A London theatre has said it is seeking a Chief Executive who is disabled, gay, from the “criminal class” or from the “global majority” in a job advert – sparking a backlash. The Telegraph has more.
The Camden People’s Theatre, which received £250,000 of taxpayer funding from Arts Council England during the Covid crisis, has attracted anger and mockery on social media over the wording of its job posting for an Artistic Director and joint Chief Executive.
The theatre, a charity, says in its advert that it encourages applications from individuals without formal education or who identify as “working-class, benefit class, criminal class and/or underclass”.
Social media users hit back at the advert, writing on X (formerly Twitter) that the wording was insulting and using “Victorian” terms associated with class.
“Working class being lumped in with criminal class is awful,” wrote one user. Another said it was “offensive to the point of reading like a parody”.
“The classification is reminiscent of Charles Booth’s 19th century poverty maps,” another wrote. Another said “who identifies as ‘criminal class?’ The Krays?”
Conservative MP Neil O’Brien pointed out that taxpayer money was being spent on the £45,000-£50,000 a year Chief Executive job, and asked “what if… being a criminal is bad?”
The theatre also said that applications from members of the “global majority” would be welcomed, which the organisation said included “people of Black Caribbean, Black African, South Asian, East Asian, South East Asian, Middle Eastern, Arab, Latinx, Jewish, Romany and Irish Traveller heritage”.
Candidates who self-identified as disabled would automatically get an interview if they met the essential criteria, the advert said.
Deaf and LGBTQ+ people were also encouraged to apply, as well as those who are neurodivergent, a term encompassing those with conditions such as autism.
Equalities Minister Kemi Badenoch this week criticised the term ‘global majority’ – a replacement for ‘ethnic minority’ being pushed by the far Left – calling it “anti-white”.
What haven’t the Conservatives banned this kind of nonsense yet?
You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
30 Comments
Oldest
NewestMost Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
10navigator
1 year ago
An excellent article by Sally Beck in the Conservative Woman (25th apr) covers the rise in Autism diagnoses. In the USA, from one case in 10,000 in the early 70s, it’s currently around one in 40. Perhaps it’s coincidence that the US children are scheduled for 70 (seventy) vaccines in their early years. Andrew Wakefield’s case gets some (deserved) attention too, and the Autism/MMR link comes under much scrutiny, with many links covering the twenty year saga and hatchet job on Dr Wakefield. Well worth a read.
The new trend of diagnosing middle aged men and women with ADHD is, I’m sure, nothing to do with selling drugs and therapy. I mean, we know that pharma and the medical industry in general only acts in the interests of their patients right?
A 55 year old chap where I recently worked, who’d always worn a coat of superiority, decided to share with a number of us that he’d just been diagnosed with ADHD, and that was the reason for his behaviour. It wasn’t. He’d just found a way to excuse himself for being an absolute arsehole.
It seems like the test for autism is a series of questions, in which case it would appear to be a subjective test, subject to the type of answers given and subject to interpretation by the diagnostician. If you think you may have broken your leg you have a X ray and usually get a clear answer which is much more of an objective test.
Ralph McTell once wrote a song which I always assumed was about autism; ”Michael in the Garden’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoShjY-mWsY
All of which, as this article suggests; begs the question; why is autism a problem? To my mind it only becomes a problem when it raises serious barriers to someone being able to function as an independent adult in society and that is not always an easy assessment to make
My son kept trying to tell me he had ADHD ‘because I find it difficult to sit still’. I told him, what you’ve got is called ‘being a boy’.
I dare say there are autistic kids out there but too many are quick to pin a disability label on their kid instead of admitting he or she is just a pain in the backside.
Last edited 1 year ago by disgruntled246
godknowsimgood
1 year ago
The majority of the questions in the AQ test can honestly be answered either ‘agree’ or ‘disagree’. For example:
Q1. I prefer to do things with others rather than on my own.
Honest answer: I prefer to do some things with others, and I prefer to do some things on my own. So I could quite honestly answer that question either way, depending on my inclination at the time of answering.
Q2. I prefer to do things the same way over and over again.
