211129
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Does Catching Covid Lower Your IQ?

by Noah Carl
22 March 2024 11:00 AM

Recent headlines would have us believe that catching Covid makes you less intelligent, with even mild infections knocking several points off your IQ. All these headlines refer to a study by Adam Hampshire and colleagues published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study was based on the Real-Time Assessment of Community Transmission (REACT) cohort in England – a sample of 2.4 million people who were randomly selected to take a Covid test during the pandemic. Of the original participants, about 110,000 subsequently completed an online questionnaire and cognitive test. And of these, about 10,000 people were excluded because their symptoms began less than 12 weeks before taking the cognitive test.

The authors therefore had data on cognitive ability and Covid infection for about 100,000 people. As for Covid infection, they knew both the date of infection and its severity, measured by the number and duration of various symptoms. They also had data on people’s demographic characteristics and pre-existing health conditions.

Their main findings are shown below. The top three charts plot the distribution of cognitive test scores by variant, illness duration and hospitalisation. All three comparisons are adjusted for demographic characteristics and pre-existing health conditions. The bottom three plot average differences based on a model that estimates the effect of each variable controlling for the other two, along with demographic characteristics and pre-existing health conditions.

Taken from ‘Cognition and Memory after Covid-19 in a Large Community Sample’.

The two blue charts on the left show that people who caught the original virus or the Alpha variant scored lower than those who caught the Delta or Omicron variants or who didn’t catch Covid during the study period. The red charts in the centre show that people whose symptoms persisted scored lower than those whose symptoms were short-lived. And the green charts on the right show that people who were hospitalised scored lower than those who weren’t.

The first thing to say is that Hampshire and colleagues didn’t actually look at change in test scores, which means that headlines referring to “drops in IQ” or “falls in IQ” are highly misleading. Rather, they looked at the association between test scores and illness duration/severity across individuals. As the authors clearly state, “we could not assess cognitive change” and “we could not infer causality”.

However, it’s true that one possible explanation for their findings is that Covid infection has a causal effect on cognitive ability – reducing it by 42% of a standard deviation (6 IQ points) among those with symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks. How likely is this? Before getting to an alternative explanation, I will highlight several things in the paper that caught my eye.

First, if you go to Table S6 in the Supplementary Appendix, you find the exact distributions of cognitive scores corresponding to the top three charts in the image above. These confirm that individuals who caught the Omicron variant, individuals who had asymptomatic infections, and individuals who required no medical treatment, had a marginally better (i.e., more right-shifted) distribution of scores than those who did not catch Covid during the study period.

Asymptomatic individuals had higher average cognitive test scores than those who didn’t catch Covid.

Second, the authors estimated the effects of variant, illness duration and hospitalisation on a cognitive score variable that was standardised after adjustment for demographic characteristics and pre-existing health conditions. Depending on the interrelationships among the variables, this may have resulted in larger effects of variant, illness duration and hospitalisation than would have been observed if standardisation had been done before adjustment.

Third, if you go to Table S7 in the Supplementary Appendix, you find the output from a multivariate model of cognitive test scores that includes a predictor for number of vaccine doses. The output seems to imply that vaccination had a statistically significant negative effect on cognitive ability. This is contrary to a Swedish study which found a strong positive association between vaccination and cognitive ability. I say “seems to imply” because the output is rather unclear. It’s possible that I am misinterpreting how the vaccine doses variable was coded. (The authors did not respond to my request for clarification.)

But let’s take the main findings at face value. Could they be explained by something other than Covid infection having a causal effect on cognitive ability? Yes: self-selection.

We know that people with higher cognitive ability tend to work in professions that had lower risk of exposure to Covid. Hence they may have been less likely to get infected during the early months of the pandemic and more likely to catch the milder Omicron variant. We also know that people with higher cognitive ability tend to be healthier. So they may have been less likely to become seriously ill when they did catch Covid.

In other words, rather than early and more-serious infections causing lower cognitive ability, it may be that higher cognitive ability caused people to get later and less-serious infections. This explanation is consistent with the first of the three observations I made above.

Overall, the Hampshire and colleagues’ findings are interesting and they clearly warrant further scrutiny. But I’m not yet convinced that Covid infection has a large negative impact on cognitive ability. Having said that, I could certainly believe that an infection bad enough to send someone to the ICU might knock a few points off their IQ – at least temporarily.

