• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Justice, American Style

by Dr James Allan
17 February 2024 9:00 AM

Many people hear my accent and guess that I’m American. When I say that I’m in fact Canadian-born they apologise. I always ask “why?” and tell them I like Americans as they’re just about the friendliest people on earth. In fact, I’ve long claimed the mantle of being the most pro-American law professor in Australia and Canada. The U.S. spends a huge chunk of its GDP protecting countries (like us and like most of Europe) that flat out refuse to spend even 2% of GDP defending themselves. However, for a long time now I’ve also pointed out that the U.S. justice system is woefully bad. Let me be clear. It seriously stinks. At the federal level some 98% of accused are convicted – a laughably embarrassing figure for any democracy. Almost all of those are convictions without trial where the Feds have basically threatened you with 500 years in jail or you cut a deal, plead guilty and take a tolerably low sentence. (And for all those who say “well, you should never plead guilty if you didn’t do it” I point out that they also cut deals with all sorts of others who have to testify against you and fighting the charges will bankrupt you and your family even if you win and only the uber brave can withstand this treatment.) Think of it this way. Given a choice between the Australian criminal justice systems (Canberra or Victoria) – with their patently flawed lack of commitment to the presumption of innocence and the cab rank rule – or being tried in the U.S. by the Feds, you’d have to be brain dead not to roll the dice in Canberra or Melbourne.

This has been a longstanding problem in the U.S., a criminal justice system that no Australian, Canadian or Brit would really recognise as a fair system. But in the last little while it’s been made worse by being politicised. Take the recent defamation case against the legendarily funny columnist Mark Steyn in Washington D.C. brought by the climate change alarmist Michael Mann – yes, the hockey stick guy who laughably claimed to be a Nobel laureate for years. This trial and verdict makes a mockery of the idea that any politically conservative person could get a remotely fair trial in Washington D.C. (where some 93% vote Democrat year in and year out).  Mann and his lawyers (none paid for by Mann but by invisible wealthy types in the background) delayed their own case for over a decade to try to bankrupt Steyn who ended up representing himself. The case was so weak it should never have gone to the jury, not least because in U.S. defamation cases plaintiffs who are public figures (as Mann clearly is) have to prove actual malice – basically that Steyn when blasting the falsity of the hockey stick climate change catastrophism knew that he, Steyn, was lying; that Steyn subjectively knew what he was saying wasn’t true. But as Steyn pointed out at trial, he’s been saying the same thing about Mann’s hockey stick charade for over two decades and even wrote a book about it. No way that test is met. And, of course, Mann needs also to prove reputational damage. But given the clear benefits of being on the climate change gravy train he couldn’t call a single witness to allege any damage Mann ever suffered.

But this is D.C. The plaintiff’s lawyer in his closing argument asked the jury, regardless of everything else, to award exemplary damages to, in effect, silence these global warming sceptics. No judge in Australia or Canada – not even one appointed by Dan Andrews – would allow a lawyer to appeal for exemplary damages even though the legal requirements otherwise to win the case had not been met. It would have been a directed verdict for Steyn. But the jury came back and awarded Mann one dollar in actual damages (against Steyn and his co-defendant), a deadly verdict in jurisdictions with a costs rule and in effect a decision that Steyn was right. But then the jury also awarded Mann $1 million in exemplary damages – basically deciding that regardless of everything else Steyn is not free to speak about this issue and sending a clear message to anyone who wants to voice doubts about ‘end of the world climate scaremongering’. Of course if Steyn appeals it would be in the (non-federal) D.C. system with huge numbers of federal bureaucrats operating under regulatory climate change policies that create a near-perfect set-up to get dissidents. Good luck with that. Only the U.S. Supreme Court can save him and odds are it won’t touch it. So Steyn is probably bankrupted. Mann gets a big PR boost. And the legacy press (so yes, the ABC) will treat the verdict as something other than a bad joke. I’ll be blunt. This is a very sad outcome for Mark Steyn who is and has been a free speech warrior for decades and decades.

In addition to Steyn the justice system has pretty clearly been weaponised in the U.S. against Trump and his former advisors. A Trump former adviser has been ordered to report to prison while former Attorney General Eric Holder (a Democrat) suffered no penalty for the same charge. Or think about the so-called claims about Trump instigating an insurrection. There is no charge to that effect of course but the current Washington D.C. charges require the special Trump prosecutor to prove mens rea – that Trump didn’t actually think he’d won in 2020 but proceeded anyway when, as with Steyn, the evidence seems overwhelming that Trump did believe he’d won (and that is enough for an acquittal whether anyone else believed that or not) – and to overcome a Presidential immunity defence. It is the latter defence that Trump just lost in the D.C. Circuit appeal court and will now appeal. But think about this. You have a criminal charge that is alleging nothing more nor less than a political crime. Americans have been inundated with all the information for a couple of years. The voters are well aware of both sides of this. It can be resolved in an election in 10 months where 160 million odd people will have their say, and let us know whether they think Trump’s conduct disqualifies him from being President. Or, in keeping with the way things are done in Pakistan, Thailand and a fair few other places, you can legalise the issue and have the current President try to put his main opponent in jail for the rest of his life. You just bring the case in D.C. Hand it over to a jury in a jurisdiction where well over 90% vote Democrat. And let 12 jurors decide for a country of 332 million Americans who can and can’t be President.

I don’t care how badly you hate Trump. This is an affront to democracy. It will demand reciprocal behaviour from Republicans in future. And it is risible to claim you have to take the man currently leading in every poll off the ballot to save democracy. As I said, the U.S. criminal justice system has stunk for ages. But under Biden the stench is now political too. (I leave discussion of the documents charges and the differential treatment of Trump and Biden for another day.)

James Allan is the Garrick Professor of Law at Queensland University. This article first appeared in Spectator Australia.

Tags: 2024 U.S. ElectionDonald TrumpLawfareMark SteynMichael MannThe Democratic PartyUnited States

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

The Conceptual Conditions of Ruin

Next Post

The Great Reset Didn’t Work: The Case of EVs

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic EP.37: David Frost on Starmer’s EU Surrender, James Price on Broken Britain and David Shipley on Lucy Connolly’s Failed Appeal

by Richard Eldred
23 May 2025
8

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

29 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

29 May 2025
by Hannes Sarv

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

US to Deny Visas to Foreign Officials Who Try to Censor US Social Media Platforms

28 May 2025
by Toby Young

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

30

News Round-Up

22

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

19

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

22

‘Woke’ Rail Company Fails to Mention Women in Free Tampon Scheme

13

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

POSTS BY DATE

February 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829  
« Jan   Mar »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

February 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829  
« Jan   Mar »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

29 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe: MIT Professor Dr Richard Lindzen

29 May 2025
by Hannes Sarv

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

US to Deny Visas to Foreign Officials Who Try to Censor US Social Media Platforms

28 May 2025
by Toby Young

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

30

News Round-Up

22

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

19

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

22

‘Woke’ Rail Company Fails to Mention Women in Free Tampon Scheme

13

Trump is Handing Africa to the Chinese for the Sake of Social Media Clout

29 May 2025
by Noah Carl

Hooked on Freedom: Why Medical Autonomy Matters

29 May 2025
by Dr David Bell

So Renters WILL Pay the Costs of Net Zero

29 May 2025
by Ben Pile

The Net Zero Agenda’s Continued Collapse Into Chaos

28 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Alasdair MacIntyre 1929-2025

27 May 2025
by James Alexander

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences