, just coincidences….

Last edited 4 years ago by Jez Hewitt
4
0
PoshPanic
PoshPanic
4 years ago
Reply to  Jez Hewitt

The biggest producer of vaccines in Europe is Germany.

3
0
WeAllFallDown
WeAllFallDown
4 years ago
Reply to  Jez Hewitt

That’s pretty tenuous but I like it.

3
0
DomTaylor
DomTaylor
4 years ago
Reply to  burke19

That’s the whole point: please watch Dr Yan’s analysis on gnews.org in light of the recently leaked 2015 CCP text book on biological warfare. SaS-Cov-2 isn’t designed to kill large numbers of people itself – that would be too easy to trace back to the CCP – it is designed to be highly contageous and (with the help of CCP sponsored academics, health officials and the other powerful interests you allude to) to spread fear and thereby weaken other countries economies, societies and political systems making it easier for the CCP to impose its authoritarian rule on them. I would say that it has been extremely effective job…but one that has also opened the World’s eyes to the true nature if the CCP.

10
0
TheFascistCoronaFraud
TheFascistCoronaFraud
4 years ago
Reply to  DomTaylor

So can we get on with exposing the moles in our government who are doing the dirty work of the CCP and their accomplices by hijacking government policy and spreading so much undue fear about a largely harmless virus?

5
0
TheFascistCoronaFraud
TheFascistCoronaFraud
4 years ago
Reply to  TheFascistCoronaFraud

Because the CCP isn’t doing this crap on its own! It is our own traitors who are progressing this nonsense.

4
0
TheFascistCoronaFraud
TheFascistCoronaFraud
4 years ago
Reply to  TheFascistCoronaFraud

Four Horsemen of the Covid Apocalypse are named and are being prosecuted in this Private Criminal Prosecution. Hancock, Whitty, Vallance, Ferguson. Traitorous little scumbags. Only in the last few days have we heard about a blatant attempt to derail the case, which is great, because it means it has the legs to get these criminals sentenced for these most heinous of crimes.

Failed Attempt To Sabotage PCP By Persons Unknown
https://www.thebernician.net/failed-attempt-to-sabotage-pcp-by-persons-unknown/
“Especially when the potential consequences of my arguments being sustained are lengthy prison sentences for members of the privileged class, who genuinely believe they are unaccountable to the people they cheat, exploit and destroy for their own private material gains.”

Last edited 4 years ago by TheFascistCoronaFraud
3
0
iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  burke19

No – it is the political response of the West that shows that China did a brilliant job: minimum force to coerce your enemy to destroy itself. Could have come straight from the pen of Sun Tzu!

3
0
chris c
chris c
4 years ago
Reply to  iane

Yes!

Why release a dangerous virus when you can release a relatively mild virus and just tell everyone it’s a bioweapon

0
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
4 years ago
Reply to  burke19

I care about where it came from. 1) This might help us prevent a future pandemic but 2) we need to be able to trust our “experts” when they tell us “facts” about a viruses’ origination and spread.

From the research and reporting I’ve done, the U.S. government and public health officials are NOT telling us everything they know about the “early spread” of this virus in the U.S. Nor is the “watchdog” press.

1
0
SweetBabyCheeses
SweetBabyCheeses
4 years ago
Reply to  burke19

I don’t think they wanted to kill everyone. Who’d buy all their crap and fuel their economy if we all croaked it? They’ve done a bloody good job of getting our societies to act like theirs though so more like world domination.

2
0
Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
4 years ago
Reply to  burke19

Another theory, which will doubt be regarded as conspiracy, is that the Chinese deliberately released it. As burke19 points out given the low IFR it would appear to be a crap biological weapon, however this assumes that the purpose of biological weapons is to kill. If the Chinese are trying to gain economic, rather than military, world dominance then a virus that causes other countries to destroy their economies, but leave your own relatively intact would be perfect.
So much disinformation came out of China last year, e.g. that human to human transmission wasn’t possible, followed by the nonesense about asymptomatic transmission that it seems likely that they were deliberately misleading the West, presumably for their own gain. If they were prepared to do that then is it so hard to believe that they would release a virus then manipulate the situation (with help from the useful idiots at WHO, left wing western universities, etc.) to cause maximum damage to rival economies? Put another way, if the Chinese had it and believed it could weaken the West would you trust them not to use it?