Honest answer: Like most people, I like routine, it makes life easier, but I don’t prefer to do every single thing the same way over and over again. So I could quite honestly answer that question either way.
Q3. If I try to imagine something, I find it very easy to create a picture in my mind.
Honest answer: How do I know how ‘easy’ or otherwise it is ‘to create a picture in my mind’ compared to how ‘easy’ or otherwise it is for other people to do it in their minds? I don’t have experience of the workings of other people’s minds, only my own mind. Therefore, compared to other people, I can’t be sure. So, again, I could quite honestly answer that question either way.
Q4. I frequently get so strongly absorbed in one thing that I lose sight of other things.
Honest answer: Like most people, if I get absorbed in various activities (watching a film, a football match, a DIY job, writing an email or something like this in the DS comments section, shopping, talking to a friend, preparing a meal, etc), I don’t think about other things while ‘absorbed’ in the activity. But what exactly does “lose sight of” mean?
5. I often notice small sounds when others do not.
I generally don’t consult with other people as to whether or not they have heard “small sounds” that I have heard, it doesn’t make for riveting conversation, unless on the very rare occasions when the sound could have been made by a burglar or a mouse, or something. So, again, I could honestly answer that question either way.
Etc, etc, etc.
‘Any scores of 26 or greater indicate the presence of autistic traits; the higher the score, the more autistic traits you have.’
I decided to take the test twice, honestly both times, but with two different mindsets.
Firstly, honestly but with the mindset that I’d like the result to show that I’m quite a normal person:
I scored 10.
Secondly, honestly but with the mindset that I’d like the result to show that I am an exceptional neuroatypical or neurodiverse person:
I scored 38
Being introverted – which many people are – and/or having a somewhat obsessive personality – which many people have – do not mean a person is ‘autistic’, but it’s clear that anyone who is introverted and/or obsessive will come out in this test as having a high number of autistic traits. So introversion and obsessiveness are being conflated with autism, when they are not the same thing at all.
I agree with the authors of this DS article that there are some genuinely autistic people, and people with Asperger’s, but it can very easily be greatly overdiagnosed.
I seriously doubt a self completed questionnaire could be usefully accurate for this purpose. In so far as I know anything about the autistic spectrum, I think it’s one of those things that is hard to pin down but you know it when you see it. It’s also a very broad spectrum and you would be hard pressed to see many similarities between those on either end in terms of their behaviour and life experiences and outcomes. For me
the defining quality is that autistic people don’t really have any “side” to them.
It seemed natural to bring Paul home for Sunday lunch. She’d been scared at first to even ask, as though she was being too forward, too serious, but Paul had said yes immediately, that he’d love to. That was what she loved about him, that there was NO SIDE TO HIM, just complete straight-forwardness and genuine enthusiasm for her.
Thanks. I think I even understand that and I would regard this as true. But it’s often perceived as the exact opposite, the pure mannerism perfected to the point that nobody can really tell how it’s precisely being just acted but everybody remains nevertheless convinced that it must certainly be one.
Hopefully harmless example for demonstration: After years of problems with trainers whose soles I had run through, this usually being noticed during the first heavier autumn rains, I decided that I should perhaps try some more solid footwear and switched to standard issue German army combat boots instead as these must surely be meant for walking. During the first longer trip with them, I hammered bloody blisters into both of my hindfoot soles. I concluded that this must have been due to having formed the habit of putting all of my weight onto them first with each step during years of walking with trainers. This didn’t work with these boots as my feet would give way first and not the soles of them. I thus intentionally retrained myself to touch ground with the front part of my foot first. Technically, this worked nicely, especially as I also remembered that from my time in the military. But this became a minor Reading open air sensation and I had people literally following me and trying to parody the way I was walking for kilometers on end on occasion (and the usual string of minor run-ins and attacks).
I think people are bothered by difference, or maybe they are bothered by people who are comfortable in their own skin because it reminds them of their own insecurity.
I find the company of straightforward people preferable and refreshing.
Q1. I prefer to do things with others rather than on my own.
Honest answer: I prefer to do some things with others, and I prefer to do some things on my own. So I could quite honestly answer that question either way, depending on my inclination at the time of answering.