Tags: CovidIntelligenceREACT

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

The Longer it Takes the West to Accept that Ukraine is Losing, the Worse Things Will Get for Ukraine

Next Post

Growing Calls for Boycott of Nike Over “Woke” Rainbow Redesign of England Flag on Euro 2024 Kit

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
new follow-up comments
    Please log in to comment

    To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

    Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

    16 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Marcus Aurelius knew
    Marcus Aurelius knew
    1 year ago

    No but the jabs might.

    108
    -1
    huxleypiggles
    huxleypiggles
    1 year ago
    Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

    Anyone falling for a dodgy fake PCR test and then subsequently claiming to be “C1984” positive is definitely exhibiting signs of a lowered IQ.

    116
    -2
    FerdIII
    FerdIII
    1 year ago
    Reply to  huxleypiggles

    Absolutely. Add in the diapers. Stabs + Diapers + Bulging Eyes + Distancing = <70 IQ. ‘The Science’ likes it that way.

    47
    -1
    Marcus Aurelius knew
    Marcus Aurelius knew
    1 year ago
    Reply to  huxleypiggles

    Careful, hux, cause and effect are notoriously difficult to separate. Even the government experts get it wrong sometimes!

    🤣

    8
    0
    transmissionofflame
    transmissionofflame
    1 year ago

    Well if “covid” exists I must have had it more than once by now – I’ve had some flu/colds since 2019. I do a job that is mostly “cognitive” and I haven’t noticed a drop in my performance during or since those bouts of illness.

    41
    0
    Bellacovidonia
    Bellacovidonia
    1 year ago

    Excellent analysis as usual Noah. At least the researchers were honest in declaring the absence of causation on the test scores , which should actually be referred to in the title upfront. That would stop university PR people and publicity/virtue seeking journal editors from misrepresenting the results for public consumption usually mediated by activist journos.

    26
    0
    Roy Everett
    Roy Everett
    1 year ago

    A local judge, albeit in an obiter dictum, opined that she believed in the concept of Emotional Quotient (EQ) and that this was a quantity that allegedly could either be measured by some sort of parallel test like that for IQ or deduced from the “well-known” formula EQ=200-IQ. The implications of this are that the higher an individual’s IQ, the lower their EQ and vice versa. Enter competing expert witnesses. According to one “expert witness” this relates to the concept of “left/right hemisphere” dominance in the brain. According to an “expert mathematician”, another formulation is EQ=10000/IQ, with a similar result, the differences being discussed in court at great expense to the taxpayer and to the benefit of the pension funds of lawyers, who are more familiar with operating Excel on their fees calculations than with operating the Binomial Theorem on their algebra. Seriously, what is quite alarming is the way that contentious measurements and quasi-scientific models winds up being the foundation of legal judgements, and that judges admit expert witnesses on the basis of whether their evidence will likely support the Official Narrative on EQ/IQ modelling.

    This article leads me to advance a new notion: Sceptical Intelligence (SI), which measures how likely an individual is to embrace as reality a notion that runs counter to their current perception of reality but is consistent with the Official Narrative. It may shed light on the problems of cognitive dissonance which academics have to deal with, and the historical examples of mass hysteria (Salem, Broxstowe…). Perhaps some academic could quantify this and see if SI correlates with IQ, and if it increases or decreases after repeated exposure to the Climate Narrative, the Covid Narrative, the Gender Narrative, the Race Narrative, the Slave Narrative and any number of lesser Mencken Hobgoblins. We really need a randomised trial in which individuals are placed in a culture dish containing nutrients drawn from the current media-government-pharma-UN complex.

    20
    0
    johnboy12
    johnboy12
    1 year ago

    Typo..I think you meant Convid

    14
    0
    Jon Mors
    Jon Mors
    1 year ago

    All this ‘research’ tells me is that we spend too much money on our universities. This is definitely in ‘impact of global warming on squirrel mating habits’ territory.

    Last edited 1 year ago by Jon Mors
    31
    0
    huxleypiggles
    huxleypiggles
    1 year ago
    Reply to  Jon Mors

    😀😀😀👍

    4
    0
    JXB
    JXB
    1 year ago

    Or could it be people with low IQ we’re more likely to get CoVid? Most people ‘had’ CoVid because a non-diagnostic, highly unreliable test told them so – sometimes having to repeat it three or four times before getting the desired diagnosis confirmed.

    Low IQs also rushed to get ‘vaccinated’ thus increasing the risk of getting CoVid multiple times.

    Last edited 1 year ago by JXB
    33
    -1
    CaseyJones
    CaseyJones
    1 year ago
    Reply to  JXB

    I thought that studies showed low IQs and PhDs (don’t know fields) were the least likely to have gotten vaccinated. Moderately “educated” people trust(ed) the experts. Lower IQs probably are used to getting screwed over by the system, and much higher and educated IQs probably know the sausage-making that goes into experts’ pronouncements. Then you also get people like my in-laws with very high IQs but less education who, bless their hearts, are impressed by degrees and totally trusted the experts.