6
0
Cecil B
Cecil B
4 years ago

In the diagram why is the Pangolin anonymised?

If we knew the identity/name of the Pangolin we could interview it and establish exactly what happened

Just saying

13
0
BurlingtonBertie
BurlingtonBertie
4 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

😀

2
0
PoshPanic
PoshPanic
4 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Schwab looks like a Pangolin. I’ve never seen him in the same as one.

3
0
LePib
LePib
4 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Lol

0
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
4 years ago

We have already had this story.

https://dailysceptic.org/2021/05/16/scientists-criticise-who-over-its-failure-to-properly-investigate-covid-lab-leak-theory/

It is not exactly speculative to say there has been a cover up. Why were they busy covering something up if there was nothing to cover up in the first place – why all this pussy-footing around now. There was a cover-up for God’s-sake! The only real question was whether the virus was leaked by accident or deliberately and Fauci, Daszak et al scarcely deserve the benefit of the doubt.

It is well documented what was going on in the Wuhan laboratory:
See Steve Hilton (Fox news) below
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6225847837001#sp=show-clips
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6227902415001#sp=show-clips
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6229978391001#sp=show-clips
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6232251393001#sp=show-clips
&
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/rand-paul-reveals-dr-faucis-deception

10
0
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago
Reply to  PhantomOfLiberty

Daszak has actually funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and was the subject of 2015 news item in the journal Nature entitled ‘Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research’.)
Hasn’t Fauci also used American taxpayer’s money to fund reasearch in Wuham banned in the US?

10
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
4 years ago
Reply to  PhantomOfLiberty

Wuhan not only has a level 4 biosecurity lab, it has the only level 4 biosecurity lab in East Asia or so I have read.
I expect the Japanese steered clear because of what they got up to in Manchurian labs during WW2.

2
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
4 years ago
Reply to  karenovirus

Level 4 security for you.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8233185/Shock-photos-inside-Wuhan-lab-stores-1-500-virus-strains.html

2
0
PoshPanic
PoshPanic
4 years ago
Reply to  PhantomOfLiberty

What came first..the vaccines or the virus?

4
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
4 years ago
Reply to  PhantomOfLiberty

But could the virus have originated in a U.S. lab (probably released by accident)? I think this should also be considered at least a possibility.

If you read the study of archived Red Cross blood where units were collected over three days in mid-December 2019 (from three states) – and over a few days in six other states in mid-January – you will see that said study shows that 1.42 percent of studied blood samples showed signs of having the virus that causes COVID.

Well, if one simply extrapolates a sample with 1.42 percent “positives” to the entire country, you get as many as 4 million people who may have been infected somewhere between early December 2019 and January 2020.

There might have been, say, one million Americans who had already contracted the virus … BEFORE the Wuhan outbreak. Isn’t it possible this virus began to spread not in China but in America?

I’m not saying it did, but it’s certainly POSSIBLE. But this possibility is NOT being investigated. The fact this possibility is not being seriously investigated is actually quite important … and disturbing.

Last edited 4 years ago by BillRiceJr
1
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
4 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

Also completely ignored in this whole “early spread” investigation is the fact that there was a bad virus circulating in America (and many other countries in the world) months before the lockdowns (and before the Wuhan outbreak). This was called “the flu” although the vast majority of people who got a flu test tested “negative” for influenza. It is also true that many of these sick people who tested negative for influenza had symptoms identical to COVID (loss of smell and taste, acute shortness of breath, dry and lingering cough, etc.)

