“Never let a good crisis go to waste.”
If in doubt, attribute a quote to Churchill because he probably did say it at one time or another. It’s certainly been stolen many times over, and the mainstream media, BBC, Sky et al. have declared an emergency, broken the glass and pulled the dusty old axiom out of its case as the pictures of bloodied passengers and crew – pure gold to the climate catastrophisers – came in yesterday after the Singapore Airlines accident over Myanmar (Burma in old money). For aircraft accident it was, and as, sadly, a death was involved, and several severe injuries, this is how it will be treated by the Singapore aviation authorities. They are nothing if not thorough and eventually the truth will come out, but by then the caravanserai of the chattering classes will have emptied and the climate caravan will be somewhere – anywhere – else. They only need to borrow the truth for a day or two, they don’t need to own it.
A troublesome incident for sure. A ‘perfect storm’ of events seems to have come together. Geographically, Singapore Airlines flight SQ321 was nearing the end of its journey from London and the passengers were being served ‘breakfast’, or whatever meals are called where local time has overtaken stomach expectations. Trollies were out, galleys were stacked with the detritus of 300-odd meals, and passengers were queuing for the loos to freshen up before the arrival into Singapore. All so normal.
It was approaching mid-afternoon local time and it’s Monsoon season in that part of the world. Time for the thunderclouds to be developing. Happens every year at this time. Has to happen or it’s a crisis for farmers, fishermen and the local economies around the Bay of Bengal. Yes, if the Monsoon is a bit too vigorous, places like Bangladesh suffer loss of life with floods, but t’was ever thus. It’s no coincidence that if the Monsoon is too (un)damp a squib, then it is described as “failed”. It’s that important and has been over the centuries.
It does bring in its wake what the met men describe as ‘chaotic skies’. Clouds everywhere at every level, biblical thunderstorms with electrical activity – and yet hundreds of aircraft full of passengers daily pick their delicate way through the Monsoon without serious incident.
It’s been happening like this since Pontius was a pilot, as they say. I’ve been navigating these skies since I started commercial flying when I was 20. I learned from the old China-Hands who did it in the early days of what we would today recognise as perfectly normal aviation, not overflying most of the weather, but actually picking their way through it at dead of night with only rudimentary weather warning radar. The already red cockpit lighting turned right down to almost nothing so they could stare out into the night and try to spot the cumulonimbus with their name on it. The Flight Engineer would use a small torch to read the engine instruments so as not to disturb the pilot’s night vision. It was part of the job then. The old captains would joke that it was worse when they were doing this to spot a night fighter on a Second World War bombing run – one or more of those would spoil their evenings more surely than any bloody fluffy white cloud. Yet they (and we) had the greatest of respect for the forces of Mother Nature, then and now. A night fighter will fill your aircraft and possibly you with holes. A cumulonimbus can take hold of you and rip you up like a paper aeroplane.
Planes are stronger now than 50 years on, but pilots’ respect for weather ‘events’ remains as high as ever. The generally troubled atmosphere surrounding the Monsoon also leads to clear air turbulence which, as yesterday proved, can be just as nasty. It occurs when two air masses rub against each other, thrown together by the progress of the Monsoon. Think a ship docking, and slightly overcooking its approach to the quay. The bang and shudder as the irresistible force meets the immovable object. Two air masses do the same, but they’re more difficult to spot and therefore prepare for. It’s similar on the North Atlantic. The famous jet streams are separate fast moving tubes of air which similarly rub up against the surrounding air mass and where they meet, turbulence occurs. Always has. They tend to lie along the coastlines of New England and up into the Maritimes of Canada, especially in winter. I remember doing this route regularly in the 1970s and getting tossed around in my 707 mercilessly. I was convinced then that it got worse there annually. It didn’t and a decade later it settled down. Apparently, sun-spot activity was very high around then and there was the odd speculation that this may have been linked to rougher winds on the North Atlantic. Nothing was proved and life went on. Grumbling – and slightly queasily – we made our way back to Europe. Nobody thought of asking the politicians to alter the weather for us. No cult grew up around what was thought to be happening, organised by people it wasn’t happening to. No human sacrifices were made to placate the gods of wind. But then, there was no money sloshing around in the climate change sector either. It was enough that we were understanding more about how things were happening, where they were likely to be happening, and the best way to avoid the worst while carrying on the essential task of living a normal life. We knew our limitations and inadequacies when dealing with Mother Nature. The thought of a character assassination of MN herself, or that it might somehow be ‘our fault’, would be enough to get you booted out of a position of responsibility. Now, it’s the other way round, and only my generation who form a bridge between now and the sane 70s can recognise the huge gulf in attitudes. Two masses of thinking rubbing up against each other causing what seems to be catastrophic turbulence in mankind itself.