—-
Well, the majority of people prefer to go the toilet alone and when they’re not in some kind of relationship, also prefer to sleep alone. But that’s not the point of the question, which is quite obviously meant as I prefer to do things with others rather than on my own in my spare time and people usually agree with that. When they go out, they’ll plan to meet some friends and spend time with them. I don’t. I don’t even have any friends as I’ve decided that it’s better to avoid hooking up with people than hooking up with the wrong kind of people, eg, the drug scene.
—- Q2. I prefer to do things the same way over and over again.
Honest answer: Like most people, I like routine, it makes life easier, but I don’t prefer to do every single thing the same way over and over again. So I could quite honestly answer that question either way.
—-
The natural ambiguity of language could again justify giving a wrong answer as you don’t prefer to do things in the same way over and over again. In contrast to this, each of my days starts with the same ten step procedure which always occur in a particular order and even in a particular way. The last of these is breakfast and that’s always the exact same breakfast, ie, always with the same ingredients and always prepared in the exact same order. I sometimes changes my habits if I have a better idea or want to try something different but maybe once per year or so.
The others are a bit more difficult, so, I’ll leave it at that.
Is nobody allowed to be a bit ‘odd’ or eccentric any more? Must there always be a ‘diagnosis’ of something or other?
AJPotts
1 year ago
Politics and Public Policy Playbook:
1) manufacture a crisis
2) orchestrate demands for something to be done by the state
3) ensure a state intervention takes place
4) publicise that the crisis has worsened
5) orchestrate demands for something more to be done by the state….
Your headline is over-autistic as the article is really mostly about ADHD. That’s especially true for the conclusion as there’s no medication for autism. Judging from conversations I had about this in the past, there’s some entitlement to benefits for the latter and hence, you would perhaps have wanted to write something about millions of shirkers on benefits.
That said, for some reasons I can only vaguely gather, autism is somehow cool to have for some people¹ and I’ve encountered a small lot of people who claim to be autists but who otherwise seem to be socially perfectly well-integrated and differ barely, if at all, from the general herd. It’s not so much overdiagnosed as misdiagnosed, ie, the diagnosis is essentially a favour done to someone. At least, that’s how it looks like.
¹ Excuses their bad manners and general obnoxiousness, cf Chris Packham?
soundofreason
1 year ago
Although I think over-diagnosis is a significant and possibly the major element I think there may be other factors too. The most obvious of which is upbringing/parenting. People are having kids later in life and it seems reasonable to me that this may have a direct effect on the developing child in utero. In addition both parents often continue to work and hand their kids over to child minders and early years nurseries and this too seems likely to have a direct effect on the intellectual and emotional development of the child.
However, I also speculate that environmental factors may have an effect. Obviously, given the origins of the site, we think of the wide use of vaccines but over the last few decades there have been other changes in the chemicals people are exposed to on a routine basis. One particular speculation of mine (I do not claim it to be more than that) is the increase in exposure and ingestion of surfactants – for example ‘rinse aid’ in dishwashers and other cleaning agents such as shower sprays. I detect and detest the taste of rinse aid in my morning tea and so always rinse cups in clean water after they’ve been dish-washed. Of course, not everyone has a dishwasher – but not everyone has an autistic child, either.
Surfactants can have a significant effect on chemical reactions and I think it not unreasonable that they might be in part to blame for developmental problems in kids.
zebedee
1 year ago
I’m probably autistic as well given the test. Are you fascinated by numbers? Yes, I’m a Mathematician. Do you keep going on and on about the same thing? Yes, epidemics don’t grow exponentially as has been known since 1840. Do I prefer working with computers to humans? It depends on the computer and the human.
Reminds me of an old event at one of the voluntary organisations I was working in (being a member of it), in which the manager told me that the young volunteer I was working with was Autistic. I didn’t need to know, and probably would no have noticed otherwise. Maybe events like that are common, and perhaps supported by the usual suspects.
Hoppy Uniatz
1 year ago
After I scored well into the allegedly autistic range on that test, my brother took it upon himself to “beat my high score.” How autistic is that??!!!