I’m not saying everyone who was sick in December 2019 or January 2020 had COVID, but there is a very good possibility that a certain percentage of these individuals did or might have. Some of these people later tested positive for COVID antibodies in either late April or early May 2020. Some of these people have tested positive for COVID antibodies multiple times. Were ALL of these positive antibody tests “false positives?”

And antibodies proper fade to undetectable levels in most people within two or three months of their COVID symptoms. This would mean that most of the people who were sick with “something” that was not the flu and then got an antibody test four or five months later (when they were finally available) would have likely tested negative for antibodies. That is, a “negative” antibody test in May 2020 does not automatically prove that someone did not have COVID in November or December.

An important study would be to see how many of the MILLIONS of people who suspect they had COVID months before the lockdowns later did test positive for the virus. My guess is that if such a study was commissioned (it won’t be), it would show that a disproportionate percentage of these possible early cases did not subsequently test positive. The obvious conclusion would be that they developed natural immunity from these “early” infections.

P.S. I could actually be a participant in such a study. I had all the COVID symptoms in late January 2020 (and tested negative for flu). I have not tested positive for COVID since then. I think I acquired natural immunity from contracting a virus that wasn’t even supposed to be in my state when I contracted it.

4
0
chris c
chris c
4 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

Yes we had the same in parts of the UK, strangely the far east and far south west. One family I know had it after their son returned from a skiing trip in France with a horrendous cough. Then there were findings in sewage and blood samples in Italy and Spain going back to 2019.

The kicker is the lower level of official covid in these regions which had the “pre-covid”, I assume immunity.

Very likely it was in circulation much earlier than the Offical Narrative admits

1
0
JohnK
JohnK
4 years ago
Reply to  chris c

You’re right about that. There were some reports about sewage samples in those places, also in Brazil. As BiilR said, I’d be content to contribute to such an examination, indeed, I volunteered to do so on a note to my GP declining the offer of a jab. There was no reply to that idea. I believe it can be done in the private sector (at a considerable expense), but politically it’s taboo for the time being. This far into the future, it would need to a T-cell examination – fairly unlikely for related antibodies to be present in me now, if it was what happened in Dec 2019.

0
0
PoshPanic
PoshPanic
4 years ago

If this was multiple choice, then I’d tick C.

The other two have too many problems with them, the main point being, how come there is no other evidence anywhere bloody ever, of the virus appearing outside of Wuhan. This would have happened say, if researchers had caught it in a cave and travelled back. All the first known cases were along the metro line between the Wuhan lab and the airport.

5
0
A Heretic
A Heretic
4 years ago

who gives a **** where it came from? The problem is the response.

5
0
PhantomOfLiberty
PhantomOfLiberty
4 years ago
Reply to  A Heretic

Same people pulling all the strings though.

3
0
Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
4 years ago

This is very hopeful. Fauci is paltering to public committees. Lying by careful phrasing. If he falls, the whole thing begins to crumble.
We may discover for certain then who is the master who sends the dog Ferguson out to fetch for him.

9
0
BeBopRockSteady
BeBopRockSteady
4 years ago

The cover up or arse covering is in operation. The Wuhan Lab used to list a host of US Universities as partners on its website. Now this has been reduced to only the Eco Health Alliance

From
https://web.archive.org/web/20210101180607/http://english.whiov.cas.cn/International_Cooperation2016/Partnerships/

To
http://english.whiov.cas.cn/International_Cooperation2016/Partnerships/

Guess who is getting thrown under the bus here? Peter Danzak and his Eco Health team. I wonder if we could see who has quietly left their board recently? I’d say many rats will be deserting that ship.

Not to say they are up to their neck in it. But the powers that be will hope the trail can be scrubbed at Danzaks door.

Last edited 4 years ago by BeBopRockSteady
5
0
PoshPanic
PoshPanic
4 years ago
Reply to  BeBopRockSteady

That’s some vanishing trick. I checked out the virus archive and they’re building a nice little business there…only 950.00 for your very own Indian variant!