Back to Singapore. It’s very doubtful if a big nasty cloud caused the incident. They’re too easy to spot nowadays with sophisticated airborne weather radars. Clear air turbulence – not so easy. It can be and is forecast in the preflight met briefings. Only as a likelihood, though, not as a certainty, nor in any one specific place. Occasionally, there may be a seat-of-the-pants warning. A slight rumble. A tremble going through the aircraft. That’s a signal to start monitoring the outside air temperature, the wind read-outs and the skies ahead for slight changes in cloud patterns. I’ve erred on the side of safety enough in the past to annoy the cabin crew by warning them that it might get a bit bumpy soon. This throws their routine out of kilter, and they may decide to stop serving ‘hots’ and start gathering trays in. Anything more than a hunch and I’d tell them to secure the cabin, seat belt signs on, and if it’s getting really bad to sit themselves down and strap in immediately. There will be a mess to clear up after, but hopefully no injuries. Make an announcement to the passengers in best ‘resigned to inconvenience’ pilot voice that it may be about to feel uncomfortable for a bit, but having been here many times before I know it won’t last for very long. That last bit is important. We’ve all been here before and lived to tell the tale.
Very occasionally there is almost no discernible warning and it’s seatbelt signs on, PA to the cabin crew to be seated and hope that nothing flies around the cabin. Slow the plane down a bit, get on to ATC to request an altitude change as turbulent layers are shallow and a five or six thousand feet change in cruising level can help enormously.
The latter is what seems to have happened to SQ yesterday. No warning, a quick change of height authorised and sadly the damage control begun.
As I said, t’was ever thus. No change. The truth is out there and it will come with the Singapore inquiry months down the line when it will only merit a brief mention in the mainstream media. They will be blaming another disaster on climate change by then.
James Leary is the pseudonym of a retired B747 Captain.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I wrote a story today about Pfizer becoming a “corporate sponsor” of the Southeastern Conference (14 well-known colleges). In the story, I mention how ridiculous it is this sports league continues to push vaccines for student-athletes. I linked to two myocarditis studies (one showing 1-in-1000 risk, the other as low as 1 in 3000). I guess I need to go back into the story and add a link to this story/study.
I don’t think the 14 colleges of the SEC have thought enough about what this partnership could mean to them in the future. The potential liability is vast and they are not doing anything to improve their credibility with prospective future students.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-southeastern-conference-is-now
So, is the mRNA technique flawed across the board, for any “vaccine” drug, or just the Covid-19 one? Does anyone actually understand the biology of it (yet)? It wouldn’t be the first time that the company involved made serious mistakes.
What are the other mRNA drugs?
Genuine question.
You can find drug research reports on TrialSite News, SciTechDaily, Cnet Science, and sometimes even Interesting Engineering, to name but four…
Thank you. One has become far more curious of late…
They had ones to treat things like cancer a while back. But there were apparently a lot of problems with it.
Far more likely to cause cancer it seems….
Funny how that works. Whether it’s cancer or covid, mRNA gene therapy really seems to be gasoline on the fire!
Robert Malone has gone into detail about this. He asserts that the mRNA technology is sound, but the problem less with the genetically engineered spike protein and the delivery mechanism (e.g. lipid nanoparticles for Pfizer).
Personally, I have a fundamental problem with the idea of genetic treatment. Prefer nature to take its course and what will be will be.
So other than the delivery mechanism and the stuff inside the delivery mechanism, it’s sound?
The delivery mechanism and the spike protein inside it is pretty much the whole thing, isn’t it?
What else is there left?
Th delivery mechanism into the cell, not the delivery mechanism from the cell into the body i.e. the translation of the mRNA. Listen to Robert Malone.
