The World Health Organisation’s Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified in court that she advised her Government that vaccine passports were not needed but was ignored, despite explaining that the Covid vaccines did not stop virus transmission and the passports gave a false sense of security. The stunning revelations came to light in a Helsinki courtroom where Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala is suing after he was denied entry to a café for not having a vaccine passport.
Dr. Nohynek is Chief Physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and serves as the WHO’s Chair of Strategic Group of Experts on Immunization. Testifying yesterday, she stated that the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the COVID-19 vaccines did not stop virus transmission
During that same 2021 time period, the WHO said it was working to “create an international trusted framework” for safe travel while EU members states began rolling out Covid passports. The EU Digital Covid Certificate Regulation passed in July 2021 and more than 2.3 billion certificates were later issued. Visitors to France were banned if they did not have a valid vaccine passport which citizens had to carry to buy food at stores or to use public transport.
But Dr. Nohynek testified yesterday that her institute advised the Finnish Government in late 2021 that Covid passports no longer made sense, yet certificates continued to be required. Finnish journalist Ike Novikoff reported the news yesterday after leaving the Helsinki courtroom where Dr. Nohynek spoke.
Dr. Nohynek’s admission that the Government ignored scientific advice to terminate vaccine passports proved shocking as she is widely embraced in global medical circles. Besides chairing the WHO’s strategic advisory group on immunisations, Dr. Nohynek is one of Finland’s top vaccine advisers and serves on the boards of Vaccines Together and the International Vaccine Institute.
The EU’s digital COVID-19 certification helped establish the WHO Global Digital Health Certification Network in July 2023. “By using European best practices we contribute to digital health standards and interoperability globally — to the benefit of those most in need,” stated one EU official.
Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala created a website discussing his case against Finland’s Government where he writes that he launched his lawsuit “to defend basic rights” after he was denied breakfast in December 2021 at a Helsinki café because he did not have a Covid passport even though he was healthy. “The constitution of Finland guarantees that any citizen should not be discriminated against based on health conditions among other things,” Vauhkala states on his website.
Vauhkala’s lawsuit continued today in Helsinki district court where British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra will testify that, during the Covid pandemic, some authorities and medical professionals supported unethical, coercive and misinformed policies such as vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, which undermined informed patient consent and evidence-based medical practice.
You can read Dr. Malhotra’s testimony here.
First published in Paul D. Thacker’s Disinformation Chronicle and also by the Brownstone Institute.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I think all those who can see through the Green scam will be stocking up on food and supplies to see them through the inevitable energy blackouts.
Good to see greenconomics challenged.
It’s green communism masquerading as entrepreneurship. They want us to starve and freeze they are scum. Btw the Tories have actively promoted this, for those still asleep.
We should also remember the CBI have got it wrong on every major economic issue for 50 years or more.
Yes I have used the subsidy analogy many times. Except my shops were shops selling red jeans and green jeans. The red jean shop gets 100% subsidy from the government who prefer us all to wear red jeans. The government and assorted NGO’s who all approve of us all moving to red jeans then make statements in the media eg that “red jeans are now much cheaper than green jeans”. ——-people see this on their TV News and think well when I buy jeans I will make sure they are red.
—-Everything to do with the GREEN agenda is a total eco socialist scam, and government know that most people simply don’t have the time or the inclination to thoroughly investigate the issue of climate and energy, and we probably all have been in a situation where we were in the company of a group of friends or family and the issue of climate came up. If you try to suggest that all might not be as it seems you immediately get people looking at you as if you are from Mars. ——-Such is the power of propaganda.
—-Climate Change is the biggest pseudo scientific scam ever perpetrated, and it is so successful as a scam that it manages to convince a large chunk of the populace that by removing the cheapest most reliable energy that powers 85% of the world that they will be better off. A quite remarkable feat. Imagine going back 100 years and telling people that they must abandon coal oil and gas and that they will be much richer. ——Except people back then would not have been so utterly stupid as we seem to be.