2
0
Ken Garoo
Ken Garoo
4 years ago

SARS-CoV-2 is not a biological weapon of mass destruction. It is a political weapon of mass destruction.

It was initially aimed at China to show how they were incapable of controlling the outbreak. Conveniently the CIA-funded regime change ops ceased when the disease appeared in China.

Subsequently, following the outbreak in the west, it has been leveraged for the financial benefit of Big Pharma, corrupt politicians and insiders, and Big Banksters (especially CoL with their ‘generous’ loan of £250 billion to allow for the bribing of the citizenry to go along with the scam). It has also suited the monomaniac technocrats and the closet Dr Mengeles with their simple genetic solutions to complex problems.

The latter stuff has been on hold for some time, pending the arrival of some disease affecting the west. If SARS-CoV-2 had remained a non-western disease, like Zika and others, then lockdown would not have happened as there is no money for Big Pharma in diseases affecting the third world.

Last edited 4 years ago by Ken Garoo
3
0
peyrole
peyrole
4 years ago

This is a complete diversion. Its merely designed to encourage meaningless debate and divert everyone from the real issues.

2
-1
Julian
Julian
4 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

I tend to agree, though if it turns out to be escaped from a lab and they’ve lied about it, it adds to the stench of dishonesty that sourrounds the whole business, and further dents the credibility of the narrative.

2
0
RickH
RickH
4 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

No. It’s not irrelevant, peyrole, because it opens up questions about the range of forces at play and the nature of the overlapping parts of the scam.

4
0
BeBopRockSteady
BeBopRockSteady
4 years ago
Reply to  RickH

Indeed. As the global health officials imposed lockdowns and masking on kids, now further burying people in vaccine propaganda, they have openly being lying about what they know.

Trust is a precious thing.

3
0
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
4 years ago

Bannon’s War Room discusses this most afternoons. They and the National Pulse blog are way ahead of the curve in exposing Fauci & Co.
Get the app if you’re interested, 3-5pm GMT.
https://twitter.com/nataliegwinters/status/1394391701175869440?s=20

Last edited 4 years ago by NeilofWatford
2
0
NeilofWatford
NeilofWatford
4 years ago

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/report-chinas-military-weapon-covid-19-constructed-completely-command-control-chinese-military/
By Dr Lawrence Sellin.

1
0
SweetBabyCheeses
SweetBabyCheeses
4 years ago

A country the size of 9.597 million sq km and the new corona virus virus turns up just 14km from the one Level 4 lab in China that is doing gain of function research on coronaviruses.

Not to mention all the initial and ongoing efforts they went to cover it up. Why would you do that otherwise? It chills me to think of how many they murdered in their futile attempts to hide it too. Given what we know now, do you really believe that the perfectly healthy 34 year old Dr Li Wenliang who blew the whistle actually died of covid?!

And conveniently we are now all emulating the policies of the CCP. The fact that we are even debating the origins of covid blows my mind.

CEDAA1D2-A542-469E-A433-FC3EB60E7137.png
4
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
4 years ago
Reply to  SweetBabyCheeses

I agree that tons of plausible evidence points to Wuhan as a very possible origination point. But so too does tons of evidence point to the FACT that the virus had spread to at least 12 states in America by November or December 2019.

These states include: Washington, California, Oregon, New Jersey, South Florida and Alabama.

How in the heck did people in all these states develop COVID if the virus was not “spreading” and spreading “widely?” And not a one of these people had travelled to China.

Per published news stories, there are at least 16 Americans who had COVID in November or December 2019 – all “proven” by positive antibody tests (several of these people tested positive for antibodies multiple times). I’m no scientist or epidemiologist, but I am comfortable in postulating that some (unknown) people had to give these people this virus … and these people also almost certainly gave the virus to others.

I mean if a couple in Sylacauga, Alabama had COVID in December were they the only people in America who had it? How would this be possible?

And why wouldn’t the CDC “contact tracers” even talk to this couple?