Gaming these tests is obviously fairly easy. For instance, you can always intentionally invert your answers, as already suggested above, eg, Do I prefer to do the same thing over and over again? Absolutely f***ing not! Hence, the opposite must be the right answer! What that’s supposed to prove beyond that many people excel at cheating (Who da thunk?) is anybody’s guess.
The Liberal Progressive mentality is to turn every human behaviour into some malady or other. There are no idiots or morons any more, they are all just suffering from some syndrome or phobia and the big government is here to help.
rachel.c
1 year ago
My understanding is that autism is a serious brain disorder and you can’t be “mildly autistic” a la Elon Musk. It appears there is a massive increase in autistic people who cannot function and thrive without 24 hour support and attention from family and carers. Likely due to vaccines, drugs and other environmental factors (including the ubiquitous use of aluminium salts for all sorts of processes). Their on-going care is a huge issue. ADHD is another matter and a potential source of societal breakdown to the extent it renders people unable to function socially. Also likely stimulated by drugs and environmental toxins as well as things that go under the heading of “bad parenting”, including allowing children to access anti-social media. Maybe sometimes a result of Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy?
In certain circles at least, it is VERY fashionable to be “neurodivergent”. People like to shoehorn it into the conversation at every opportunity and often it seems to be used to describe issues that to me are just part of the ordinary struggles of life.
It’s a bit like saying you’re trans/gender fluid/whatever; people then have to be nice to you in all circumstances because anything else might be construed as “fillintheblankphobia”.
Just like the people claiming to have Long Covid because they’re a bit tired after recovering from a virus, to my mind this takes away from the people who genuinely have real problems.
brightlightsweetown
1 year ago
It’s easy to dismiss Autism, ADHD and Asperger’s as quirky childhood behaviours. My eldest grandson, now 21, showed signs of Asperger’s when under two, lining his toys up in size order, lining cars up, walking on his toes(he still does) but had an amazing vocabulary, but no clue how to really understand other people’s reactions. He suffered dreadfully all the way through school, felt a complete failure, but had ambitions to be an electrician. He’s now in his final year of his apprenticeship, has a childhood sweetheart, and is the most loving young man, however life, and dealing with others is still not easy for him. Do I blame the MMR vaccine? most certainly I do.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
An excellent article by Sally Beck in the Conservative Woman (25th apr) covers the rise in Autism diagnoses. In the USA, from one case in 10,000 in the early 70s, it’s currently around one in 40. Perhaps it’s coincidence that the US children are scheduled for 70 (seventy) vaccines in their early years. Andrew Wakefield’s case gets some (deserved) attention too, and the Autism/MMR link comes under much scrutiny, with many links covering the twenty year saga and hatchet job on Dr Wakefield. Well worth a read.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccines-autism-and-an-epidemic-of-official-lies/
Here you go.
(I wish Kathy Gyngell would go back to the original TCW layout. The current structure is a damned mess).
Off-T.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/outsourcing-politics-killing-democracy-fomenting-revolution/
An excellent article from Paul Collits on what we can expect when Kneel takes over later this year. More Bliar madness. And on steroids.
https://off-guardian.org/2024/04/26/quick-take-so-whats-with-all-the-spying/
Kit Knightly at Off-G with a brief look at the current craze for spy stories. Sadly even The Speccie is obligingly putting out commentary.
Kit Knightly is correct, it is simply additional fear porn.
The new trend of diagnosing middle aged men and women with ADHD is, I’m sure, nothing to do with selling drugs and therapy. I mean, we know that pharma and the medical industry in general only acts in the interests of their patients right?
A 55 year old chap where I recently worked, who’d always worn a coat of superiority, decided to share with a number of us that he’d just been diagnosed with ADHD, and that was the reason for his behaviour. It wasn’t. He’d just found a way to excuse himself for being an absolute arsehole.
Neuro diverse is the latest must have diagnosis in these parts.
It seems like the test for autism is a series of questions, in which case it would appear to be a subjective test, subject to the type of answers given and subject to interpretation by the diagnostician. If you think you may have broken your leg you have a X ray and usually get a clear answer which is much more of an objective test.