Hey, I’m not promoting this sh*t, I’m just repeating what I’ve read/heard.
“What else is there left?”
The 5G chemicals?
Aside from ‘unknown’ substances related to the adjuvants, the information for which is currently withheld for commercial reasons, it contains yummy things like:
Polyethylene glycol: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251011/
Incomplete RNA which is still biologically active – and with unknown effects: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-the-cia-and-national?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#play
Mould: https://khn.org/news/article/pfizer-new-vaccine-plant-persistent-mold-issues-history-of-recalls/
Metal fragments: https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/international-research-groups-find-sharp-metal-objects-in-covid-vaccines-very-frightening/
Toxic metals: https://rumble.com/v1npo1k-dr.-mark-trozzi-toxic-metals-in-covid-shots.html
Other particulate contaminants: https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/failure-to-scale-covid-19-injection-vials-must-be-independently-tested-for-conformity-to-label.-9a77eba4
Others report such wonderful things as E coli, glass fragments, fibres, other diverse fragments – and a fly leg. Dr Hughes summarises some of the data here: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/52/96
To quote Alexandra Latypova – it really is a toxic garbage soup. https://rumble.com/v1p69bf-c-19-injections-regulatory-and-manufacturing-fraud-tessa-lena-tallks-to-ale.html
Thank you for submitting all these links.
Do you remember the scene from Disney’s Fantasia where the apprentice sourcerer is mixing up a spell? The list above shows that it is still about witch craft but using a lab rather than a cave, a white coat rather than a black cloak and pointy hat…
Good comparison: most people will remember The Sorcerer’s Apprentice scene in Fantasia.
Nature, by way of our immune system, is definitely not keen on any foreign body hijacking our body cells and rearranging their chemistry and function which is what virus and thecmRNA junk do. At the first sign, it sends T cells and cytotoxic agents to kill such cells. (And if those cells are in muscles, like the heart…)
That alone should tell us not to do it deliberately.
As I understand matters, and I do so in simple terms only, mRNA gene therapy was initially and still is used as a delivery system for cancer treatment by way of immunotherapy. Basically it seeks to turn on, or off, and thereby amplify, the activities of targeted cancer seeking cells, to enable them to destroy cells which have become cancerous. Look at CTLA-4, Jim Allison and Coley….Books, not google!
Used in this manner mRNA has great potential, but the downside is that it has to turn off elements of the immune system in order to work.
It didn’t take long for bigphama’s vaccinators/genetic engineers to realise mRNA would be the perfect delivery system for a new generation of “vaccines”.
However, the problem is they know next to nothing about how the immune system actually works (mind you, no one does) and, disastrously for the jabbed even less about the long term effects.
This paper gives a clue though:-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
The paper also explains the inevitable blood clot risks.
Thanks for your response (and those from the others as well). The linked article is interesting, and I’m glad I didn’t accept the offer in March 2021. Then I said that I might change my mind when it becomes as established product. Not much chance of changing my mind now, given the emerging evidence.
Dr Palmer and Dr Bhakdi think it is. A quote from the article linked above: –
‘We note that the damage mechanism is which emerges from the autopsy studies is not limited to COVID-19 vaccines only but is completely general—it must be expected to occur similarly with mRNA vaccines against any and all infectious pathogens. This technology has failed and must be abandoned.’
Dr Bhakdi said at a recent MD4CE meeting that the human immune system is already perfect & adding anything to it will displace the balance. Good health, good diet, clean water, sunshine, fresh air & exercise are the best things to promote a healthy immune system.
And now they are trying to make mRNA flu jabs and RSV jabs and God only knows what else?
If it is getting into the bloodstream and producing an immune response there, that would suggest it’s a flaw in the design, clearly other vaccinations into the arm are not triggering a response like this.
Or a flaw in the administration of the stabs – the individuals who have been fast tracked into the role of “stabber” have not been aspirating the needle to check for blood to ensure the tip has not entered a vessel.
Probably both. The spike protein itself is toxic, and the mRNA technique goes everywhere in the body and makes it produce whatever protein it is designed to produce, ad infinitum.
Professor Sukharit Bhakdi posted on his Telegram group that it is now possible to distinguish the spike protein generated via the jab and the spike protein from the virus. He calls it a game changer.
Why is it a game changer?