“Except people back then would not have been so utterly stupid as we seem to be.”
Indeed – they were not so ‘educated’.
The problem is more subtle than that, education itself has been stolen and now consists of indoctrination only. The idea that education allows one to think, to apply logic, and form opinion is gone. Have you noticed how the BBC operates? It announces something and then has some supporter interviewed with positive help from Naga or whoever. The subject is never even debated, yet presented as truth and rubber stamped by BBC verify! BBC verify is very corrupt, does no proper research and gets it’s opinions from the Guardian. Please do look at other sources, a little research pays big rewards.
James Delingpole’s ‘Watermelons’ (Green on the outside, red on the inside) was written over a decade ago and is bang on the money. It written factually but wittily. Highly recommended read.
I could probably recommend another 100 books as well as that one. ——“Hubris” (Michael Hart) ——Energy and Climate Wars (Peter Glover and Michal Economides) and Taken by Storm (McKitrick and Essex)————-Happy reading
I agree-Watermelons was a great contribution, and alerted me to the problem.
its a pity James appears to have gone a bit, well…
The Green economy is just a taxpayer-filled trough, and where there’s a trough there will be pigs.
What ‘Green’ products exactly are going to be produced that consumers want we don’t already have?
As far as I can see the Green economy is hydrogen projects, carbon capture, batteries, BEVs, wind and solar installations, insulating homes and buildings.
All of this is reliant on massive taxpayer funded subsidies and increases in consumer prices. It is to serve ideological and bureaucratic interests, not the interests of consumers.
None of this adds to what we have, but replaces what works with what either doesn’t or is less efficient, or nobody wants anyway.
Jobs are a cost, but if the economic activity they undertake produces a value in excess of cost, then we get wealthier. If there is just cost and no benefit, we get poorer. Green economy is all cost.
If these Green products are so good, we would already have them funded by private investors.
You got it.
An interesting thought. What is a green product? Is it a wind turbine? Is it a solar panel? Is it an electric car? Is it a heat pump? Is it even insulation materials? Strangely NONE of these are the slightest bit green, all require massive inputs of fossil fuels and mined minerals. They may over lifetime slightly reduce the CO2 produced, but not by much compared to the CO2 produced in manufacture! The most common insulation in use now is probably foamed polyurethane between aluminium foil sheets. How much oil does this take, and how much electricity to refine aluminum? One might be surprised how high both are. Then there is glass and rock fibre products. Both of these are energy intensive to produce and are made with gas or oil heat. Clearly all these products should be banned at once.
It’s very puzzling. These people are university educated, and suppose to be intelligent. However, net zero and intelligence are a poor fit. So why is it? Puppets on a string?
University educated? There you have it.
“Two things are outstanding in the creation of the English system of canals, and they characterise all the Industrial Revolution. One is that the men who made the revolution were practical men. …they often had little education, and in fact school education as it then was could only dull an inventive mind. The grammar schools legally could only teach the classical subjects for which they had been founded. The universities also (there were only two, at Oxford and Cambridge) took little interest in modern or scientific studies; and they were closed to those who did not conform to the Church of England.”
Jacob Bronowski
And…
“Too much of what is called ’education’ is little more than an expensive isolation from reality.”
Thomas Sowell
“I have never let schooling interfere with my education” —Mark Twain
It is divestment from hydrocarbons, along with blowing up Coal Power Stations and looking virtuous.
Ah, I see what the CBIs problem is. A woman is in charge. Always leads to disaster. Women should not have the vote nor be in charge of anything serious because they mostly vote for welfare and steer organisations toward woke and female centric causes.
Men are grafters (and women perhaps grifters – the comment that got the Reform candidate in so much trouble, but which may be true) and push for success, victory and performance. This is a viewpoint that I will get lambasted for by feminists and femiboys. But our ancestors knew this. That is why women were never in charge of anything involving detail. Queen Elizabeth I ans Queen Anne were advised by men.
Why are these Chief Executives always of a specific type and background, on a merry go round of similar senior posts?