Ralph McTell once wrote a song which I always assumed was about autism; ”Michael in the Garden’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoShjY-mWsY
All of which, as this article suggests; begs the question; why is autism a problem? To my mind it only becomes a problem when it raises serious barriers to someone being able to function as an independent adult in society and that is not always an easy assessment to make
“My kid is special.”
My son kept trying to tell me he had ADHD ‘because I find it difficult to sit still’. I told him, what you’ve got is called ‘being a boy’.
I dare say there are autistic kids out there but too many are quick to pin a disability label on their kid instead of admitting he or she is just a pain in the backside.
The majority of the questions in the AQ test can honestly be answered either ‘agree’ or ‘disagree’. For example:
Q1. I prefer to do things with others rather than on my own.
Honest answer: I prefer to do some things with others, and I prefer to do some things on my own. So I could quite honestly answer that question either way, depending on my inclination at the time of answering.
Q2. I prefer to do things the same way over and over again.
Honest answer: Like most people, I like routine, it makes life easier, but I don’t prefer to do every single thing the same way over and over again. So I could quite honestly answer that question either way.
Q3. If I try to imagine something, I find it very easy to create a picture in my mind.
Honest answer: How do I know how ‘easy’ or otherwise it is ‘to create a picture in my mind’ compared to how ‘easy’ or otherwise it is for other people to do it in their minds? I don’t have experience of the workings of other people’s minds, only my own mind. Therefore, compared to other people, I can’t be sure. So, again, I could quite honestly answer that question either way.
Q4. I frequently get so strongly absorbed in one thing that I lose sight of other things.
Honest answer: Like most people, if I get absorbed in various activities (watching a film, a football match, a DIY job, writing an email or something like this in the DS comments section, shopping, talking to a friend, preparing a meal, etc), I don’t think about other things while ‘absorbed’ in the activity. But what exactly does “lose sight of” mean?
5. I often notice small sounds when others do not.
I generally don’t consult with other people as to whether or not they have heard “small sounds” that I have heard, it doesn’t make for riveting conversation, unless on the very rare occasions when the sound could have been made by a burglar or a mouse, or something. So, again, I could honestly answer that question either way.
Etc, etc, etc.
‘Any scores of 26 or greater indicate the presence of autistic traits; the higher the score, the more autistic traits you have.’
I decided to take the test twice, honestly both times, but with two different mindsets.
Firstly, honestly but with the mindset that I’d like the result to show that I’m quite a normal person:
I scored 10.
Secondly, honestly but with the mindset that I’d like the result to show that I am an exceptional neuroatypical or neurodiverse person:
I scored 38
Being introverted – which many people are – and/or having a somewhat obsessive personality – which many people have – do not mean a person is ‘autistic’, but it’s clear that anyone who is introverted and/or obsessive will come out in this test as having a high number of autistic traits. So introversion and obsessiveness are being conflated with autism, when they are not the same thing at all.
I agree with the authors of this DS article that there are some genuinely autistic people, and people with Asperger’s, but it can very easily be greatly overdiagnosed.
I seriously doubt a self completed questionnaire could be usefully accurate for this purpose. In so far as I know anything about the autistic spectrum, I think it’s one of those things that is hard to pin down but you know it when you see it. It’s also a very broad spectrum and you would be hard pressed to see many similarities between those on either end in terms of their behaviour and life experiences and outcomes. For me
the defining quality is that autistic people don’t really have any “side” to them.
For me the defining quality is that autistic people don’t really have any “side” to them.
What do you mean by that? (If I may ask)
Of course you may ask – we are here to question everything!
This is what I was thinking of: https://dict.leo.org/forum/viewUnsolvedquery.php?idForum=2&idThread=1258018&lp=ende&lang=en
It seemed natural to bring Paul home for Sunday lunch. She’d been scared at first to even ask, as though she was being too forward, too serious, but Paul had said yes immediately, that he’d love to. That was what she loved about him, that there was NO SIDE TO HIM, just complete straight-forwardness and genuine enthusiasm for her.
