- “Clapham attacker should have had asylum claim refused under Home Office rules” – Abdul Ezedi’s conviction for sexual assault and his inclusion on sex offenders’ register should have prevented the Home Office granting him asylum, says the Telegraph.
- “Church of England faces questions over acid attack suspect’s conversion” – Abdul Ezedi‘s sylum application was supported by an Anglican priest, reports the Telegraph.
- “Clapham chemical attack suspect ‘a good Muslim’ despite claiming to convert to Christianity” – Friends of the Clapham attacker who claimed to have changed religion to gain asylum say he planned to return to Afghanistan to “find a wife”, according to the Telegraph.
- “Rishi is ignoring what is blindingly obvious to us all: the Tories are now beyond help” – The Party isn’t even trying any more, says Camilla Tominey in the Telegraph.
- “Reform support in Red Wall climbs to highest level ever” – Richard Tice’s party is now on 14% across 40 of the traditionally Labour-held seats won by the Tories in 2019, reports the Telegraph.
- “Sunak attempts to rally the troops – but is running out of time” – Some Conservative MPs are already so resigned to defeat that they want an early election before things get even worse, according to the Times.
- “Our MPs must finally wake up to the Islamist threat – both here and in the Middle East” – Britain’s support for Israel is having a momentous impact on domestic security, argues Charles Moore in the Telegraph. Huston, we have a problem.
- “The blinkered BBC shamefully ignores Hamas’s genocidal aims” – How often do television news reports remind viewers that one of the main goals of Hamas is to kill as many Jews as possible? Almost never, says Danny Cohen in the Telegraph.
- “European farmers have stolen our Brexit thunder” – Brexit was far too polite a protest against the EU, claims Ross Clark in the Telegraph. We should take a leaf out of the French farmers’ book.
- “Why are farmers protesting in France and across Europe?” – Workers across the continent are frustrated by cheap imports, the EU’s green laws and higher taxes, reports the Times.
- “Is there nothing to be done? Are there no solutions at all? Are we really stuck in globalist mass-migrant climate freakout deindustrialisation rainbow hell world forever?” – On Substack, Eugyppius sets out some reasons not to give up hope in spite of the gloomy political outlook.
- “Greta Thunberg cleared after judge throws out public order charge” – Greta Thunberg and four other cases have been thrown out at Westminster Magistrates’ Court yesterday, according to the Mail.
- “Why Volvo has pulled the plug on its electric car brand” – Volvo has decided to sell its stake in Polestar, says the Telegraph.
- “Keir Starmer’s £28 billion problem” – Labour looks set to ditch its pledge to spend £28 Billion on ‘green investment’, much to Ed Miliband’s chagrin, says Katie Balls in the Spectator.
- “Labour’s VAT policy is out-of-touch” – Bridget Phillipson, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary, has no sympathy for the low-paid employees who’ll be affected by VAT on school fees, says Mr. Chips on Substack.
- “Lab Origin: The Case is Even Stronger Now” – New evidence has emerged to strengthen the lab origin case, reports Alex Washburne for the Brownstone Institute.
- “The Covid IFR percentage was a scandalous lie” – On Substack, Bill Rice, Jr. discusses the scandalous claim at the beginning of the pandemic that the Infection Fatality Rate of COVID-19 was 3.4%. The real number is closer to between 0.3 and 0.5%.
- “Covid Research Waste – Bin 3” – How about spending some money on proper scientific studies that can give us answers on the riddle of viral transmission, suggest Prof. Carl Heneghan and Dr .Tom Jefferson in Trust the Evidence.
- “Welsh Government Spends £100,000 Telling People To Wash Their Hands” – Public Health Wales has spent a whopping £102,000 of taxpayers’ money instructing people on how to wash their hands, reports Guido Fawkes.
- “The Meaningless Incoherence Of ‘LGBTQ+’” – Time to drop the ubiquitous term, says Andrew Sullivan in the Weekly Dish. It obscures and misleads more than it clarifies.
- “Environment Agency strips ‘mother’ and ‘father’ from its policies” – The quango has removed the ‘gendered’ words from its staff in order to curry favour with Stonewall, according to the Times.
- “Team Trump’s fears that Taylor Swift could keep Biden in power” – According to online speculation among pro-Trump conspiracy theorists, Taylor Swift’s appearance at the Super Bowl will be the crowning moment in a plot to drum up support for Joe Biden, according to the Mail.
- “Jack Barwell describes how he came to be labelled a ‘fascist’ by Left-wing students at Exeter” – Watch a student at Exeter talk about how little tolerance there is for free speech on his university campus.
If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
In a happier, simpler time, this would have been a rather boring academic discussion about temperature measurements.
Today it’s part of a battle to keep the state out of our lives and be able to live free.
Pretty nuts really.
This academic discussion is being controlled and as far as I can see, discussed less (ie detail) and sensationalised more! Very nuts!
Some time in the late 1980s or very early 1990, I was on a summer holiday on a farm on Bodmin Moor. By that time, it hadn’t rained in this area for 19 weeks in a row and some of the moor farms received water supplies from tankers. That was a generally hot summer, not the five weeks of no rain with mostly lovely temperatures we had this year.
Ha, my lasting memory of Bodmin is failing my first driving test there ( steep inclines + crap clutch control = going backwards when attempting a hill start. Not great when there’s a car behind you.
) but passing second time. I miss Cornwall though.
Real experts manage to do that after passing the test. I’ve recently encountered one (and waited patiently on the pavement until he had remembered which of all these pedals are supposed to be used in what order).
My brother’s instructor used to put my brother’s cigarettes, and later his wristwatch behind the back wheel. Made for really good hill starts!
The Met Office used the “break in the clouds” explanation to explain the Heathrow “record”, ignoring criticism that by amazing co-incidence three jets landed on an unusual approach (West to East) and promptly turned on to a taxiway and blew jet exhausts over the exact spot that the temperature sensor was positioned. These Mexplanations are getting tedious. In other news, some US “records” are held by sensors positioned a few feet from a municipal incinerator, or top of a black roof or in a car-park. They served their purpose, but that purpose was not as a measure of climate, and were then re-purposed to create bogus records to fill newspaper headlines and create climate scares.
More detail on the Heathrow 2015 “record”, including site map and aircraft movements: https://clivebest.com/blog/?p=6721
Don’t know if it’s of any use but by looking at Flightradar24 playback for that day, two RAF Typhoons were operating from that base around that time: Flights CHAOS011 (reg ZJ914) and CHAOS012 (reg ZK377). After a brief exercise over the North Sea, CHAOS011 landed just after 15:10. CHAOS012 landed 15 minutes later.
Of course, it must be sheer coincidence!
A weather event is not Climate.
A normal summer is not Climate Hell.
Putting an electronic measuring device at Heathrow on tarmac, near jet engines, behind a magnifying glass, next to a fire is not science. It is fraud. Move it 5 miles to the countryside and the temp was 36C.
The entire cult of warm and cult of the changing thingy is a fraud.
I had first-hand experience of such temperature anomalies during my working life. I knew this was bs as soon as it was published.
“The Met Office distorts data and lies” is not the surprise. That would be them telling the truth
My kitchen is usually a fairly cool room since it’s north facing. But strangely enough, after I’ve cooked a roast and I leave the oven door open, the kitchen quickly warms up a bit for a while and then fairly quickly the temperature drops again.
Must be climate change – so I’d better stop cooking roasts and start eating raw insects.
All these institutions that have been hollowed out by GangGreen termites must eventually realise that trust, once destroyed, take years of effort to reestablish. Witness also the Zro Covid, Lockdown and “Vaccine” enthusiasts.
So far as the “Climate” scam is concerned, it should be remembered that accurate records for a significant number of years is the exception rather than the rule, so suggesting that some weather event is “Unprecedented” is meaningless at best.
And that is without considering the multitude of proven cases where activist “Scientists” have had their smelly little thumbs on the ‘data’.
So we have Australia’ BOM admitting that under their regime, the temperatures of the past have been ‘discovered’ to be around 1°C colder than originally recorded.
Coming back to 2022 (and before), all the recent ‘unprecedented’ temperatures such as Coningsby are blatantly and deliberately fraudulent. If we had even a few honest politicians, all these MET chancers would have been sacked, long ago.
“Global Temperature” ??? “Warmest year” ???. etc etc . But what does any of that stuff really mean? Is there really such a thing as a “global temperature? If so, how is it calculated?—– But since most of the time we recorded temperatures using thermometers at individual places around the world at different times and mostly only in wealthy western countries (USA, Europe etc), how can we know what temperatures were where we did not have extensive coverage, which was really the case most of the time and over most of the globe? —-The answer is we cannot. Then we started to get temperature data from satellites around 1979, but how can you compare thermometer readings where coverage was sparse from let’s say 1925 or 1845 to satellite data that covers almost the whole planet? —You cannot.. —–So this idea that we have a “warmest year on record” or “warmest since records began” etc is misleading, especially when it is used to promote solutions to some problem that might not even exist, or that might exist but is not much of a problem. On TV I regularly see politicians and bureaucrats, eco activists and assorted “save the planet” people latch onto elements of the unreliable temperature record, like the one this summer where a temperature of 40C was apparently recorded. This ofcourse is what is known as “cherry picking” or “confirmation bias”, where someone only looks for things that support their preconceived idea and ignore everything that doesn’t.— The temperature record of earth is a jumble of data ,adjusted here and there for various anomalies, such as the build up of towns and cities around a site where temperatures may have been recorded for the last 100 years or more, and it is known that towns and cities are warmer, sometimes by several degrees. Out of all of this clutter of guesses, assumptions, missing data and different forms of data collection we are led to believe that some “scientists” know what year was warmer than some other year, often to accuracies of hundredths of a degree, when the thermometers used were never designed for such accuracies. It is also important to bear in mind that if something warms, it does not necessarily mean humans warmed it. To claim humans have warmed something requires evidence, and since there is nothing unusual about current temperatures that would simply be an assumption, and when the assumption is motivated by the desire for certain public policy’s then what we have is a “cautionary tale”.
So either the Met Office lie by sticking to their story, or lie by giving an unbelievable excuse why they didn’t quality check it thoroughly enough?
In 2015 I happened to be in North East New Zealand, when Cyclone Pam caused extreme damage and around 11 deaths in Vanuatu and some damage to other Pacific island states. The MET (using their extreme GangGreen technology) forecasted major problems next for NE New Zealand but, fortunately this turned out to be a nothingburger.
Although we are assured that The Science is absolutely Settled, it is, in reality, anything but. At that time, Richard Betts, now Head of Climate Impacts at the MET Hadley Centre, was presumably charged by his gaffer, Dame Julia Sligo, to occasionally go onto Climate Blogs and fly the GangGreen flag.
On the then excellent Bishop Hill Blog, I pointed out the inadequacies of their forecasts for Pam, the fact that the claimed wind speed was obviously inflated and that severe tropical cyclones were entirely ‘precedented’.
Betts replied pointing out that the attribution of extreme weather arising from burning “fossil” fuels was well established, quoting the UN’s IPCC Report. To which I pointed out that the IPCC’s latest report said nothing of the kind (as contaminated as it is by GangGreen assumptions) and that his quotation was lifted directly from the “Summary for Policymakers”, which is a 100% political document.
We then heard nothing more from Betts, who is obviously not any kind of scientist, just another GangGreen charlatan.