    21
    0
    huxleypiggles
    huxleypiggles
    1 year ago

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-denounces-anti-vaxxers-calls-covid-jab-refusal-an-almost-suicidal-act-of-denial/

    The satanic ‘Pope’ mouthing off again.

    The only man worth listening to in the Catholic Church is Archbishop Vigano.

    26
    0
    sskinner
    sskinner
    1 year ago

    Here are things that will cause mental atrophy: Social isolation; Using fear to ‘encourage’ mental conformity while stigmatizing free thinking; making people perform humiliating and pointless rituals such as testing, self isolating, social distancing (an oxymoron), and mask wearing.
    The mind is a muscle and being able to think freely within society at large is the best exercise there is, and I don’t consider social media the best places for thinking freely, because the key word is ‘think’.

    21
    0
    wryobserver
    wryobserver
    1 year ago

    I suspect that if you ran the same study for influenza or infectious mononucleosis you would find the same result.

    11
    0
    A. Contrarian
    A. Contrarian
    1 year ago
    Reply to  wryobserver

    I was about to post the same comment – no one has ever bothered to do the same for other diseases as far as I’m aware, so we have no meaningful comparison whatsoever. There was recently a study into post viral issues following Covid vs flu, and embarrassingly it seemed to be much more likely after flu!

    9
    0

    NEWSLETTER

    View today’s newsletter

    To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

    DONATE

    PODCAST

    The End of American Empire? – With Doug Stokes

    by Richard Eldred
    2 May 2025
    6

    LISTED ARTICLES

    • Most Read
    • Most Commented
    • Editors Picks

    BREAKING: Merz Government Orders Pushback of All Illegal Migrants at German Borders, Effectively Abolishing Asylum

    7 May 2025
    by Eugyppius

    News Round-Up

    8 May 2025
    by Richard Eldred

    Sun-Dimming Quango has £800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow – and a CEO on £450k

    8 May 2025
    by Sallust

    Orsted Cancels Hornsea 4 Wind Farm – and Kills Miliband’s ‘Clean Power 2030’ Agenda Dead

    7 May 2025
    by David Turver

    Definitive Guide to the WHO Pandemic Agreement

    7 May 2025
    by Dr David Bell and Dr Thi Thuy Van Dinh

    What Does Renaud Camus Actually Believe? Part Two: Is He Really a Conspiracy Theorist?

    26

    BREAKING: Merz Government Orders Pushback of All Illegal Migrants at German Borders, Effectively Abolishing Asylum

    21

    News Round-Up

    18

    Orsted Cancels Hornsea 4 Wind Farm – and Kills Miliband’s ‘Clean Power 2030’ Agenda Dead

    41

    EXCLUSIVE: Britain Forced to Spend £1.5 Billion to Mitigate Wind Turbine Corruptions to Vital Air Defence Radar

    14

    Australia’s Liberal Party Only Has Itself to Blame for its Crushing Defeat by Labour

    8 May 2025
    by Dr James Allan

    EXCLUSIVE: Britain Forced to Spend £1.5 Billion to Mitigate Wind Turbine Corruptions to Vital Air Defence Radar

    8 May 2025
    by Chris Morrison

    What Does Renaud Camus Actually Believe? Part Two: Is He Really a Conspiracy Theorist?

    8 May 2025
    by Steven Tucker

    BREAKING: Merz Government Orders Pushback of All Illegal Migrants at German Borders, Effectively Abolishing Asylum

    7 May 2025
    by Eugyppius

    Definitive Guide to the WHO Pandemic Agreement

    7 May 2025
    by Dr David Bell and Dr Thi Thuy Van Dinh

    POSTS BY DATE

    March 2024
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
    « Feb   Apr »

    SOCIAL LINKS

    Free Speech Union
    • Home
    • About us
    • Donate
    • Privacy Policy

    Facebook

    • X

    Instagram

    RSS

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    © Skeptics Ltd.

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password? Register

    Create New Account!

    Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

    Already have an account?
    Please click here to login Log In

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In
    wpDiscuz
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Articles
    • About
    • Archive
      • ARCHIVE
      • NEWS ROUND-UPS
    • Podcasts
    • Newsletter
    • Premium
    • Donate
    • Log In

    © Skeptics Ltd.

    You are going to send email to

    Move Comment
    Perfecty
    Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
    Notifications preferences