Pathology.
The dead can’t lie… Hence the push & rush to destroy the evidence via cremation.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651
The autopsy in Dresden of the 76yr old which Will described seems to be the first instance where this method was applied and this result obtained.
Hence a game-changer to Bhakdi.
Not sure whether he doesn’t know about the one of the 55yr old, or whether that was later, then used the same method etc..
As I understand it SARS Cov-2 is a respiratory tract infection therefore the only exposure is ‘air side’ so it’s not clear to me how it would get into the blood stream. The disease attacks the lungs not the circulatory system.
The injection on the other had goes into the shoulder, it was supposed to remain local but we now know for a fact that it does not, so it’s reasonable to assume it is reaching the blood supply (unless there is some plausible other route around the body that bypasses the bloodstream).
So given the above two statements, it’s not clear how a natural infection in the respiratory tract would cause an immune response in the circulatory system (it’s this immune response which causes the clots I believe), however it is very clear how a jab would cause this.
It seems too obvious to be true in all honesty, would anyone like to comment on my reasoning?
You are right. It is idiotic to inject someone in the deltoid for a virus which attacks your respiratory system. Blood poisoning is the only result. Akin to cutting off your hand to save your foot from gangrene.
All of these quacksines contain poisons, that most people can’t pronounce or spell. They don’t do anything against a virus, hence the quacksinated making up the 90% death rate ‘from’ rona. Follow the money is what they mean by follow the science. The speed of science means the velocity of money which can be made.
Indeed, there is no plausible mechanism for how an injection in the deltoid can induce mucosal immunity in the respiratory tract. That is why a nasal vaccine would theoretically make more sense than an injectable one, but so far no successful one has emerged yet.
“The speed of science means the velocity of money which can be made.”
I do hope John Campbell calls in here because he really did not understand ‘the speed of science’ and I am sure your explanation will help him and many others. It has certainly enlightened me.
Many thanks.
Look at any development project. The balance between development itself and testing, fixing, certification, obtaining approvals etc is probably in the ratio of 20%:80%. The “speed of science” was only possible because they didn’t follow all the testing and certification stuff.
The virus can sometimes enter the circulatory system VIA the lungs, of course, but usually it does not do so in quantities anywhere near large enough to even approach the level of spike protein from the jabs.
Wow, just lovely. But it couldn’t be the “safe and effective” jabs, no. It MUST be the virus, climate change, working too hard (per Billy Joel), or maybe even karma. But not the jabs!
There’s even some blaming artificial sweeteners!
There are swathes of people I believe who should definitely take the booster without delay; yup!
Does that make me a good person or a bad one?
Blessed are the unvaccinated, for they shall inherit the earth. Or at least the west.
Peace of mind – not having to worry about every little twinge: blessedness indeed.
I’m feeling pretty blessed at the moment
Does anyone know why MPs continue to,think the covid vaccines are safe and effective when the data says otherwise. I continue to get responses from our Mp Simon Jupp to say the vaccines are safe and effective. Isn’t it the responsibility of the MPs to be current on their information about covid vaccines as they are being doled out to every Uk citizen despite not having an efficacy or safety data and certainly no long term data.
I have to admit, if I were an MP I sure would like to be on the right side of this debate when certain people are dragged into court and found guilty of criminal negligence, wouldn’t you?
Just lovely. Today I found out that one of my FB friends has congestive heart failure and was told she could die suddenly. She just turned 38. Kinda young to have something like that. Sure enough, she was jabbed about a year ago, then got a really bad case of Omicron shortly after that put her in the hospital. And now this. So much for “safe and effective”, right?
Why hasn’t anyone addressed the fact that the very nature of mRNA vaccines means that they will cause automatic damage to the body?
Consider this, the mRNA vaccines function by causing healthy cells to present pathogenic spike proteins on their surface so that the immune system will respond. What is the immune response? The destruction of that cell!
Therefore, ANY cell that takes in that mRNA material and starts to make spike proteins will be targeted for destruction by the immune system! Whether it is heart calls, blood vessel cells, organ cells, or nerve cells, if they present the spike protein, they will be destroyed!
So at BEST these shots make your immune system target arm muscle cells, and at worst your own immune system will be targetting what would normally be healthy cells all through out your body!