Here’s the answer: They wouldn’t if they didn’t want to disclose evidence that this virus WAS spreading widely in America – weeks if not months before they say the virus was even in this country.

It’s not the “early spread” investigations public health officials did perform … It’s the ones they didn’t … and still won’t perform that tell us something about the legitimacy of these early spread investigations.

Last edited 4 years ago by BillRiceJr
2
0
SweetBabyCheeses
SweetBabyCheeses
4 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

Yes I could well believe that. I’m actually pretty certain I caught covid around New Year 2020 myself, if not then it was another virus with identical symptoms. I was v poorly, considering I am a slim, fit and healthy 30something. My GP said he’d seen a lot of it about and it was nothing to worry about! No one close to me seemed to catch it (or if they did it was nothing like mine).
Apologies if it seems like I’m digressing but that’s my exact point – it’s such an ordinary virus that why would anyone think differently? Even the old and the vulnerable who can be seriously ill usually die with it and not from it. When have you ever been to the Dr with a cold/flu and been tested for anything?! This is such a non “pandemic” that it could’ve passed entirely under the radar for years.

So perhaps the unusual thing here is that the whistle was blown in the origin location when they could’ve continued to cover it up and waited until someone else discovered SARS-COV2….well what if no one ever did?! Maybe China blew their own whistle in the end because they were fed up with us ignoring it!

1
0
JohnK
JohnK
4 years ago
Reply to  SweetBabyCheeses

It’s possible that it has been around for a while before it was identified. Like you, I had something in the last week in Dec 2019, and as you say, it was never the norm to approach any GP for anything that appeared to be a ‘cold’ like infection. They don’t want people in with things like that to pass on, after all. Looking on the bright side, there could be a fair bit of natural immunity on those grounds, but they are not interested in analysing what we dealt with before it was announced.

0
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
4 years ago

The origination question is obviously supremely important. I would simply say that if the virus did originate in Wuhan and thus begin to “spread” throughout the world from this city … then said “spread” MUST have begun months before the “Wuhan Outbreak” (which was reported world-wide on or around December 30, 2019).

I say this because there is a mountain of compelling evidence that the virus had ALREADY spread around the world by at least November 2019. It was certainly “spreading” in America by November.

So any spread that began in China must have begun by, say, September, if not earlier – to have infected so many people in so many different states in America by November.

Still, the CDC says they can find no evidence of spread of the virus in America before mid-January.

To which I say: The CDC obviously isn’t looking very hard.

3
0
Chuck
Chuck
4 years ago

After suspecting that it was made in a lab the next question should be if it is man-made who made it and who distributed it? The US/West has a persistent history of using chemical, biological, radioactive, and nuclear weapons. From the Project for a New American Century “Combat will likely take place in new dimensions: In space, cyber-space and perhaps the world of microbes… advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool” Here is an well reasoned article by Ron Unz that spells out the case for it more likely being a biological attack against China. https://www.21cir.com/2021/05/the-truth-and-the-whole-truth-about-the-origins-of-covid-19/

0
0
binarygeoff
binarygeoff
4 years ago

Regardless of where it came from or whether or not it was deliberate the political elite worldwide have milked us to death using the usual excuse of caring for the public while doing the complete opposite for their own personal gain. And no I was not referring to money although I imagine there are a large number of this elite that have done just fine financially too.

3
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
4 years ago

Please read Dr. Mercola’s newsletter issued today. A very good discussion on the origin of sars covid2 and the response of US congressmen demanding an investigation into its origin. Anyone see Matt or Boris or one of the 600 plus mps insist on an investigation into the origin of sars covid2. Before we go one step further injecting people with an experimental biologicals, shouldn’t we know what we are dealing with? Just a thought.

