Mark Steyn was found in breach of Ofcom regulations for misrepresenting vaccine risks. But the published data show that the risks of the Covid booster jabs were even greater than Steyn implied, says Prof Norman Fenton.
The economic case for renewable energy doesn't add up and never has, says Economics Professor Ross McKitrick. But governments love the climate alarm agenda because it involves a relentless expansion of their power.
Mark Steyn, the former GB News presenter, has taken Ofcom to court accusing it of "killing his career" after he questioned Covid vaccines on air, with the regulator saying his programmes caused "harm to viewers".
The treatment of Mark Steyn and Donald Trump at the hands of American 'justice' shows just how biased and politicised it is, says law professor James Allan. America increasingly resembles Pakistan.
Does Michael Mann's libel victory over Mark Steyn mean we're saddled with his hockey stick climate chart forever, asks Tony Morrison. Or will good science eventually triumph over bad?
Mark Steyn's libel loss to 'hockey stick' climate chart creator Michael Mann – with $1m in punitive damages – is a travesty of justice, says Chris Morrison. Freedom and fairness are dying in Democrat America.
Arctic sea ice continues its stonking recovery with January's extent the 24th highest in a 45-year record. Time for the Net Zero blob to stop all the fudges, omissions and outright deceptions.
In the widely-billed climate trial of the century, the fake Nobel laureate Michael Mann is suing Mark Steyn for libel for saying his infamous 'hockey stick' graph is fraudulent.
In reporting about the Ofcom ruling against Mark Steyn, the Telegraph has managed to misrepresent the reason for the breach, and in doing so wrongly imply that questioning Covid vaccines is against Ofcom rules.
Is Mark Steyn a victim of censorship at the hands of GB News? Or is it perfectly reasonable to ask him to abide by Ofcom’s rules, given that it can be fined over £5 million for breaking them and lose its licence?