Thanks. I think I even understand that and I would regard this as true. But it’s often perceived as the exact opposite, the pure mannerism perfected to the point that nobody can really tell how it’s precisely being just acted but everybody remains nevertheless convinced that it must certainly be one.
Hopefully harmless example for demonstration: After years of problems with trainers whose soles I had run through, this usually being noticed during the first heavier autumn rains, I decided that I should perhaps try some more solid footwear and switched to standard issue German army combat boots instead as these must surely be meant for walking. During the first longer trip with them, I hammered bloody blisters into both of my hindfoot soles. I concluded that this must have been due to having formed the habit of putting all of my weight onto them first with each step during years of walking with trainers. This didn’t work with these boots as my feet would give way first and not the soles of them.
I thus intentionally retrained myself to touch ground with the front part of my foot first. Technically, this worked nicely, especially as I also remembered that from my time in the military. But this became a minor Reading open air sensation and I had people literally following me and trying to parody the way I was walking for kilometers on end on occasion (and the usual string of minor run-ins and attacks).
I think people are bothered by difference, or maybe they are bothered by people who are comfortable in their own skin because it reminds them of their own insecurity.
I find the company of straightforward people preferable and refreshing.
Q1. I prefer to do things with others rather than on my own.
Honest answer: I prefer to do some things with others, and I prefer to do some things on my own. So I could quite honestly answer that question either way, depending on my inclination at the time of answering.
—-
Well, the majority of people prefer to go the toilet alone and when they’re not in some kind of relationship, also prefer to sleep alone. But that’s not the point of the question, which is quite obviously meant as I prefer to do things with others rather than on my own in my spare time and people usually agree with that. When they go out, they’ll plan to meet some friends and spend time with them. I don’t. I don’t even have any friends as I’ve decided that it’s better to avoid hooking up with people than hooking up with the wrong kind of people, eg, the drug scene.
—-
Q2. I prefer to do things the same way over and over again.
Honest answer: Like most people, I like routine, it makes life easier, but I don’t prefer to do every single thing the same way over and over again. So I could quite honestly answer that question either way.
—-
The natural ambiguity of language could again justify giving a wrong answer as you don’t prefer to do things in the same way over and over again. In contrast to this, each of my days starts with the same ten step procedure which always occur in a particular order and even in a particular way. The last of these is breakfast and that’s always the exact same breakfast, ie, always with the same ingredients and always prepared in the exact same order. I sometimes changes my habits if I have a better idea or want to try something different but maybe once per year or so.
The others are a bit more difficult, so, I’ll leave it at that.
Is nobody allowed to be a bit ‘odd’ or eccentric any more? Must there always be a ‘diagnosis’ of something or other?
Politics and Public Policy Playbook:
1) manufacture a crisis
2) orchestrate demands for something to be done by the state
3) ensure a state intervention takes place
4) publicise that the crisis has worsened
5) orchestrate demands for something more to be done by the state….
Rinse and repeat. Forever and ever.
And perhaps another item: 6) As an election is in the offing, claim that you’ve done all the right things, and vote for us again.
Off-T.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-ivermectin-covid-treatment-lawsuit-social-media/
FDA in a massive backtrack on Ivermectin.
Off-T
https://www.globalresearch.ca/excess-deaths-japan-3rd-covid-shot/5855764
A third of Japanese deaths in 2022 occurred after the third Covid injection.
Why so many off-topic references?
Or, autism and ADHD is rapidly increasing because of over vaccinating the population.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/defender-in-depth-mark-blaxill-autism-epidemic-overvaccination/?utm_id=20240403
https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/5-huge-historical-vaccine-frauds
No. 5 deals with autism.
The rest are equally worrying.
Your headline is over-autistic as the article is really mostly about ADHD. That’s especially true for the conclusion as there’s no medication for autism. Judging from conversations I had about this in the past, there’s some entitlement to benefits for the latter and hence, you would perhaps have wanted to write something about millions of shirkers on benefits.
That said, for some reasons I can only vaguely gather, autism is somehow cool to have for some people¹ and I’ve encountered a small lot of people who claim to be autists but who otherwise seem to be socially perfectly well-integrated and differ barely, if at all, from the general herd. It’s not so much overdiagnosed as misdiagnosed, ie, the diagnosis is essentially a favour done to someone. At least, that’s how it looks like.
¹ Excuses their bad manners and general obnoxiousness, cf Chris Packham?
Although I think over-diagnosis is a significant and possibly the major element I think there may be other factors too. The most obvious of which is upbringing/parenting. People are having kids later in life and it seems reasonable to me that this may have a direct effect on the developing child in utero. In addition both parents often continue to work and hand their kids over to child minders and early years nurseries and this too seems likely to have a direct effect on the intellectual and emotional development of the child.
However, I also speculate that environmental factors may have an effect. Obviously, given the origins of the site, we think of the wide use of vaccines but over the last few decades there have been other changes in the chemicals people are exposed to on a routine basis. One particular speculation of mine (I do not claim it to be more than that) is the increase in exposure and ingestion of surfactants – for example ‘rinse aid’ in dishwashers and other cleaning agents such as shower sprays. I detect and detest the taste of rinse aid in my morning tea and so always rinse cups in clean water after they’ve been dish-washed. Of course, not everyone has a dishwasher – but not everyone has an autistic child, either.
Surfactants can have a significant effect on chemical reactions and I think it not unreasonable that they might be in part to blame for developmental problems in kids.
I’m probably autistic as well given the test. Are you fascinated by numbers? Yes, I’m a Mathematician. Do you keep going on and on about the same thing? Yes, epidemics don’t grow exponentially as has been known since 1840. Do I prefer working with computers to humans? It depends on the computer and the human.
Reminds me of an old event at one of the voluntary organisations I was working in (being a member of it), in which the manager told me that the young volunteer I was working with was Autistic. I didn’t need to know, and probably would no have noticed otherwise. Maybe events like that are common, and perhaps supported by the usual suspects.
After I scored well into the allegedly autistic range on that test, my brother took it upon himself to “beat my high score.” How autistic is that??!!!
Gaming these tests is obviously fairly easy. For instance, you can always intentionally invert your answers, as already suggested above, eg, Do I prefer to do the same thing over and over again? Absolutely f***ing not! Hence, the opposite must be the right answer! What that’s supposed to prove beyond that many people excel at cheating (Who da thunk?) is anybody’s guess.
The Liberal Progressive mentality is to turn every human behaviour into some malady or other. There are no idiots or morons any more, they are all just suffering from some syndrome or phobia and the big government is here to help.
My understanding is that autism is a serious brain disorder and you can’t be “mildly autistic” a la Elon Musk. It appears there is a massive increase in autistic people who cannot function and thrive without 24 hour support and attention from family and carers. Likely due to vaccines, drugs and other environmental factors (including the ubiquitous use of aluminium salts for all sorts of processes). Their on-going care is a huge issue. ADHD is another matter and a potential source of societal breakdown to the extent it renders people unable to function socially. Also likely stimulated by drugs and environmental toxins as well as things that go under the heading of “bad parenting”, including allowing children to access anti-social media. Maybe sometimes a result of Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy?
In certain circles at least, it is VERY fashionable to be “neurodivergent”. People like to shoehorn it into the conversation at every opportunity and often it seems to be used to describe issues that to me are just part of the ordinary struggles of life.
It’s a bit like saying you’re trans/gender fluid/whatever; people then have to be nice to you in all circumstances because anything else might be construed as “fillintheblankphobia”.
Just like the people claiming to have Long Covid because they’re a bit tired after recovering from a virus, to my mind this takes away from the people who genuinely have real problems.
It’s easy to dismiss Autism, ADHD and Asperger’s as quirky childhood behaviours. My eldest grandson, now 21, showed signs of Asperger’s when under two, lining his toys up in size order, lining cars up, walking on his toes(he still does) but had an amazing vocabulary, but no clue how to really understand other people’s reactions. He suffered dreadfully all the way through school, felt a complete failure, but had ambitions to be an electrician. He’s now in his final year of his apprenticeship, has a childhood sweetheart, and is the most loving young man, however life, and dealing with others is still not easy for him. Do I blame the MMR vaccine? most certainly I do.