1
0
gedhurst
gedhurst
4 years ago

With wet markets all over China, the virus originated in one 400m from a Level 4 Biosecurity lab, doing gain of function research on … er… coronaviruses.
The only open question is whether the lab escape was accidental or deliberate.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 46: Ofcom’s Ill-Fated Imperialism, One Year of Two-Tier Keir and Phoney Green Jobs

by Richard Eldred
1 August 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Teacher Sacked After Criticising ‘Two-Tier Justice’ in Lucy Connolly Case

3 August 2025
by Toby Young

Record Number of Over-60s Referred to Prevent Amid Explosion in ‘Extreme Right Wing’ Views, eg Liking The Dambusters

2 August 2025
by Toby Young

Devastating Official US Report Lays Bare The Abuses of ‘Settled’ Climate Science And Its Role in Net Zero

3 August 2025
by Chris Morrison
Screenshot

New Coinbase ad About Broken Britain Shows We’ve Become the Laughing Stock of the World

3 August 2025
by Sallust

News Round-Up

3 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Record Number of Over-60s Referred to Prevent Amid Explosion in ‘Extreme Right Wing’ Views, eg Liking The Dambusters

85

Teacher Sacked After Criticising ‘Two-Tier Justice’ in Lucy Connolly Case

22

News Round-Up

19

Labour Targets Anti-Migrant Protesters With Terrorist Tracking Software

16
Screenshot

New Coinbase ad About Broken Britain Shows We’ve Become the Laughing Stock of the World

15

Nappy Pads on Ceiling Sewage Leaks – Did Infection Kill the Letby Babies?

3 August 2025
by Dr David Livermore
Screenshot

New Coinbase ad About Broken Britain Shows We’ve Become the Laughing Stock of the World

3 August 2025
by Sallust

Devastating Official US Report Lays Bare The Abuses of ‘Settled’ Climate Science And Its Role in Net Zero

3 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

In 2020, the Left Told us Rioting Worked. In 2025, They Tell us it Doesn’t. What Changed? The Politics of the Rioters, of Course

3 August 2025
by Steven Tucker

Sex Sells. It Always Has. And the Ad Industry Has Finally Remembered That

2 August 2025
by Lee Taylor

POSTS BY DATE

June 2024
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« May   Jul »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

June 2024
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« May   Jul »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Teacher Sacked After Criticising ‘Two-Tier Justice’ in Lucy Connolly Case

3 August 2025
by Toby Young

Record Number of Over-60s Referred to Prevent Amid Explosion in ‘Extreme Right Wing’ Views, eg Liking The Dambusters

2 August 2025
by Toby Young

Devastating Official US Report Lays Bare The Abuses of ‘Settled’ Climate Science And Its Role in Net Zero

3 August 2025
by Chris Morrison
Screenshot

New Coinbase ad About Broken Britain Shows We’ve Become the Laughing Stock of the World

3 August 2025
by Sallust

News Round-Up

3 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Record Number of Over-60s Referred to Prevent Amid Explosion in ‘Extreme Right Wing’ Views, eg Liking The Dambusters

85

Teacher Sacked After Criticising ‘Two-Tier Justice’ in Lucy Connolly Case

22

News Round-Up

19

Labour Targets Anti-Migrant Protesters With Terrorist Tracking Software

16
Screenshot

New Coinbase ad About Broken Britain Shows We’ve Become the Laughing Stock of the World

15

Nappy Pads on Ceiling Sewage Leaks – Did Infection Kill the Letby Babies?

3 August 2025
by Dr David Livermore
Screenshot

New Coinbase ad About Broken Britain Shows We’ve Become the Laughing Stock of the World

3 August 2025
by Sallust

Devastating Official US Report Lays Bare The Abuses of ‘Settled’ Climate Science And Its Role in Net Zero

3 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

In 2020, the Left Told us Rioting Worked. In 2025, They Tell us it Doesn’t. What Changed? The Politics of the Rioters, of Course

3 August 2025
by Steven Tucker

Sex Sells. It Always Has. And the Ad Industry Has Finally Remembered That

2 August 2025
by Lee Taylor

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences