Our post, ‘The Time Has Come to Get Rid of the Whole Lot of Them‘, has generated some powerful emotions. The Hallett Inquiry Module 2a continues to unveil cancel cultures and other conduct unbecoming of public servants.
We normally don’t name individuals (we made an exception for Hancock) as it does little to foster debate. But the goings-on of one ‘expert’ giving evidence, identified as a canceller-contortionist, is worthy of our attention.
Canceller-contortionists are people with no background in respiratory virus epidemiology or evidence analysis who vomited forth idiotic theories like ‘zero-Covid’ and then tried to cancel or pretend they never uttered such nonsense.
Their spinal columns are so mobile when giving evidence that they tie themselves in knots with the KC and the court stenographer. They are different from double flip-floppers like Dame Jenny Harries.
Some media have cottoned on to a particular contortionist to the then-Scottish First Minister who pushed zero-Covid. The Mail reports, “Professor [Devi] Sridhar was an advocate of ‘zero-Covid’ but now admits she was wrong”. However, the media supporters of zero-Covid activists remain silent.
Some MPs, such as Richard Burgon, said: ”A ‘zero-Covid’ strategy would avoid the cycle of lockdowns by locking down cases and contacts instead of the whole country. If other countries can do it, there is no reason why we can’t, too.” In August 2020, a group of MPs and peers urged the Government to commit to a ‘zero-Covid’ strategy across England.
Scottish advice resonated as late as March 2021, one year after the lockdown began; the former First Minister argued that elimination was the “only sensible strategy”. “Ms. Sturgeon repeatedly claimed she was committed to achieving virus ‘elimination’ during the first year, driving case numbers as close to zero as possible,” reported the Telegraph.
Mrs Sturgeon’s claim came the same month the BMJ hosted a debate on ‘Zero-Covid—known unknowns’. The following quotation appears as the headline to their summary: “There should be a compelling case that eradication is better than simply ongoing control.”
The trouble is, like the former Chair of Public Health England, this particular adviser’s knowledge of the epidemiology of respiratory viruses could be written on the back of a postage stamp. A second-class stamp that is.
Our date-stamp for pointing out the futility of heavy-handed interventions or elimination of what was and is already circulating everywhere is April 8th 2020. So we do not need an eraser.
In our one-page summary to the Prime Minister in the now infamous cabinet office meeting in September 2020, we wrote:
The current strategy requires acknowledging the virus is endemic and the need to learn to live with Covid. Recent responses are out of proportion to the threat. They are underpinned by a lack of understanding of the data, of the role of community pathogens and an overreliance on predictive modelling. Thinking has been distorted by three decades of influenza preparedness as if there were no other pathogens with pandemic potential.
The Disinformation Chronicle reports some of the sweeping statements on lots of things, but zero-Covid is the biggest pile of nonsense conceived during the madness of King Covid. The activists were adamant that lockdowns were the only way out of the pandemic.
The activist tactics included shooting down anyone who considered the alternatives to elimination.
As our Riddles series shows, humanity knows little and understands even less about these bugs, even after 100 years of study, more or less since the Spanish Influenza and the end of World War One. But, hey, why sit down and study, research and piece evidence together when you can fire from the hip?
The problems with this kind of approach are shown in the consequences. Stalinist ‘flattening the curve’ and ‘short sharp shock’ lockdowns that wrecked society and the economy spring to mind.
Second, having a solution out of the box means you do not have to do any research or clarify facts, but you have to attack those who want to.
Or, in line with our Riddles series, they impede and undermine the rationale for elucidating the ecology and transmission of respiratory agents (think of the Antarctic outbreaks), which is complex and not understood.
The third problem is that, sooner or later, you get found out, and then you have to mobilise your spinal column to confuse the KC and the court stenographer and get your rubber out to try and cancel what you said and wrote. Here is the transcript if anyone is remotely interested in the ramblings and contortions. Good luck. Oh, and a tip: do not miss this on page 28: “So the Czech Republic came out and said, ‘Okay, we don’t have testing but, you know what, masks for everyone.’ Community efforts wear masks; it’s a sign that you can do something.”
The logic here is equivalent to: “Eat dung, as two trillion flies cannot be wrong.”
The biggest problem is whether these people will be held accountable for their conduct.
In September 2022, we reported the back-pedalling race had begun. It’s still ongoing.
Please be aware that this post will not auto-delete: hopefully, that is clear enough for Mr. John Swinney.
Prof. Carl Heneghan is the Oxford Professor of Evidence Based Medicine and Dr. Tom Jefferson is an epidemiologist based in Rome who works with Professor Heneghan on the Cochrane Collaboration. This article was first published on their Substack, Trust The Evidence, which you can subscribe to here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Funded by B&M Gates & best friends with Chelsea Clinton.
Sridhar is the living embodiment of an establishment puppet.
I asked you this already, but regardless – have you played the Dane yet?
As a youth I used to weep in butcher’s shops.
The COVID science was always an interdisciplinary effort: Whoever had some well-sounding academic or at least medical title and was willing to have the right oponions in public could – no matter what his field of expertise, if any, actually was – become part of The Very Wise Sages®
‘Science’? No $cientism. Follow the money.
Real science has been dead since maths and models usurped physical reality (mid 19th century).
Einstein is a famous example (there are few things as stupid as relativity).
This non-Scot whatever she/zhe is has no idea about the immune system.
No one can prove to me that flying viruses exist.
Bacteria can’t exist outside a host.
“Devi Sridhar’s Knowledge of the Epidemiology of Respiratory Viruses Could be Written on the Back of a Postage Stamp”Wasn’t it blindingly obvious?
I always remember the great Ian Brown’s Twitter post in response to comments on his Twitter feed, which contained some “vaccine sceptical” views from smart-alecs along the lines of “Stick to singing mate, you don’t know anything about medicine”. His answer “OK, but you’re taking medical advice from a computer salesman” (Billy, in case you were wondering).
It must be harder for the authors to stomach than for the rest of us – their profession has disgraced itself despite their best efforts to do the right thing. A lifetime of work betrayed by the wicked, the stupird, the selfish and the lazy.
“A lifetime of work” is the issue here – all that study, all those exams, the belief that they were doing the right thing because the process drove them in that direction. To suggest or to ask them now to double check they did the right thing, they thought they knew the right thing, “the science” and were they in the wrong after all? It doesn’t bear thinking about. What a loss of face and of status. Better to double down and see no evil, hear no evil…
”If other countries can do it, there is no reason why we can’t, too.”
As Sir Desmond Swayne put it in a question in the Commons: “Herd stupidity”.
Quite, I still want to check out his voting record on all matters relating to CV NPIs etc ….
I think he voted against most/all of it – when they had votes. Lots of stuff was passed without a vote early on.
Credit where it is due. Clearly the estimed Doctors Heneghan and Jeffries have had enough of pussy-footing politeness and have opened an “who dares wins assault” and frankly I don’t blame them.
The time has come to get rid of the whole lot of them and this waste of space oxygen thief Sridhar deserves to be amongst the first.
A horrible blot on humanity.
When four days ago, I pointed out that Sridhar’s expertise lay in the field of anthropology and that perhaps an epidemiology/medicine/virology qualification might be better suited to her post as chair of Global Public Health (aka ‘the pandemic professor), three folk gave down votes. Prof’ Heneghan would seem to agree with my comment. Thank heaven I took his and Mike Yeadon’s advice and remain unstabbed.
As for the Olympically dim Richard Burgon, it doesn’t surprise me that he pinned his colours to Sridhar’s mast and is likely to be a front bencher in Starmer’s upcoming clown show. Sheesh!
All lockdowns do is kick the can down the road. Simply explainable with two packs of cards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4kWbYlopN4
I’m a subscriber to TTE. Neil (perhaps the Neil who comments here – hope he doesn’t mind me quoting him) said this:
“First time I saw Devi on TV and heard she is a professor in the dept of public health at Edinburgh I had to find her background and was comforted to read she’s an anthropologist who wrote a book with the young Clinton. I thought that explained why her knowledge of virology and medicine differed from my 50 year old knowledge.
She was reported to be one of crankies favourites.
This last week has been a great relief to realise my understanding is ok!”